Loading…
Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate
The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night...
Saved in:
Published in: | Universal access in the information society 2021-08, Vol.20 (3), p.633-645 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133 |
container_end_page | 645 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 633 |
container_title | Universal access in the information society |
container_volume | 20 |
creator | Fresno, Nazaret |
description | The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2554896379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554896379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHPq5mk2d14K8UvEDxo6TFksxPdst3UJBX898au6M3LzJvhvcfMI-Qc2CUwVl1FYJypIpcij7Oq4AdkAiXIQnJVHf7iWh2TkxjXjHGoASZkM7cWY6TJ023wm27AIdGt77vUWdNT_MhzpH6g6Q3pyoe-pauuzRCb6_3OmojUuz123ZA1nEFJl8_ZD2OmDqnLyxYbk_CUHDnTRzz76VOyvL15WdwXj093D4v5Y2EFqFQ0jJect6ypamGrSjqHBiRDwYE1xrVuBk41jRPWGM6sLR2HsjQCayOkBCGm5GL0zT-97zAmvfa7kI-Lmks5q1UpKpVZfGTZ4GMM6PQ2dBsTPjUw_R2rHmPVueh9rJpnkRhFMZOHVwx_1v-ovgDa1Hnt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554896379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Fresno, Nazaret</creator><creatorcontrib>Fresno, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><description>The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Closed captioning ; Communication ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computers and Society ; Debates ; Hearing loss ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Night ; Social networks ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2021-08, Vol.20 (3), p.633-645</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6702-159X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fresno, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><title>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><addtitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</addtitle><description>The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Closed captioning</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Society</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHPq5mk2d14K8UvEDxo6TFksxPdst3UJBX898au6M3LzJvhvcfMI-Qc2CUwVl1FYJypIpcij7Oq4AdkAiXIQnJVHf7iWh2TkxjXjHGoASZkM7cWY6TJ023wm27AIdGt77vUWdNT_MhzpH6g6Q3pyoe-pauuzRCb6_3OmojUuz123ZA1nEFJl8_ZD2OmDqnLyxYbk_CUHDnTRzz76VOyvL15WdwXj093D4v5Y2EFqFQ0jJect6ypamGrSjqHBiRDwYE1xrVuBk41jRPWGM6sLR2HsjQCayOkBCGm5GL0zT-97zAmvfa7kI-Lmks5q1UpKpVZfGTZ4GMM6PQ2dBsTPjUw_R2rHmPVueh9rJpnkRhFMZOHVwx_1v-ovgDa1Hnt</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Fresno, Nazaret</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-159X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</title><author>Fresno, Nazaret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Closed captioning</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Society</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fresno, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fresno, Nazaret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><stitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>633-645</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-159X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1615-5289 |
ispartof | Universal access in the information society, 2021-08, Vol.20 (3), p.633-645 |
issn | 1615-5289 1615-5297 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2554896379 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Accessibility Closed captioning Communication Computer Communication Networks Computer Science Computers and Society Debates Hearing loss Information Storage and Retrieval Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) IT in Business Night Social networks User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction Websites |
title | Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20to%20prominent%20political%20events%20on%20the%20World%20Wide%20Web:%20the%20case%20of%20the%20final%202016%20US%20presidential%20debate&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Fresno,%20Nazaret&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=633-645&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2554896379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554896379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |