Loading…

Sulfur Constraints on the Carbon Cycle of a Blanket Bog Peatland

The reduction of sulfate (SO42−) represents an alternative terminal electron acceptor for the oxidation of organic matter in peat soils. The greenhouse gas budget in peatlands will be constrained by how much a peatland can utilize SO42− reduction as an alternative to methanogenesis. Using records of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences 2021-08, Vol.126 (8), p.n/a
Main Authors: Boothroyd, I. M., Worrall, F., Moody, C. S., Clay, G. D., Abbott, G. D., Rose, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences
container_volume 126
creator Boothroyd, I. M.
Worrall, F.
Moody, C. S.
Clay, G. D.
Abbott, G. D.
Rose, R.
description The reduction of sulfate (SO42−) represents an alternative terminal electron acceptor for the oxidation of organic matter in peat soils. The greenhouse gas budget in peatlands will be constrained by how much a peatland can utilize SO42− reduction as an alternative to methanogenesis. Using records of atmospheric deposition and stream chemistry coupled with elemental analysis of peat soil, vegetation, particulate organic matter (POM) and dissolved organic matter (DOM), this study estimated a 23‐years long sulfur (S) budget for a blanket bog‐covered catchment in the North Pennines, England. The study showed that: (a) Atmospheric deposition of total S significantly declined over the study period from 2.4 to 0.5 t S/km2/yr. (b) Long term accumulation of S into deep peat at 1 m depth averaged 127 kg S/km2/yr. (c) Total S fluvial flux peaked as 4.5 t S/km2/yr with an average of 0.7 t S/km2/yr. (d) On average, over 23 years, 0.25 t S/km2/yr were reduced to either mineral sulphides or hydrogen sulphide; however, in eight out of the 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S to the streams of the catchment. At maximum observed, S reduction capacity the peatland was capable of a net removal of 71% of atmospheric S deposition. Allowing for the efficiency of energy transfer in the redox process and the oxidation state of peat organic matter means that for every mole of SO42− reduced, 1.69 moles of CO2 were produced, and an average of 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis. Plain Language Summary Peatlands are important terrestrial carbon (C) stores, with more carbon stored in peatlands than in the atmosphere. The very existence of peatlands relies on the fate or organic matter and the carbon budget is, therefore, a statement of ecosystem's future. The C budget of the peatland can be viewed as a series of reduction‐oxidation reactions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is fixed in to plant organic matter by photosynthesis. As organic matter transfers into the peat profile, the organic matter is transformed to CO2, methane (CH4), dissolved organic matter (DOM) and lost as particulate organic matter (POM). All but the transformation to POM requires a terminal electron acceptor, the most efficient of which is oxygen, followed by nitrate, but both of these are rapidly consumed in the water‐logged conditions of peatlands which could lead to production of the powerful greenhouse gas—methane. The alternative electron acceptors that could limit organic matt
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2021JG006435
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2564463800</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2564463800</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouKx78wcEvFqdfLXJTbdodVlQ_DiXNE1019qsSYvsvzeyIp6cy7wzPMw7vAgdEzgjQNU5BUoWFUDOmdhDE0pylUmVk_1fLdghmsW4hlQyrQiZoIvHsXNjwKXv4xD0qh8i9j0eXi0udWiSLLems9g7rPG80_2bHfDcv-B7q4c0tkfowOku2tlPn6Ln66un8iZb3lW35eUyM4wLlVHdGmsUZcLmVuvCmFZI53JpGuBWFUy2mgsgjXYFU6ZJn7cApKBagZCcsik62d3dBP8x2jjUaz-GPlnWVOSc50wCJOp0R5ngYwzW1ZuwetdhWxOov2Oq_8aUcLbDP1ed3f7L1ovqoaIUQLEvXMNmmw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2564463800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sulfur Constraints on the Carbon Cycle of a Blanket Bog Peatland</title><source>Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Boothroyd, I. M. ; Worrall, F. ; Moody, C. S. ; Clay, G. D. ; Abbott, G. D. ; Rose, R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boothroyd, I. M. ; Worrall, F. ; Moody, C. S. ; Clay, G. D. ; Abbott, G. D. ; Rose, R.</creatorcontrib><description>The reduction of sulfate (SO42−) represents an alternative terminal electron acceptor for the oxidation of organic matter in peat soils. The greenhouse gas budget in peatlands will be constrained by how much a peatland can utilize SO42− reduction as an alternative to methanogenesis. Using records of atmospheric deposition and stream chemistry coupled with elemental analysis of peat soil, vegetation, particulate organic matter (POM) and dissolved organic matter (DOM), this study estimated a 23‐years long sulfur (S) budget for a blanket bog‐covered catchment in the North Pennines, England. The study showed that: (a) Atmospheric deposition of total S significantly declined over the study period from 2.4 to 0.5 t S/km2/yr. (b) Long term accumulation of S into deep peat at 1 m depth averaged 127 kg S/km2/yr. (c) Total S fluvial flux peaked as 4.5 t S/km2/yr with an average of 0.7 t S/km2/yr. (d) On average, over 23 years, 0.25 t S/km2/yr were reduced to either mineral sulphides or hydrogen sulphide; however, in eight out of the 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S to the streams of the catchment. At maximum