Loading…

Finite difference method accelerated with sparse solvers for structural analysis of the metal-organic complexes

Finite difference method (FDM) implemented in the FDMNES software [Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63, 125120] was revised. Thorough analysis shows, that the calculated diagonal in the FDM matrix consists of about 96% zero elements. Thus a sparse solver would be more suitable for the problem instead of traditio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2016-05, Vol.712 (1), p.12004
Main Authors: Guda, A A, Guda, S A, Soldatov, M A, Lomachenko, K A, Bugaev, A L, Lamberti, C, Gawelda, W, Bressler, C, Smolentsev, G, Soldatov, A V, Joly, Y
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 12004
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 712
creator Guda, A A
Guda, S A
Soldatov, M A
Lomachenko, K A
Bugaev, A L
Lamberti, C
Gawelda, W
Bressler, C
Smolentsev, G
Soldatov, A V
Joly, Y
description Finite difference method (FDM) implemented in the FDMNES software [Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63, 125120] was revised. Thorough analysis shows, that the calculated diagonal in the FDM matrix consists of about 96% zero elements. Thus a sparse solver would be more suitable for the problem instead of traditional Gaussian elimination for the diagonal neighbourhood. We have tried several iterative sparse solvers and the direct one MUMPS solver with METIS ordering turned out to be the best. Compared to the Gaussian solver present method is up to 40 times faster and allows XANES simulations for complex systems already on personal computers. We show applicability of the software for metal-organic [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex both for low spin and high spin states populated after laser excitation.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/712/1/012004
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575112534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575112534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9LwzAUxYsoOKdfQQI--VCXf226xzGcUwYK6nNI0xuX0S01yab79nZWNgTBvNxw7o9zk3uS5JLgG4KLYkAEp2meDfOBIHRABphQjPlR0ts3jvf3ojhNzkJYYMzaI3qJm9iVjYAqawx4WGlAS4hzVyGlNdTgVYQKfdg4R6FRPgAKrt6AD8g4j0L0ax3XXtVIrVS9DTYgZ1Ccf7uoOnX-Ta2sRtotmxo-IZwnJ0bVAS5-aj95ndy-jKfp7PHufjyapZpzGlOqS0xynONCcax4xhQrM2wwFSUhwEQuqoKbFuBQYFPpIZSCtaLOuBkKLlg_ue5856qWjbdL5bfSKSuno5ncaZhwxgqRbUjLXnVs4937GkKUC7f27X-CpJnICKEZ4y2Vd5T2LgQPZm9LsNwFIXc7lrt9yzYISWQXxOEp1jUH54en8fMvTjaVaVn6B_vPgC9u3ZeS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575112534</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Finite difference method accelerated with sparse solvers for structural analysis of the metal-organic complexes</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Guda, A A ; Guda, S A ; Soldatov, M A ; Lomachenko, K A ; Bugaev, A L ; Lamberti, C ; Gawelda, W ; Bressler, C ; Smolentsev, G ; Soldatov, A V ; Joly, Y</creator><creatorcontrib>Guda, A A ; Guda, S A ; Soldatov, M A ; Lomachenko, K A ; Bugaev, A L ; Lamberti, C ; Gawelda, W ; Bressler, C ; Smolentsev, G ; Soldatov, A V ; Joly, Y</creatorcontrib><description>Finite difference method (FDM) implemented in the FDMNES software [Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63, 125120] was revised. Thorough analysis shows, that the calculated diagonal in the FDM matrix consists of about 96% zero elements. Thus a sparse solver would be more suitable for the problem instead of traditional Gaussian elimination for the diagonal neighbourhood. We have tried several iterative sparse solvers and the direct one MUMPS solver with METIS ordering turned out to be the best. Compared to the Gaussian solver present method is up to 40 times faster and allows XANES simulations for complex systems already on personal computers. We show applicability of the software for metal-organic [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex both for low spin and high spin states populated after laser excitation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/712/1/012004</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Complex systems ; Condensed Matter ; Coordination compounds ; Finite difference method ; Gaussian elimination ; Iron ; Iterative methods ; Materials Science ; Mathematical analysis ; Mumps ; Personal computers ; Physics ; Software ; Solvers ; Structural analysis</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2016-05, Vol.712 (1), p.12004</ispartof><rights>Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2016. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1872-6112</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2575112534?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://hal.science/hal-01433875$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guda, A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guda, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldatov, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomachenko, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugaev, A L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamberti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawelda, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolentsev, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldatov, A V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, Y</creatorcontrib><title>Finite difference method accelerated with sparse solvers for structural analysis of the metal-organic complexes</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><description>Finite difference method (FDM) implemented in the FDMNES software [Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63, 125120] was revised. Thorough analysis shows, that the calculated diagonal in the FDM matrix consists of about 96% zero elements. Thus a sparse solver would be more suitable for the problem instead of traditional Gaussian elimination for the diagonal neighbourhood. We have tried several iterative sparse solvers and the direct one MUMPS solver with METIS ordering turned out to be the best. Compared to the Gaussian solver present method is up to 40 times faster and allows XANES simulations for complex systems already on personal computers. We show applicability of the software for metal-organic [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex both for low spin and high spin states populated after laser excitation.</description><subject>Complex systems</subject><subject>Condensed Matter</subject><subject>Coordination compounds</subject><subject>Finite difference method</subject><subject>Gaussian elimination</subject><subject>Iron</subject><subject>Iterative methods</subject><subject>Materials Science</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mumps</subject><subject>Personal computers</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Solvers</subject><subject>Structural analysis</subject><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkV9LwzAUxYsoOKdfQQI--VCXf226xzGcUwYK6nNI0xuX0S01yab79nZWNgTBvNxw7o9zk3uS5JLgG4KLYkAEp2meDfOBIHRABphQjPlR0ts3jvf3ojhNzkJYYMzaI3qJm9iVjYAqawx4WGlAS4hzVyGlNdTgVYQKfdg4R6FRPgAKrt6AD8g4j0L0ax3XXtVIrVS9DTYgZ1Ccf7uoOnX-Ta2sRtotmxo-IZwnJ0bVAS5-aj95ndy-jKfp7PHufjyapZpzGlOqS0xynONCcax4xhQrM2wwFSUhwEQuqoKbFuBQYFPpIZSCtaLOuBkKLlg_ue5856qWjbdL5bfSKSuno5ncaZhwxgqRbUjLXnVs4937GkKUC7f27X-CpJnICKEZ4y2Vd5T2LgQPZm9LsNwFIXc7lrt9yzYISWQXxOEp1jUH54en8fMvTjaVaVn6B_vPgC9u3ZeS</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Guda, A A</creator><creator>Guda, S A</creator><creator>Soldatov, M A</creator><creator>Lomachenko, K A</creator><creator>Bugaev, A L</creator><creator>Lamberti, C</creator><creator>Gawelda, W</creator><creator>Bressler, C</creator><creator>Smolentsev, G</creator><creator>Soldatov, A V</creator><creator>Joly, Y</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>IOP Science</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>1XC</scope><scope>VOOES</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-6112</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Finite difference method accelerated with sparse solvers for structural analysis of the metal-organic complexes</title><author>Guda, A A ; Guda, S A ; Soldatov, M A ; Lomachenko, K A ; Bugaev, A L ; Lamberti, C ; Gawelda, W ; Bressler, C ; Smolentsev, G ; Soldatov, A V ; Joly, Y</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Complex systems</topic><topic>Condensed Matter</topic><topic>Coordination compounds</topic><topic>Finite difference method</topic><topic>Gaussian elimination</topic><topic>Iron</topic><topic>Iterative methods</topic><topic>Materials Science</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mumps</topic><topic>Personal computers</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Solvers</topic><topic>Structural analysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guda, A A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guda, S A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldatov, M A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lomachenko, K A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bugaev, A L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lamberti, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gawelda, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bressler, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Smolentsev, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Soldatov, A V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joly, Y</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL) (Open Access)</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guda, A A</au><au>Guda, S A</au><au>Soldatov, M A</au><au>Lomachenko, K A</au><au>Bugaev, A L</au><au>Lamberti, C</au><au>Gawelda, W</au><au>Bressler, C</au><au>Smolentsev, G</au><au>Soldatov, A V</au><au>Joly, Y</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Finite difference method accelerated with sparse solvers for structural analysis of the metal-organic complexes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><addtitle>J. Phys.: Conf. Ser</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>712</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>12004</spage><pages>12004-</pages><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>Finite difference method (FDM) implemented in the FDMNES software [Phys. Rev. B, 2001, 63, 125120] was revised. Thorough analysis shows, that the calculated diagonal in the FDM matrix consists of about 96% zero elements. Thus a sparse solver would be more suitable for the problem instead of traditional Gaussian elimination for the diagonal neighbourhood. We have tried several iterative sparse solvers and the direct one MUMPS solver with METIS ordering turned out to be the best. Compared to the Gaussian solver present method is up to 40 times faster and allows XANES simulations for complex systems already on personal computers. We show applicability of the software for metal-organic [Fe(bpy)3]2+ complex both for low spin and high spin states populated after laser excitation.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/712/1/012004</doi><tpages>4</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1872-6112</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6588
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2016-05, Vol.712 (1), p.12004
issn 1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2575112534
source Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Complex systems
Condensed Matter
Coordination compounds
Finite difference method
Gaussian elimination
Iron
Iterative methods
Materials Science
Mathematical analysis
Mumps
Personal computers
Physics
Software
Solvers
Structural analysis
title Finite difference method accelerated with sparse solvers for structural analysis of the metal-organic complexes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T18%3A27%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Finite%20difference%20method%20accelerated%20with%20sparse%20solvers%20for%20structural%20analysis%20of%20the%20metal-organic%20complexes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Guda,%20A%20A&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=712&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=12004&rft.pages=12004-&rft.issn=1742-6588&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/712/1/012004&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_j%3E2575112534%3C/proquest_iop_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c442t-2cb0160608a40a453a3b50f027b11e3767d84f6064e80fdc9eb7367dc54f97473%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575112534&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true