Comparison of different interpolation methods, used for modelling of probe heads errors

Virtual CMMs allow user to estimate the uncertainty of measurement using multiple measurement simulations. Most often the Virtual CMMs consist of several modules responsible for main errors sources modelling. These modules utilizes different interpolation methods in order to model the error values i...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2018-08, Vol.1065 (14), p.142021
Main Authors: Gąska, P, Gruza, M, Gąska, A, Harmatys, W, Sładek, J
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Coordinate measuring machines
Interpolation
Modelling
Modules
Physics
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2781-30a4dc0aff3d6cb30f5f307cd1094d0b5230849037faf953a149234b3332001d3
container_end_page
container_issue 14
container_start_page 142021
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 1065
creator Gąska, P
Gruza, M
Gąska, A
Harmatys, W
Sładek, J
description Virtual CMMs allow user to estimate the uncertainty of measurement using multiple measurement simulations. Most often the Virtual CMMs consist of several modules responsible for main errors sources modelling. These modules utilizes different interpolation methods in order to model the error values in any point in machine's measuring volume. Thus the proper functioning of Virtual CMM depends on chosen interpolation method. Experiment described in this paper is aimed to assess which interpolation method would give the best results for newly developed probe head errors model for the articulated probe heads.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/1065/14/142021
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2572717021</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2572717021</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2781-30a4dc0aff3d6cb30f5f307cd1094d0b5230849037faf953a149234b3332001d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkNtKxDAQhoMouK6-Q8BLrTs5tGkvpXhEUFDxMqRN4nZpm5p0L3x7UyoriGAIJDDfPzN8CGECFwTyfEUEp0mWFtmKQJauCI-XAiV7aLEr7e_-eX6IjkLYALB4xAK9la4blG-C67GzWDfWGm_6ETf9aPzgWjU2sdSZce10OMfbYDS2zuPOadO2Tf8-xQbvKoPXRumAjffOh2N0YFUbzMn3u0Sv11cv5W3y8HhzV14-JDUVOUkYKK5rUNYyndUVA5taBqLWBAquoUopg5wXwIRVtkiZIrygjFdxeQpANFui07lvXOFja8IoN27r-zhS0lRQQUR0Eal8pmrvQvDGysE3nfKfkoCcNMrJj5xcyUmjJFzOGmP0bI42bvjpff9UPv8i5aBtpPkf9L9DvgC5PYHq</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2572717021</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of different interpolation methods, used for modelling of probe heads errors</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Gąska, P ; Gruza, M ; Gąska, A ; Harmatys, W ; Sładek, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Gąska, P ; Gruza, M ; Gąska, A ; Harmatys, W ; Sładek, J</creatorcontrib><description>Virtual CMMs allow user to estimate the uncertainty of measurement using multiple measurement simulations. Most often the Virtual CMMs consist of several modules responsible for main errors sources modelling. These modules utilizes different interpolation methods in order to model the error values in any point in machine's measuring volume. Thus the proper functioning of Virtual CMM depends on chosen interpolation method. Experiment described in this paper is aimed to assess which interpolation method would give the best results for newly developed probe head errors model for the articulated probe heads.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1065/14/142021</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Coordinate measuring machines ; Interpolation ; Modelling ; Modules ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2018-08, Vol.1065 (14), p.142021</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2781-30a4dc0aff3d6cb30f5f307cd1094d0b5230849037faf953a149234b3332001d3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2572717021?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gąska, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruza, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gąska, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmatys, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sładek, J</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of different interpolation methods, used for modelling of probe heads errors</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Virtual CMMs allow user to estimate the uncertainty of measurement using multiple measurement simulations. Most often the Virtual CMMs consist of several modules responsible for main errors sources modelling. These modules utilizes different interpolation methods in order to model the error values in any point in machine's measuring volume. Thus the proper functioning of Virtual CMM depends on chosen interpolation method. Experiment described in this paper is aimed to assess which interpolation method would give the best results for newly developed probe head errors model for the articulated probe heads.</description><subject>Coordinate measuring machines</subject><subject>Interpolation</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Modules</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkNtKxDAQhoMouK6-Q8BLrTs5tGkvpXhEUFDxMqRN4nZpm5p0L3x7UyoriGAIJDDfPzN8CGECFwTyfEUEp0mWFtmKQJauCI-XAiV7aLEr7e_-eX6IjkLYALB4xAK9la4blG-C67GzWDfWGm_6ETf9aPzgWjU2sdSZce10OMfbYDS2zuPOadO2Tf8-xQbvKoPXRumAjffOh2N0YFUbzMn3u0Sv11cv5W3y8HhzV14-JDUVOUkYKK5rUNYyndUVA5taBqLWBAquoUopg5wXwIRVtkiZIrygjFdxeQpANFui07lvXOFja8IoN27r-zhS0lRQQUR0Eal8pmrvQvDGysE3nfKfkoCcNMrJj5xcyUmjJFzOGmP0bI42bvjpff9UPv8i5aBtpPkf9L9DvgC5PYHq</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Gąska, P</creator><creator>Gruza, M</creator><creator>Gąska, A</creator><creator>Harmatys, W</creator><creator>Sładek, J</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Comparison of different interpolation methods, used for modelling of probe heads errors</title><author>Gąska, P ; Gruza, M ; Gąska, A ; Harmatys, W ; Sładek, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2781-30a4dc0aff3d6cb30f5f307cd1094d0b5230849037faf953a149234b3332001d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Coordinate measuring machines</topic><topic>Interpolation</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Modules</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gąska, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gruza, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gąska, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Harmatys, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sładek, J</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gąska, P</au><au>Gruza, M</au><au>Gąska, A</au><au>Harmatys, W</au><au>Sładek, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of different interpolation methods, used for modelling of probe heads errors</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>1065</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>142021</spage><pages>142021-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Virtual CMMs allow user to estimate the uncertainty of measurement using multiple measurement simulations. Most often the Virtual CMMs consist of several modules responsible for main errors sources modelling. These modules utilizes different interpolation methods in order to model the error values in any point in machine's measuring volume. Thus the proper functioning of Virtual CMM depends on chosen interpolation method. Experiment described in this paper is aimed to assess which interpolation method would give the best results for newly developed probe head errors model for the articulated probe heads.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/1065/14/142021</doi><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6588
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2018-08, Vol.1065 (14), p.142021
issn 1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2572717021
source Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Coordinate measuring machines
Interpolation
Modelling
Modules
Physics
title Comparison of different interpolation methods, used for modelling of probe heads errors
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T18%3A44%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20different%20interpolation%20methods,%20used%20for%20modelling%20of%20probe%20heads%20errors&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=G%C4%85ska,%20P&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=1065&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=142021&rft.pages=142021-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/1065/14/142021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2572717021%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2781-30a4dc0aff3d6cb30f5f307cd1094d0b5230849037faf953a149234b3332001d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2572717021&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true