Family matters? Exploring media coverage of presidential candidates' families by gender and race

Researchers have only recently begun to explore the role of parenthood and family in politics. While some scholars focus on the political attitudes of parents, others examine the advantages and disadvantages of politicians' parental status on candidate viability. Building on the concept of poli...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Politics, groups & identities groups & identities, 2020-10, Vol.8 (5), p.1022-1042
Main Authors: D. Burge, Camille, J. Hodges, Melissa, Rinaldi, Rio
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
campaigns
Candidates
Content analysis
Discourse
Discourses
Election results
Elections
Families & family life
Family
Family roles
Grandparents
Mass media images
Media coverage
motherhood
Mothers
Narratives
Parental status
Parents & parenting
Political attitudes
Political campaigns
Political discourse
Politicians
Politics
Presidential candidates
Presidential elections
Presidents
Primaries & caucuses
Race
Spouses
Stereotypes
Viability
Wall Street
women and gender
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Researchers have only recently begun to explore the role of parenthood and family in politics. While some scholars focus on the political attitudes of parents, others examine the advantages and disadvantages of politicians' parental status on candidate viability. Building on the concept of politicized motherhood, we argue that focusing on candidates' parental status alone provides an incomplete picture of the full range and symbolic functioning of family in political discourse. We coin the theory, politicized family, which includes narratives of candidates' spouses, parents, grandparents, and children, and argue it provides a more useful frame for understanding these processes. We also move the literature forward by assessing how media coverage of families of presidential hopefuls varies along gendered and racialized lines. Using 2,458 articles and opinion pieces from the Washington Post, New York Times, and Wall Street Journal, we conduct a content analysis of candidate coverage from the 2004 and 2008 Democratic presidential primaries to explore how national print media portrays the family narratives of presidential candidates. Our results uncover both gendered and racialized family discourses embedded in media representations of presidential hopefuls. We conclude with a discussion of the implications of such portrayals for establishing candidates' relatability and electoral viability.
ISSN:2156-5503
2156-5511
DOI:10.1080/21565503.2019.1584748