Loading…
Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects
We consider a funding competition for targeted projects. Potential participants have stochastic opportunity costs, and do not know the number of competitors. The funding agency sets a budget cap indicating the maximum funding that participants may request. We show that raising the budget cap helps t...
Saved in:
Published in: | The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy 2021-07, Vol.21 (3), p.1013-1034 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-796d73ae10a2ba78bb94ef72b259ace87c01543a9aa06fbb3314835d5f7c3d913 |
container_end_page | 1034 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 1013 |
container_title | The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | De Chiara, Alessandro Iossa, Elisabetta |
description | We consider a funding competition for targeted projects. Potential participants have stochastic opportunity costs, and do not know the number of competitors. The funding agency sets a budget cap indicating the maximum funding that participants may request. We show that raising the budget cap helps to attract more participants but causes an increase in the requested funds. A higher budget cap is optimal when the preferences of researchers and the funding agency are more congruent, competition is lower, targeted projects have larger social value, the cost of public funds is smaller, or bidding preparation costs are lower. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1515/bejeap-2020-0347 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2563486635</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2563486635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-796d73ae10a2ba78bb94ef72b259ace87c01543a9aa06fbb3314835d5f7c3d913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGr3Lgdcj-bmnZVo0SoUFK3rkMzc6YPaqUkG6b93ygiuXN2zON-58BFyCfQaJMibgBv0-5JRRkvKhT4hI7BclqAMOyUjBlaUCqg5J5OU1oGCtcIAgxGBd8x5vVsWeYXFfVcvMRdNG4uFj33EunjDhD5Wq-I1thuscrogZ43fJpz83jH5eHxYTJ_K-cvseXo3LysBLJfaqlpzj0A9C16bEKzARrPApPUVGl1RkIJ76z1VTQicgzBc1rLRFa8t8DG5Gnb3sf3qMGW3abu46186JhUXRiku-xYdWlVsU4rYuH1cf_p4cEDd0Y0b3LijG3d00yO3A_LttxljjcvYHfrwt_8fyoADBc5_AJMda6k</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2563486635</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>De Chiara, Alessandro ; Iossa, Elisabetta</creator><creatorcontrib>De Chiara, Alessandro ; Iossa, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><description>We consider a funding competition for targeted projects. Potential participants have stochastic opportunity costs, and do not know the number of competitors. The funding agency sets a budget cap indicating the maximum funding that participants may request. We show that raising the budget cap helps to attract more participants but causes an increase in the requested funds. A higher budget cap is optimal when the preferences of researchers and the funding agency are more congruent, competition is lower, targeted projects have larger social value, the cost of public funds is smaller, or bidding preparation costs are lower.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2194-6108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1935-1682</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1515/bejeap-2020-0347</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berkeley: De Gruyter</publisher><subject>award budget ; Budgets ; competitive grants ; Contests ; Federal budget ; Federal funding ; Funding ; O25 ; O30 ; O31 ; O38 ; Opportunity costs ; procurement of innovation ; project choice ; research funding mechanisms ; research tournaments ; targeted funding</subject><ispartof>The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy, 2021-07, Vol.21 (3), p.1013-1034</ispartof><rights>Copyright Berkeley Electronic Press Jul 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-796d73ae10a2ba78bb94ef72b259ace87c01543a9aa06fbb3314835d5f7c3d913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7951-7189</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>De Chiara, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iossa, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><title>Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects</title><title>The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy</title><description>We consider a funding competition for targeted projects. Potential participants have stochastic opportunity costs, and do not know the number of competitors. The funding agency sets a budget cap indicating the maximum funding that participants may request. We show that raising the budget cap helps to attract more participants but causes an increase in the requested funds. A higher budget cap is optimal when the preferences of researchers and the funding agency are more congruent, competition is lower, targeted projects have larger social value, the cost of public funds is smaller, or bidding preparation costs are lower.</description><subject>award budget</subject><subject>Budgets</subject><subject>competitive grants</subject><subject>Contests</subject><subject>Federal budget</subject><subject>Federal funding</subject><subject>Funding</subject><subject>O25</subject><subject>O30</subject><subject>O31</subject><subject>O38</subject><subject>Opportunity costs</subject><subject>procurement of innovation</subject><subject>project choice</subject><subject>research funding mechanisms</subject><subject>research tournaments</subject><subject>targeted funding</subject><issn>2194-6108</issn><issn>1935-1682</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kEtLAzEUhYMoWGr3Lgdcj-bmnZVo0SoUFK3rkMzc6YPaqUkG6b93ygiuXN2zON-58BFyCfQaJMibgBv0-5JRRkvKhT4hI7BclqAMOyUjBlaUCqg5J5OU1oGCtcIAgxGBd8x5vVsWeYXFfVcvMRdNG4uFj33EunjDhD5Wq-I1thuscrogZ43fJpz83jH5eHxYTJ_K-cvseXo3LysBLJfaqlpzj0A9C16bEKzARrPApPUVGl1RkIJ76z1VTQicgzBc1rLRFa8t8DG5Gnb3sf3qMGW3abu46186JhUXRiku-xYdWlVsU4rYuH1cf_p4cEDd0Y0b3LijG3d00yO3A_LttxljjcvYHfrwt_8fyoADBc5_AJMda6k</recordid><startdate>20210701</startdate><enddate>20210701</enddate><creator>De Chiara, Alessandro</creator><creator>Iossa, Elisabetta</creator><general>De Gruyter</general><general>Berkeley Electronic Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-7189</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210701</creationdate><title>Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects</title><author>De Chiara, Alessandro ; Iossa, Elisabetta</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-796d73ae10a2ba78bb94ef72b259ace87c01543a9aa06fbb3314835d5f7c3d913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>award budget</topic><topic>Budgets</topic><topic>competitive grants</topic><topic>Contests</topic><topic>Federal budget</topic><topic>Federal funding</topic><topic>Funding</topic><topic>O25</topic><topic>O30</topic><topic>O31</topic><topic>O38</topic><topic>Opportunity costs</topic><topic>procurement of innovation</topic><topic>project choice</topic><topic>research funding mechanisms</topic><topic>research tournaments</topic><topic>targeted funding</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>De Chiara, Alessandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iossa, Elisabetta</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>De Chiara, Alessandro</au><au>Iossa, Elisabetta</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects</atitle><jtitle>The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy</jtitle><date>2021-07-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>1013</spage><epage>1034</epage><pages>1013-1034</pages><issn>2194-6108</issn><eissn>1935-1682</eissn><abstract>We consider a funding competition for targeted projects. Potential participants have stochastic opportunity costs, and do not know the number of competitors. The funding agency sets a budget cap indicating the maximum funding that participants may request. We show that raising the budget cap helps to attract more participants but causes an increase in the requested funds. A higher budget cap is optimal when the preferences of researchers and the funding agency are more congruent, competition is lower, targeted projects have larger social value, the cost of public funds is smaller, or bidding preparation costs are lower.</abstract><cop>Berkeley</cop><pub>De Gruyter</pub><doi>10.1515/bejeap-2020-0347</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7951-7189</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2194-6108 |
ispartof | The B.E. journal of economic analysis & policy, 2021-07, Vol.21 (3), p.1013-1034 |
issn | 2194-6108 1935-1682 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2563486635 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | award budget Budgets competitive grants Contests Federal budget Federal funding Funding O25 O30 O31 O38 Opportunity costs procurement of innovation project choice research funding mechanisms research tournaments targeted funding |
title | Setting the Budget for Targeted Research Projects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A33%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Setting%20the%20Budget%20for%20Targeted%20Research%20Projects&rft.jtitle=The%20B.E.%20journal%20of%20economic%20analysis%20&%20policy&rft.au=De%20Chiara,%20Alessandro&rft.date=2021-07-01&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=1013&rft.epage=1034&rft.pages=1013-1034&rft.issn=2194-6108&rft.eissn=1935-1682&rft_id=info:doi/10.1515/bejeap-2020-0347&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2563486635%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c412t-796d73ae10a2ba78bb94ef72b259ace87c01543a9aa06fbb3314835d5f7c3d913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2563486635&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |