Loading…
GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models
Landslide susceptibility mapping plays an important role in integrated watershed management planning, especially in the field of land-use planning in landslide-prone areas. This study aims to evaluate the performance of widely used hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including the in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) 2021-08, Vol.108 (1), p.1025-1046 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p157t-7a4a1a504dceb3d822a3a91022a1f9dc955073e68f107b3c59e3ea76d54ad8a83 |
container_end_page | 1046 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 1025 |
container_title | Natural hazards (Dordrecht) |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Salehpour Jam, Amin Mosaffaie, Jamal Sarfaraz, Faramarz Shadfar, Samad Akhtari, Rouhangiz |
description | Landslide susceptibility mapping plays an important role in integrated watershed management planning, especially in the field of land-use planning in landslide-prone areas. This study aims to evaluate the performance of widely used hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including the integrated index method (IIM), AHP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in the Alamut watershed, Iran. Ten causal layers including slope angle, slope aspect, rainfall, lithology, altitude, land use, and the most common distance maps including distance to fault, distance to stream, and distance to road were used to produce LSMs. Meanwhile, the landslide distribution map was used to evaluate the accuracy of the produced LSMs. The weights of the causal factors were also calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method based on the viewpoints of 14 experts. Finally, the quality sum (
Q
s
) index as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the performance of the MCDM models. The
Q
s
values for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.355, 0.903, and 0.703, respectively. Therefore, IIM and AHP-VIKOR methods are more efficient than AHP-TOPSIS to create LSM. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the ROC curves for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.784, 0.853, and 0.844, respectively. Therefore, the accuracy of the MCDM models is acceptable for TOPSIS and excellent for IIM and AHP-VIKOR. In general, results of the performance assessment of MCDM models indicated the good performance of the models to produce LSMs, so that the IIM was introduced as the best model. Also, the performance of IIM and AHP-VIKOR are more than the AHP-TOPSIS model to produce LSMs. Overall, the application of the AHP method in combination with other MCDM models as a hybrid model to produce LSMs is recommended under the principles of group decision-making in AHP for land-use planning and landslide risk management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2555785779</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555785779</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p157t-7a4a1a504dceb3d822a3a91022a1f9dc955073e68f107b3c59e3ea76d54ad8a83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkMFOhDAQhhujibj6Ap5IPFdnKKXt0aCum-zGg5p4awotyoYFpHDYt7eIiZf5D_Nl5s9HyDXCLQKIO48ImaKQIIVUoKT8hETIBaMgUzglEah5xeDjnFx4vwdAzBIVkXy9eaWF8c7GjWmtb2rrYj_50vVjXdRNPR7jg-n7uv2MJz_Pr2Mx1Dbe5Q-7-NBZ1_hLclaZxrurv1yR96fHt_yZbl_Wm_x-S_vQZKTCpAYNh9SWrmBWJolhRiGExErZUnEOgrlMVgiiYCVXjjkjMstTY6WRbEVulrv90H1Pzo96301DG17qhHMuJBdCBYotlO-H0NcN_xSCnm3pxZYOtvSvLc3ZD1S2XJc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555785779</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Salehpour Jam, Amin ; Mosaffaie, Jamal ; Sarfaraz, Faramarz ; Shadfar, Samad ; Akhtari, Rouhangiz</creator><creatorcontrib>Salehpour Jam, Amin ; Mosaffaie, Jamal ; Sarfaraz, Faramarz ; Shadfar, Samad ; Akhtari, Rouhangiz</creatorcontrib><description>Landslide susceptibility mapping plays an important role in integrated watershed management planning, especially in the field of land-use planning in landslide-prone areas. This study aims to evaluate the performance of widely used hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including the integrated index method (IIM), AHP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in the Alamut watershed, Iran. Ten causal layers including slope angle, slope aspect, rainfall, lithology, altitude, land use, and the most common distance maps including distance to fault, distance to stream, and distance to road were used to produce LSMs. Meanwhile, the landslide distribution map was used to evaluate the accuracy of the produced LSMs. The weights of the causal factors were also calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method based on the viewpoints of 14 experts. Finally, the quality sum (
Q
s
) index as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the performance of the MCDM models. The
Q
s
