Loading…

Risk-targeted hazard maps for Spain

Many studies have demonstrated that the design of structures in a region through the uniform hazard principle does not guarantee a uniform collapse risk. Even in regions with similar Peak Ground Accelerations (PGAs) corresponding to the same mean return period, the seismic risk in terms of collapse...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2021-10, Vol.19 (13), p.5369-5389
Main Authors: Kharazian, A., Molina, S., Galiana-Merino, J. J., Agea-Medina, N.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53
container_end_page 5389
container_issue 13
container_start_page 5369
container_title Bulletin of earthquake engineering
container_volume 19
creator Kharazian, A.
Molina, S.
Galiana-Merino, J. J.
Agea-Medina, N.
description Many studies have demonstrated that the design of structures in a region through the uniform hazard principle does not guarantee a uniform collapse risk. Even in regions with similar Peak Ground Accelerations (PGAs) corresponding to the same mean return period, the seismic risk in terms of collapse probability will be significantly different mainly due to the shape of the hazard curves as well as uncertainties in structural capacities. In this paper, risk-targeted hazard mapping is being explored in peninsular Spain using a recently updated seismic hazard map. Since risk targeting involves multiple input parameters such as the model parameters of fragility curves, their variability was considered through their probability distribution as observed in reinforced concrete (RC) moment frame buildings, representing the most common building typology in Spain. The influence of the variation of these parameters on the risk results were investigated, and different assumptions for estimating the model parameters of fragility curves are illustrated. These assumptions were included in a fixed (generic) fragility curve or building-site-specific fragility curves. Different acceptable damage states (i.e., collapse and yielding) were considered concerning Spain’s seismicity level. Finally, the maps for risk-targeted design ground motions and risk coefficients are presented. It is outlined that the employment of risk-targeted analysis leads to the modifications for existing design ground motions due to the different shape of the hazard curves across Spain and considering the uncertainty of structural capacity. Moreover, it is found that using the building- and site-specific fragility curves could result in a more uniform seismic risk across the country.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10518-021-01189-8
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2575666720</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2575666720</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gKeFnqOTbD6PUtQKBcEP8Bamu0ndanfXZHvQv97YFbx5mhl4783jR8g5gwsGoC8TA8kMBc4oMGYsNQdkwqQuKRNSHe53oFqxl2NyktIGgEttYUJmD016owPGtR98XbziF8a62GKfitDF4rHHpj0lRwHfkz_7nVPyfHP9NF_Q5f3t3fxqSbE0aqAca7DcVMZY4X2-pABfWxOENAJ1vVJeM9SWBxsQxQoqLyvrUQcmyrqS5ZTMxtw-dh87nwa36XaxzS9dbiuVUppDVvFRVcUupeiD62OzxfjpGLgfGG6E4TIMt4fhTDaVoyllcbv28S_6H9c3HOZgyA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2575666720</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risk-targeted hazard maps for Spain</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kharazian, A. ; Molina, S. ; Galiana-Merino, J. J. ; Agea-Medina, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kharazian, A. ; Molina, S. ; Galiana-Merino, J. J. ; Agea-Medina, N.</creatorcontrib><description>Many studies have demonstrated that the design of structures in a region through the uniform hazard principle does not guarantee a uniform collapse risk. Even in regions with similar Peak Ground Accelerations (PGAs) corresponding to the same mean return period, the seismic risk in terms of collapse probability will be significantly different mainly due to the shape of the hazard curves as well as uncertainties in structural capacities. In this paper, risk-targeted hazard mapping is being explored in peninsular Spain using a recently updated seismic hazard map. Since risk targeting involves multiple input parameters such as the model parameters of fragility curves, their variability was considered through their probability distribution as observed in reinforced concrete (RC) moment frame buildings, representing the most common building typology in Spain. The influence of the variation of these parameters on the risk results were investigated, and different assumptions for estimating the model parameters of fragility curves are illustrated. These assumptions were included in a fixed (generic) fragility curve or building-site-specific fragility curves. Different acceptable damage states (i.e., collapse and yielding) were considered concerning Spain’s seismicity level. Finally, the maps for risk-targeted design ground motions and risk coefficients are presented. It is outlined that the employment of risk-targeted analysis leads to the modifications for existing design ground motions due to the different shape of the hazard curves across Spain and considering the uncertainty of structural capacity. Moreover, it is found that using the building- and site-specific fragility curves could result in a more uniform seismic risk across the country.