Loading…

Synthesis and characterization of 3-(4-fluorophenyl)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene and 3,3’-(4- fluorophenyl)dithieno[3,2-b;2’,3’-d]thiophene molecules

Synthesis of 3-(4-fluorophenyl)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (FPhTT) and 3,3’-(4- fluorophenyl)dithieno[3,2-b;2’,3’-d]thiophene (FPhDTT) were achieved starting from 3-bromothiophene and 3,4-dibromothiophene, respectively. They were electropolymerized and the resulting polymers P[FPhTT] and P[FPhDTT] were c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Electrochimica acta 2021-09, Vol.390, p.138837, Article 138837
Main Authors: Topal, Sema, Topal, Sebahat, Ulukan, Pelin, Ustamehmetoğlu, Belkıs, Ozturk, Turan, Sezer, Esma
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Synthesis of 3-(4-fluorophenyl)thieno[3,2-b]thiophene (FPhTT) and 3,3’-(4- fluorophenyl)dithieno[3,2-b;2’,3’-d]thiophene (FPhDTT) were achieved starting from 3-bromothiophene and 3,4-dibromothiophene, respectively. They were electropolymerized and the resulting polymers P[FPhTT] and P[FPhDTT] were characterized by diverse electrochemical methods such as cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), galvanostatic charge-discharge (GCD), electrochemical quartz crystal microbalance (EQCM) and spectroelectrochemical measurements. Mechanism of electropolymerization of the monomers was supported by DFT level calculations. Band gaps of P[FPhTT] and P[FPhDTT] were calculated as 1.63 and 1.77 eV, respectively, from the onset absorptions of the absorption spectra. From EIS measurements, the highest capacitance values of P[FPhTT] and P[FPhDTT] were calculated to be 39.4 and 281.7 Fg1−, respectively, when the applied potentials were equal to their oxidation peak potentials. Surface characterization of the P[FPhTT] and P[FPhDTT] films on ITO electrodes were performed by atomic force microscope (AFM) and the results suggested that P[FPhDTT] had more porous surface. GCD results indicated that P[FPhDTT] had higher energy density than P[FPhTT], possibly due to its porous structure. According to the ECD results, P[FPhTT] has more stable optical properties. As a conclusion, P[FPhDTT] might be suggested for energy storage applications while P[FPhTT] could be suitable for electrochromic devices.
ISSN:0013-4686
1873-3859
DOI:10.1016/j.electacta.2021.138837