Loading…

Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests

Bucket foundations have been increasingly used to support offshore wind turbines as alternatives to monopiles and can be classified into two types: monopod and tripod/jacket supported on multiple shallow foundations. Despite the recent research on the bearing capacity and stiffness of skirted founda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2021-10, Vol.149, p.106813, Article 106813
Main Authors: Barari, Amin, Glitrup, Kasper, Christiansen, Lasse Riis, Ibsen, Lars Bo, Choo, Yun Wook
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 106813
container_title Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)
container_volume 149
creator Barari, Amin
Glitrup, Kasper
Christiansen, Lasse Riis
Ibsen, Lars Bo
Choo, Yun Wook
description Bucket foundations have been increasingly used to support offshore wind turbines as alternatives to monopiles and can be classified into two types: monopod and tripod/jacket supported on multiple shallow foundations. Despite the recent research on the bearing capacity and stiffness of skirted foundations, knowledge regarding the monotonic and cyclic responses of multiple bucket foundation systems in saturated sand is scarce. In this study, the angular rotation of mono-bucket and tripod foundation systems in dense sand due to drained monotonic and cyclic loading was analyzed by performing a series of three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses. The Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness (HS small) and the UBC3D-PLM soil model were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations subjected to wind and wave loading. The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests. Calibration was carried out based on the monotonic and cyclic model tests, in-situ shear wave velocity measurements, and empirical relationships for shear moduli. Long-term deformations and the resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation, which is a unique feature of tripod suction caisson foundations (the so-called “self-healing’’ mechanism), uncertainties, and nonlinearities in centrifuge tests and numerical predictions involving different alternative calibration scenarios of the models are discussed. Based on the numerical results, a closed-form expression is proposed that enables the prediction of drained bearing capacity of multiple caissons under combined loading. This expression was validated for a range of embedment ratios. •The rotation of tripod foundation system in dense sand due to cyclic loading was analyzed by performing 3D FE analyses.•The HS small and the UBC3D-PLM soil models were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations.•The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests.•The resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation (the so called “self-healing’’ mechanism) was discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106813
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2568031997</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0267726121002359</els_id><sourcerecordid>2568031997</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUU1r3DAUFKWFbtP8hIKgZ2_1YUt2L6WEfkFoLwnkJuynp0SLV3IlucX_pz802m6gx57eMHozg94Q8oazPWdcvTvsc_Sz3cJeMMErp3oun5Ed7_XQyJbfPSc7JpRutFD8JXmV84ExrnmvduTPTfJLtDSvUHwMFEafc50ursGOJypXnGh0Lj_EhPS3D5ZiwHS_0bHC8oA-0WMMscTg4S8HG8wVJsxL1WOmPtDs57LRXJ_f0-_rEZOHcaZLQuvhXwxgKMm79R6rpcWZFswlvyYv3DhnvHyaF-T286ebq6_N9Y8v364-XjcgpS6NgLadnG5tq3Q9RDsAukm6aUQp5AQWhhYFdrKbhOoROmCqE9pOCnpnVTfIC_L27Luk-HOtyeYQ1xRqpBGd6pnkw6DrVnfeghRzTujMkvxxTJvhzJwKMQfzVIg5FWLOhVTdh7MO6xd-eUwmg8cA9QIJoRgb_X8cHgGm6ZxO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2568031997</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Barari, Amin ; Glitrup, Kasper ; Christiansen, Lasse Riis ; Ibsen, Lars Bo ; Choo, Yun Wook</creator><creatorcontrib>Barari, Amin ; Glitrup, Kasper ; Christiansen, Lasse Riis ; Ibsen, Lars Bo ; Choo, Yun Wook</creatorcontrib><description>Bucket foundations have been increasingly used to support offshore wind turbines as alternatives to monopiles and can be classified into two types: monopod and tripod/jacket supported on multiple shallow foundations. Despite the recent research on the bearing capacity and stiffness of skirted foundations, knowledge regarding the monotonic and cyclic responses of multiple bucket foundation systems in saturated sand is scarce. In this study, the angular rotation of mono-bucket and tripod foundation systems in dense sand due to drained monotonic and cyclic loading was analyzed by performing a series of three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses. The Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness (HS small) and the UBC3D-PLM soil model were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations subjected to wind and wave loading. The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests. Calibration was carried out based on the monotonic and cyclic model tests, in-situ shear wave velocity measurements, and empirical relationships for shear moduli. Long-term deformations and the resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation, which is a unique feature of tripod suction caisson foundations (the so-called “self-healing’’ mechanism), uncertainties, and nonlinearities in centrifuge tests and numerical predictions involving different alternative calibration scenarios of the models are discussed. Based on the numerical results, a closed-form expression is proposed that enables the prediction of drained bearing capacity of multiple caissons under combined loading. This expression was validated for a range of embedment ratios. •The rotation of tripod foundation system in dense sand due to cyclic loading was analyzed by performing 3D FE analyses.•The HS small and the UBC3D-PLM soil models were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations.•The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests.•The resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation (the so called “self-healing’’ mechanism) was discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0267-7261</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-341X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106813</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Barking: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Bearing capacity ; Caissons ; Calibration ; Centrifuge model ; Centrifuges ; Combined loading ; Cyclic loading ; Cyclic loads ; Empirical analysis ; Failure envelopes ; Finite element analysis (FEA) ; Long-term deformations ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; Model testing ; Numerical prediction ; Offshore ; Offshore operations ; Predictions ; Rotation ; Sand ; Series (mathematics) ; Shallow foundations ; Shear modulus ; Soil analysis ; Soil suction ; Soils ; Stiffness ; Three dimensional analysis ; Tripod bucket foundation ; Turbines ; Wave velocity ; Wind effects ; Wind power ; Wind turbines</subject><ispartof>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2021-10, Vol.149, p.106813, Article 106813</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-4366-6377</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barari, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glitrup, Kasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Lasse Riis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibsen, Lars Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Yun Wook</creatorcontrib><title>Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests</title><title>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</title><description>Bucket foundations have been increasingly used to support offshore wind turbines as alternatives to monopiles and can be classified into two types: monopod and tripod/jacket supported on multiple shallow foundations. Despite the recent research on the bearing capacity and stiffness of skirted foundations, knowledge regarding the monotonic and cyclic responses of multiple bucket foundation systems in saturated sand is scarce. In this study, the angular rotation of mono-bucket and tripod foundation systems in dense sand due to drained monotonic and cyclic loading was analyzed by performing a series of three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses. The Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness (HS small) and the UBC3D-PLM soil model were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations subjected to wind and wave loading. The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests. Calibration was carried out based on the monotonic and cyclic model tests, in-situ shear wave velocity measurements, and empirical relationships for shear moduli. Long-term deformations and the resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation, which is a unique feature of tripod suction caisson foundations (the so-called “self-healing’’ mechanism), uncertainties, and nonlinearities in centrifuge tests and numerical predictions involving different alternative calibration scenarios of the models are discussed. Based on the numerical results, a closed-form expression is proposed that enables the prediction of drained bearing capacity of multiple caissons under combined loading. This expression was validated for a range of embedment ratios. •The rotation of tripod foundation system in dense sand due to cyclic loading was analyzed by performing 3D FE analyses.•The HS small and the UBC3D-PLM soil models were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations.•The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests.•The resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation (the so called “self-healing’’ mechanism) was discussed.</description><subject>Bearing capacity</subject><subject>Caissons</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Centrifuge model</subject><subject>Centrifuges</subject><subject>Combined loading</subject><subject>Cyclic loading</subject><subject>Cyclic loads</subject><subject>Empirical analysis</subject><subject>Failure envelopes</subject><subject>Finite element analysis (FEA)</subject><subject>Long-term deformations</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Model testing</subject><subject>Numerical prediction</subject><subject>Offshore</subject><subject>Offshore operations</subject><subject>Predictions</subject><subject>Rotation</subject><subject>Sand</subject><subject>Series (mathematics)</subject><subject>Shallow foundations</subject><subject>Shear modulus</subject><subject>Soil analysis</subject><subject>Soil suction</subject><subject>Soils</subject><subject>Stiffness</subject><subject>Three dimensional analysis</subject><subject>Tripod bucket foundation</subject><subject>Turbines</subject><subject>Wave velocity</subject><subject>Wind effects</subject><subject>Wind power</subject><subject>Wind turbines</subject><issn>0267-7261</issn><issn>1879-341X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUU1r3DAUFKWFbtP8hIKgZ2_1YUt2L6WEfkFoLwnkJuynp0SLV3IlucX_pz802m6gx57eMHozg94Q8oazPWdcvTvsc_Sz3cJeMMErp3oun5Ed7_XQyJbfPSc7JpRutFD8JXmV84ExrnmvduTPTfJLtDSvUHwMFEafc50ursGOJypXnGh0Lj_EhPS3D5ZiwHS_0bHC8oA-0WMMscTg4S8HG8wVJsxL1WOmPtDs57LRXJ_f0-_rEZOHcaZLQuvhXwxgKMm79R6rpcWZFswlvyYv3DhnvHyaF-T286ebq6_N9Y8v364-XjcgpS6NgLadnG5tq3Q9RDsAukm6aUQp5AQWhhYFdrKbhOoROmCqE9pOCnpnVTfIC_L27Luk-HOtyeYQ1xRqpBGd6pnkw6DrVnfeghRzTujMkvxxTJvhzJwKMQfzVIg5FWLOhVTdh7MO6xd-eUwmg8cA9QIJoRgb_X8cHgGm6ZxO</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Barari, Amin</creator><creator>Glitrup, Kasper</creator><creator>Christiansen, Lasse Riis</creator><creator>Ibsen, Lars Bo</creator><creator>Choo, Yun Wook</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-6377</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests</title><author>Barari, Amin ; Glitrup, Kasper ; Christiansen, Lasse Riis ; Ibsen, Lars Bo ; Choo, Yun Wook</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Bearing capacity</topic><topic>Caissons</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Centrifuge model</topic><topic>Centrifuges</topic><topic>Combined loading</topic><topic>Cyclic loading</topic><topic>Cyclic loads</topic><topic>Empirical analysis</topic><topic>Failure envelopes</topic><topic>Finite element analysis (FEA)</topic><topic>Long-term deformations</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Model testing</topic><topic>Numerical prediction</topic><topic>Offshore</topic><topic>Offshore operations</topic><topic>Predictions</topic><topic>Rotation</topic><topic>Sand</topic><topic>Series (mathematics)</topic><topic>Shallow foundations</topic><topic>Shear modulus</topic><topic>Soil analysis</topic><topic>Soil suction</topic><topic>Soils</topic><topic>Stiffness</topic><topic>Three dimensional analysis</topic><topic>Tripod bucket foundation</topic><topic>Turbines</topic><topic>Wave velocity</topic><topic>Wind effects</topic><topic>Wind power</topic><topic>Wind turbines</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barari, Amin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Glitrup, Kasper</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christiansen, Lasse Riis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ibsen, Lars Bo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Choo, Yun Wook</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barari, Amin</au><au>Glitrup, Kasper</au><au>Christiansen, Lasse Riis</au><au>Ibsen, Lars Bo</au><au>Choo, Yun Wook</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests</atitle><jtitle>Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984)</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>149</volume><spage>106813</spage><pages>106813-</pages><artnum>106813</artnum><issn>0267-7261</issn><eissn>1879-341X</eissn><abstract>Bucket foundations have been increasingly used to support offshore wind turbines as alternatives to monopiles and can be classified into two types: monopod and tripod/jacket supported on multiple shallow foundations. Despite the recent research on the bearing capacity and stiffness of skirted foundations, knowledge regarding the monotonic and cyclic responses of multiple bucket foundation systems in saturated sand is scarce. In this study, the angular rotation of mono-bucket and tripod foundation systems in dense sand due to drained monotonic and cyclic loading was analyzed by performing a series of three-dimensional finite element (FE) analyses. The Hardening Soil Model with Small Strain Stiffness (HS small) and the UBC3D-PLM soil model were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations subjected to wind and wave loading. The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests. Calibration was carried out based on the monotonic and cyclic model tests, in-situ shear wave velocity measurements, and empirical relationships for shear moduli. Long-term deformations and the resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation, which is a unique feature of tripod suction caisson foundations (the so-called “self-healing’’ mechanism), uncertainties, and nonlinearities in centrifuge tests and numerical predictions involving different alternative calibration scenarios of the models are discussed. Based on the numerical results, a closed-form expression is proposed that enables the prediction of drained bearing capacity of multiple caissons under combined loading. This expression was validated for a range of embedment ratios. •The rotation of tripod foundation system in dense sand due to cyclic loading was analyzed by performing 3D FE analyses.•The HS small and the UBC3D-PLM soil models were employed to analyze the moment response of offshore foundations.•The procedures were validated against a database of well-documented centrifuge tests.•The resulting decreasing trend in accumulated rotation (the so called “self-healing’’ mechanism) was discussed.</abstract><cop>Barking</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106813</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4366-6377</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0267-7261
ispartof Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984), 2021-10, Vol.149, p.106813, Article 106813
issn 0267-7261
1879-341X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2568031997
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Bearing capacity
Caissons
Calibration
Centrifuge model
Centrifuges
Combined loading
Cyclic loading
Cyclic loads
Empirical analysis
Failure envelopes
Finite element analysis (FEA)
Long-term deformations
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
Model testing
Numerical prediction
Offshore
Offshore operations
Predictions
Rotation
Sand
Series (mathematics)
Shallow foundations
Shear modulus
Soil analysis
Soil suction
Soils
Stiffness
Three dimensional analysis
Tripod bucket foundation
Turbines
Wave velocity
Wind effects
Wind power
Wind turbines
title Tripod suction caisson foundations for offshore wind energy and their monotonic and cyclic responses in silty sand: Numerical predictions for centrifuge model tests
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A16%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Tripod%20suction%20caisson%20foundations%20for%20offshore%20wind%20energy%20and%20their%20monotonic%20and%20cyclic%20responses%20in%20silty%20sand:%20Numerical%20predictions%20for%20centrifuge%20model%20tests&rft.jtitle=Soil%20dynamics%20and%20earthquake%20engineering%20(1984)&rft.au=Barari,%20Amin&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=149&rft.spage=106813&rft.pages=106813-&rft.artnum=106813&rft.issn=0267-7261&rft.eissn=1879-341X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.soildyn.2021.106813&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2568031997%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-2c44bf74d46702149cefb3fbae323bcdc94e2e535b268ec5c06527db6c8fd6593%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2568031997&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true