Loading…
Scaling up agriculture? The dynamics of land transfer in inland China
•Our four cash-cropping, mountainous sites remain dominated by smallholders who are well integrated into supply chains.•The scale of leasing out farmland is very small – 3% of total landholdings.•Apart from organised land transfers in Shaanxi, very few farmers are leasing land to new operators.•The...
Saved in:
Published in: | World development 2021-10, Vol.146, p.105563, Article 105563 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | •Our four cash-cropping, mountainous sites remain dominated by smallholders who are well integrated into supply chains.•The scale of leasing out farmland is very small – 3% of total landholdings.•Apart from organised land transfers in Shaanxi, very few farmers are leasing land to new operators.•The vast majority of respondents plan to continue to farm on the same amount of land in the near future.•We explain varied land transfer through crop attributes, commodity chains, agrarian history and state-corporate activities.
Major changes are taking place in the Chinese countryside. Long a smallholder dominant economy with small and fragmented farms, a suite of policies, regulations, and financial instruments are being mobilised to drive larger-scale, more commercialised, and more industrialised farming in China. Larger operators such as “dragon-head” agribusinesses are transforming production and supply chains, while the operational rights and titles over farmland are being formalised so that smallholders can more easily transfer their land to large-scale producers. This article aims to deepen our understanding of the extent and nature of land transfer in China by exploring its dynamics in inland provinces. It draws on a 2019 survey of more than 900 cash-cropping farms in four provinces (Hebei, Shaanxi, Hubei and Yunnan), semi-structured interviews, and secondary data. Our mixed methods approach supports in-depth analysis of the extent and dynamics of land transfer in apple, tea, orange and coffee-growing areas. We find that in contrast to national statistics, land transfer from smallholders to other operators is generally quite limited, a finding which highlights the ongoing viability of specialised smallholder farming and other site-specific barriers to scaling up. In the site where land transfer is most extensive, it is being driven by a state-agribusiness-cooperative alliance rather than through a newly emerged rural land market. We also find that the nature of leasing out farmland is markedly different to leasing in farmland. Where it occurs, the leasing out of land tends to be organised and formalised, and is tied to state developmentalist goals, particularly poverty alleviation. The leasing in of land is more widespread and occurs on an informal basis. Our analysis highlights key conditions that determine uneven land transfer and confirms that local political-economic dynamics complicate the realisation of central government directives on the ground. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0305-750X 1873-5991 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.worlddev.2021.105563 |