Dimensions of Learning Styles among Engineering Students

Current study is conducted to examine the types of learning styles among engineering students. Felder Silverman learning style model (FSLSM) was used to measure the types of learning styles represent engineering students. FSLSM contains four dimensions that intended to identify learning preferences...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2018-07, Vol.1049 (1), p.12055
Main Authors: R Jamali, A., M Mohamad, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cognitive style
Engineering
Engineering education
Learning
Physics
Students
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12055
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 1049
creator R Jamali, A.
M Mohamad, M.
description Current study is conducted to examine the types of learning styles among engineering students. Felder Silverman learning style model (FSLSM) was used to measure the types of learning styles represent engineering students. FSLSM contains four dimensions that intended to identify learning preferences of students with respect to process information, perceive information, input information and understand information. Each dimension consisted of two sub-dimensions such as in processing dimension learner can be either active learner or reflective learner, this pattern follows in all four dimensions, perceive dimension distinguishes sensing or intuitive learner, input dimension distinguishes visual learners or verbal learners, understand distinguishes sequential or global learners. This study applied survey research method. Index of learning styles (ILS) was used as a tool to collect data. A total of 315 engineering students participated from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Finding revealed that engineering students are tending to be visual learners.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012055
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572373259</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572373259</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkN1LwzAQwIMoOD_-Bgu-CbXJpWnSR5nzi4HC9Dmk7WV0bElNtof997ZUJoLgvdwd97s7-BFyxegto0plTOaQFqIsMkbzMmMZZUCFOCKTw-T4UCt1Ss5iXFHK-5ATou7bDbrYehcTb5M5muBat0wW2_0aY2I2vm9mbtk6xDAOdg26bbwgJ9asI15-53Py8TB7nz6l89fH5-ndPK25ZCI1Im_KSgDUFUphZFFIa4vGgLIVQq1yQGZtjRXDugJuKwW0QcWpAETR5PycXI93u-A_dxi3euV3wfUvNQgJXHIQZU_JkaqDjzGg1V1oNybsNaN60KQHAXqQoQdNmulRU795M262vvs5_fI2XfwGddfYHuZ_wP-9-ALY7Xdo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572373259</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dimensions of Learning Styles among Engineering Students</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>R Jamali, A. ; M Mohamad, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>R Jamali, A. ; M Mohamad, M.</creatorcontrib><description>Current study is conducted to examine the types of learning styles among engineering students. Felder Silverman learning style model (FSLSM) was used to measure the types of learning styles represent engineering students. FSLSM contains four dimensions that intended to identify learning preferences of students with respect to process information, perceive information, input information and understand information. Each dimension consisted of two sub-dimensions such as in processing dimension learner can be either active learner or reflective learner, this pattern follows in all four dimensions, perceive dimension distinguishes sensing or intuitive learner, input dimension distinguishes visual learners or verbal learners, understand distinguishes sequential or global learners. This study applied survey research method. Index of learning styles (ILS) was used as a tool to collect data. A total of 315 engineering students participated from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Finding revealed that engineering students are tending to be visual learners.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012055</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Cognitive style ; Engineering ; Engineering education ; Learning ; Physics ; Students</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2018-07, Vol.1049 (1), p.12055</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2572373259?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,25734,27905,27906,36993,44571</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>R Jamali, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Mohamad, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Dimensions of Learning Styles among Engineering Students</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Current study is conducted to examine the types of learning styles among engineering students. Felder Silverman learning style model (FSLSM) was used to measure the types of learning styles represent engineering students. FSLSM contains four dimensions that intended to identify learning preferences of students with respect to process information, perceive information, input information and understand information. Each dimension consisted of two sub-dimensions such as in processing dimension learner can be either active learner or reflective learner, this pattern follows in all four dimensions, perceive dimension distinguishes sensing or intuitive learner, input dimension distinguishes visual learners or verbal learners, understand distinguishes sequential or global learners. This study applied survey research method. Index of learning styles (ILS) was used as a tool to collect data. A total of 315 engineering students participated from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Finding revealed that engineering students are tending to be visual learners.</description><subject>Cognitive style</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Engineering education</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkN1LwzAQwIMoOD_-Bgu-CbXJpWnSR5nzi4HC9Dmk7WV0bElNtof997ZUJoLgvdwd97s7-BFyxegto0plTOaQFqIsMkbzMmMZZUCFOCKTw-T4UCt1Ss5iXFHK-5ATou7bDbrYehcTb5M5muBat0wW2_0aY2I2vm9mbtk6xDAOdg26bbwgJ9asI15-53Py8TB7nz6l89fH5-ndPK25ZCI1Im_KSgDUFUphZFFIa4vGgLIVQq1yQGZtjRXDugJuKwW0QcWpAETR5PycXI93u-A_dxi3euV3wfUvNQgJXHIQZU_JkaqDjzGg1V1oNybsNaN60KQHAXqQoQdNmulRU795M262vvs5_fI2XfwGddfYHuZ_wP-9-ALY7Xdo</recordid><startdate>20180701</startdate><enddate>20180701</enddate><creator>R Jamali, A.</creator><creator>M Mohamad, M.</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180701</creationdate><title>Dimensions of Learning Styles among Engineering Students</title><author>R Jamali, A. ; M Mohamad, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Cognitive style</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Engineering education</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>R Jamali, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>M Mohamad, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>R Jamali, A.</au><au>M Mohamad, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dimensions of Learning Styles among Engineering Students</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2018-07-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>1049</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12055</spage><pages>12055-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Current study is conducted to examine the types of learning styles among engineering students. Felder Silverman learning style model (FSLSM) was used to measure the types of learning styles represent engineering students. FSLSM contains four dimensions that intended to identify learning preferences of students with respect to process information, perceive information, input information and understand information. Each dimension consisted of two sub-dimensions such as in processing dimension learner can be either active learner or reflective learner, this pattern follows in all four dimensions, perceive dimension distinguishes sensing or intuitive learner, input dimension distinguishes visual learners or verbal learners, understand distinguishes sequential or global learners. This study applied survey research method. Index of learning styles (ILS) was used as a tool to collect data. A total of 315 engineering students participated from Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia. Finding revealed that engineering students are tending to be visual learners.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012055</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6588
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2018-07, Vol.1049 (1), p.12055
issn 1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2572373259
source Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Cognitive style
Engineering
Engineering education
Learning
Physics
Students
title Dimensions of Learning Styles among Engineering Students
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T01%3A20%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dimensions%20of%20Learning%20Styles%20among%20Engineering%20Students&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=R%20Jamali,%20A.&rft.date=2018-07-01&rft.volume=1049&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12055&rft.pages=12055-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/1049/1/012055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2572373259%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3715-a54d9b522cbe75a7667ff6da28fbe2c842e1ffceb1ecb23fb820de83052ee5d43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572373259&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true