Loading…
Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland
One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified i...
Saved in:
Published in: | Local government studies 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.546-567 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3 |
container_end_page | 567 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 546 |
container_title | Local government studies |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Swianiewicz, Paweł Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna |
description | One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557936083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557936083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r20AQxZeQQo3jj1AYyFnOSrOSVjm1mDYJGNJDS4_Lav_YCtKOuyvX6NtXwum1p2GG33vDe4x9yvk255I_cOQcG-Tbghfzqa5yxPqGrfJaYNaglLdstTDZAn1km5S6lmNeiUbWuGLTr-MEiQYHPRndw4H-uBgGF8YE5kiUHAQaYSTw0bksdtbB5egCnIN18UBdOEBL86LjBNF5isMjaEjj2U5AHsYLwTCDLoLRySXoAnynXgd7xz543Se3eZ9r9vPb1x-752z_-vSy-7LPDKIcs1qaRram5L6UtXACncaysQ0vjSm8b4VEa4SubGVr4bXA1lSFR-596RvBLa7Z_dX3FOn32aVRvdE5hvmlKsqybrDiEmeqvFImUkpzEHWK3TCHUjlXS9HqX9FqKVq9Fz3rPl91XViy6wvF3qpRTz1FH3UwXVL4f4u_YA-GFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557936083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor & Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Swianiewicz, Paweł ; Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creator><creatorcontrib>Swianiewicz, Paweł ; Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><description>One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-3930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9388</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Acquisitions & mergers ; Amalgmation ; Capital ; Capital expenditures ; common pool problem ; council mergers ; Expenditures ; Hoarding ; Local government ; Local politics ; Mergers ; Poland ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Reforms ; Side effects ; synthetic control ; territorial reform</subject><ispartof>Local government studies, 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.546-567</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1890-6738 ; 0000-0002-0573-6637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swianiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><title>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</title><title>Local government studies</title><description>One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.</description><subject>Acquisitions & mergers</subject><subject>Amalgmation</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>common pool problem</subject><subject>council mergers</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Hoarding</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Local politics</subject><subject>Mergers</subject><subject>Poland</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>synthetic control</subject><subject>territorial reform</subject><issn>0300-3930</issn><issn>1743-9388</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9r20AQxZeQQo3jj1AYyFnOSrOSVjm1mDYJGNJDS4_Lav_YCtKOuyvX6NtXwum1p2GG33vDe4x9yvk255I_cOQcG-Tbghfzqa5yxPqGrfJaYNaglLdstTDZAn1km5S6lmNeiUbWuGLTr-MEiQYHPRndw4H-uBgGF8YE5kiUHAQaYSTw0bksdtbB5egCnIN18UBdOEBL86LjBNF5isMjaEjj2U5AHsYLwTCDLoLRySXoAnynXgd7xz543Se3eZ9r9vPb1x-752z_-vSy-7LPDKIcs1qaRram5L6UtXACncaysQ0vjSm8b4VEa4SubGVr4bXA1lSFR-596RvBLa7Z_dX3FOn32aVRvdE5hvmlKsqybrDiEmeqvFImUkpzEHWK3TCHUjlXS9HqX9FqKVq9Fz3rPl91XViy6wvF3qpRTz1FH3UwXVL4f4u_YA-GFA</recordid><startdate>20210704</startdate><enddate>20210704</enddate><creator>Swianiewicz, Paweł</creator><creator>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-6637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210704</creationdate><title>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</title><author>Swianiewicz, Paweł ; Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions & mergers</topic><topic>Amalgmation</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>common pool problem</topic><topic>council mergers</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Hoarding</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Local politics</topic><topic>Mergers</topic><topic>Poland</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>synthetic control</topic><topic>territorial reform</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swianiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Local government studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swianiewicz, Paweł</au><au>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</atitle><jtitle>Local government studies</jtitle><date>2021-07-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>546-567</pages><issn>0300-3930</issn><eissn>1743-9388</eissn><abstract>One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-6637</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-3930 |
ispartof | Local government studies, 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.546-567 |
issn | 0300-3930 1743-9388 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2557936083 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts |
subjects | Acquisitions & mergers Amalgmation Capital Capital expenditures common pool problem council mergers Expenditures Hoarding Local government Local politics Mergers Poland Quasi-experimental methods Reforms Side effects synthetic control territorial reform |
title | Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A38%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20some%20local%20governments%20choose%20not%20to%20free-ride%20when%20undergoing%20boundary%20reform:%20a%20study%20of%20two%20merger%20cases%20in%20Poland&rft.jtitle=Local%20government%20studies&rft.au=Swianiewicz,%20Pawe%C5%82&rft.date=2021-07-04&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=546-567&rft.issn=0300-3930&rft.eissn=1743-9388&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2557936083%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557936083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |