Loading…

Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland

One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Local government studies 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.546-567
Main Authors: Swianiewicz, Paweł, Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3
container_end_page 567
container_issue 4
container_start_page 546
container_title Local government studies
container_volume 47
creator Swianiewicz, Paweł
Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna
description One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2557936083</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2557936083</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r20AQxZeQQo3jj1AYyFnOSrOSVjm1mDYJGNJDS4_Lav_YCtKOuyvX6NtXwum1p2GG33vDe4x9yvk255I_cOQcG-Tbghfzqa5yxPqGrfJaYNaglLdstTDZAn1km5S6lmNeiUbWuGLTr-MEiQYHPRndw4H-uBgGF8YE5kiUHAQaYSTw0bksdtbB5egCnIN18UBdOEBL86LjBNF5isMjaEjj2U5AHsYLwTCDLoLRySXoAnynXgd7xz543Se3eZ9r9vPb1x-752z_-vSy-7LPDKIcs1qaRram5L6UtXACncaysQ0vjSm8b4VEa4SubGVr4bXA1lSFR-596RvBLa7Z_dX3FOn32aVRvdE5hvmlKsqybrDiEmeqvFImUkpzEHWK3TCHUjlXS9HqX9FqKVq9Fz3rPl91XViy6wvF3qpRTz1FH3UwXVL4f4u_YA-GFA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2557936083</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Swianiewicz, Paweł ; Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creator><creatorcontrib>Swianiewicz, Paweł ; Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><description>One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-3930</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1743-9388</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers ; Amalgmation ; Capital ; Capital expenditures ; common pool problem ; council mergers ; Expenditures ; Hoarding ; Local government ; Local politics ; Mergers ; Poland ; Quasi-experimental methods ; Reforms ; Side effects ; synthetic control ; territorial reform</subject><ispartof>Local government studies, 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.546-567</ispartof><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2020</rights><rights>2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1890-6738 ; 0000-0002-0573-6637</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swianiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><title>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</title><title>Local government studies</title><description>One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.</description><subject>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</subject><subject>Amalgmation</subject><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Capital expenditures</subject><subject>common pool problem</subject><subject>council mergers</subject><subject>Expenditures</subject><subject>Hoarding</subject><subject>Local government</subject><subject>Local politics</subject><subject>Mergers</subject><subject>Poland</subject><subject>Quasi-experimental methods</subject><subject>Reforms</subject><subject>Side effects</subject><subject>synthetic control</subject><subject>territorial reform</subject><issn>0300-3930</issn><issn>1743-9388</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9r20AQxZeQQo3jj1AYyFnOSrOSVjm1mDYJGNJDS4_Lav_YCtKOuyvX6NtXwum1p2GG33vDe4x9yvk255I_cOQcG-Tbghfzqa5yxPqGrfJaYNaglLdstTDZAn1km5S6lmNeiUbWuGLTr-MEiQYHPRndw4H-uBgGF8YE5kiUHAQaYSTw0bksdtbB5egCnIN18UBdOEBL86LjBNF5isMjaEjj2U5AHsYLwTCDLoLRySXoAnynXgd7xz543Se3eZ9r9vPb1x-752z_-vSy-7LPDKIcs1qaRram5L6UtXACncaysQ0vjSm8b4VEa4SubGVr4bXA1lSFR-596RvBLa7Z_dX3FOn32aVRvdE5hvmlKsqybrDiEmeqvFImUkpzEHWK3TCHUjlXS9HqX9FqKVq9Fz3rPl91XViy6wvF3qpRTz1FH3UwXVL4f4u_YA-GFA</recordid><startdate>20210704</startdate><enddate>20210704</enddate><creator>Swianiewicz, Paweł</creator><creator>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-6637</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210704</creationdate><title>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</title><author>Swianiewicz, Paweł ; Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Acquisitions &amp; mergers</topic><topic>Amalgmation</topic><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Capital expenditures</topic><topic>common pool problem</topic><topic>council mergers</topic><topic>Expenditures</topic><topic>Hoarding</topic><topic>Local government</topic><topic>Local politics</topic><topic>Mergers</topic><topic>Poland</topic><topic>Quasi-experimental methods</topic><topic>Reforms</topic><topic>Side effects</topic><topic>synthetic control</topic><topic>territorial reform</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swianiewicz, Paweł</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Local government studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swianiewicz, Paweł</au><au>Szmigiel-Rawska, Katarzyna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland</atitle><jtitle>Local government studies</jtitle><date>2021-07-04</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>546</spage><epage>567</epage><pages>546-567</pages><issn>0300-3930</issn><eissn>1743-9388</eissn><abstract>One of the side effects of municipal territorial reforms is the common-pool problem. The problem arises when the costs of an activity that benefits a small entity are borne by a larger entity. A review of existing empirical studies suggests that although the common-pool problem has been identified in all investigated cases, it has not as yet been sufficiently analysed and understood. This article focuses on two voluntary mergers in Poland. The authors test the impact of the merger decision on the pre-merger level of capital spending and debt. The analysis is based on a quasi-experimental design using Synthetic Control method. The paper identifies factors explaining why the behaviour of the analysed merging municipalities differs from the results of earlier studies. The most important finding is that the mechanism preventing common resources hoarding is effective when local rules are applied to the merger.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1890-6738</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0573-6637</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-3930
ispartof Local government studies, 2021-07, Vol.47 (4), p.546-567
issn 0300-3930
1743-9388
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2557936083
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Acquisitions & mergers
Amalgmation
Capital
Capital expenditures
common pool problem
council mergers
Expenditures
Hoarding
Local government
Local politics
Mergers
Poland
Quasi-experimental methods
Reforms
Side effects
synthetic control
territorial reform
title Why some local governments choose not to free-ride when undergoing boundary reform: a study of two merger cases in Poland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T17%3A38%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Why%20some%20local%20governments%20choose%20not%20to%20free-ride%20when%20undergoing%20boundary%20reform:%20a%20study%20of%20two%20merger%20cases%20in%20Poland&rft.jtitle=Local%20government%20studies&rft.au=Swianiewicz,%20Pawe%C5%82&rft.date=2021-07-04&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=546&rft.epage=567&rft.pages=546-567&rft.issn=0300-3930&rft.eissn=1743-9388&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03003930.2020.1761337&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2557936083%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c338t-78c98bc50f5874e43ea359d905cc2ffb483dc4a6d6d74fa43bc62f30ff5f940d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2557936083&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true