Loading…

Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India

Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study invest...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Geological Society of India 2021-08, Vol.97 (8), p.867-880
Main Authors: Samantaray, Sandeep, Sahoo, Abinash, Agnihotri, Ankita
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633
container_end_page 880
container_issue 8
container_start_page 867
container_title Journal of the Geological Society of India
container_volume 97
creator Samantaray, Sandeep
Sahoo, Abinash
Agnihotri, Ankita
description Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R 2 as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2559301419</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2559301419</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3ArdG8JpNxV8XaQlvBxzrkNe3UdqYmM0r_vSkjuHJ1L5dzzuV8AFwSfEMwzm8joVnBEaYEkVxmCB-BAS5yjoSUxXHaMREoF5SegrMY1xgLjiUbgO0oRh_j1tctbEo43jSNg-PgPztf2z3sYlUv4Wur2yq2ldUbqGsHJ3sTKgcXvgvpsvDtdxM-4Ny3q8bdwble6Vq7Cr5UXz7Ae50yruG0dpU-Byel3kR_8TuH4H38-PYwQbPnp-nDaIYsI6JFmZMl4ZhpZmlJJWMmM0VpsLS5MDp3lhtbSkJza7TgBDNnGJGu4MwRagRjQ3DV5-5Ck5rEVq2bLtTppaJZVjBMOCmSivQqG5oYgy_VLlRbHfaKYHWgqnqqKlFVB6oKJw_tPTFp66UPf8n_m34A2Wh6QA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2559301419</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</title><source>Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List</source><creator>Samantaray, Sandeep ; Sahoo, Abinash ; Agnihotri, Ankita</creator><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sandeep ; Sahoo, Abinash ; Agnihotri, Ankita</creatorcontrib><description>Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R 2 as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0016-7622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 0974-6889</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New Delhi: Geological Society of India</publisher><subject>Adaptive systems ; Algorithms ; Artificial neural networks ; Discharge ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Environmental risk ; Extreme values ; Flood discharge ; Flood forecasting ; Flood frequency ; Flood management ; Flood predictions ; Flooding ; Floods ; Frequency analysis ; Fuzzy logic ; Geology ; Heuristic methods ; Hydraulic structures ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Neural networks ; Optimization ; Peak floods ; Regression analysis ; River basins ; River discharge ; Rivers ; Stations ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical methods</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2021-08, Vol.97 (8), p.867-880</ispartof><rights>GEOL. SOC. INDIA 2021</rights><rights>GEOL. SOC. INDIA 2021.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Abinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agnihotri, Ankita</creatorcontrib><title>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</title><title>Journal of the Geological Society of India</title><addtitle>J Geol Soc India</addtitle><description>Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R 2 as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.</description><subject>Adaptive systems</subject><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial neural networks</subject><subject>Discharge</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Environmental risk</subject><subject>Extreme values</subject><subject>Flood discharge</subject><subject>Flood forecasting</subject><subject>Flood frequency</subject><subject>Flood management</subject><subject>Flood predictions</subject><subject>Flooding</subject><subject>Floods</subject><subject>Frequency analysis</subject><subject>Fuzzy logic</subject><subject>Geology</subject><subject>Heuristic methods</subject><subject>Hydraulic structures</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Peak floods</subject><subject>Regression analysis</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>River discharge</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical methods</subject><issn>0016-7622</issn><issn>0974-6889</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWKs_wF3ArdG8JpNxV8XaQlvBxzrkNe3UdqYmM0r_vSkjuHJ1L5dzzuV8AFwSfEMwzm8joVnBEaYEkVxmCB-BAS5yjoSUxXHaMREoF5SegrMY1xgLjiUbgO0oRh_j1tctbEo43jSNg-PgPztf2z3sYlUv4Wur2yq2ldUbqGsHJ3sTKgcXvgvpsvDtdxM-4Ny3q8bdwble6Vq7Cr5UXz7Ae50yruG0dpU-Byel3kR_8TuH4H38-PYwQbPnp-nDaIYsI6JFmZMl4ZhpZmlJJWMmM0VpsLS5MDp3lhtbSkJza7TgBDNnGJGu4MwRagRjQ3DV5-5Ck5rEVq2bLtTppaJZVjBMOCmSivQqG5oYgy_VLlRbHfaKYHWgqnqqKlFVB6oKJw_tPTFp66UPf8n_m34A2Wh6QA</recordid><startdate>20210801</startdate><enddate>20210801</enddate><creator>Samantaray, Sandeep</creator><creator>Sahoo, Abinash</creator><creator>Agnihotri, Ankita</creator><general>Geological Society of India</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210801</creationdate><title>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</title><author>Samantaray, Sandeep ; Sahoo, Abinash ; Agnihotri, Ankita</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Adaptive systems</topic><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial neural networks</topic><topic>Discharge</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Environmental risk</topic><topic>Extreme values</topic><topic>Flood discharge</topic><topic>Flood forecasting</topic><topic>Flood frequency</topic><topic>Flood management</topic><topic>Flood predictions</topic><topic>Flooding</topic><topic>Floods</topic><topic>Frequency analysis</topic><topic>Fuzzy logic</topic><topic>Geology</topic><topic>Heuristic methods</topic><topic>Hydraulic structures</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Peak floods</topic><topic>Regression analysis</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>River discharge</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Samantaray, Sandeep</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sahoo, Abinash</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agnihotri, Ankita</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Samantaray, Sandeep</au><au>Sahoo, Abinash</au><au>Agnihotri, Ankita</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Geological Society of India</jtitle><stitle>J Geol Soc India</stitle><date>2021-08-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>97</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>867</spage><epage>880</epage><pages>867-880</pages><issn>0016-7622</issn><eissn>0974-6889</eissn><abstract>Flooding is the most common and widespread natural hazard affecting societies around the globe. In this context, forecasting of peak flood discharge is necessary for planning, designing and managing hydraulic structures and is crucial for decision makers to mitigate flooding risks. This study investigates potential of four most frequently used traditional statistical distribution techniques and three neural network algorithms for flood forecasting. Four statistical methods includes Generalized Extreme Value (GEV), Log Pearson-III (LP-III), Gumbel, and Normal. The methods were used for modeling annual maximum discharge at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge station of the river Mahanadi for a period of 60 years (1960 to 2019). In addition, a new hybrid neural network approach (ANFIS-FFA) combining the optimization model i.e. Firefly Algorithm (FFA) with data-driven model Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) is adopted to predict flood discharge and compare the obtained results with conventional algorithms. Three statistical constraints MSE, RMSE, WI are employed to find the performance of proposed hybrid model. Result shows that, ANFIS-FFA gives the best values of WI as 0.9604, 0.961, 0.9598 and 0.9615 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations respectively during testing phase. Again regression analysis is done to find the value for coefficient of determination; it gives the best value of R 2 as 95.906, 96.014, 96.113, 96.131 at Andhiyarkore, Bamanidhi, Baronda, Kurubhatta gauge stations considering ANFIS-FFA algorithm. Results from this comparative exercise suggest that hybrid ANFIS-FFA gives best performance compared to other statistical and conventional neural network approaches.</abstract><cop>New Delhi</cop><pub>Geological Society of India</pub><doi>10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0016-7622
ispartof Journal of the Geological Society of India, 2021-08, Vol.97 (8), p.867-880
issn 0016-7622
0974-6889
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2559301419
source Springer Nature:Jisc Collections:Springer Nature Read and Publish 2023-2025: Springer Reading List
subjects Adaptive systems
Algorithms
Artificial neural networks
Discharge
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Environmental risk
Extreme values
Flood discharge
Flood forecasting
Flood frequency
Flood management
Flood predictions
Flooding
Floods
Frequency analysis
Fuzzy logic
Geology
Heuristic methods
Hydraulic structures
Hydrogeology
Mathematical models
Neural networks
Optimization
Peak floods
Regression analysis
River basins
River discharge
Rivers
Stations
Statistical analysis
Statistical methods
title Assessment of Flood Frequency using Statistical and Hybrid Neural Network Method: Mahanadi River Basin, India
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A12%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Assessment%20of%20Flood%20Frequency%20using%20Statistical%20and%20Hybrid%20Neural%20Network%20Method:%20Mahanadi%20River%20Basin,%20India&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Geological%20Society%20of%20India&rft.au=Samantaray,%20Sandeep&rft.date=2021-08-01&rft.volume=97&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=867&rft.epage=880&rft.pages=867-880&rft.issn=0016-7622&rft.eissn=0974-6889&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s12594-021-1785-0&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2559301419%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-5d8f1403a3c2f2833b5b9fb08c76ba7dc4bcf8127cba64103db318d943d12b633%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2559301419&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true