Loading…
Techno-economic Analysis of Acid Gas Removal and Liquefaction for Pressurized LNG
This study estimated the life cycle cost (LCC) of an acid gas removal and a liquefaction processes for Pressurized LNG (PLNG) production and compared the results with the cost of normal LNG production. PLNG is pressurized LNG that is liquefied at a higher pressure and temperature than normal LNG. Du...
Saved in:
Published in: | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2018-05, Vol.358 (1), p.12066 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 12066 |
container_title | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering |
container_volume | 358 |
creator | Lee, S H Seo, Y K Chang, D J |
description | This study estimated the life cycle cost (LCC) of an acid gas removal and a liquefaction processes for Pressurized LNG (PLNG) production and compared the results with the cost of normal LNG production. PLNG is pressurized LNG that is liquefied at a higher pressure and temperature than normal LNG. Due to the high temperature, the energy for liquefaction is reduced. The allowable CO2 concentration in PLNG is increased up to 3 mol% when the product pressure 25 bar. An amine process with 35 wt% of diethanolamine (DEA) aqueous solution and a nitrogen expansion cycle were selected for the acid gas removal and the liquefaction processes, respectively. Two types of CO2 concentration in the feed gas were investigated to analyze their impacts on the acid gas removal unit. When the CO2 concentration was 5 mol%, the acid gas removal unit was required for both LNG and PLNG production. However, the acid gas removal unit was not necessary in PLNG when the concentration was 0.5 mol% and the pressure was higher than 15 bar. The results showed that the LCC of PLNG was reduced by almost 35% relative to that of LNG when the PLNG pressure was higher than 15 bar. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/1757-899X/358/1/012066 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2556902527</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2556902527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QQJu3IzNczKzLKW2Qn1XcBcymQRT2smYtEL99aaMVATB1b2Xe87h8AFwjtEVRkUxwIKLrCjL1wHl6RogTFCeH4De_nG43wt8DE5iXCCUC8ZQDzzOjX5rfGa0b_zKaThs1HIbXYTewqF2NZyoCJ_Myn-oJVRNDWfufWOs0mvnG2h9gA_BxLgJ7tOk593kFBxZtYzm7Hv2wcv1eD6aZrP7yc1oOMs0Y2ydVRxzmgvDECdYsQITqgurci4Uq4pSWUyF4ZxrYSuKsDBCVLYUnOdcpa2mfXDR5bbBp0ZxLRd-E1L7KElSlYhwIpIq71Q6-BiDsbINbqXCVmIkd_jkjozcUZIJn8Syw5eMpDM63_4k_2u6_MN0-zz-JZNtbekXHBF96g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2556902527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Techno-economic Analysis of Acid Gas Removal and Liquefaction for Pressurized LNG</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Lee, S H ; Seo, Y K ; Chang, D J</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, S H ; Seo, Y K ; Chang, D J</creatorcontrib><description>This study estimated the life cycle cost (LCC) of an acid gas removal and a liquefaction processes for Pressurized LNG (PLNG) production and compared the results with the cost of normal LNG production. PLNG is pressurized LNG that is liquefied at a higher pressure and temperature than normal LNG. Due to the high temperature, the energy for liquefaction is reduced. The allowable CO2 concentration in PLNG is increased up to 3 mol% when the product pressure 25 bar. An amine process with 35 wt% of diethanolamine (DEA) aqueous solution and a nitrogen expansion cycle were selected for the acid gas removal and the liquefaction processes, respectively. Two types of CO2 concentration in the feed gas were investigated to analyze their impacts on the acid gas removal unit. When the CO2 concentration was 5 mol%, the acid gas removal unit was required for both LNG and PLNG production. However, the acid gas removal unit was not necessary in PLNG when the concentration was 0.5 mol% and the pressure was higher than 15 bar. The results showed that the LCC of PLNG was reduced by almost 35% relative to that of LNG when the PLNG pressure was higher than 15 bar.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/358/1/012066</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Acids ; Aqueous solutions ; Carbon dioxide ; Diethanolamine ; Economic analysis ; High temperature ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle costs ; Liquefaction ; Liquefied natural gas</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018-05, Vol.358 (1), p.12066</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2556902527?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Y K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, D J</creatorcontrib><title>Techno-economic Analysis of Acid Gas Removal and Liquefaction for Pressurized LNG</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>This study estimated the life cycle cost (LCC) of an acid gas removal and a liquefaction processes for Pressurized LNG (PLNG) production and compared the results with the cost of normal LNG production. PLNG is pressurized LNG that is liquefied at a higher pressure and temperature than normal LNG. Due to the high temperature, the energy for liquefaction is reduced. The allowable CO2 concentration in PLNG is increased up to 3 mol% when the product pressure 25 bar. An amine process with 35 wt% of diethanolamine (DEA) aqueous solution and a nitrogen expansion cycle were selected for the acid gas removal and the liquefaction processes, respectively. Two types of CO2 concentration in the feed gas were investigated to analyze their impacts on the acid gas removal unit. When the CO2 concentration was 5 mol%, the acid gas removal unit was required for both LNG and PLNG production. However, the acid gas removal unit was not necessary in PLNG when the concentration was 0.5 mol% and the pressure was higher than 15 bar. The results showed that the LCC of PLNG was reduced by almost 35% relative to that of LNG when the PLNG pressure was higher than 15 bar.