The Snowden Files Made Public: A Material Politics of Contesting Surveillance

In the wake of the disclosures by Edward Snowden about NSA surveillance practices, a series of public hearings was held before the Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs (LIBE) Committee of the European Parliament in 2013–2014. These hearings offer a wealth of information concerning the details...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International political sociology 2017-03, Vol.11 (1), p.73-89
Main Authors: Gros, Valentin, de Goede, Marieke, İşleyen, Beste
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Civil liberties
Civil rights
Legislatures
Politics
Privacy
Public hearings
Right of privacy
Surveillance
Wealth
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the wake of the disclosures by Edward Snowden about NSA surveillance practices, a series of public hearings was held before the Civil Liberties, Justice, and Home Affairs (LIBE) Committee of the European Parliament in 2013–2014. These hearings offer a wealth of information concerning the details of Snowden’s claims, their implications for privacy rights, and the way in which the transatlantic political dialogue on these issues is unfolding. However, they have yet to receive academic attention. This article suggests that the LIBE Hearings were an important platform that rendered the contested Snowden files into public evidence of contemporary surveillance practices. Drawing on the concept of “material publics” proposed by Noortje Marres and others, we examine how the material setting of LIBE was crucial to the ways in which the Snowden files were made public in Europe. Valid evidence was produced, legal issues were identified, technological solutions were fostered, and responsibilities were enacted and denied.
ISSN:1749-5679
1749-5687
DOI:10.1093/ips/olw031