Loading…
Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India
Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study invest...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Geological Society of India 2021-08, Vol.97 (8), p.867-880 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633 |
container_end_page | 880 |
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 867 |
container_title | Journal of the Geological Society of India |
container_volume | 97 |
creator | Samantaray, Sandeep Sahoo, Abinash Agnihotri, Ankita |
description | Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R
2
as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2559301419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559301419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3ArdG8JpNxV8XaQlvBxzrkNe3UdqYmM0r_vSkjuHJ1L5dzzuV8AFwSfEMwzm8joVnBEaYEkVxmCB-BAS5yjoSUxXHaMREoF5SegrMY1xgLjiUbgO0oRh_j1tctbEo43jSNg-PgPztf2z3sYlUv4Wur2yq2ldUbqGsHJ3sTKgcXvgvpsvDtdxM-4Ny3q8bdwble6Vq7Cr5UXz7Ae50yruG0dpU-Byel3kR_8TuH4H38-PYwQbPnp-nDaIYsI6JFmZMl4ZhpZmlJJWMmM0VpsLS5MDp3lhtbSkJza7TgBDNnGJGu4MwRagRjQ3DV5-5Ck5rEVq2bLtTppaJZVjBMOCmSivQqG5oYgy_VLlRbHfaKYHWgqnqqKlFVB6oKJw_tPTFp66UPf8n_m34A2Wh6QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559301419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Samantaray, Sandeep ; Sahoo, Abinash ; Agnihotri, Ankita</creator><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sandeep ; Sahoo, Abinash ; Agnihotri, Ankita</creatorcontrib><description>Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R
2
as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-6889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Geological Society of India</publisher><subject>Adaptive systems ; Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Discharge ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental risk ; Extreme values ; Flood discharge ; Flood forecasting ; Flood frequency ; Flood management ; Flood predictions ; Flooding ; Floods ; Frequency analysis ; Fuzzy logic ; Geology ; Heuristic methods ; Hydraulic structures ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Optimization ; Peak floods ; Regression analysis ; River basins ; River discharge ; Rivers ; Stations ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2021-08, Vol.97 (8), p.867-880</ispartof><rights>GEOL. SOC. INDIA 2021</rights><rights>GEOL. SOC. INDIA 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Abinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agnihotri, Ankita</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</title><title>Journal of the Geological Society of India</title><addtitle>J Geol Soc India</addtitle><description>Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R
2
as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.</description><subject>Adaptive systems</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Flood discharge</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flood frequency</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood predictions</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Heuristic methods</subject><subject>Hydraulic structures</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Peak floods</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River discharge</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>0016-7622</issn><issn>0974-6889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3ArdG8JpNxV8XaQlvBxzrkNe3UdqYmM0r_vSkjuHJ1L5dzzuV8AFwSfEMwzm8joVnBEaYEkVxmCB-BAS5yjoSUxXHaMREoF5SegrMY1xgLjiUbgO0oRh_j1tctbEo43jSNg-PgPztf2z3sYlUv4Wur2yq2ldUbqGsHJ3sTKgcXvgvpsvDtdxM-4Ny3q8bdwble6Vq7Cr5UXz7Ae50yruG0dpU-Byel3kR_8TuH4H38-PYwQbPnp-nDaIYsI6JFmZMl4ZhpZmlJJWMmM0VpsLS5MDp3lhtbSkJza7TgBDNnGJGu4MwRagRjQ3DV5-5Ck5rEVq2bLtTppaJZVjBMOCmSivQqG5oYgy_VLlRbHfaKYHWgqnqqKlFVB6oKJw_tPTFp66UPf8n_m34A2Wh6QA</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Samantaray, Sandeep</creator><creator>Sahoo, Abinash</creator><creator>Agnihotri, Ankita</creator><general>Geological Society of India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</title><author>Samantaray, Sandeep ; Sahoo, Abinash ; Agnihotri, Ankita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptive systems</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Flood discharge</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flood frequency</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood predictions</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Heuristic methods</topic><topic>Hydraulic structures</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Peak floods</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River discharge</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Abinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agnihotri, Ankita</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samantaray, Sandeep</au><au>Sahoo, Abinash</au><au>Agnihotri, Ankita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle><stitle>J Geol Soc India</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>880</epage><pages>867-880</pages><issn>0016-7622</issn><eissn>0974-6889</eissn><abstract>Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R
2
as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Geological Society of India</pub><doi>10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0016-7622 |
ispartof | Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2021-08, Vol.97 (8), p.867-880 |
issn | 0016-7622 0974-6889 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2559301419 |
source | Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List |
subjects | Adaptive systems Algorithms Artificial neural networks Discharge Earth and Environmental Science Earth Sciences Environmental risk Extreme values Flood discharge Flood forecasting Flood frequency Flood management Flood predictions Flooding Floods Frequency analysis Fuzzy logic Geology Heuristic methods Hydraulic structures Hydrogeology Mathematical models Neural networks Optimization Peak floods Regression analysis River basins River discharge Rivers Stations Statistical analysis Statistical methods |
title | Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Flood%20Frequency%20using%20Statistical%20and%20Hybrid%20Neural%20Network%20Method:%20Mahanadi%20River%20Basin,%20India&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Geological%20Society%20of%20India&rft.au=Samantaray,%20Sandeep&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=880&rft.pages=867-880&rft.issn=0016-7622&rft.eissn=0974-6889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559301419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559301419&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |