Loading…

Status of the MEG II experiment at PSI

The MEG experiment, phase I, has recently established the best experimental upper limit on the branching ratio of the µ → eγ decay of 4.2 × 10−13 (90% Confidence Level). According to the standard model (SM) of particle physics, such a decay should definitely be non observable while several model of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2019-01, Vol.1137 (1), p.12028
Main Author: Baldini, Alessandro M
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-20c1915ef80360532da8e303d1566f81948763f1c800979addea7bf93e43ef2d3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12028
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 1137
creator Baldini, Alessandro M
description The MEG experiment, phase I, has recently established the best experimental upper limit on the branching ratio of the µ → eγ decay of 4.2 × 10−13 (90% Confidence Level). According to the standard model (SM) of particle physics, such a decay should definitely be non observable while several model of new physics (NP) beyond the SM (BSM) predict it should happen at an experimentally detectable rate. In this talk I summarize the theoretical motivations for searching for this decay and I present the status of the second phase of the experiment, MEG II, which will be able to increase the sensitivity to the µ → eγ decay by about one order of magnitude in few years of data taking.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012028
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2565403389</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2565403389</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-20c1915ef80360532da8e303d1566f81948763f1c800979addea7bf93e43ef2d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkG9LwzAQxoMoOKefwYDgC6E2lzT_XsrYZmXiYPo6xDbBDV1rk4F-e1MqE0Hw3tzB_e6euwehcyDXQJTKQRY0E1yLHIDJHHIClFB1gEb7zuG-VuoYnYSwIYSlkCN0uYo27gJuPI4vDt9P57gssftoXbd-c9uIbcTLVXmKjrx9De7sO4_R02z6OLnNFg_zcnKzyCrGdcwoqUADd14RJghntLbKMcJq4EJ4BbpQUjAPlSJES23r2ln57DVzBXOe1myMLoa9bde871yIZtPsum2SNJQLXqSzlU6UHKiqa0LonDdtutZ2nwaI6U0x_bumf930phgwgylp8mqYXDftz-q75WT1GzRt7RPM_oD_k_gCS6ttbA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2565403389</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Status of the MEG II experiment at PSI</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Baldini, Alessandro M</creator><creatorcontrib>Baldini, Alessandro M ; MEGII Collaboration</creatorcontrib><description>The MEG experiment, phase I, has recently established the best experimental upper limit on the branching ratio of the µ → eγ decay of 4.2 × 10−13 (90% Confidence Level). According to the standard model (SM) of particle physics, such a decay should definitely be non observable while several model of new physics (NP) beyond the SM (BSM) predict it should happen at an experimentally detectable rate. In this talk I summarize the theoretical motivations for searching for this decay and I present the status of the second phase of the experiment, MEG II, which will be able to increase the sensitivity to the µ → eγ decay by about one order of magnitude in few years of data taking.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012028</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Confidence intervals ; Experiments ; Particle decay ; Particle physics ; Standard model (particle physics)</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2019-01, Vol.1137 (1), p.12028</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2019. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-20c1915ef80360532da8e303d1566f81948763f1c800979addea7bf93e43ef2d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2565403389?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Baldini, Alessandro M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEGII Collaboration</creatorcontrib><title>Status of the MEG II experiment at PSI</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>The MEG experiment, phase I, has recently established the best experimental upper limit on the branching ratio of the µ → eγ decay of 4.2 × 10−13 (90% Confidence Level). According to the standard model (SM) of particle physics, such a decay should definitely be non observable while several model of new physics (NP) beyond the SM (BSM) predict it should happen at an experimentally detectable rate. In this talk I summarize the theoretical motivations for searching for this decay and I present the status of the second phase of the experiment, MEG II, which will be able to increase the sensitivity to the µ → eγ decay by about one order of magnitude in few years of data taking.</description><subject>Confidence intervals</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Particle decay</subject><subject>Particle physics</subject><subject>Standard model (particle physics)</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkG9LwzAQxoMoOKefwYDgC6E2lzT_XsrYZmXiYPo6xDbBDV1rk4F-e1MqE0Hw3tzB_e6euwehcyDXQJTKQRY0E1yLHIDJHHIClFB1gEb7zuG-VuoYnYSwIYSlkCN0uYo27gJuPI4vDt9P57gssftoXbd-c9uIbcTLVXmKjrx9De7sO4_R02z6OLnNFg_zcnKzyCrGdcwoqUADd14RJghntLbKMcJq4EJ4BbpQUjAPlSJES23r2ln57DVzBXOe1myMLoa9bde871yIZtPsum2SNJQLXqSzlU6UHKiqa0LonDdtutZ2nwaI6U0x_bumf930phgwgylp8mqYXDftz-q75WT1GzRt7RPM_oD_k_gCS6ttbA</recordid><startdate>20190101</startdate><enddate>20190101</enddate><creator>Baldini, Alessandro M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20190101</creationdate><title>Status of the MEG II experiment at PSI</title><author>Baldini, Alessandro M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-20c1915ef80360532da8e303d1566f81948763f1c800979addea7bf93e43ef2d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Confidence intervals</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Particle decay</topic><topic>Particle physics</topic><topic>Standard model (particle physics)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Baldini, Alessandro M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>MEGII Collaboration</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Baldini, Alessandro M</au><aucorp>MEGII Collaboration</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Status of the MEG II experiment at PSI</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2019-01-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>1137</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12028</spage><pages>12028-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>The MEG experiment, phase I, has recently established the best experimental upper limit on the branching ratio of the µ → eγ decay of 4.2 × 10−13 (90% Confidence Level). According to the standard model (SM) of particle physics, such a decay should definitely be non observable while several model of new physics (NP) beyond the SM (BSM) predict it should happen at an experimentally detectable rate. In this talk I summarize the theoretical motivations for searching for this decay and I present the status of the second phase of the experiment, MEG II, which will be able to increase the sensitivity to the µ → eγ decay by about one order of magnitude in few years of data taking.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012028</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6588
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2019-01, Vol.1137 (1), p.12028
issn 1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2565403389
source Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Confidence intervals
Experiments
Particle decay
Particle physics
Standard model (particle physics)
title Status of the MEG II experiment at PSI
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T16%3A20%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Status%20of%20the%20MEG%20II%20experiment%20at%20PSI&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Baldini,%20Alessandro%20M&rft.aucorp=MEGII%20Collaboration&rft.date=2019-01-01&rft.volume=1137&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12028&rft.pages=12028-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/1137/1/012028&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2565403389%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c359t-20c1915ef80360532da8e303d1566f81948763f1c800979addea7bf93e43ef2d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2565403389&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true