Spatial Distribution, Population Structure, and Predatory Impact of Gelatinous Predators on Zooplankton Community in Inshore Waters off Crimean Coast of the Black Sea

• Published in: Žurnal Sibirskogo federalʹnogo universiteta. Seriâ Biologiâ (Online) 2021-04, Vol.14 (2), p.168-181
• Main Authors: Finenko, Galina A, Anninsky, Boris E, Datzyk, Natalya A
• Format: Article
• Language: Russian
• Subjects: Abundance; Aurelia aurita; Beroe ovata; Biomass; Carbon content; Distribution; Interspecific relationships; Marine invertebrates; Mnemiopsis leidyi; Plankton; Pleurobrachia pileus; Population structure; Predation; Predators; Spatial distribution; Zooplankton
• ISSN: 1997-1389; 2313-5530
• DOI: 10.17516/1997-1389-0336

The study reports the data on the distribution and predatory impact of the gelatinous macroplankton on mesozooplankton in the inshore waters of Crimea in April 2016. In the study areas, gelatinous macroplankton comprised Scyphomedusae Aurelia aurita (Linnaeus, 1758) and three ctenophore species (Mnemiopsis leidyi A. Agassiz, 1865, Beroe ovata Bruguire, 1789, and Pleurobrachia pileus (O. F. Müller, 1776). The biomass of A. aurita dominated everywhere and varied from ~ 62 to 330 g·m-2 in different areas. The largest A. aurita biomass was observed in the South Coast of Crimea and the smallest in Karkinitsky Bay, where the number of jellyfish was high, suggesting the predominance of small individuals in the population. The size structure of A. aurita population differed by region: the proportion of large animals increased from the West to the East. The abundance and biomass of M. leidyi were rather low: 0.33-1.45 ind.m-2 and 1-51.7 g.m-2, respectively (the exception was the position in the Kerch Strait, where M. leidyi abundance reached 2 ind. m-2 and biomass 126.3 g.m-2); that species occurred only at 33-45 % of the stations (the exception was Karkinitsky Bay - 17 %), with the maximum values in the South Coast of Crimea. Large, 55-70-mm, adult individuals predominated. P pileus biomass was lower than the biomass of A. aurita and M. leidyi in all areas, but its abundance was much higher. The daily rations of A. aurita varied widely both in the entire area and from one region to another. The daily ration values correlated with the carbon content in A. aurita body. The predation pressure of A. aurita on zooplankton in the inshore waters of Crimea was very low and did not result in a crucial decrease in mesozooplankton abundance. The effect of M. leidyi, even with its low abundance and biomass, was much stronger.