Analytical network process method for badminton athlete's scholarship recommendations

Pathways admissions line independent achievement sports especially badminton was held in UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung aimed to help athletes who want to proceed to a higher level and change the paradigm of athletes on the importance of continuing education to a higher level in accordance with the...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2019-12, Vol.1402 (6), p.66064
Main Authors: Andrian, R, Fuadi, R S, Fahrudin, R, Rahman, A, Wildanuddin, M, Wahana, A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Athletes
Badminton
Continuing education
Criteria
Decision support systems
Mathematical analysis
Physics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Pathways admissions line independent achievement sports especially badminton was held in UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung aimed to help athletes who want to proceed to a higher level and change the paradigm of athletes on the importance of continuing education to a higher level in accordance with the specified criteria. The process of input in determining the acceptance still uses old system by Microsoft Excel that sometimes causes confusion. To help determine an independent candidate of badminton accomplishment line, it is then required a decision support system. The Method that can be used for deciding support system by using Analytical Network Process (ANP). Using this method, the calculation was done by doing a comparison between the criteria and alternatives then produce supermatrics, then do the weighting process will determine the athletes who deserve to UIN Sunan Gunung Djati in Bandung. This research used 9 prospective registrants (alternate) as a sample after doing comparison calculation manually and the application of the method itself then acquired relative error of 0%. So the system has been made is said to be worth used relative error less than 50%.
ISSN:1742-6588
1742-6596
DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1402/6/066064