Loading…

Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using Aspen Plus

This study presents the simulation of hydrothermal gasification (HTG) of Scenedesmus obliquus microalgae and their derivatives using Aspen Plus V11. The effect of operating parameters such as temperature, pressure, and biomass concentration on the yield and composition of gaseous products using whol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-09, Vol.15 (5), p.1421-1430
Main Authors: Mustapha, Sherif Ishola, Mohammed, Usman Aliyu, Bux, Faizal, Isa, Yusuf Makarfi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 1430
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1421
container_title Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining
container_volume 15
creator Mustapha, Sherif Ishola
Mohammed, Usman Aliyu
Bux, Faizal
Isa, Yusuf Makarfi
description This study presents the simulation of hydrothermal gasification (HTG) of Scenedesmus obliquus microalgae and their derivatives using Aspen Plus V11. The effect of operating parameters such as temperature, pressure, and biomass concentration on the yield and composition of gaseous products using whole algae, lipid, and lipid extracted algae (LEA) as feedstocks was examined. The results showed that reaction pressure exhibited minimal impact whereas temperature, biomass concentration, and feedstock composition had significant effects on the composition of gaseous products. It was also found that a low temperature (400 °C) and biomass concentration of 40 wt% favored the production of methane‐rich gas. In contrast, high temperature (700 °C) and low biomass concentration (10 wt%) favored hydrogen‐rich gas production in all the three feedstocks considered. The highest mole fraction achieved for CH4 was 53.45, 61.70, and 52.20 mol%, which corresponded to a CH4 yield of 31.14, 56.90, and 30.15 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipid, and LEA respectively. For H2 rich gas production, the highest mole fractions achieved were 55.77, 52.29, and 55.34 mol%, which correspond to H2 yields of 75.44, 105.51, and 73.49 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipids, and LEA, respectively. The ranking order for the yield and lower heating value of the product gas from the HTG process is lipid > whole algae > LEA. This study has shown that hydrogen‐rich and methane‐rich gas can be produced from the hydrothermal gasification of microalgae as a function of the reaction conditions and feedstock composition. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd
doi_str_mv 10.1002/bbb.2245
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_wiley</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568012476</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2568012476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p2215-98e596bc18babfc7bba34b7aa98bf5885f1c2236a8da8b68fbfb5d21ba5bef803</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKfgTwh43ZmkTZd6tw11gqCggnfhfZtkZvRrTTvpv7dz4tU5Fw_nwEPINWczzpi4RcSZEIk8IROexSLiLOan_z35PCcXIWwZk6lM5ISU68G0dfdl2xIKuoHgnc-h83VFa0ffcltZY0PZB1pj4Xf9WKAy1HeBGtv6_YjubbijQH83ajNUUPqchq43A-2DrzZ0ERpb0deiD5fkzEER7NVfTsnHw_37ah09vzw-rRbPUSMEl1GmrMxSzLlCQJfPESFOcA6QKXRSKel4LkScgjKgMFUOHUojOIJE6xSLp-TmuNu09a63odPbum-r8VILmSrGRTJPRyo6Ut--sINuWl9CO2jO9MGkHk3qg0m9XC4PGf8AblRq9w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568012476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using Aspen Plus</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola ; Mohammed, Usman Aliyu ; Bux, Faizal ; Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</creator><creatorcontrib>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola ; Mohammed, Usman Aliyu ; Bux, Faizal ; Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</creatorcontrib><description>This study presents the simulation of hydrothermal gasification (HTG) of Scenedesmus obliquus microalgae and their derivatives using Aspen Plus V11. The effect of operating parameters such as temperature, pressure, and biomass concentration on the yield and composition of gaseous products using whole algae, lipid, and lipid extracted algae (LEA) as feedstocks was examined. The results showed that reaction pressure exhibited minimal impact whereas temperature, biomass concentration, and feedstock composition had significant effects on the composition of gaseous products. It was also found that a low temperature (400 °C) and biomass concentration of 40 wt% favored the production of methane‐rich gas. In contrast, high temperature (700 °C) and low biomass concentration (10 wt%) favored hydrogen‐rich gas production in all the three feedstocks considered. The highest mole fraction achieved for CH4 was 53.45, 61.70, and 52.20 mol%, which corresponded to a CH4 yield of 31.14, 56.90, and 30.15 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipid, and LEA respectively. For H2 rich gas production, the highest mole fractions achieved were 55.77, 52.29, and 55.34 mol%, which correspond to H2 yields of 75.44, 105.51, and 73.49 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipids, and LEA, respectively. The ranking order for the yield and lower heating value of the product gas from the HTG process is lipid &gt; whole algae &gt; LEA. This study has shown that hydrogen‐rich and methane‐rich gas can be produced from the hydrothermal gasification of microalgae as a function of the reaction conditions and feedstock composition. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</description><identifier>ISSN: 1932-104X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1932-1031</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/bbb.2245</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Algae ; Aquatic microorganisms ; Biomass ; Calorific value ; Composition effects ; Gas production ; Gasification ; High temperature ; hydrogen ; hydrothermal gasification ; Lipids ; Low temperature ; Methane ; microalgae ; Oil and gas production ; Phytoplankton ; Raw materials ; Scenedesmus obliquus ; supercritical water ; Yield</subject><ispartof>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-09, Vol.15 (5), p.1421-1430</ispartof><rights>2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-8272-3402</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Usman Aliyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bux, Faizal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</creatorcontrib><title>Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using Aspen Plus</title><title>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</title><description>This study presents the simulation of hydrothermal gasification (HTG) of Scenedesmus obliquus microalgae and their derivatives using Aspen Plus V11. The effect of operating parameters such as temperature, pressure, and biomass concentration on the yield and composition of gaseous products using whole algae, lipid, and lipid extracted algae (LEA) as feedstocks was examined. The results showed that reaction pressure exhibited minimal impact whereas temperature, biomass concentration, and feedstock composition had significant effects on the composition of gaseous products. It was also found that a low temperature (400 °C) and biomass concentration of 40 wt% favored the production of methane‐rich gas. In contrast, high temperature (700 °C) and low biomass concentration (10 wt%) favored hydrogen‐rich gas production in all the three feedstocks considered. The highest mole fraction achieved for CH4 was 53.45, 61.70, and 52.20 mol%, which corresponded to a CH4 yield of 31.14, 56.90, and 30.15 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipid, and LEA respectively. For H2 rich gas production, the highest mole fractions achieved were 55.77, 52.29, and 55.34 mol%, which correspond to H2 yields of 75.44, 105.51, and 73.49 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipids, and LEA, respectively. The ranking order for the yield and lower heating value of the product gas from the HTG process is lipid &gt; whole algae &gt; LEA. This study has shown that hydrogen‐rich and methane‐rich gas can be produced from the hydrothermal gasification of microalgae as a function of the reaction conditions and feedstock composition. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</description><subject>Algae</subject><subject>Aquatic microorganisms</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Calorific value</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Gas production</subject><subject>Gasification</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>hydrogen</subject><subject>hydrothermal gasification</subject><subject>Lipids</subject><subject>Low temperature</subject><subject>Methane</subject><subject>microalgae</subject><subject>Oil and gas production</subject><subject>Phytoplankton</subject><subject>Raw materials</subject><subject>Scenedesmus obliquus</subject><subject>supercritical water</subject><subject>Yield</subject><issn>1932-104X</issn><issn>1932-1031</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kF1LwzAYhYMoOKfgTwh43ZmkTZd6tw11gqCggnfhfZtkZvRrTTvpv7dz4tU5Fw_nwEPINWczzpi4RcSZEIk8IROexSLiLOan_z35PCcXIWwZk6lM5ISU68G0dfdl2xIKuoHgnc-h83VFa0ffcltZY0PZB1pj4Xf9WKAy1HeBGtv6_YjubbijQH83ajNUUPqchq43A-2DrzZ0ERpb0deiD5fkzEER7NVfTsnHw_37ah09vzw-rRbPUSMEl1GmrMxSzLlCQJfPESFOcA6QKXRSKel4LkScgjKgMFUOHUojOIJE6xSLp-TmuNu09a63odPbum-r8VILmSrGRTJPRyo6Ut--sINuWl9CO2jO9MGkHk3qg0m9XC4PGf8AblRq9w</recordid><startdate>202109</startdate><enddate>202109</enddate><creator>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola</creator><creator>Mohammed, Usman Aliyu</creator><creator>Bux, Faizal</creator><creator>Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>7QF</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SE</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H8G</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>H99</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.F</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-3402</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202109</creationdate><title>Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using Aspen Plus</title><author>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola ; Mohammed, Usman Aliyu ; Bux, Faizal ; Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2215-98e596bc18babfc7bba34b7aa98bf5885f1c2236a8da8b68fbfb5d21ba5bef803</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algae</topic><topic>Aquatic microorganisms</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Calorific value</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Gas production</topic><topic>Gasification</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>hydrogen</topic><topic>hydrothermal gasification</topic><topic>Lipids</topic><topic>Low temperature</topic><topic>Methane</topic><topic>microalgae</topic><topic>Oil and gas production</topic><topic>Phytoplankton</topic><topic>Raw materials</topic><topic>Scenedesmus obliquus</topic><topic>supercritical water</topic><topic>Yield</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mohammed, Usman Aliyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bux, Faizal</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</creatorcontrib><collection>Aluminium Industry Abstracts</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Corrosion Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Copper Technical Reference Library</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>ASFA: Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Marine Biotechnology Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mustapha, Sherif Ishola</au><au>Mohammed, Usman Aliyu</au><au>Bux, Faizal</au><au>Isa, Yusuf Makarfi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using Aspen Plus</atitle><jtitle>Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining</jtitle><date>2021-09</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1421</spage><epage>1430</epage><pages>1421-1430</pages><issn>1932-104X</issn><eissn>1932-1031</eissn><abstract>This study presents the simulation of hydrothermal gasification (HTG) of Scenedesmus obliquus microalgae and their derivatives using Aspen Plus V11. The effect of operating parameters such as temperature, pressure, and biomass concentration on the yield and composition of gaseous products using whole algae, lipid, and lipid extracted algae (LEA) as feedstocks was examined. The results showed that reaction pressure exhibited minimal impact whereas temperature, biomass concentration, and feedstock composition had significant effects on the composition of gaseous products. It was also found that a low temperature (400 °C) and biomass concentration of 40 wt% favored the production of methane‐rich gas. In contrast, high temperature (700 °C) and low biomass concentration (10 wt%) favored hydrogen‐rich gas production in all the three feedstocks considered. The highest mole fraction achieved for CH4 was 53.45, 61.70, and 52.20 mol%, which corresponded to a CH4 yield of 31.14, 56.90, and 30.15 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipid, and LEA respectively. For H2 rich gas production, the highest mole fractions achieved were 55.77, 52.29, and 55.34 mol%, which correspond to H2 yields of 75.44, 105.51, and 73.49 mmol g−1 for whole algae, lipids, and LEA, respectively. The ranking order for the yield and lower heating value of the product gas from the HTG process is lipid &gt; whole algae &gt; LEA. This study has shown that hydrogen‐rich and methane‐rich gas can be produced from the hydrothermal gasification of microalgae as a function of the reaction conditions and feedstock composition. © 2021 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/bbb.2245</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8272-3402</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1932-104X
ispartof Biofuels, bioproducts and biorefining, 2021-09, Vol.15 (5), p.1421-1430
issn 1932-104X
1932-1031
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2568012476
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Algae
Aquatic microorganisms
Biomass
Calorific value
Composition effects
Gas production
Gasification
High temperature
hydrogen
hydrothermal gasification
Lipids
Low temperature
Methane
microalgae
Oil and gas production
Phytoplankton
Raw materials
Scenedesmus obliquus
supercritical water
Yield
title Hydrothermal gasification of Scenedesmus obliquus and its derivatives: a thermodynamic study using Aspen Plus
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T21%3A04%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_wiley&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Hydrothermal%20gasification%20of%20Scenedesmus%20obliquus%20and%20its%20derivatives:%20a%20thermodynamic%20study%20using%20Aspen%20Plus&rft.jtitle=Biofuels,%20bioproducts%20and%20biorefining&rft.au=Mustapha,%20Sherif%20Ishola&rft.date=2021-09&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1421&rft.epage=1430&rft.pages=1421-1430&rft.issn=1932-104X&rft.eissn=1932-1031&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/bbb.2245&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_wiley%3E2568012476%3C/proquest_wiley%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p2215-98e596bc18babfc7bba34b7aa98bf5885f1c2236a8da8b68fbfb5d21ba5bef803%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568012476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true