Loading…
Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures
We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displa...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth |
container_volume | 126 |
creator | Tung, Sui Shirzaei, Manoochehr Ojha, Chandrakanta Pepe, Antonio Liu, Zhen |
description | We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems.
Plain Language Summary
On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appear |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2020JB021124 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2555979426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555979426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL9OwzAQxiMEEqiw8QCWWAnYTs6JRyhtoSpC4t8aOc6lTQkNtZ2ibKxsPCNPgqsCYuKWO33fT3e6LwgOGT1hlMtTTjkdn1POGI-3gj3OhAxlBGL7d2bRbnBg7Zz6Sr3E4r3g_c6ZVrvWqJr0m4UzTW3JzQoNcTMknDJJbqtiitqgdWSgjJstW_WE5A6XLS40kqvFylvVVDksSN6Ry2o6-3z7GFYF1pXryKBW3tbkuvGCJU1JogvyiHWj1-7PebT7wU6paosH370XPAwH9_3LcHIzuuqfTUIViRRCnSeQpwBaJVCUMkWdlikVTMaFFrGAohCQMyylQgVJLAooU0hAIkOWezfqBUebvS-m8S9Yl82b1iz8yYwDgExkzIWnjjeUNo21BsvsxVTPynQZo9k67-xv3h6PNvhrVWP3L5uNR7fnADSG6AtYPoMi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555979426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tung, Sui ; Shirzaei, Manoochehr ; Ojha, Chandrakanta ; Pepe, Antonio ; Liu, Zhen</creator><creatorcontrib>Tung, Sui ; Shirzaei, Manoochehr ; Ojha, Chandrakanta ; Pepe, Antonio ; Liu, Zhen</creatorcontrib><description>We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems.
Plain Language Summary
On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appeared over a zone of elastic weakness where could be relevant to subsurface viscous or fluid bodies, meanwhile, aftershocks tended to cluster within a shallow rigid body. Overall, the findings of this study provide insights into potential structural controls over the seismic occurrence and help improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within the western Mojave desert.
Key Points
Heterogeneous velocity structures in the epicentral area are simulated in elastic models
Peak slip occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and documented afterslip
Most aftershocks are located outside slip asperities and within a shallow brittle zone</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020JB021124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aftershock ; Aftershocks ; Algorithms ; Displacement ; Distribution ; Earthquakes ; Elastic properties ; Fault lines ; Finite element method ; finite element model ; Geological faults ; Geophysical data ; Geophysics ; Heterogeneity ; InSAR ; Interferometric synthetic aperture radar ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Optimization ; Properties ; Ridgecrest earthquake sequence ; Rigid structures ; Rigidity ; Rocks ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; S waves ; SAR (radar) ; Satellite imagery ; Seismic activity ; Seismic velocities ; Sequencing ; Slip ; Spaceborne remote sensing ; structural control ; Synthetic aperture radar ; Three dimensional models ; Velocity ; velocity structure ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0086-3722 ; 0000-0002-6313-823X ; 0000-0002-4708-2133 ; 0000-0002-7843-3565 ; 0000-0002-5025-4485</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tung, Sui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Chandrakanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhen</creatorcontrib><title>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems.
Plain Language Summary
On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appeared over a zone of elastic weakness where could be relevant to subsurface viscous or fluid bodies, meanwhile, aftershocks tended to cluster within a shallow rigid body. Overall, the findings of this study provide insights into potential structural controls over the seismic occurrence and help improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within the western Mojave desert.
Key Points
Heterogeneous velocity structures in the epicentral area are simulated in elastic models
Peak slip occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and documented afterslip
Most aftershocks are located outside slip asperities and within a shallow brittle zone</description><subject>aftershock</subject><subject>Aftershocks</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Elastic properties</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>finite element model</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geophysical data</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>InSAR</subject><subject>Interferometric synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Ridgecrest earthquake sequence</subject><subject>Rigid structures</subject><subject>Rigidity</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>S waves</subject><subject>SAR (radar)</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic velocities</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Spaceborne remote sensing</subject><subject>structural control</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>velocity structure</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL9OwzAQxiMEEqiw8QCWWAnYTs6JRyhtoSpC4t8aOc6lTQkNtZ2ibKxsPCNPgqsCYuKWO33fT3e6LwgOGT1hlMtTTjkdn1POGI-3gj3OhAxlBGL7d2bRbnBg7Zz6Sr3E4r3g_c6ZVrvWqJr0m4UzTW3JzQoNcTMknDJJbqtiitqgdWSgjJstW_WE5A6XLS40kqvFylvVVDksSN6Ry2o6-3z7GFYF1pXryKBW3tbkuvGCJU1JogvyiHWj1-7PebT7wU6paosH370XPAwH9_3LcHIzuuqfTUIViRRCnSeQpwBaJVCUMkWdlikVTMaFFrGAohCQMyylQgVJLAooU0hAIkOWezfqBUebvS-m8S9Yl82b1iz8yYwDgExkzIWnjjeUNo21BsvsxVTPynQZo9k67-xv3h6PNvhrVWP3L5uNR7fnADSG6AtYPoMi</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Tung, Sui</creator><creator>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</creator><creator>Ojha, Chandrakanta</creator><creator>Pepe, Antonio</creator><creator>Liu, Zhen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-3722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-823X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-2133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-3565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-4485</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</title><author>Tung, Sui ; Shirzaei, Manoochehr ; Ojha, Chandrakanta ; Pepe, Antonio ; Liu, Zhen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>aftershock</topic><topic>Aftershocks</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Elastic properties</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>finite element model</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geophysical data</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>InSAR</topic><topic>Interferometric synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Ridgecrest earthquake sequence</topic><topic>Rigid structures</topic><topic>Rigidity</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>S waves</topic><topic>SAR (radar)</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic velocities</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Spaceborne remote sensing</topic><topic>structural control</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>velocity structure</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tung, Sui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Chandrakanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tung, Sui</au><au>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</au><au>Ojha, Chandrakanta</au><au>Pepe, Antonio</au><au>Liu, Zhen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems.
Plain Language Summary
On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appeared over a zone of elastic weakness where could be relevant to subsurface viscous or fluid bodies, meanwhile, aftershocks tended to cluster within a shallow rigid body. Overall, the findings of this study provide insights into potential structural controls over the seismic occurrence and help improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within the western Mojave desert.
Key Points
Heterogeneous velocity structures in the epicentral area are simulated in elastic models
Peak slip occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and documented afterslip
Most aftershocks are located outside slip asperities and within a shallow brittle zone</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2020JB021124</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-3722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-823X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-2133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-3565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-4485</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2169-9313 |
ispartof | Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a |
issn | 2169-9313 2169-9356 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2555979426 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | aftershock Aftershocks Algorithms Displacement Distribution Earthquakes Elastic properties Fault lines Finite element method finite element model Geological faults Geophysical data Geophysics Heterogeneity InSAR Interferometric synthetic aperture radar Mathematical analysis Mathematical models Numerical models Optimization Properties Ridgecrest earthquake sequence Rigid structures Rigidity Rocks Rupture Rupturing S waves SAR (radar) Satellite imagery Seismic activity Seismic velocities Sequencing Slip Spaceborne remote sensing structural control Synthetic aperture radar Three dimensional models Velocity velocity structure Wave velocity |
title | Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A07%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20Controls%20Over%20the%202019%20Ridgecrest%20Earthquake%20Sequence%20Investigated%20by%20High%E2%80%90Fidelity%20Elastic%20Models%20of%203D%20Velocity%20Structures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Tung,%20Sui&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020JB021124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2555979426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555979426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |