Analysing the cumulative energy demand of external bearing walls

The assessment of environmental properties of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle analysis (LCA). Due to the rapidly evolving construction industry, LCA research is carried out in many areas, from building materials and components to overall building system. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering 2020-06, Vol.867 (1), p.12048
Main Author: Wolfova, M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aeration
Biomass
Building materials
Composition
Concrete blocks
Construction industry
Construction materials
Demand analysis
Energy consumption
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Walls
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-4aff9e69dfae863208f9a966a6355bf0c0dd0805617db515a011ea7a4a6eba343
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12048
container_title IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering
container_volume 867
creator Wolfova, M
description The assessment of environmental properties of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle analysis (LCA). Due to the rapidly evolving construction industry, LCA research is carried out in many areas, from building materials and components to overall building system. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool used to compare environmental impacts along the life cycle of products or services. This paper presents an evaluation and comparing of two external bearing walls of different material compositions regarding the materials´ total energy consumption within the cradle to gate boundaries. Impact categories were calculated by the software SimaPro using Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) method and applying the Ecoinvent database. A renewable (biomass, wind, solar, geothermal, water) and non-renewable (fossil, nuclear, biomass) energies were under consideration. The composition with brick as a core wall material achieved worse results in all categories than the wall composition with aerated concrete block.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1757-899X/867/1/012048
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2562535229</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2562535229</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-4aff9e69dfae863208f9a966a6355bf0c0dd0805617db515a011ea7a4a6eba343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkMFKw0AQhhdRsFZfQQJevMTsbrKbzc1SWhUqHlTwtkyS2ZqSJnE3Ufv2JkQqguBpBub_foaPkHNGrxhVKmCxiH2VJC-BknHAAso4jdQBmewPh_tdsWNy4tyGUhlHEZ2Q61kF5c4V1dprX9HLum1XQlu8o4cV2vXOy3ELVe7VxsPPFm2f9lIEOwAfUJbulBwZKB2efc8peV4unua3_urh5m4-W_lZyGPlR2BMgjLJDaCSIafKJJBICTIUIjU0o3lOFRWSxXkqmADKGEIMEUhMIYzCKbkYextbv3XoWr2pu-Edp7mQXISC86RPyTGV2do5i0Y3ttiC3WlG9WBLDyL0IEX3tjTTo60e5CNY1M1P87_Q5R_Q_ePiV0w3uQm_ADH-eV4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2562535229</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Analysing the cumulative energy demand of external bearing walls</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Wolfova, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Wolfova, M</creatorcontrib><description>The assessment of environmental properties of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle analysis (LCA). Due to the rapidly evolving construction industry, LCA research is carried out in many areas, from building materials and components to overall building system. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool used to compare environmental impacts along the life cycle of products or services. This paper presents an evaluation and comparing of two external bearing walls of different material compositions regarding the materials´ total energy consumption within the cradle to gate boundaries. Impact categories were calculated by the software SimaPro using Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) method and applying the Ecoinvent database. A renewable (biomass, wind, solar, geothermal, water) and non-renewable (fossil, nuclear, biomass) energies were under consideration. The composition with brick as a core wall material achieved worse results in all categories than the wall composition with aerated concrete block.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1757-8981</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1757-899X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1757-899X/867/1/012048</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Aeration ; Biomass ; Building materials ; Composition ; Concrete blocks ; Construction industry ; Construction materials ; Demand analysis ; Energy consumption ; Life cycle analysis ; Life cycle assessment ; Walls</subject><ispartof>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2020-06, Vol.867 (1), p.12048</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2020. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-4aff9e69dfae863208f9a966a6355bf0c0dd0805617db515a011ea7a4a6eba343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2562535229?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wolfova, M</creatorcontrib><title>Analysing the cumulative energy demand of external bearing walls</title><title>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</title><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><description>The assessment of environmental properties of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle analysis (LCA). Due to the rapidly evolving construction industry, LCA research is carried out in many areas, from building materials and components to overall building system. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool used to compare environmental impacts along the life cycle of products or services. This paper presents an evaluation and comparing of two external bearing walls of different material compositions regarding the materials´ total energy consumption within the cradle to gate boundaries. Impact categories were calculated by the software SimaPro using Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) method and applying the Ecoinvent database. A renewable (biomass, wind, solar, geothermal, water) and non-renewable (fossil, nuclear, biomass) energies were under consideration. The composition with brick as a core wall material achieved worse results in all categories than the wall composition with aerated concrete block.</description><subject>Aeration</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Building materials</subject><subject>Composition</subject><subject>Concrete blocks</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Construction materials</subject><subject>Demand analysis</subject><subject>Energy consumption</subject><subject>Life cycle analysis</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Walls</subject><issn>1757-8981</issn><issn>1757-899X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2020</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkMFKw0AQhhdRsFZfQQJevMTsbrKbzc1SWhUqHlTwtkyS2ZqSJnE3Ufv2JkQqguBpBub_foaPkHNGrxhVKmCxiH2VJC-BknHAAso4jdQBmewPh_tdsWNy4tyGUhlHEZ2Q61kF5c4V1dprX9HLum1XQlu8o4cV2vXOy3ELVe7VxsPPFm2f9lIEOwAfUJbulBwZKB2efc8peV4unua3_urh5m4-W_lZyGPlR2BMgjLJDaCSIafKJJBICTIUIjU0o3lOFRWSxXkqmADKGEIMEUhMIYzCKbkYextbv3XoWr2pu-Edp7mQXISC86RPyTGV2do5i0Y3ttiC3WlG9WBLDyL0IEX3tjTTo60e5CNY1M1P87_Q5R_Q_ePiV0w3uQm_ADH-eV4</recordid><startdate>20200601</startdate><enddate>20200601</enddate><creator>Wolfova, M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20200601</creationdate><title>Analysing the cumulative energy demand of external bearing walls</title><author>Wolfova, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-4aff9e69dfae863208f9a966a6355bf0c0dd0805617db515a011ea7a4a6eba343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2020</creationdate><topic>Aeration</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Building materials</topic><topic>Composition</topic><topic>Concrete blocks</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Construction materials</topic><topic>Demand analysis</topic><topic>Energy consumption</topic><topic>Life cycle analysis</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Walls</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wolfova, M</creatorcontrib><collection>Institute of Physics Open Access Journal Titles</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Materials science collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wolfova, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Analysing the cumulative energy demand of external bearing walls</atitle><jtitle>IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering</jtitle><addtitle>IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng</addtitle><date>2020-06-01</date><risdate>2020</risdate><volume>867</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12048</spage><pages>12048-</pages><issn>1757-8981</issn><eissn>1757-899X</eissn><abstract>The assessment of environmental properties of buildings is now commonly using a life cycle analysis (LCA). Due to the rapidly evolving construction industry, LCA research is carried out in many areas, from building materials and components to overall building system. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) is a tool used to compare environmental impacts along the life cycle of products or services. This paper presents an evaluation and comparing of two external bearing walls of different material compositions regarding the materials´ total energy consumption within the cradle to gate boundaries. Impact categories were calculated by the software SimaPro using Cumulative Energy Demand (CED) method and applying the Ecoinvent database. A renewable (biomass, wind, solar, geothermal, water) and non-renewable (fossil, nuclear, biomass) energies were under consideration. The composition with brick as a core wall material achieved worse results in all categories than the wall composition with aerated concrete block.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1757-899X/867/1/012048</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1757-8981
ispartof IOP conference series. Materials Science and Engineering, 2020-06, Vol.867 (1), p.12048
issn 1757-8981
1757-899X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2562535229
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access); Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Aeration
Biomass
Building materials
Composition
Concrete blocks
Construction industry
Construction materials
Demand analysis
Energy consumption
Life cycle analysis
Life cycle assessment
Walls
title Analysing the cumulative energy demand of external bearing walls
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T14%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Analysing%20the%20cumulative%20energy%20demand%20of%20external%20bearing%20walls&rft.jtitle=IOP%20conference%20series.%20Materials%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Wolfova,%20M&rft.date=2020-06-01&rft.volume=867&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12048&rft.pages=12048-&rft.issn=1757-8981&rft.eissn=1757-899X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1757-899X/867/1/012048&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2562535229%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3278-4aff9e69dfae863208f9a966a6355bf0c0dd0805617db515a011ea7a4a6eba343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2562535229&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true