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1570-761X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-1456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01189-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Buildings ; Civil Engineering ; Coefficients ; Collapse ; Concrete ; Concrete construction ; Design ; Design modifications ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Earth Sciences ; Earthquake damage ; Earthquakes ; Employment ; Engineering research ; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology ; Fragility ; Frame structures ; Geological hazards ; Geophysics/Geodesy ; Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences ; Ground motion ; Hydrogeology ; Mathematical models ; Original Article ; Parameters ; Probability ; Probability distribution ; Probability theory ; Reinforced concrete ; Risk analysis ; Seismic engineering ; Seismic hazard ; Seismicity ; Shape ; Structural Geology ; Typology ; Uncertainty ; Working groups</subject><ispartof>Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-10, Vol.19 (13), p.5369-5389</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kharazian, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galiana-Merino, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agea-Medina, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Risk-targeted hazard maps for Spain</title><title>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</title><addtitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</addtitle><description>Many studies have demonstrated that the design of structures in a region through the uniform hazard principle does not guarantee a uniform collapse risk. Even in regions with similar Peak Ground Accelerations (PGAs) corresponding to the same mean return period, the seismic risk in terms of collapse probability will be significantly different mainly due to the shape of the hazard curves as well as uncertainties in structural capacities. In this paper, risk-targeted hazard mapping is being explored in peninsular Spain using a recently updated seismic hazard map. Since risk targeting involves multiple input parameters such as the model parameters of fragility curves, their variability was considered through their probability distribution as observed in reinforced concrete (RC) moment frame buildings, representing the most common building typology in Spain. The influence of the variation of these parameters on the risk results were investigated, and different assumptions for estimating the model parameters of fragility curves are illustrated. These assumptions were included in a fixed (generic) fragility curve or building-site-specific fragility curves. Different acceptable damage states (i.e., collapse and yielding) were considered concerning Spain’s seismicity level. Finally, the maps for risk-targeted design ground motions and risk coefficients are presented. It is outlined that the employment of risk-targeted analysis leads to the modifications for existing design ground motions due to the different shape of the hazard curves across Spain and considering the uncertainty of structural capacity. Moreover, it is found that using the building- and site-specific fragility curves could result in a more uniform seismic risk across the country.</description><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Civil Engineering</subject><subject>Coefficients</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Concrete</subject><subject>Concrete construction</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Design modifications</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Earthquake damage</subject><subject>Earthquakes</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Engineering research</subject><subject>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</subject><subject>Fragility</subject><subject>Frame structures</subject><subject>Geological hazards</subject><subject>Geophysics/Geodesy</subject><subject>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</subject><subject>Ground motion</subject><subject>Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Original Article</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Probability</subject><subject>Probability distribution</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Reinforced concrete</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Seismic engineering</subject><subject>Seismic hazard</subject><subject>Seismicity</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Structural Geology</subject><subject>Typology</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><subject>Working groups</subject><issn>1570-761X</issn><issn>1573-1456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKv_gKeFnqOTbD6PUtQKBcEP8Bamu0ndanfXZHvQv97YFbx5mhl4783jR8g5gwsGoC8TA8kMBc4oMGYsNQdkwqQuKRNSHe53oFqxl2NyktIGgEttYUJmD016owPGtR98XbziF8a62GKfitDF4rHHpj0lRwHfkz_7nVPyfHP9NF_Q5f3t3fxqSbE0aqAca7DcVMZY4X2-pABfWxOENAJ1vVJeM9SWBxsQxQoqLyvrUQcmyrqS5ZTMxtw-dh87nwa36XaxzS9dbiuVUppDVvFRVcUupeiD62OzxfjpGLgfGG6E4TIMt4fhTDaVoyllcbv28S_6H9c3HOZgyA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Kharazian, A.</creator><creator>Molina, S.</creator><creator>Galiana-Merino, J. J.</creator><creator>Agea-Medina, N.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Risk-targeted hazard maps for Spain</title><author>Kharazian, A. ; Molina, S. ; Galiana-Merino, J. J. ; Agea-Medina, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Civil Engineering</topic><topic>Coefficients</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Concrete</topic><topic>Concrete construction</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Design modifications</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Earthquake damage</topic><topic>Earthquakes</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Engineering research</topic><topic>Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology</topic><topic>Fragility</topic><topic>Frame structures</topic><topic>Geological hazards</topic><topic>Geophysics/Geodesy</topic><topic>Geotechnical Engineering &amp; Applied Earth Sciences</topic><topic>Ground motion</topic><topic>Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Original Article</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Probability</topic><topic>Probability distribution</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Reinforced concrete</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Seismic engineering</topic><topic>Seismic hazard</topic><topic>Seismicity</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Structural Geology</topic><topic>Typology</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><topic>Working groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kharazian, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molina, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Galiana-Merino, J. J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Agea-Medina, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kharazian, A.</au><au>Molina, S.</au><au>Galiana-Merino, J. J.</au><au>Agea-Medina, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risk-targeted hazard maps for Spain</atitle><jtitle>Bulletin of earthquake engineering</jtitle><stitle>Bull Earthquake Eng</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>13</issue><spage>5369</spage><epage>5389</epage><pages>5369-5389</pages><issn>1570-761X</issn><eissn>1573-1456</eissn><abstract>Many studies have demonstrated that the design of structures in a region through the uniform hazard principle does not guarantee a uniform collapse risk. Even in regions with similar Peak Ground Accelerations (PGAs) corresponding to the same mean return period, the seismic risk in terms of collapse probability will be significantly different mainly due to the shape of the hazard curves as well as uncertainties in structural capacities. In this paper, risk-targeted hazard mapping is being explored in peninsular Spain using a recently updated seismic hazard map. Since risk targeting involves multiple input parameters such as the model parameters of fragility curves, their variability was considered through their probability distribution as observed in reinforced concrete (RC) moment frame buildings, representing the most common building typology in Spain. The influence of the variation of these parameters on the risk results were investigated, and different assumptions for estimating the model parameters of fragility curves are illustrated. These assumptions were included in a fixed (generic) fragility curve or building-site-specific fragility curves. Different acceptable damage states (i.e., collapse and yielding) were considered concerning Spain’s seismicity level. Finally, the maps for risk-targeted design ground motions and risk coefficients are presented. It is outlined that the employment of risk-targeted analysis leads to the modifications for existing design ground motions due to the different shape of the hazard curves across Spain and considering the uncertainty of structural capacity. Moreover, it is found that using the building- and site-specific fragility curves could result in a more uniform seismic risk across the country.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10518-021-01189-8</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1570-761X
ispartof Bulletin of earthquake engineering, 2021-10, Vol.19 (13), p.5369-5389
issn 1570-761X
1573-1456
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2575666720
source Springer Link
subjects Buildings
Civil Engineering
Coefficients
Collapse
Concrete
Concrete construction
Design
Design modifications
Earth and Environmental Science
Earth Sciences
Earthquake damage
Earthquakes
Employment
Engineering research
Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology
Fragility
Frame structures
Geological hazards
Geophysics/Geodesy
Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences
Ground motion
Hydrogeology
Mathematical models
Original Article
Parameters
Probability
Probability distribution
Probability theory
Reinforced concrete
Risk analysis
Seismic engineering
Seismic hazard
Seismicity
Shape
Structural Geology
Typology
Uncertainty
Working groups
title Risk-targeted hazard maps for Spain
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A58%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risk-targeted%20hazard%20maps%20for%20Spain&rft.jtitle=Bulletin%20of%20earthquake%20engineering&rft.au=Kharazian,%20A.&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=13&rft.spage=5369&rft.epage=5389&rft.pages=5369-5389&rft.issn=1570-761X&rft.eissn=1573-1456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10518-021-01189-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2575666720%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a386t-2ad0928c8894ee2ad540ed98f4584a7db6e71a792f9faa4b0ce5c9ea7f143dc53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2575666720&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true