Loading…

The Emu: More‐Than‐Human and More‐Than‐Animal Geographies

The emu is endemic to Australia and is one of the world’s largest flightless birds. For Indigenous peoples, the emu is a highly significant and totemic species—a fact that is poorly recognised by many. Emu shows itself, and is positioned as: a national symbol in the Australian Commonwealth Coat of A...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Antipode 2021-09, Vol.53 (5), p.1526-1545
Main Authors: Raven, Margaret, Robinson, Daniel, Hunter, John
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3
container_end_page 1545
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1526
container_title Antipode
container_volume 53
creator Raven, Margaret
Robinson, Daniel
Hunter, John
description The emu is endemic to Australia and is one of the world’s largest flightless birds. For Indigenous peoples, the emu is a highly significant and totemic species—a fact that is poorly recognised by many. Emu shows itself, and is positioned as: a national symbol in the Australian Commonwealth Coat of Arms; a spirit and Dreaming‐creation belief involving the sky; a scientific animal; medicine and food; an oil; and as a component that has been isolated, privatised and monopolised through the patent system. It is important to recognise the significance of animals like the emu, and its many uses. Yet to date there is limited critical discussion of the appropriation and patenting of emu oil products which appear to be based on Indigenous knowledge, uses and innovations. This article uses more‐than‐human and more‐than‐animal thinking to decentre, problematise and Indigenise “ways of thinking” about the emu. We also seek to reframe the subjugation of “traditional knowledge” in scientific discourses and to reify Indigenous Australian innovations, and relationships with animals and Country.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/anti.12736
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557152709</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557152709</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSR2CGljH9ip-yiqrSVCmzC2rKTCU3VJsVuhLrjCJyRk-ASViyYzZNG35t5eoRcUxjRMHem2dcjyhSXJ2RAhVRxyjmckgGAlLFIKTsnF96vAUAwgAHJ8hVG0213Hz22Dr8-PvOVaYLMu61pItOUf_ZZU2_NJpph--rMblWjvyRnldl4vPrVIXl5mOaTebx8ni0m2TIuOFcytgWUpqh4CYyWqkSLqlI4DpESEByVYBap5DaF0gqhCl7wtBpbyRChomD5kNz0d3eufevQ7_W67VwTXmqWJIomTME4ULc9VbjWe4eV3rmQ2B00BX2sSB8r0j8VBZj28Hu9wcM_pM6e8kXv-QbnNGuS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557152709</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The Emu: More‐Than‐Human and More‐Than‐Animal Geographies</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Raven, Margaret ; Robinson, Daniel ; Hunter, John</creator><creatorcontrib>Raven, Margaret ; Robinson, Daniel ; Hunter, John</creatorcontrib><description>The emu is endemic to Australia and is one of the world’s largest flightless birds. For Indigenous peoples, the emu is a highly significant and totemic species—a fact that is poorly recognised by many. Emu shows itself, and is positioned as: a national symbol in the Australian Commonwealth Coat of Arms; a spirit and Dreaming‐creation belief involving the sky; a scientific animal; medicine and food; an oil; and as a component that has been isolated, privatised and monopolised through the patent system. It is important to recognise the significance of animals like the emu, and its many uses. Yet to date there is limited critical discussion of the appropriation and patenting of emu oil products which appear to be based on Indigenous knowledge, uses and innovations. This article uses more‐than‐human and more‐than‐animal thinking to decentre, problematise and Indigenise “ways of thinking” about the emu. We also seek to reframe the subjugation of “traditional knowledge” in scientific discourses and to reify Indigenous Australian innovations, and relationships with animals and Country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0066-4812</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1467-8330</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/anti.12736</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Aboriginal Australians ; Animals ; Appropriation ; Birds ; Discourses ; Dreaming ; emu ; Food ; Indigenous knowledge ; Indigenous peoples ; Innovations ; Local knowledge ; medicine ; more‐than‐human ; Patenting ; Petroleum ; Scientific knowledge ; spiritual</subject><ispartof>Antipode, 2021-09, Vol.53 (5), p.1526-1545</ispartof><rights>2021 The Authors. © 2021 Antipode Foundation Ltd.</rights><rights>2021. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9871-7987 ; 0000-0002-1287-1319</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27843,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Raven, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John</creatorcontrib><title>The Emu: More‐Than‐Human and More‐Than‐Animal Geographies</title><title>Antipode</title><description>The emu is endemic to Australia and is one of the world’s largest flightless birds. For Indigenous peoples, the emu is a highly significant and totemic species—a fact that is poorly recognised by many. Emu shows itself, and is positioned as: a national symbol in the Australian Commonwealth Coat of Arms; a spirit and Dreaming‐creation belief involving the sky; a scientific animal; medicine and food; an oil; and as a component that has been isolated, privatised and monopolised through the patent system. It is important to recognise the significance of animals like the emu, and its many uses. Yet to date there is limited critical discussion of the appropriation and patenting of emu oil products which appear to be based on Indigenous knowledge, uses and innovations. This article uses more‐than‐human and more‐than‐animal thinking to decentre, problematise and Indigenise “ways of thinking” about the emu. We also seek to reframe the subjugation of “traditional knowledge” in scientific discourses and to reify Indigenous Australian innovations, and relationships with animals and Country.