</description><subject>Acids</subject><subject>Aqueous solutions</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Diethanolamine</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle costs</subject><subject>Liquefaction</subject><subject>Liquefied natural gas</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEtLAzEUhYMoWKt_QQJu3IzNczKzLKW2Qn1XcBcymQRT2smYtEL99aaMVATB1b2Xe87h8AFwjtEVRkUxwIKLrCjL1wHl6RogTFCeH4De_nG43wt8DE5iXCCUC8ZQDzzOjX5rfGa0b_zKaThs1HIbXYTewqF2NZyoCJ_Myn-oJVRNDWfufWOs0mvnG2h9gA_BxLgJ7tOk593kFBxZtYzm7Hv2wcv1eD6aZrP7yc1oOMs0Y2ydVRxzmgvDECdYsQITqgurci4Uq4pSWUyF4ZxrYSuKsDBCVLYUnOdcpa2mfXDR5bbBp0ZxLRd-E1L7KElSlYhwIpIq71Q6-BiDsbINbqXCVmIkd_jkjozcUZIJn8Syw5eMpDM63_4k_2u6_MN0-zz-JZNtbekXHBF96g</recordid><startdate>20180501</startdate><enddate>20180501</enddate><creator>Lee, S H</creator><creator>Seo, Y K</creator><creator>Chang, D J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180501</creationdate><title>Techno-economic Analysis of Acid Gas Removal and Liquefaction for Pressurized LNG</title><author>Lee, S H ; Seo, Y K ; Chang, D J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acids</topic><topic>Aqueous solutions</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Diethanolamine</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle costs</topic><topic>Liquefaction</topic><topic>Liquefied natural gas</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, S H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seo, Y K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, D J</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP_英国物理学会OA刊</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, S H</au><au>Seo, Y K</au><au>Chang, D J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Techno-economic Analysis of Acid Gas Removal and Liquefaction for Pressurized LNG</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2018-05-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>358</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12066</spage><pages>12066-</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>This study estimated the life cycle cost (LCC) of an acid gas removal and a liquefaction processes for Pressurized LNG (PLNG) production and compared the results with the cost of normal LNG production. PLNG is pressurized LNG that is liquefied at a higher pressure and temperature than normal LNG. Due to the high temperature, the energy for liquefaction is reduced. The allowable CO2 concentration in PLNG is increased up to 3 mol% when the product pressure 25 bar. An amine process with 35 wt% of diethanolamine (DEA) aqueous solution and a nitrogen expansion cycle were selected for the acid gas removal and the liquefaction processes, respectively. Two types of CO2 concentration in the feed gas were investigated to analyze their impacts on the acid gas removal unit. When the CO2 concentration was 5 mol%, the acid gas removal unit was required for both LNG and PLNG production. However, the acid gas removal unit was not necessary in PLNG when the concentration was 0.5 mol% and the pressure was higher than 15 bar. The results showed that the LCC of PLNG was reduced by almost 35% relative to that of LNG when the PLNG pressure was higher than 15 bar.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/358/1/012066</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1757-8981 |
ispartof | IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2018-05, Vol.358 (1), p.12066 |
issn | 1757-8981 1757-899X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2556902527 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Acids Aqueous solutions Carbon dioxide Diethanolamine Economic analysis High temperature Life cycle assessment Life cycle costs Liquefaction Liquefied natural gas |
title | Techno-economic Analysis of Acid Gas Removal and Liquefaction for Pressurized LNG |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T06%3A11%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Techno-economic%20Analysis%20of%20Acid%20Gas%20Removal%20and%20Liquefaction%20for%20Pressurized%20LNG&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Lee,%20S%20H&rft.date=2018-05-01&rft.volume=358&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12066&rft.pages=12066-&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/358/1/012066&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2556902527%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-b515367e40521a48123c8fa657a4b89af137e555c7fb3017e77bf975565a7bfd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2556902527&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |