Loading…

Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate

The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Universal access in the information society 2021-08, Vol.20 (3), p.633-645
Main Author: Fresno, Nazaret
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133
container_end_page 645
container_issue 3
container_start_page 633
container_title Universal access in the information society
container_volume 20
creator Fresno, Nazaret
description The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2554896379</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2554896379</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHPq5mk2d14K8UvEDxo6TFksxPdst3UJBX898au6M3LzJvhvcfMI-Qc2CUwVl1FYJypIpcij7Oq4AdkAiXIQnJVHf7iWh2TkxjXjHGoASZkM7cWY6TJ023wm27AIdGt77vUWdNT_MhzpH6g6Q3pyoe-pauuzRCb6_3OmojUuz123ZA1nEFJl8_ZD2OmDqnLyxYbk_CUHDnTRzz76VOyvL15WdwXj093D4v5Y2EFqFQ0jJect6ypamGrSjqHBiRDwYE1xrVuBk41jRPWGM6sLR2HsjQCayOkBCGm5GL0zT-97zAmvfa7kI-Lmks5q1UpKpVZfGTZ4GMM6PQ2dBsTPjUw_R2rHmPVueh9rJpnkRhFMZOHVwx_1v-ovgDa1Hnt</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2554896379</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Fresno, Nazaret</creator><creatorcontrib>Fresno, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><description>The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1615-5289</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1615-5297</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Closed captioning ; Communication ; Computer Communication Networks ; Computer Science ; Computers and Society ; Debates ; Hearing loss ; Information Storage and Retrieval ; Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet) ; IT in Business ; Night ; Social networks ; User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction ; Websites</subject><ispartof>Universal access in the information society, 2021-08, Vol.20 (3), p.633-645</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6702-159X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fresno, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><title>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</title><title>Universal access in the information society</title><addtitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</addtitle><description>The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Closed captioning</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Computer Communication Networks</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Computers and Society</subject><subject>Debates</subject><subject>Hearing loss</subject><subject>Information Storage and Retrieval</subject><subject>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</subject><subject>IT in Business</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</subject><subject>Websites</subject><issn>1615-5289</issn><issn>1615-5297</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UE1LAzEQDaJgrf4BTwHPq5mk2d14K8UvEDxo6TFksxPdst3UJBX898au6M3LzJvhvcfMI-Qc2CUwVl1FYJypIpcij7Oq4AdkAiXIQnJVHf7iWh2TkxjXjHGoASZkM7cWY6TJ023wm27AIdGt77vUWdNT_MhzpH6g6Q3pyoe-pauuzRCb6_3OmojUuz123ZA1nEFJl8_ZD2OmDqnLyxYbk_CUHDnTRzz76VOyvL15WdwXj093D4v5Y2EFqFQ0jJect6ypamGrSjqHBiRDwYE1xrVuBk41jRPWGM6sLR2HsjQCayOkBCGm5GL0zT-97zAmvfa7kI-Lmks5q1UpKpVZfGTZ4GMM6PQ2dBsTPjUw_R2rHmPVueh9rJpnkRhFMZOHVwx_1v-ovgDa1Hnt</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Fresno, Nazaret</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-159X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</title><author>Fresno, Nazaret</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Closed captioning</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Computer Communication Networks</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Computers and Society</topic><topic>Debates</topic><topic>Hearing loss</topic><topic>Information Storage and Retrieval</topic><topic>Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)</topic><topic>IT in Business</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction</topic><topic>Websites</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fresno, Nazaret</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Science Journals (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fresno, Nazaret</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate</atitle><jtitle>Universal access in the information society</jtitle><stitle>Univ Access Inf Soc</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>20</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>633</spage><epage>645</epage><pages>633-645</pages><issn>1615-5289</issn><eissn>1615-5297</eissn><abstract>The final presidential debate in the U.S. was one of the most widely followed programs of 2016. The main broadcasters aired it live on television and streamed it through social media with closed captioning so that all Americans could access this highly awaited political event. After the debate night, most networks uploaded the full program or fragments of it to their websites in order to make it available to viewers who had missed the original transmission. This paper focuses on the closed captioning provided in the videos of the final debate available on the websites and YouTube channels of the most prominent networks that televised the event. Drawing on literature from Media Accessibility, Communication and Internet Studies, an analysis of the availability and functionality of the online captions in those clips was performed, which proved that the accessibility services offered after the debate night to audiences with hearing loss could be substantially improved.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6702-159X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1615-5289
ispartof Universal access in the information society, 2021-08, Vol.20 (3), p.633-645
issn 1615-5289
1615-5297
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2554896379
source Springer Nature
subjects Accessibility
Closed captioning
Communication
Computer Communication Networks
Computer Science
Computers and Society
Debates
Hearing loss
Information Storage and Retrieval
Information Systems Applications (incl.Internet)
IT in Business
Night
Social networks
User Interfaces and Human Computer Interaction
Websites
title Access to prominent political events on the World Wide Web: the case of the final 2016 US presidential debate
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A31%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Access%20to%20prominent%20political%20events%20on%20the%20World%20Wide%20Web:%20the%20case%20of%20the%20final%202016%20US%20presidential%20debate&rft.jtitle=Universal%20access%20in%20the%20information%20society&rft.au=Fresno,%20Nazaret&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=20&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=633&rft.epage=645&rft.pages=633-645&rft.issn=1615-5289&rft.eissn=1615-5297&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10209-020-00747-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2554896379%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-b02622d0b783c775ffea150e3210bafdf41f9bbf3caa20cc6f2166a3e8a355133%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2554896379&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true