Loading…

Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?

New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Review of European Community & international environmental law 2021-07, Vol.30 (2), p.233-248
Main Authors: Mayr, Stefan, Hollaus, Birgit, Madner, Verena
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063
cites
container_end_page 248
container_issue 2
container_start_page 233
container_title Review of European Community & international environmental law
container_volume 30
creator Mayr, Stefan
Hollaus, Birgit
Madner, Verena
description New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/reel.12386
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557241398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557241398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb2LqbjbZJF5EatRCoVJaPC6T7GxN2SYxm1D69qZGPDqXmcM3Mz8fIdecTXlf9w2inXJfxPKMjHwWMo-JJDj_m2N5SSbO7RhjnImIx8GIrN_B7mlV2DvafiJdpc90PqdQavqxXlILhweabqjrXAtFCZlFmhWV6dDSurJFfqQtlFuLmnY1LUq67TOUj1fkwoB1OPntY7J5SdezN2-xfJ3PnhZeLkQkPZSoI52gD5mIINIMkMe5MVKySDJuNIYYC8hMmIBOZACJ0AnkIcTaJIxJMSY3w926qb46dK3aVV1T9i-VH4aRH3CRxD11O1B5UznXoFF1U-yhOSrO1EmcOolTP-J6mA_wobB4_IdUqzRdDDvfyBlubw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557241398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Mayr, Stefan ; Hollaus, Birgit ; Madner, Verena</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Stefan ; Hollaus, Birgit ; Madner, Verena</creatorcontrib><description>New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-0386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/reel.12386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Compatibility ; Environmental policy ; GATT ; International law ; Palm oil ; Renewable energy ; Tariffs ; Trade ; Transportation industry</subject><ispartof>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law, 2021-07, Vol.30 (2), p.233-248</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Review of European, Comparative &amp; International Environmental Law published by Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0685-6910 ; 0000-0002-4802-5560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollaus, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madner, Verena</creatorcontrib><title>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</title><title>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law</title><description>New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Compatibility</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>GATT</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Palm oil</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Transportation industry</subject><issn>2050-0386</issn><issn>2050-0394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb2LqbjbZJF5EatRCoVJaPC6T7GxN2SYxm1D69qZGPDqXmcM3Mz8fIdecTXlf9w2inXJfxPKMjHwWMo-JJDj_m2N5SSbO7RhjnImIx8GIrN_B7mlV2DvafiJdpc90PqdQavqxXlILhweabqjrXAtFCZlFmhWV6dDSurJFfqQtlFuLmnY1LUq67TOUj1fkwoB1OPntY7J5SdezN2-xfJ3PnhZeLkQkPZSoI52gD5mIINIMkMe5MVKySDJuNIYYC8hMmIBOZACJ0AnkIcTaJIxJMSY3w926qb46dK3aVV1T9i-VH4aRH3CRxD11O1B5UznXoFF1U-yhOSrO1EmcOolTP-J6mA_wobB4_IdUqzRdDDvfyBlubw</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Mayr, Stefan</creator><creator>Hollaus, Birgit</creator><creator>Madner, Verena</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-5560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</title><author>Mayr, Stefan ; Hollaus, Birgit ; Madner, Verena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Compatibility</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>GATT</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Palm oil</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Transportation industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollaus, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madner, Verena</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayr, Stefan</au><au>Hollaus, Birgit</au><au>Madner, Verena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</atitle><jtitle>Review of European Community &amp; international environmental law</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>233-248</pages><issn>2050-0386</issn><eissn>2050-0394</eissn><abstract>New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/reel.12386</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-5560</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2050-0386
ispartof Review of European Community & international environmental law, 2021-07, Vol.30 (2), p.233-248
issn 2050-0386
2050-0394
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2557241398
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Agreements
Biodiesel fuels
Biofuels
Compatibility
Environmental policy
GATT
International law
Palm oil
Renewable energy
Tariffs
Trade
Transportation industry
title Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A48%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Palm%20oil,%20the%20RED%20II%20and%20WTO%20law:%20EU%20sustainable%20biofuel%20policy%20tangled%20up%20in%20green?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20European%20Community%20&%20international%20environmental%20law&rft.au=Mayr,%20Stefan&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=233-248&rft.issn=2050-0386&rft.eissn=2050-0394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/reel.12386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557241398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557241398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true