Loading…

Assessing adult farm labor statistics: Evidence from a survey design experiment in Ethiopia

Agricultural labor accounts for most of the employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, few empirical studies have examined the reliability of farm labor measures emerging from household surveys. In this study, we report the results from a survey design experiment in rural Ethiopia that focus on the effe...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Economics letters 2021-06, Vol.203, p.109836, Article 109836
Main Authors: Dammert, Ana C., Galdo, Jose
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 109836
container_title Economics letters
container_volume 203
creator Dammert, Ana C.
Galdo, Jose
description Agricultural labor accounts for most of the employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, few empirical studies have examined the reliability of farm labor measures emerging from household surveys. In this study, we report the results from a survey design experiment in rural Ethiopia that focus on the effects of survey respondent i.e., proxy vs self-report, on adult farm labor. Our results show that proxy respondents generate lower farm labor statistics relative to self-responses for men but not for women. The magnitude of the impacts for men reaches 3.9 percentage points or 4.3% lower rate of participation relative to the mean participation obtained from the self-report. Our results have implications for the current debate on the measurement of agricultural productivity and the collection of survey data in rural areas of developing settings. •We implement a survey design experiment in Ethiopia for 1197 farming households.•Our random design focuses on comparing proxy vs self-reporting of adult farm labor.•Results show self/proxy gaps in farm labor statistics for men but not for women.•Results have implications for the collection of survey data in poor agricultural settings.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109836
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556878134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0165176521001130</els_id><sourcerecordid>2556878134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_ghDwuTMfTZP6ImPMDxj4ok8-hDS5nSldW5NsuP_ejvru04XLOefe80PolpIFJbS4bxZg-66FtGCE0XFXKl6coRlVkmeSy_wczUadyKgsxCW6irEhhLJSihn6XMYIMfpui43btwnXJuxwa6o-4JhM8jF5Gx_w-uAddBZwHfodNjjuwwGO2EH02w7DzwDB76BL2Hd4nb58P3hzjS5q00a4-Ztz9PG0fl-9ZJu359fVcpPZnLCUSVWWguXUOQM1ra2VvKJKkcLlxBHjclZZY8FUyplcKMUZ4YybupJAeeEMn6O7KXcI_fceYtJNvw_deFIzIQolFeX5qBKTyoY-xgC1HsaXTThqSvSJo270H0d94qgnjqPvcfLBWOHgIeho_QmF8wFs0q73_yT8AsX5f6o</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556878134</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessing adult farm labor statistics: Evidence from a survey design experiment in Ethiopia</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Dammert, Ana C. ; Galdo, Jose</creator><creatorcontrib>Dammert, Ana C. ; Galdo, Jose</creatorcontrib><description>Agricultural labor accounts for most of the employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, few empirical studies have examined the reliability of farm labor measures emerging from household surveys. In this study, we report the results from a survey design experiment in rural Ethiopia that focus on the effects of survey respondent i.e., proxy vs self-report, on adult farm labor. Our results show that proxy respondents generate lower farm labor statistics relative to self-responses for men but not for women. The magnitude of the impacts for men reaches 3.9 percentage points or 4.3% lower rate of participation relative to the mean participation obtained from the self-report. Our results have implications for the current debate on the measurement of agricultural productivity and the collection of survey data in rural areas of developing settings. •We implement a survey design experiment in Ethiopia for 1197 farming households.•Our random design focuses on comparing proxy vs self-reporting of adult farm labor.•Results show self/proxy gaps in farm labor statistics for men but not for women.•Results have implications for the collection of survey data in poor agricultural settings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0165-1765</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7374</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109836</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Agricultural production ; Employment ; Farm labor ; Farmworkers ; Gender ; Labor ; Labor market ; Labor statistics ; Polls &amp; surveys ; Productivity measurement ; Reliability ; Rural areas ; Rural communities ; Self report ; Survey design ; Women</subject><ispartof>Economics letters, 2021-06, Vol.203, p.109836, Article 109836</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Jun 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1234-4754</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dammert, Ana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galdo, Jose</creatorcontrib><title>Assessing adult farm labor statistics: Evidence from a survey design experiment in Ethiopia</title><title>Economics letters</title><description>Agricultural labor accounts for most of the employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, few empirical studies have examined the reliability of farm labor measures emerging from household surveys. In this study, we report the results from a survey design experiment in rural Ethiopia that focus on the effects of survey respondent i.e., proxy vs self-report, on adult farm labor. Our results show that proxy respondents generate lower farm labor statistics relative to self-responses for men but not for women. The magnitude of the impacts for men reaches 3.9 percentage points or 4.3% lower rate of participation relative to the mean participation obtained from the self-report. Our results have implications for the current debate on the measurement of agricultural productivity and the collection of survey data in rural areas of developing settings. •We implement a survey design experiment in Ethiopia for 1197 farming households.•Our random design focuses on comparing proxy vs self-reporting of adult farm labor.•Results show self/proxy gaps in farm labor statistics for men but not for women.•Results have implications for the collection of survey data in poor agricultural settings.</description><subject>Agricultural production</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Farm labor</subject><subject>Farmworkers</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Labor market</subject><subject>Labor statistics</subject><subject>Polls &amp; surveys</subject><subject>Productivity measurement</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Rural areas</subject><subject>Rural communities</subject><subject>Self report</subject><subject>Survey design</subject><subject>Women</subject><issn>0165-1765</issn><issn>1873-7374</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAUxYMoOKd_ghDwuTMfTZP6ImPMDxj4ok8-hDS5nSldW5NsuP_ejvru04XLOefe80PolpIFJbS4bxZg-66FtGCE0XFXKl6coRlVkmeSy_wczUadyKgsxCW6irEhhLJSihn6XMYIMfpui43btwnXJuxwa6o-4JhM8jF5Gx_w-uAddBZwHfodNjjuwwGO2EH02w7DzwDB76BL2Hd4nb58P3hzjS5q00a4-Ztz9PG0fl-9ZJu359fVcpPZnLCUSVWWguXUOQM1ra2VvKJKkcLlxBHjclZZY8FUyplcKMUZ4YybupJAeeEMn6O7KXcI_fceYtJNvw_deFIzIQolFeX5qBKTyoY-xgC1HsaXTThqSvSJo270H0d94qgnjqPvcfLBWOHgIeho_QmF8wFs0q73_yT8AsX5f6o</recordid><startdate>20210601</startdate><enddate>20210601</enddate><creator>Dammert, Ana C.</creator><creator>Galdo, Jose</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-4754</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210601</creationdate><title>Assessing adult farm labor statistics: Evidence from a survey design experiment in Ethiopia</title><author>Dammert, Ana C. ; Galdo, Jose</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agricultural production</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Farm labor</topic><topic>Farmworkers</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Labor market</topic><topic>Labor statistics</topic><topic>Polls &amp; surveys</topic><topic>Productivity measurement</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Rural areas</topic><topic>Rural communities</topic><topic>Self report</topic><topic>Survey design</topic><topic>Women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dammert, Ana C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galdo, Jose</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dammert, Ana C.</au><au>Galdo, Jose</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessing adult farm labor statistics: Evidence from a survey design experiment in Ethiopia</atitle><jtitle>Economics letters</jtitle><date>2021-06-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>203</volume><spage>109836</spage><pages>109836-</pages><artnum>109836</artnum><issn>0165-1765</issn><eissn>1873-7374</eissn><abstract>Agricultural labor accounts for most of the employment in Sub-Saharan Africa. Yet, few empirical studies have examined the reliability of farm labor measures emerging from household surveys. In this study, we report the results from a survey design experiment in rural Ethiopia that focus on the effects of survey respondent i.e., proxy vs self-report, on adult farm labor. Our results show that proxy respondents generate lower farm labor statistics relative to self-responses for men but not for women. The magnitude of the impacts for men reaches 3.9 percentage points or 4.3% lower rate of participation relative to the mean participation obtained from the self-report. Our results have implications for the current debate on the measurement of agricultural productivity and the collection of survey data in rural areas of developing settings. •We implement a survey design experiment in Ethiopia for 1197 farming households.•Our random design focuses on comparing proxy vs self-reporting of adult farm labor.•Results show self/proxy gaps in farm labor statistics for men but not for women.•Results have implications for the collection of survey data in poor agricultural settings.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109836</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1234-4754</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0165-1765
ispartof Economics letters, 2021-06, Vol.203, p.109836, Article 109836
issn 0165-1765
1873-7374
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2556878134
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Agricultural production
Employment
Farm labor
Farmworkers
Gender
Labor
Labor market
Labor statistics
Polls & surveys
Productivity measurement
Reliability
Rural areas
Rural communities
Self report
Survey design
Women
title Assessing adult farm labor statistics: Evidence from a survey design experiment in Ethiopia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T14%3A05%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessing%20adult%20farm%20labor%20statistics:%20Evidence%20from%20a%20survey%20design%20experiment%20in%20Ethiopia&rft.jtitle=Economics%20letters&rft.au=Dammert,%20Ana%20C.&rft.date=2021-06-01&rft.volume=203&rft.spage=109836&rft.pages=109836-&rft.artnum=109836&rft.issn=0165-1765&rft.eissn=1873-7374&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.econlet.2021.109836&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556878134%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c402t-78995241ddaef1fcc73b18806d40d0ad42bcaceab8da4588320323afb7e136da3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556878134&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true