values for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.355, 0.903, and 0.703, respectively. Therefore, IIM and AHP-VIKOR methods are more efficient than AHP-TOPSIS to create LSM. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the ROC curves for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.784, 0.853, and 0.844, respectively. Therefore, the accuracy of the MCDM models is acceptable for TOPSIS and excellent for IIM and AHP-VIKOR. In general, results of the performance assessment of MCDM models indicated the good performance of the models to produce LSMs, so that the IIM was introduced as the best model. Also, the performance of IIM and AHP-VIKOR are more than the AHP-TOPSIS model to produce LSMs. Overall, the application of the AHP method in combination with other MCDM models as a hybrid model to produce LSMs is recommended under the principles of group decision-making in AHP for land-use planning and landslide risk management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-030X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0840</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Analytic hierarchy process ; Civil Engineering ; Decision making ; Distance ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental Management ; Environmental risk ; Geographic information systems ; Geographical information systems ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences ; Hydrogeology ; Land use ; Land use management ; Land use planning ; Landslides ; Lithology ; Management planning ; Mapping ; Multiple criterion ; Natural Hazards ; Original Paper ; Performance assessment ; Performance evaluation ; Performance testing ; Rain ; Rainfall ; Risk management ; Slopes ; Watershed management</subject><ispartof>Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2021-08, Vol.108 (1), p.1025-1046</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-p157t-7a4a1a504dceb3d822a3a91022a1f9dc955073e68f107b3c59e3ea76d54ad8a83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Salehpour Jam, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosaffaie, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfaraz, Faramarz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadfar, Samad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhtari, Rouhangiz</creatorcontrib><title>GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models</title><title>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</title><addtitle>Nat Hazards</addtitle><description>Landslide susceptibility mapping plays an important role in integrated watershed management planning, especially in the field of land-use planning in landslide-prone areas. This study aims to evaluate the performance of widely used hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including the integrated index method (IIM), AHP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in the Alamut watershed, Iran. Ten causal layers including slope angle, slope aspect, rainfall, lithology, altitude, land use, and the most common distance maps including distance to fault, distance to stream, and distance to road were used to produce LSMs. Meanwhile, the landslide distribution map was used to evaluate the accuracy of the produced LSMs. The weights of the causal factors were also calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method based on the viewpoints of 14 experts. Finally, the quality sum (
Q
s
) index as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the performance of the MCDM models. The
Q
s
values for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.355, 0.903, and 0.703, respectively. Therefore, IIM and AHP-VIKOR methods are more efficient than AHP-TOPSIS to create LSM. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the ROC curves for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.784, 0.853, and 0.844, respectively. Therefore, the accuracy of the MCDM models is acceptable for TOPSIS and excellent for IIM and AHP-VIKOR. In general, results of the performance assessment of MCDM models indicated the good performance of the models to produce LSMs, so that the IIM was introduced as the best model. Also, the performance of IIM and AHP-VIKOR are more than the AHP-TOPSIS model to produce LSMs. Overall, the application of the AHP method in combination with other MCDM models as a hybrid model to produce LSMs is recommended under the principles of group decision-making in AHP for land-use planning and landslide risk management.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Analytic hierarchy process</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Distance</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Geographic information systems</subject><subject>Geographical information systems</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Land use</subject><subject>Land use management</subject><subject>Land use planning</subject><subject>Landslides</subject><subject>Lithology</subject><subject>Management planning</subject><subject>Mapping</subject><subject>Multiple criterion</subject><subject>Natural Hazards</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Performance assessment</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Performance testing</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>Rainfall</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>Slopes</subject><subject>Watershed management</subject><issn>0921-030X</issn><issn>1573-0840</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkMFOhDAQhhujibj6Ap5IPFdnKKXt0aCum-zGg5p4awotyoYFpHDYt7eIiZf5D_Nl5s9HyDXCLQKIO48ImaKQIIVUoKT8hETIBaMgUzglEah5xeDjnFx4vwdAzBIVkXy9eaWF8c7GjWmtb2rrYj_50vVjXdRNPR7jg-n7uv2MJz_Pr2Mx1Dbe5Q-7-NBZ1_hLclaZxrurv1yR96fHt_yZbl_Wm_x-S_vQZKTCpAYNh9SWrmBWJolhRiGExErZUnEOgrlMVgiiYCVXjjkjMstTY6WRbEVulrv90H1Pzo96301DG17qhHMuJBdCBYotlO-H0NcN_xSCnm3pxZYOtvSvLc3ZD1S2XJc</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Salehpour Jam, Amin</creator><creator>Mosaffaie, Jamal</creator><creator>Sarfaraz, Faramarz</creator><creator>Shadfar, Samad</creator><creator>Akhtari, Rouhangiz</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models</title><author>Salehpour Jam, Amin ; Mosaffaie, Jamal ; Sarfaraz, Faramarz ; Shadfar, Samad ; Akhtari, Rouhangiz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p157t-7a4a1a504dceb3d822a3a91022a1f9dc955073e68f107b3c59e3ea76d54ad8a83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Analytic hierarchy process</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Distance</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Geographic information systems</topic><topic>Geographical information systems</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Land use</topic><topic>Land use management</topic><topic>Land use planning</topic><topic>Landslides</topic><topic>Lithology</topic><topic>Management planning</topic><topic>Mapping</topic><topic>Multiple criterion</topic><topic>Natural Hazards</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Performance assessment</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Performance testing</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>Rainfall</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>Slopes</topic><topic>Watershed management</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salehpour Jam, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mosaffaie, Jamal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sarfaraz, Faramarz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shadfar, Samad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akhtari, Rouhangiz</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salehpour Jam, Amin</au><au>Mosaffaie, Jamal</au><au>Sarfaraz, Faramarz</au><au>Shadfar, Samad</au><au>Akhtari, Rouhangiz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models</atitle><jtitle>Natural hazards (Dordrecht)</jtitle><stitle>Nat Hazards</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>1025</spage><epage>1046</epage><pages>1025-1046</pages><issn>0921-030X</issn><eissn>1573-0840</eissn><abstract>Landslide susceptibility mapping plays an important role in integrated watershed management planning, especially in the field of land-use planning in landslide-prone areas. This study aims to evaluate the performance of widely used hybrid multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) models including the integrated index method (IIM), AHP-TOPSIS, and AHP-VIKOR to produce landslide susceptibility maps (LSMs) in the Alamut watershed, Iran. Ten causal layers including slope angle, slope aspect, rainfall, lithology, altitude, land use, and the most common distance maps including distance to fault, distance to stream, and distance to road were used to produce LSMs. Meanwhile, the landslide distribution map was used to evaluate the accuracy of the produced LSMs. The weights of the causal factors were also calculated using the analytic hierarchy process (AHP) method based on the viewpoints of 14 experts. Finally, the quality sum (
Q
s
) index as well as the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to validate the performance of the MCDM models. The
Q
s
values for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.355, 0.903, and 0.703, respectively. Therefore, IIM and AHP-VIKOR methods are more efficient than AHP-TOPSIS to create LSM. The area under the curve (AUC) values of the ROC curves for AHP-TOPSIS, IIM, and AHP-VIKOR were calculated 0.784, 0.853, and 0.844, respectively. Therefore, the accuracy of the MCDM models is acceptable for TOPSIS and excellent for IIM and AHP-VIKOR. In general, results of the performance assessment of MCDM models indicated the good performance of the models to produce LSMs, so that the IIM was introduced as the best model. Also, the performance of IIM and AHP-VIKOR are more than the AHP-TOPSIS model to produce LSMs. Overall, the application of the AHP method in combination with other MCDM models as a hybrid model to produce LSMs is recommended under the principles of group decision-making in AHP for land-use planning and landslide risk management.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5</doi><tpages>22</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-030X |
ispartof | Natural hazards (Dordrecht), 2021-08, Vol.108 (1), p.1025-1046 |
issn | 0921-030X 1573-0840 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2555785779 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Accuracy Analytic hierarchy process Civil Engineering Decision making Distance Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental Management Environmental risk Geographic information systems Geographical information systems Geophysics/Geodesy Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences Hydrogeology Land use Land use management Land use planning Landslides Lithology Management planning Mapping Multiple criterion Natural Hazards Original Paper Performance assessment Performance evaluation Performance testing Rain Rainfall Risk management Slopes Watershed management |
title | GIS-based landslide susceptibility mapping using hybrid MCDM models |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T13%3A12%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GIS-based%20landslide%20susceptibility%20mapping%20using%20hybrid%20MCDM%20models&rft.jtitle=Natural%20hazards%20(Dordrecht)&rft.au=Salehpour%20Jam,%20Amin&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=1025&rft.epage=1046&rft.pages=1025-1046&rft.issn=0921-030X&rft.eissn=1573-0840&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11069-021-04718-5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_sprin%3E2555785779%3C/proquest_sprin%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p157t-7a4a1a504dceb3d822a3a91022a1f9dc955073e68f107b3c59e3ea76d54ad8a83%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555785779&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |