Loading…

The Survey on the Perception of Safety and Security Culture for Nuclear Workers

A survey was developed to evaluate employee perceptions of the safety culture and culture of nuclear security. The survey was made up of 52 questions divided into 13 factors: leadership, involvement of employee, work environment, employee competence, management commitment, procedures, leader attitud...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2019-05, Vol.528 (1), p.12017
Main Authors: Prabaswari, Atyanti Dyah, Dharmastiti, Rini
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A survey was developed to evaluate employee perceptions of the safety culture and culture of nuclear security. The survey was made up of 52 questions divided into 13 factors: leadership, involvement of employee, work environment, employee competence, management commitment, procedures, leader attitude, training and qualifications, employee attitude, implementation and operation, integrated safety, self-assessment, belief. The survey was conducted on 125 employees working in nuclear area. A survey were conducted between February and May 2016. A numerical value was given to each question, so that the results of the survey were represented as a score. The data reveal that age group 60-69 years dominate by having the best perception on 6 factors. The overall value of factors, the company is included in rank B. The relationship between the long term period of working and to the value of rank does not show the relationship trend. MANOVA analysis showed that if multivariate test was done together, the thirteen factors did not show any differences on the group lenght of working. However, if analyzed individually, it turns out the Training and Qualification factors have different effects on the group of long term period of working.
ISSN:1757-8981
1757-899X
DOI:10.1088/1757-899X/528/1/012017