Loading…
Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?
New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast...
Saved in:
Published in: | Review of European Community & international environmental law 2021-07, Vol.30 (2), p.233-248 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 248 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 233 |
container_title | Review of European Community & international environmental law |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Mayr, Stefan Hollaus, Birgit Madner, Verena |
description | New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/reel.12386 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557241398</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557241398</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb2LqbjbZJF5EatRCoVJaPC6T7GxN2SYxm1D69qZGPDqXmcM3Mz8fIdecTXlf9w2inXJfxPKMjHwWMo-JJDj_m2N5SSbO7RhjnImIx8GIrN_B7mlV2DvafiJdpc90PqdQavqxXlILhweabqjrXAtFCZlFmhWV6dDSurJFfqQtlFuLmnY1LUq67TOUj1fkwoB1OPntY7J5SdezN2-xfJ3PnhZeLkQkPZSoI52gD5mIINIMkMe5MVKySDJuNIYYC8hMmIBOZACJ0AnkIcTaJIxJMSY3w926qb46dK3aVV1T9i-VH4aRH3CRxD11O1B5UznXoFF1U-yhOSrO1EmcOolTP-J6mA_wobB4_IdUqzRdDDvfyBlubw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557241398</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Mayr, Stefan ; Hollaus, Birgit ; Madner, Verena</creator><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Stefan ; Hollaus, Birgit ; Madner, Verena</creatorcontrib><description>New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2050-0386</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2050-0394</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/reel.12386</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Agreements ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Compatibility ; Environmental policy ; GATT ; International law ; Palm oil ; Renewable energy ; Tariffs ; Trade ; Transportation industry</subject><ispartof>Review of European Community & international environmental law, 2021-07, Vol.30 (2), p.233-248</ispartof><rights>2020 The Authors. Review of European, Comparative & International Environmental Law published by Wiley Periodicals LLC</rights><rights>2020. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063</citedby><orcidid>0000-0003-0685-6910 ; 0000-0002-4802-5560</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollaus, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madner, Verena</creatorcontrib><title>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</title><title>Review of European Community & international environmental law</title><description>New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.</description><subject>Agreements</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Compatibility</subject><subject>Environmental policy</subject><subject>GATT</subject><subject>International law</subject><subject>Palm oil</subject><subject>Renewable energy</subject><subject>Tariffs</subject><subject>Trade</subject><subject>Transportation industry</subject><issn>2050-0386</issn><issn>2050-0394</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMFKw0AQhhdRsNRefIIFb2LqbjbZJF5EatRCoVJaPC6T7GxN2SYxm1D69qZGPDqXmcM3Mz8fIdecTXlf9w2inXJfxPKMjHwWMo-JJDj_m2N5SSbO7RhjnImIx8GIrN_B7mlV2DvafiJdpc90PqdQavqxXlILhweabqjrXAtFCZlFmhWV6dDSurJFfqQtlFuLmnY1LUq67TOUj1fkwoB1OPntY7J5SdezN2-xfJ3PnhZeLkQkPZSoI52gD5mIINIMkMe5MVKySDJuNIYYC8hMmIBOZACJ0AnkIcTaJIxJMSY3w926qb46dK3aVV1T9i-VH4aRH3CRxD11O1B5UznXoFF1U-yhOSrO1EmcOolTP-J6mA_wobB4_IdUqzRdDDvfyBlubw</recordid><startdate>202107</startdate><enddate>202107</enddate><creator>Mayr, Stefan</creator><creator>Hollaus, Birgit</creator><creator>Madner, Verena</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-5560</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202107</creationdate><title>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</title><author>Mayr, Stefan ; Hollaus, Birgit ; Madner, Verena</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agreements</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Compatibility</topic><topic>Environmental policy</topic><topic>GATT</topic><topic>International law</topic><topic>Palm oil</topic><topic>Renewable energy</topic><topic>Tariffs</topic><topic>Trade</topic><topic>Transportation industry</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mayr, Stefan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hollaus, Birgit</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madner, Verena</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Online Library Free Content</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Review of European Community & international environmental law</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mayr, Stefan</au><au>Hollaus, Birgit</au><au>Madner, Verena</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green?</atitle><jtitle>Review of European Community & international environmental law</jtitle><date>2021-07</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>233</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>233-248</pages><issn>2050-0386</issn><eissn>2050-0394</eissn><abstract>New European Union (EU) rules on biofuels have led to mounting tensions between the EU and some of its trading partners. A particularly contentious measure is the ‘freeze and phase‐out’ of certain biofuels in the transport sector with a high indirect land‐use change risk, as introduced by the recast of the Renewable Energy Directive. In light of Indonesia’s recent move to initiate proceedings against the EU at the World Trade Organization (WTO), this article systematically explores relevant key concepts of WTO law and analyses the compatibility of the EU measures with the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT) and the Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT Agreement). While the EU measures are carefully crafted to avoid potential WTO pitfalls—such as applicability of the TBT Agreement—the article identifies several critical aspects that raise doubts about the measure’s compatibility with WTO law. In particular, the seemingly deliberate targeting of palm oil casts doubt on the justification of the measure on environmental grounds.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/reel.12386</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0685-6910</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4802-5560</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2050-0386 |
ispartof | Review of European Community & international environmental law, 2021-07, Vol.30 (2), p.233-248 |
issn | 2050-0386 2050-0394 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2557241398 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; PAIS Index; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Agreements Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Compatibility Environmental policy GATT International law Palm oil Renewable energy Tariffs Trade Transportation industry |
title | Palm oil, the RED II and WTO law: EU sustainable biofuel policy tangled up in green? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T20%3A48%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Palm%20oil,%20the%20RED%20II%20and%20WTO%20law:%20EU%20sustainable%20biofuel%20policy%20tangled%20up%20in%20green?&rft.jtitle=Review%20of%20European%20Community%20&%20international%20environmental%20law&rft.au=Mayr,%20Stefan&rft.date=2021-07&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=233&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=233-248&rft.issn=2050-0386&rft.eissn=2050-0394&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/reel.12386&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557241398%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3376-e6ed7d9e2ab37a7d0ae18cff6607601fde5e83abf59ad964a93d9ac5a8df90063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557241398&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |