The reintegration officers’ perspectives on offenders to be discharged from community supervision in Singapore

Purpose This paper aims to focus on the perspectives of correctional officers supervising young offenders on community supervision in Singapore. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a qualitative research framework, where attention was devoted to understanding the perspectives of eight rein...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Safer communities 2021-07, Vol.20 (2), p.120-131
Main Author: Chan, Joyce P.S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Case management
Community
Compliance
Correctional personnel
Correctional treatment programs
Criminal sentences
Discharge
Discrimination
Employment
Evidence based research
Evidence-based practice
Ex-convicts
Inequality
Offenders
Parole & probation
Prison officers
Qualitative research
Recidivism
Rehabilitation
Stigma
Supervision
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose This paper aims to focus on the perspectives of correctional officers supervising young offenders on community supervision in Singapore. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a qualitative research framework, where attention was devoted to understanding the perspectives of eight reintegration officers, and what they perceived to have helped young offenders successfully discharged from community supervision. Findings The five essential factors that emerged are compliance to supervision conditions, education and/or employment, ability to cope and efforts to change, support and environment. Each factor is defensible and had been substantiated by past research that incorporates evidence-based practice in correctional rehabilitation for offenders. Research limitations/implications Due to constraints imposed on the research timeline, the five factors identified do not take into account societal-level barriers such as stigma, discrimination and inequalities, which are important factors that can be further explored in subsequent studies. Originality/value In Singapore, there is no research study on the Reintegration Officers' perspectives on what they deemed as critical for offenders to be discharged from community supervision. Understanding these key factors may help to shape future research in determining supervisees’ readiness for discharge from community supervision in Singapore. This knowledge gained could further inform and bolster the correctional rehabilitation services provided by SPS and be further developed into a tool that can be used to systematically assess the readiness of offenders to be discharged from community supervision.
ISSN:1757-8043
2042-8774
DOI:10.1108/SC-08-2020-0027