Loading…
Numerical analysis of hardness variations for a dome built without supports using directed energy deposition and multi-axis tool paths
There are many process parameters for directed energy deposition (DED) that influence product quality. Using a well-defined analytical model to simulate the process increases the knowledge of the process. In this paper, a finite element analysis of hardness and temperature history for a thin-wall he...
Saved in:
Published in: | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology 2021-09, Vol.116 (3-4), p.975-991 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7a52142055b32f43447e3717668980529c96cfcd5dd64d8e64b450c8ab168c343 |
container_end_page | 991 |
container_issue | 3-4 |
container_start_page | 975 |
container_title | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology |
container_volume | 116 |
creator | Kalami, Hamed Urbanic, Jill |
description | There are many process parameters for directed energy deposition (DED) that influence product quality. Using a well-defined analytical model to simulate the process increases the knowledge of the process. In this paper, a finite element analysis of hardness and temperature history for a thin-wall hemisphere dome is investigated using the SYSWELD software. The dome diameter and thickness are 45 mm and 2 mm respectively, and 144 beads of varying lengths is required to fabricate this part without support structures. A three-dimensional thermo-metallurgical-mechanical solution is used to generate the hardness. Two approaches for heat input are applied: constant laser efficiency and constant melt pool size. The results show a reasonable match between the experimental hardness data and the finite element analysis. The numerical results correlated better for the base segments than for those built at the top. Influence factors vary as the component is built, as conduction into the substrate occurs for the base partitions, but convection and radiation influence the heat losses at the top for thin-walled components. This illustrates the challenges with respect to developing accurate results. Faster numerical analysis techniques need to be developed to simulate products fabricated by DED additive manufacturing processes. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00170-021-07504-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557307939</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557307939</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7a52142055b32f43447e3717668980529c96cfcd5dd64d8e64b450c8ab168c343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kL1uFDEUhS0EEkvgBagsURuu_2dKFAFBikIDteW1PbuOZseDrwfYF-C5cVikdFS3-c45uh8hrzm85QD2HQJwCwwEZ2A1KGaekB1XUjIJXD8lOxBmYNKa4Tl5gXjfccPNsCO_77ZTqjn4mfrFz2fMSMtEj77GJSHSH75m33JZkE6lUk9jOSW63_Lc6M_cjmVrFLd1LbUh3TAvBxpzTaGlSNOS6uFMY1oL5oeOPhHpaZtbZv5XH2qlzHT17YgvybPJz5he_btX5NvHD1-vb9jtl0-fr9_fsiAAGrNeC64EaL2XYlJSKZuk5daYYRxAizGMJkwh6hiNikMyaq80hMHv-7NBKnlF3lx611q-bwmbuy9b7Y-jE1pbCXaUY6fEhQq1INY0ubXmk69nx8E9-HYX3677dn99O9ND8hLCDi-HVB-r_5P6Azv5hQA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557307939</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Numerical analysis of hardness variations for a dome built without supports using directed energy deposition and multi-axis tool paths</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kalami, Hamed ; Urbanic, Jill</creator><creatorcontrib>Kalami, Hamed ; Urbanic, Jill</creatorcontrib><description>There are many process parameters for directed energy deposition (DED) that influence product quality. Using a well-defined analytical model to simulate the process increases the knowledge of the process. In this paper, a finite element analysis of hardness and temperature history for a thin-wall hemisphere dome is investigated using the SYSWELD software. The dome diameter and thickness are 45 mm and 2 mm respectively, and 144 beads of varying lengths is required to fabricate this part without support structures. A three-dimensional thermo-metallurgical-mechanical solution is used to generate the hardness. Two approaches for heat input are applied: constant laser efficiency and constant melt pool size. The results show a reasonable match between the experimental hardness data and the finite element analysis. The numerical results correlated better for the base segments than for those built at the top. Influence factors vary as the component is built, as conduction into the substrate occurs for the base partitions, but convection and radiation influence the heat losses at the top for thin-walled components. This illustrates the challenges with respect to developing accurate results. Faster numerical analysis techniques need to be developed to simulate products fabricated by DED additive manufacturing processes.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0268-3768</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-3015</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00170-021-07504-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Beads ; CAE) and Design ; Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD ; Deposition ; Diameters ; Domes ; Engineering ; Finite element analysis ; Finite element method ; Hardness ; Industrial and Production Engineering ; Mechanical Engineering ; Media Management ; Metallurgy ; Numerical analysis ; Original Article ; Process parameters ; Substrates</subject><ispartof>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021-09, Vol.116 (3-4), p.975-991</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7a52142055b32f43447e3717668980529c96cfcd5dd64d8e64b450c8ab168c343</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-2906-7618</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kalami, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbanic, Jill</creatorcontrib><title>Numerical analysis of hardness variations for a dome built without supports using directed energy deposition and multi-axis tool paths</title><title>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</title><addtitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</addtitle><description>There are many process parameters for directed energy deposition (DED) that influence product quality. Using a well-defined analytical model to simulate the process increases the knowledge of the process. In this paper, a finite element analysis of hardness and temperature history for a thin-wall hemisphere dome is investigated using the SYSWELD software. The dome diameter and thickness are 45 mm and 2 mm respectively, and 144 beads of varying lengths is required to fabricate this part without support structures. A three-dimensional thermo-metallurgical-mechanical solution is used to generate the hardness. Two approaches for heat input are applied: constant laser efficiency and constant melt pool size. The results show a reasonable match between the experimental hardness data and the finite element analysis. The numerical results correlated better for the base segments than for those built at the top. Influence factors vary as the component is built, as conduction into the substrate occurs for the base partitions, but convection and radiation influence the heat losses at the top for thin-walled components. This illustrates the challenges with respect to developing accurate results. Faster numerical analysis techniques need to be developed to simulate products fabricated by DED additive manufacturing processes.