observed, S reduction capacity the peatland was capable of a net removal of 71% of atmospheric S deposition. Allowing for the efficiency of energy transfer in the redox process and the oxidation state of peat organic matter means that for every mole of SO42− reduced, 1.69 moles of CO2 were produced, and an average of 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis. Plain Language Summary Peatlands are important terrestrial carbon (C) stores, with more carbon stored in peatlands than in the atmosphere. The very existence of peatlands relies on the fate or organic matter and the carbon budget is, therefore, a statement of ecosystem's future. The C budget of the peatland can be viewed as a series of reduction‐oxidation reactions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is fixed in to plant organic matter by photosynthesis. As organic matter transfers into the peat profile, the organic matter is transformed to CO2, methane (CH4), dissolved organic matter (DOM) and lost as particulate organic matter (POM). All but the transformation to POM requires a terminal electron acceptor, the most efficient of which is oxygen, followed by nitrate, but both of these are rapidly consumed in the water‐logged conditions of peatlands which could lead to production of the powerful greenhouse gas—methane. The alternative electron acceptors that could limit organic matter loss are iron and sulfate. In this study, we use detailed long term records, coupled with elemental composition measurements, from an peatland in the UK to show that for every tonne of S removed by the peatland 0.23 tonnes of carbon are diverted from methane loss. Key Points Study evaluates the Sulfur (S) budget of a peatland to assess controls on C and greenhouse gas budgets The peat was accumulating 127 kg S/km2/yr, and reducing 0.25 t S/km2/yr, but in 8 out of 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S The peatland was capable of removing 71% of atmospheric deposition and diverting 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis</description><identifier>ISSN: 2169-8953</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2169-8961</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2021JG006435</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Atmosphere ; atmospheric deposition ; Bogs ; Carbon cycle ; Carbon dioxide ; Catchment area ; Catchments ; Chemical composition ; Constraints ; Deposition ; Dissolved organic matter ; Electrons ; Energy transfer ; fluvial flux ; Greenhouse gases ; Hydrogen sulfide ; Hydrogen sulphide ; Methane ; Methanogenesis ; Organic soils ; Oxidation ; Oxidoreductions ; Particulate organic matter ; Peat ; Peat soils ; Peatlands ; Photosynthesis ; Records ; Reduction ; Soil ; Soil analysis ; Sulfates ; Sulfides ; Sulfur ; Sulphides ; Sulphur ; Valence</subject><ispartof>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2021-08, Vol.126 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021. American Geophysical Union. All Rights Reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0371-7416 ; 0000-0002-4139-1330 ; 0000-0001-9920-9573 ; 0000-0002-8477-2774 ; 0000-0001-9803-8215</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boothroyd, I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrall, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moody, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, R.</creatorcontrib><title>Sulfur Constraints on the Carbon Cycle of a Blanket Bog Peatland</title><title>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</title><description>The reduction of sulfate (SO42−) represents an alternative terminal electron acceptor for the oxidation of organic matter in peat soils. The greenhouse gas budget in peatlands will be constrained by how much a peatland can utilize SO42− reduction as an alternative to methanogenesis. Using records of atmospheric deposition and stream chemistry coupled with elemental analysis of peat soil, vegetation, particulate organic matter (POM) and dissolved organic matter (DOM), this study estimated a 23‐years long sulfur (S) budget for a blanket bog‐covered catchment in the North Pennines, England. The study showed that: (a) Atmospheric deposition of total S significantly declined over the study period from 2.4 to 0.5 t S/km2/yr. (b) Long term accumulation of S into deep peat at 1 m depth averaged 127 kg S/km2/yr. (c) Total S fluvial flux peaked as 4.5 t S/km2/yr with an average of 0.7 t S/km2/yr. (d) On average, over 23 years, 0.25 t S/km2/yr were reduced to either mineral sulphides or hydrogen sulphide; however, in eight out of the 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S to the streams of the catchment. At maximum observed, S reduction capacity the peatland was capable of a net removal of 71% of atmospheric S deposition. Allowing for the efficiency of energy transfer in the redox process and the oxidation state of peat organic matter means that for every mole of SO42− reduced, 1.69 moles of CO2 were produced, and an average of 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis. Plain Language Summary Peatlands are important terrestrial carbon (C) stores, with more carbon stored in peatlands than in the atmosphere. The very existence of peatlands relies on the fate or organic matter and the carbon budget is, therefore, a statement of ecosystem's future. The C budget of the peatland can be viewed as a series of reduction‐oxidation reactions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is fixed in to plant organic matter by photosynthesis. As organic matter transfers into the peat profile, the organic matter is transformed to CO2, methane (CH4), dissolved organic matter (DOM) and lost as particulate organic matter (POM). All but the transformation to POM requires a terminal electron acceptor, the most efficient of which is oxygen, followed by nitrate, but both of these are rapidly consumed in the water‐logged conditions of peatlands which could lead to production of the powerful greenhouse gas—methane. The alternative electron acceptors that could limit organic matter loss are iron and sulfate. In this study, we use detailed long term records, coupled with elemental composition measurements, from an peatland in the UK to show that for every tonne of S removed by the peatland 0.23 tonnes of carbon are diverted from methane loss. Key Points Study evaluates the Sulfur (S) budget of a peatland to assess controls on C and greenhouse gas budgets The peat was accumulating 127 kg S/km2/yr, and reducing 0.25 t S/km2/yr, but in 8 out of 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S The peatland was capable of removing 71% of atmospheric deposition and diverting 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis</description><subject>Atmosphere</subject><subject>atmospheric deposition</subject><subject>Bogs</subject><subject>Carbon cycle</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Catchment area</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Chemical composition</subject><subject>Constraints</subject><subject>Deposition</subject><subject>Dissolved organic matter</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Energy transfer</subject><subject>fluvial flux</subject><subject>Greenhouse gases</subject><subject>Hydrogen sulfide</subject><subject>Hydrogen sulphide</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>Methanogenesis</subject><subject>Organic soils</subject><subject>Oxidation</subject><subject>Oxidoreductions</subject><subject>Particulate organic matter</subject><subject>Peat</subject><subject>Peat soils</subject><subject>Peatlands</subject><subject>Photosynthesis</subject><subject>Records</subject><subject>Reduction</subject><subject>Soil</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Sulfates</subject><subject>Sulfides</subject><subject>Sulfur</subject><subject>Sulphides</subject><subject>Sulphur</subject><subject>Valence</subject><issn>2169-8953</issn><issn>2169-8961</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouKx78wcEvFqdfLXJTbdodVlQ_DiXNE1019qsSYvsvzeyIp6cy7wzPMw7vAgdEzgjQNU5BUoWFUDOmdhDE0pylUmVk_1fLdghmsW4hlQyrQiZoIvHsXNjwKXv4xD0qh8i9j0eXi0udWiSLLems9g7rPG80_2bHfDcv-B7q4c0tkfowOku2tlPn6Ln66un8iZb3lW35eUyM4wLlVHdGmsUZcLmVuvCmFZI53JpGuBWFUy2mgsgjXYFU6ZJn7cApKBagZCcsik62d3dBP8x2jjUaz-GPlnWVOSc50wCJOp0R5ngYwzW1ZuwetdhWxOov2Oq_8aUcLbDP1ed3f7L1ovqoaIUQLEvXMNmmw</recordid><startdate>202108</startdate><enddate>202108</enddate><creator>Boothroyd, I. M.</creator><creator>Worrall, F.</creator><creator>Moody, C. S.</creator><creator>Clay, G. D.</creator><creator>Abbott, G. D.</creator><creator>Rose, R.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-7416</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-1330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9920-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-2774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-8215</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202108</creationdate><title>Sulfur Constraints on the Carbon Cycle of a Blanket Bog Peatland</title><author>Boothroyd, I. M. ; Worrall, F. ; Moody, C. S. ; Clay, G. D. ; Abbott, G. D. ; Rose, R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Atmosphere</topic><topic>atmospheric deposition</topic><topic>Bogs</topic><topic>Carbon cycle</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Catchment area</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Chemical composition</topic><topic>Constraints</topic><topic>Deposition</topic><topic>Dissolved organic matter</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Energy transfer</topic><topic>fluvial flux</topic><topic>Greenhouse gases</topic><topic>Hydrogen sulfide</topic><topic>Hydrogen sulphide</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>Methanogenesis</topic><topic>Organic soils</topic><topic>Oxidation</topic><topic>Oxidoreductions</topic><topic>Particulate organic matter</topic><topic>Peat</topic><topic>Peat soils</topic><topic>Peatlands</topic><topic>Photosynthesis</topic><topic>Records</topic><topic>Reduction</topic><topic>Soil</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Sulfates</topic><topic>Sulfides</topic><topic>Sulfur</topic><topic>Sulphides</topic><topic>Sulphur</topic><topic>Valence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boothroyd, I. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Worrall, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moody, C. S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clay, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abbott, G. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rose, R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boothroyd, I. M.</au><au>Worrall, F.</au><au>Moody, C. S.</au><au>Clay, G. D.</au><au>Abbott, G. D.</au><au>Rose, R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sulfur Constraints on the Carbon Cycle of a Blanket Bog Peatland</atitle><jtitle>Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences</jtitle><date>2021-08</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>126</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>2169-8953</issn><eissn>2169-8961</eissn><abstract>The reduction of sulfate (SO42−) represents an alternative terminal electron acceptor for the oxidation of organic matter in peat soils. The greenhouse gas budget in peatlands will be constrained by how much a peatland can utilize SO42− reduction as an alternative to methanogenesis. Using records of atmospheric deposition and stream chemistry coupled with elemental analysis of peat soil, vegetation, particulate organic matter (POM) and dissolved organic matter (DOM), this study estimated a 23‐years long sulfur (S) budget for a blanket bog‐covered catchment in the North Pennines, England. The study showed that: (a) Atmospheric deposition of total S significantly declined over the study period from 2.4 to 0.5 t S/km2/yr. (b) Long term accumulation of S into deep peat at 1 m depth averaged 127 kg S/km2/yr. (c) Total S fluvial flux peaked as 4.5 t S/km2/yr with an average of 0.7 t S/km2/yr. (d) On average, over 23 years, 0.25 t S/km2/yr were reduced to either mineral sulphides or hydrogen sulphide; however, in eight out of the 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S to the streams of the catchment. At maximum observed, S reduction capacity the peatland was capable of a net removal of 71% of atmospheric S deposition. Allowing for the efficiency of energy transfer in the redox process and the oxidation state of peat organic matter means that for every mole of SO42− reduced, 1.69 moles of CO2 were produced, and an average of 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis. Plain Language Summary Peatlands are important terrestrial carbon (C) stores, with more carbon stored in peatlands than in the atmosphere. The very existence of peatlands relies on the fate or organic matter and the carbon budget is, therefore, a statement of ecosystem's future. The C budget of the peatland can be viewed as a series of reduction‐oxidation reactions. Carbon dioxide (CO2) from the atmosphere is fixed in to plant organic matter by photosynthesis. As organic matter transfers into the peat profile, the organic matter is transformed to CO2, methane (CH4), dissolved organic matter (DOM) and lost as particulate organic matter (POM). All but the transformation to POM requires a terminal electron acceptor, the most efficient of which is oxygen, followed by nitrate, but both of these are rapidly consumed in the water‐logged conditions of peatlands which could lead to production of the powerful greenhouse gas—methane. The alternative electron acceptors that could limit organic matter loss are iron and sulfate. In this study, we use detailed long term records, coupled with elemental composition measurements, from an peatland in the UK to show that for every tonne of S removed by the peatland 0.23 tonnes of carbon are diverted from methane loss. Key Points Study evaluates the Sulfur (S) budget of a peatland to assess controls on C and greenhouse gas budgets The peat was accumulating 127 kg S/km2/yr, and reducing 0.25 t S/km2/yr, but in 8 out of 23 years the catchment was a net producer of S The peatland was capable of removing 71% of atmospheric deposition and diverting 0.47 t C/km2/yr are diverted from methanogenesis</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2021JG006435</doi><tpages>20</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0371-7416</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4139-1330</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9920-9573</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8477-2774</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9803-8215</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2169-8953
ispartof Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences, 2021-08, Vol.126 (8), p.n/a
issn 2169-8953
2169-8961
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2564463800
source Wiley:Jisc Collections:Wiley Read and Publish Open Access 2024-2025 (reading list); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Atmosphere
atmospheric deposition
Bogs
Carbon cycle
Carbon dioxide
Catchment area
Catchments
Chemical composition
Constraints
Deposition
Dissolved organic matter
Electrons
Energy transfer
fluvial flux
Greenhouse gases
Hydrogen sulfide
Hydrogen sulphide
Methane
Methanogenesis
Organic soils
Oxidation
Oxidoreductions
Particulate organic matter
Peat
Peat soils
Peatlands
Photosynthesis
Records
Reduction
Soil
Soil analysis
Sulfates
Sulfides
Sulfur
Sulphides
Sulphur
Valence
title Sulfur Constraints on the Carbon Cycle of a Blanket Bog Peatland
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T03%3A08%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sulfur%20Constraints%20on%20the%20Carbon%20Cycle%20of%20a%20Blanket%20Bog%20Peatland&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20geophysical%20research.%20Biogeosciences&rft.au=Boothroyd,%20I.%20M.&rft.date=2021-08&rft.volume=126&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=2169-8953&rft.eissn=2169-8961&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2021JG006435&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2564463800%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3459-2adcec9235e6eaa7ccd58ff68cb04e9738da4501baf739cb896d00172a9058423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2564463800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true