Loading…

Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures

We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a
Main Authors: Tung, Sui, Shirzaei, Manoochehr, Ojha, Chandrakanta, Pepe, Antonio, Liu, Zhen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 7
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth
container_volume 126
creator Tung, Sui
Shirzaei, Manoochehr
Ojha, Chandrakanta
Pepe, Antonio
Liu, Zhen
description We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems. Plain Language Summary On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appear
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2020JB021124
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2555979426</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2555979426</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL9OwzAQxiMEEqiw8QCWWAnYTs6JRyhtoSpC4t8aOc6lTQkNtZ2ibKxsPCNPgqsCYuKWO33fT3e6LwgOGT1hlMtTTjkdn1POGI-3gj3OhAxlBGL7d2bRbnBg7Zz6Sr3E4r3g_c6ZVrvWqJr0m4UzTW3JzQoNcTMknDJJbqtiitqgdWSgjJstW_WE5A6XLS40kqvFylvVVDksSN6Ry2o6-3z7GFYF1pXryKBW3tbkuvGCJU1JogvyiHWj1-7PebT7wU6paosH370XPAwH9_3LcHIzuuqfTUIViRRCnSeQpwBaJVCUMkWdlikVTMaFFrGAohCQMyylQgVJLAooU0hAIkOWezfqBUebvS-m8S9Yl82b1iz8yYwDgExkzIWnjjeUNo21BsvsxVTPynQZo9k67-xv3h6PNvhrVWP3L5uNR7fnADSG6AtYPoMi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2555979426</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Tung, Sui ; Shirzaei, Manoochehr ; Ojha, Chandrakanta ; Pepe, Antonio ; Liu, Zhen</creator><creatorcontrib>Tung, Sui ; Shirzaei, Manoochehr ; Ojha, Chandrakanta ; Pepe, Antonio ; Liu, Zhen</creatorcontrib><description>We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems. Plain Language Summary On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appeared over a zone of elastic weakness where could be relevant to subsurface viscous or fluid bodies, meanwhile, aftershocks tended to cluster within a shallow rigid body. Overall, the findings of this study provide insights into potential structural controls over the seismic occurrence and help improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within the western Mojave desert. Key Points Heterogeneous velocity structures in the epicentral area are simulated in elastic models Peak slip occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and documented afterslip Most aftershocks are located outside slip asperities and within a shallow brittle zone</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-9313</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-9356</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2020JB021124</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>aftershock ; Aftershocks ; Algorithms ; Displacement ; Distribution ; Earthquakes ; Elastic properties ; Fault lines ; Finite element method ; finite element model ; Geological faults ; Geophysical data ; Geophysics ; Heterogeneity ; InSAR ; Interferometric synthetic aperture radar ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Numerical models ; Optimization ; Properties ; Ridgecrest earthquake sequence ; Rigid structures ; Rigidity ; Rocks ; Rupture ; Rupturing ; S waves ; SAR (radar) ; Satellite imagery ; Seismic activity ; Seismic velocities ; Sequencing ; Slip ; Spaceborne remote sensing ; structural control ; Synthetic aperture radar ; Three dimensional models ; Velocity ; velocity structure ; Wave velocity</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. The Authors.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-0086-3722 ; 0000-0002-6313-823X ; 0000-0002-4708-2133 ; 0000-0002-7843-3565 ; 0000-0002-5025-4485</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tung, Sui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Chandrakanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhen</creatorcontrib><title>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</title><description>We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems. Plain Language Summary On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appeared over a zone of elastic weakness where could be relevant to subsurface viscous or fluid bodies, meanwhile, aftershocks tended to cluster within a shallow rigid body. Overall, the findings of this study provide insights into potential structural controls over the seismic occurrence and help improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within the western Mojave desert. Key Points Heterogeneous velocity structures in the epicentral area are simulated in elastic models Peak slip occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and documented afterslip Most aftershocks are located outside slip asperities and within a shallow brittle zone</description><subject>aftershock</subject><subject>Aftershocks</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Displacement</subject><subject>Distribution</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Elastic properties</subject><subject>Fault lines</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>finite element model</subject><subject>Geological faults</subject><subject>Geophysical data</subject><subject>Geophysics</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>InSAR</subject><subject>Interferometric synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Numerical models</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Properties</subject><subject>Ridgecrest earthquake sequence</subject><subject>Rigid structures</subject><subject>Rigidity</subject><subject>Rocks</subject><subject>Rupture</subject><subject>Rupturing</subject><subject>S waves</subject><subject>SAR (radar)</subject><subject>Satellite imagery</subject><subject>Seismic activity</subject><subject>Seismic velocities</subject><subject>Sequencing</subject><subject>Slip</subject><subject>Spaceborne remote sensing</subject><subject>structural control</subject><subject>Synthetic aperture radar</subject><subject>Three dimensional models</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>velocity structure</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><issn>2169-9313</issn><issn>2169-9356</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kL9OwzAQxiMEEqiw8QCWWAnYTs6JRyhtoSpC4t8aOc6lTQkNtZ2ibKxsPCNPgqsCYuKWO33fT3e6LwgOGT1hlMtTTjkdn1POGI-3gj3OhAxlBGL7d2bRbnBg7Zz6Sr3E4r3g_c6ZVrvWqJr0m4UzTW3JzQoNcTMknDJJbqtiitqgdWSgjJstW_WE5A6XLS40kqvFylvVVDksSN6Ry2o6-3z7GFYF1pXryKBW3tbkuvGCJU1JogvyiHWj1-7PebT7wU6paosH370XPAwH9_3LcHIzuuqfTUIViRRCnSeQpwBaJVCUMkWdlikVTMaFFrGAohCQMyylQgVJLAooU0hAIkOWezfqBUebvS-m8S9Yl82b1iz8yYwDgExkzIWnjjeUNo21BsvsxVTPynQZo9k67-xv3h6PNvhrVWP3L5uNR7fnADSG6AtYPoMi</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Tung, Sui</creator><creator>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</creator><creator>Ojha, Chandrakanta</creator><creator>Pepe, Antonio</creator><creator>Liu, Zhen</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-3722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-823X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-2133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-3565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-4485</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</title><author>Tung, Sui ; Shirzaei, Manoochehr ; Ojha, Chandrakanta ; Pepe, Antonio ; Liu, Zhen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>aftershock</topic><topic>Aftershocks</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Displacement</topic><topic>Distribution</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Elastic properties</topic><topic>Fault lines</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>finite element model</topic><topic>Geological faults</topic><topic>Geophysical data</topic><topic>Geophysics</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>InSAR</topic><topic>Interferometric synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Numerical models</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Properties</topic><topic>Ridgecrest earthquake sequence</topic><topic>Rigid structures</topic><topic>Rigidity</topic><topic>Rocks</topic><topic>Rupture</topic><topic>Rupturing</topic><topic>S waves</topic><topic>SAR (radar)</topic><topic>Satellite imagery</topic><topic>Seismic activity</topic><topic>Seismic velocities</topic><topic>Sequencing</topic><topic>Slip</topic><topic>Spaceborne remote sensing</topic><topic>structural control</topic><topic>Synthetic aperture radar</topic><topic>Three dimensional models</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>velocity structure</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tung, Sui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ojha, Chandrakanta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pepe, Antonio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Zhen</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tung, Sui</au><au>Shirzaei, Manoochehr</au><au>Ojha, Chandrakanta</au><au>Pepe, Antonio</au><au>Liu, Zhen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>7</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-9313</issn><eissn>2169-9356</eissn><abstract>We develop finite element models of the coseismic displacement field accounting for the 3D elastic structures surrounding the epicentral area of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence containing two major events of Mw7.1 and Mw6.4. The coseismic slip distribution is inferred from the surface displacement field recorded by interferometric synthetic aperture radar. The rupture dip geometry is further optimized using a novel nonlinear‐crossover‐linear inversion approach. It is found that accounting for elastic heterogeneity and fault along‐strike curvilinearity improves the fit to the observed displacement field and yields a more accurate estimate of geodetic moment and Coulomb stress changes. We observe spatial correlations among the locations of aftershocks and patches of high slip, and rock anomalous elastic properties, suggesting that the shallow crust's elastic structures possibly controlled the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. Most of the coseismic slip with a peak slip of 7.4 m at 3.6 km depth occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and significant post‐Mw7.1 afterslip. This implies that viscous materials or fluid presence might have contributed to the low rupture velocity of the mainshock. Moreover, the zone of high slip on the northwest‐trending fault segment is laterally bounded by two aftershock clusters, whose location is characterized by intermediate rock rigidity. Notably, some minor orthogonal faults consistently end above a subsurface rigid body. Overall, these observations of structural controls improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within incipient fault systems. Plain Language Summary On July 4 and 5, 2019, a magnitude 7.1 and 6.4 earthquake occurred near the town, Ridgecrest, California. The permanent surface movements induced by these events were captured by satellite images. Here, we develop realistic numerical models and innovational optimization algorithms to investigate the displacement fields and image the distribution of the earthquake slip. These events were hosted by a pair of orthogonal faults and their resolved orientations are similar to the nearby known fault structures. We discover that the fault slip and aftershock locations could be related to the local rock materials, suggesting that the variable elastic properties of the shallow crust might have influenced the development of the Ridgecrest earthquake sequence. As also supported by other seismic and geophysical datasets, most of the coseismic slip appeared over a zone of elastic weakness where could be relevant to subsurface viscous or fluid bodies, meanwhile, aftershocks tended to cluster within a shallow rigid body. Overall, the findings of this study provide insights into potential structural controls over the seismic occurrence and help improve our understandings of the seismogenesis within the western Mojave desert. Key Points Heterogeneous velocity structures in the epicentral area are simulated in elastic models Peak slip occurred above a zone of reduced S‐wave velocity and documented afterslip Most aftershocks are located outside slip asperities and within a shallow brittle zone</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2020JB021124</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0086-3722</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6313-823X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4708-2133</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7843-3565</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5025-4485</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-9313
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Solid earth, 2021-07, Vol.126 (7), p.n/a
issn 2169-9313
2169-9356
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2555979426
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects aftershock
Aftershocks
Algorithms
Displacement
Distribution
Earthquakes
Elastic properties
Fault lines
Finite element method
finite element model
Geological faults
Geophysical data
Geophysics
Heterogeneity
InSAR
Interferometric synthetic aperture radar
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Numerical models
Optimization
Properties
Ridgecrest earthquake sequence
Rigid structures
Rigidity
Rocks
Rupture
Rupturing
S waves
SAR (radar)
Satellite imagery
Seismic activity
Seismic velocities
Sequencing
Slip
Spaceborne remote sensing
structural control
Synthetic aperture radar
Three dimensional models
Velocity
velocity structure
Wave velocity
title Structural Controls Over the 2019 Ridgecrest Earthquake Sequence Investigated by High‐Fidelity Elastic Models of 3D Velocity Structures
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T23%3A07%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Structural%20Controls%20Over%20the%202019%20Ridgecrest%20Earthquake%20Sequence%20Investigated%20by%20High%E2%80%90Fidelity%20Elastic%20Models%20of%203D%20Velocity%20Structures&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Solid%20earth&rft.au=Tung,%20Sui&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=7&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-9313&rft.eissn=2169-9356&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2020JB021124&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2555979426%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a3685-cb75b855ca75df98ec8f806194dc6465dd65b1ef9aea5746d5f85759e1e1b5dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2555979426&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true