</description><subject>Beads</subject><subject>CAE) and Design</subject><subject>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Domes</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Hardness</subject><subject>Industrial and Production Engineering</subject><subject>Mechanical Engineering</subject><subject>Media Management</subject><subject>Metallurgy</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Process parameters</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><issn>0268-3768</issn><issn>1433-3015</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kL1uFDEUhS0EEkvgBagsURuu_2dKFAFBikIDteW1PbuOZseDrwfYF-C5cVikdFS3-c45uh8hrzm85QD2HQJwCwwEZ2A1KGaekB1XUjIJXD8lOxBmYNKa4Tl5gXjfccPNsCO_77ZTqjn4mfrFz2fMSMtEj77GJSHSH75m33JZkE6lUk9jOSW63_Lc6M_cjmVrFLd1LbUh3TAvBxpzTaGlSNOS6uFMY1oL5oeOPhHpaZtbZv5XH2qlzHT17YgvybPJz5he_btX5NvHD1-vb9jtl0-fr9_fsiAAGrNeC64EaL2XYlJSKZuk5daYYRxAizGMJkwh6hiNikMyaq80hMHv-7NBKnlF3lx611q-bwmbuy9b7Y-jE1pbCXaUY6fEhQq1INY0ubXmk69nx8E9-HYX3677dn99O9ND8hLCDi-HVB-r_5P6Azv5hQA</recordid><startdate>20210901</startdate><enddate>20210901</enddate><creator>Kalami, Hamed</creator><creator>Urbanic, Jill</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-7618</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210901</creationdate><title>Numerical analysis of hardness variations for a dome built without supports using directed energy deposition and multi-axis tool paths</title><author>Kalami, Hamed ; Urbanic, Jill</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7a52142055b32f43447e3717668980529c96cfcd5dd64d8e64b450c8ab168c343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Beads</topic><topic>CAE) and Design</topic><topic>Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Domes</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Hardness</topic><topic>Industrial and Production Engineering</topic><topic>Mechanical Engineering</topic><topic>Media Management</topic><topic>Metallurgy</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Process parameters</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kalami, Hamed</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Urbanic, Jill</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kalami, Hamed</au><au>Urbanic, Jill</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Numerical analysis of hardness variations for a dome built without supports using directed energy deposition and multi-axis tool paths</atitle><jtitle>International journal of advanced manufacturing technology</jtitle><stitle>Int J Adv Manuf Technol</stitle><date>2021-09-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>3-4</issue><spage>975</spage><epage>991</epage><pages>975-991</pages><issn>0268-3768</issn><eissn>1433-3015</eissn><abstract>There are many process parameters for directed energy deposition (DED) that influence product quality. Using a well-defined analytical model to simulate the process increases the knowledge of the process. In this paper, a finite element analysis of hardness and temperature history for a thin-wall hemisphere dome is investigated using the SYSWELD software. The dome diameter and thickness are 45 mm and 2 mm respectively, and 144 beads of varying lengths is required to fabricate this part without support structures. A three-dimensional thermo-metallurgical-mechanical solution is used to generate the hardness. Two approaches for heat input are applied: constant laser efficiency and constant melt pool size. The results show a reasonable match between the experimental hardness data and the finite element analysis. The numerical results correlated better for the base segments than for those built at the top. Influence factors vary as the component is built, as conduction into the substrate occurs for the base partitions, but convection and radiation influence the heat losses at the top for thin-walled components. This illustrates the challenges with respect to developing accurate results. Faster numerical analysis techniques need to be developed to simulate products fabricated by DED additive manufacturing processes.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00170-021-07504-6</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2906-7618</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0268-3768 |
ispartof | International journal of advanced manufacturing technology, 2021-09, Vol.116 (3-4), p.975-991 |
issn | 0268-3768 1433-3015 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2557307939 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Beads CAE) and Design Computer-Aided Engineering (CAD Deposition Diameters Domes Engineering Finite element analysis Finite element method Hardness Industrial and Production Engineering Mechanical Engineering Media Management Metallurgy Numerical analysis Original Article Process parameters Substrates |
title | Numerical analysis of hardness variations for a dome built without supports using directed energy deposition and multi-axis tool paths |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A48%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Numerical%20analysis%20of%20hardness%20variations%20for%20a%20dome%20built%20without%20supports%20using%20directed%20energy%20deposition%20and%20multi-axis%20tool%20paths&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology&rft.au=Kalami,%20Hamed&rft.date=2021-09-01&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=3-4&rft.spage=975&rft.epage=991&rft.pages=975-991&rft.issn=0268-3768&rft.eissn=1433-3015&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00170-021-07504-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2557307939%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c200t-7a52142055b32f43447e3717668980529c96cfcd5dd64d8e64b450c8ab168c343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557307939&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |