Loading…

Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building

The availability of sustainable (or green) building certifications schemes is constantly increasing and it is not always easy to understand how the schemes on the market differentiate from each other. The purpose of this study is to create a better dialog between client and consultant in relation to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2019-02, Vol.471 (9), p.92060
Main Authors: Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer, Skjelmose, Ole, Jensen, Kasper Guldager, Jensen, Kristian Knorr, Birgisdottir, Harpa
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3
container_end_page
container_issue 9
container_start_page 92060
container_title IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering
container_volume 471
creator Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer
Skjelmose, Ole
Jensen, Kasper Guldager
Jensen, Kristian Knorr
Birgisdottir, Harpa
description The availability of sustainable (or green) building certifications schemes is constantly increasing and it is not always easy to understand how the schemes on the market differentiate from each other. The purpose of this study is to create a better dialog between client and consultant in relation to building certification systems. Here it is relevant to give an overview and understanding of selected certification systems, and how they fulfil the definition of sustainable buildings. There is a great variation of how certification systems are structured and evaluated. Furthermore, "sustainability" is a word with many meanings and definitions, which is why sustainable certifications will also vary. In this study, certification schemes are categorized using a definition of sustainable buildings. This definition consists of a social, environmental and economic dimension of sustainability and in total 13 subcategories. The subcategories are based on recent years' publications concerning sustainable buildings from the Danish Building Research Institute and the Danish Transport and Construction Agency, which leans on the European CEN TC/350 standards for sustainable buildings. The certification schemes analysed are both of international, regional and local scale (Active House, BREEAM, DGNB, Green Star, HQE, LEED, Living Building Challenge, Miljöbyggnad, Nordic Ecolabel and WELL). The results show a large variation of the weight on the dimensions of social, environmental and economic sustainability within the 10 certification schemes included in the analysis. To be defined as a sustainable building certification, the three dimensions should be given equal weight according to the definition of sustainability. However, this is only the case for the DGNB certification scheme. A majority of the building certifications have the largest focus on criteria within the environmental dimension. Across the selected certifications this dimension account for an average of 51%. This indicates that certifications have "green" buildings as their main focus point. However, a certification such as WELL almost completely focuses on social sustainability (93%) due to its attention to the wellbeing of the user inside the building. The social dimension on average account for 43% with a large focus on the indoor environment. Overall, economy is only represented in the certifications to a very low degree (average of 5.6%), except within DGNB. There are aspects, which this categorisation me
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2560838748</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2560838748</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQreeFObtGk-LmedH6B4MQXvQtomM2NrapJezF9vu8pEELzKgfOcNy8PAOcIXiHIWIJoTmPG-VuCKUp4AnkKCTwAk_3icD8zdAxOvF9BSCjGcAJEIYNaWmc-TbOMrjuzroehUC4YbSoZjG2ixdYHtfHRrKqs2-2DjcK7im6UNo3ZMVZHi84HaRpZrtU-6RQcabn26uz7nYLX2_lLcR8_Pt89FLPHuMIEhpirStZI6jLPkOacKkxxLTlJ05QQIjNO8r57ncpqKF5TBEvFMII5UbCElc6m4GLMbZ396JQPYmU71_RfijQnkGWMYtZTZKQqZ713SovWmY10W4GgGGSKwZMYnIlepuBilNkfXo6HxrY_yU-L-S9MtPXQJP0D_Sf_C8GShIo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2560838748</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer ; Skjelmose, Ole ; Jensen, Kasper Guldager ; Jensen, Kristian Knorr ; Birgisdottir, Harpa</creator><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer ; Skjelmose, Ole ; Jensen, Kasper Guldager ; Jensen, Kristian Knorr ; Birgisdottir, Harpa</creatorcontrib><description>The availability of sustainable (or green) building certifications schemes is constantly increasing and it is not always easy to understand how the schemes on the market differentiate from each other. The purpose of this study is to create a better dialog between client and consultant in relation to building certification systems. Here it is relevant to give an overview and understanding of selected certification systems, and how they fulfil the definition of sustainable buildings. There is a great variation of how certification systems are structured and evaluated. Furthermore, "sustainability" is a word with many meanings and definitions, which is why sustainable certifications will also vary. In this study, certification schemes are categorized using a definition of sustainable buildings. This definition consists of a social, environmental and economic dimension of sustainability and in total 13 subcategories. The subcategories are based on recent years' publications concerning sustainable buildings from the Danish Building Research Institute and the Danish Transport and Construction Agency, which leans on the European CEN TC/350 standards for sustainable buildings. The certification schemes analysed are both of international, regional and local scale (Active House, BREEAM, DGNB, Green Star, HQE, LEED, Living Building Challenge, Miljöbyggnad, Nordic Ecolabel and WELL). The results show a large variation of the weight on the dimensions of social, environmental and economic sustainability within the 10 certification schemes included in the analysis. To be defined as a sustainable building certification, the three dimensions should be given equal weight according to the definition of sustainability. However, this is only the case for the DGNB certification scheme. A majority of the building certifications have the largest focus on criteria within the environmental dimension. Across the selected certifications this dimension account for an average of 51%. This indicates that certifications have "green" buildings as their main focus point. However, a certification such as WELL almost completely focuses on social sustainability (93%) due to its attention to the wellbeing of the user inside the building. The social dimension on average account for 43% with a large focus on the indoor environment. Overall, economy is only represented in the certifications to a very low degree (average of 5.6%), except within DGNB. There are aspects, which this categorisation method does not consider such as the ambition within the criteria. In addition, the values in the environmental and social dimensions potentially have an impact on the economic value of the building and thus the economic dimension indirectly becomes a focus, which is not visible through this method. However, the categorisation makes it easy to get an overview of the thematic content within the certification and thereby highlight the value of the certification. Furthermore, it could be of especially good use for non-technical clients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Certification ; Criteria ; Economic analysis ; Green buildings ; Impact analysis ; Indoor environments ; Social factors ; Sustainability ; Systems analysis ; Weight</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2019-02, Vol.471 (9), p.92060</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2560838748?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skjelmose, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kasper Guldager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kristian Knorr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birgisdottir, Harpa</creatorcontrib><title>Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>The availability of sustainable (or green) building certifications schemes is constantly increasing and it is not always easy to understand how the schemes on the market differentiate from each other. The purpose of this study is to create a better dialog between client and consultant in relation to building certification systems. Here it is relevant to give an overview and understanding of selected certification systems, and how they fulfil the definition of sustainable buildings. There is a great variation of how certification systems are structured and evaluated. Furthermore, "sustainability" is a word with many meanings and definitions, which is why sustainable certifications will also vary. In this study, certification schemes are categorized using a definition of sustainable buildings. This definition consists of a social, environmental and economic dimension of sustainability and in total 13 subcategories. The subcategories are based on recent years' publications concerning sustainable buildings from the Danish Building Research Institute and the Danish Transport and Construction Agency, which leans on the European CEN TC/350 standards for sustainable buildings. The certification schemes analysed are both of international, regional and local scale (Active House, BREEAM, DGNB, Green Star, HQE, LEED, Living Building Challenge, Miljöbyggnad, Nordic Ecolabel and WELL). The results show a large variation of the weight on the dimensions of social, environmental and economic sustainability within the 10 certification schemes included in the analysis. To be defined as a sustainable building certification, the three dimensions should be given equal weight according to the definition of sustainability. However, this is only the case for the DGNB certification scheme. A majority of the building certifications have the largest focus on criteria within the environmental dimension. Across the selected certifications this dimension account for an average of 51%. This indicates that certifications have "green" buildings as their main focus point. However, a certification such as WELL almost completely focuses on social sustainability (93%) due to its attention to the wellbeing of the user inside the building. The social dimension on average account for 43% with a large focus on the indoor environment. Overall, economy is only represented in the certifications to a very low degree (average of 5.6%), except within DGNB. There are aspects, which this categorisation method does not consider such as the ambition within the criteria. In addition, the values in the environmental and social dimensions potentially have an impact on the economic value of the building and thus the economic dimension indirectly becomes a focus, which is not visible through this method. However, the categorisation makes it easy to get an overview of the thematic content within the certification and thereby highlight the value of the certification. Furthermore, it could be of especially good use for non-technical clients.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>Economic analysis</subject><subject>Green buildings</subject><subject>Impact analysis</subject><subject>Indoor environments</subject><subject>Social factors</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Systems analysis</subject><subject>Weight</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkF1LwzAUhoMoOKd_QQreeFObtGk-LmedH6B4MQXvQtomM2NrapJezF9vu8pEELzKgfOcNy8PAOcIXiHIWIJoTmPG-VuCKUp4AnkKCTwAk_3icD8zdAxOvF9BSCjGcAJEIYNaWmc-TbOMrjuzroehUC4YbSoZjG2ixdYHtfHRrKqs2-2DjcK7im6UNo3ZMVZHi84HaRpZrtU-6RQcabn26uz7nYLX2_lLcR8_Pt89FLPHuMIEhpirStZI6jLPkOacKkxxLTlJ05QQIjNO8r57ncpqKF5TBEvFMII5UbCElc6m4GLMbZ396JQPYmU71_RfijQnkGWMYtZTZKQqZ713SovWmY10W4GgGGSKwZMYnIlepuBilNkfXo6HxrY_yU-L-S9MtPXQJP0D_Sf_C8GShIo</recordid><startdate>20190224</startdate><enddate>20190224</enddate><creator>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer</creator><creator>Skjelmose, Ole</creator><creator>Jensen, Kasper Guldager</creator><creator>Jensen, Kristian Knorr</creator><creator>Birgisdottir, Harpa</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190224</creationdate><title>Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building</title><author>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer ; Skjelmose, Ole ; Jensen, Kasper Guldager ; Jensen, Kristian Knorr ; Birgisdottir, Harpa</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>Economic analysis</topic><topic>Green buildings</topic><topic>Impact analysis</topic><topic>Indoor environments</topic><topic>Social factors</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Systems analysis</topic><topic>Weight</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Skjelmose, Ole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kasper Guldager</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jensen, Kristian Knorr</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Birgisdottir, Harpa</creatorcontrib><collection>IOP Publishing</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zimmermann, Regitze Kjaer</au><au>Skjelmose, Ole</au><au>Jensen, Kasper Guldager</au><au>Jensen, Kristian Knorr</au><au>Birgisdottir, Harpa</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2019-02-24</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>471</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>92060</spage><pages>92060-</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>The availability of sustainable (or green) building certifications schemes is constantly increasing and it is not always easy to understand how the schemes on the market differentiate from each other. The purpose of this study is to create a better dialog between client and consultant in relation to building certification systems. Here it is relevant to give an overview and understanding of selected certification systems, and how they fulfil the definition of sustainable buildings. There is a great variation of how certification systems are structured and evaluated. Furthermore, "sustainability" is a word with many meanings and definitions, which is why sustainable certifications will also vary. In this study, certification schemes are categorized using a definition of sustainable buildings. This definition consists of a social, environmental and economic dimension of sustainability and in total 13 subcategories. The subcategories are based on recent years' publications concerning sustainable buildings from the Danish Building Research Institute and the Danish Transport and Construction Agency, which leans on the European CEN TC/350 standards for sustainable buildings. The certification schemes analysed are both of international, regional and local scale (Active House, BREEAM, DGNB, Green Star, HQE, LEED, Living Building Challenge, Miljöbyggnad, Nordic Ecolabel and WELL). The results show a large variation of the weight on the dimensions of social, environmental and economic sustainability within the 10 certification schemes included in the analysis. To be defined as a sustainable building certification, the three dimensions should be given equal weight according to the definition of sustainability. However, this is only the case for the DGNB certification scheme. A majority of the building certifications have the largest focus on criteria within the environmental dimension. Across the selected certifications this dimension account for an average of 51%. This indicates that certifications have "green" buildings as their main focus point. However, a certification such as WELL almost completely focuses on social sustainability (93%) due to its attention to the wellbeing of the user inside the building. The social dimension on average account for 43% with a large focus on the indoor environment. Overall, economy is only represented in the certifications to a very low degree (average of 5.6%), except within DGNB. There are aspects, which this categorisation method does not consider such as the ambition within the criteria. In addition, the values in the environmental and social dimensions potentially have an impact on the economic value of the building and thus the economic dimension indirectly becomes a focus, which is not visible through this method. However, the categorisation makes it easy to get an overview of the thematic content within the certification and thereby highlight the value of the certification. Furthermore, it could be of especially good use for non-technical clients.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1757-8981
ispartof IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2019-02, Vol.471 (9), p.92060
issn 1757-8981
1757-899X
1757-899X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2560838748
source Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Buildings
Certification
Criteria
Economic analysis
Green buildings
Impact analysis
Indoor environments
Social factors
Sustainability
Systems analysis
Weight
title Categorizing Building Certification Systems According to the Definition of Sustainable Building
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T12%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Categorizing%20Building%20Certification%20Systems%20According%20to%20the%20Definition%20of%20Sustainable%20Building&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Zimmermann,%20Regitze%20Kjaer&rft.date=2019-02-24&rft.volume=471&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=92060&rft.pages=92060-&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/471/9/092060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2560838748%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-9ecad1afb531f997e474da96222666a3965981d2ac0674d710be841056e0b0cf3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2560838748&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true