</description><subject>Aboriginal Australians</subject><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Appropriation</subject><subject>Birds</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Dreaming</subject><subject>emu</subject><subject>Food</subject><subject>Indigenous knowledge</subject><subject>Indigenous peoples</subject><subject>Innovations</subject><subject>Local knowledge</subject><subject>medicine</subject><subject>more‐than‐human</subject><subject>Patenting</subject><subject>Petroleum</subject><subject>Scientific knowledge</subject><subject>spiritual</subject><issn>0066-4812</issn><issn>1467-8330</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1OwzAQhS0EEqWw4QSR2CGljH9ip-yiqrSVCmzC2rKTCU3VJsVuhLrjCJyRk-ASViyYzZNG35t5eoRcUxjRMHem2dcjyhSXJ2RAhVRxyjmckgGAlLFIKTsnF96vAUAwgAHJ8hVG0213Hz22Dr8-PvOVaYLMu61pItOUf_ZZU2_NJpph--rMblWjvyRnldl4vPrVIXl5mOaTebx8ni0m2TIuOFcytgWUpqh4CYyWqkSLqlI4DpESEByVYBap5DaF0gqhCl7wtBpbyRChomD5kNz0d3eufevQ7_W67VwTXmqWJIomTME4ULc9VbjWe4eV3rmQ2B00BX2sSB8r0j8VBZj28Hu9wcM_pM6e8kXv-QbnNGuS</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Raven, Margaret</creator><creator>Robinson, Daniel</creator><creator>Hunter, John</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9871-7987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-1319</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>The Emu: More‐Than‐Human and More‐Than‐Animal Geographies</title><author>Raven, Margaret ; Robinson, Daniel ; Hunter, John</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Aboriginal Australians</topic><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Appropriation</topic><topic>Birds</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Dreaming</topic><topic>emu</topic><topic>Food</topic><topic>Indigenous knowledge</topic><topic>Indigenous peoples</topic><topic>Innovations</topic><topic>Local knowledge</topic><topic>medicine</topic><topic>more‐than‐human</topic><topic>Patenting</topic><topic>Petroleum</topic><topic>Scientific knowledge</topic><topic>spiritual</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Raven, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robinson, Daniel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunter, John</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Antipode</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Raven, Margaret</au><au>Robinson, Daniel</au><au>Hunter, John</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The Emu: More‐Than‐Human and More‐Than‐Animal Geographies</atitle><jtitle>Antipode</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>53</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1526</spage><epage>1545</epage><pages>1526-1545</pages><issn>0066-4812</issn><eissn>1467-8330</eissn><abstract>The emu is endemic to Australia and is one of the world’s largest flightless birds. For Indigenous peoples, the emu is a highly significant and totemic species—a fact that is poorly recognised by many. Emu shows itself, and is positioned as: a national symbol in the Australian Commonwealth Coat of Arms; a spirit and Dreaming‐creation belief involving the sky; a scientific animal; medicine and food; an oil; and as a component that has been isolated, privatised and monopolised through the patent system. It is important to recognise the significance of animals like the emu, and its many uses. Yet to date there is limited critical discussion of the appropriation and patenting of emu oil products which appear to be based on Indigenous knowledge, uses and innovations. This article uses more‐than‐human and more‐than‐animal thinking to decentre, problematise and Indigenise “ways of thinking” about the emu. We also seek to reframe the subjugation of “traditional knowledge” in scientific discourses and to reify Indigenous Australian innovations, and relationships with animals and Country.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/anti.12736</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9871-7987</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1287-1319</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0066-4812
ispartof Antipode, 2021-09, Vol.53 (5), p.1526-1545
issn 0066-4812
1467-8330
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2557152709
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index
subjects Aboriginal Australians
Animals
Appropriation
Birds
Discourses
Dreaming
emu
Food
Indigenous knowledge
Indigenous peoples
Innovations
Local knowledge
medicine
more‐than‐human
Patenting
Petroleum
Scientific knowledge
spiritual
title The Emu: More‐Than‐Human and More‐Than‐Animal Geographies
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T21%3A23%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20Emu:%20More%E2%80%90Than%E2%80%90Human%20and%20More%E2%80%90Than%E2%80%90Animal%20Geographies&rft.jtitle=Antipode&rft.au=Raven,%20Margaret&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=53&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1526&rft.epage=1545&rft.pages=1526-1545&rft.issn=0066-4812&rft.eissn=1467-8330&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/anti.12736&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557152709%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-bc0dacf3d021d7debe7f7e94815043e742be163b80db447c3c38f9b62ee0f10b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557152709&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true