Loading…
661 Identifying children ‘missing’ during UK COVID-19 lockdown: A retrospective cohort study (2015–2020) of Oxfordshire ED attendances and inpatient diagnoses
BackgroundOn 23rd March 2020, the UK ‘stay at home’ order heralded the first national lockdown, lasting 7-weeks. Dramatic reductions of paediatric attendances/admissions were noted nationally and internationally, with concerns surrounding diagnosis which may be missing from secondary care.We conduct...
Saved in:
Published in: | Archives of disease in childhood 2021-10, Vol.106 (Suppl 1), p.A74-A74 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | A74 |
container_issue | Suppl 1 |
container_start_page | A74 |
container_title | Archives of disease in childhood |
container_volume | 106 |
creator | Charlesworth, James EG Bold, Rhian Pal, Rani |
description | BackgroundOn 23rd March 2020, the UK ‘stay at home’ order heralded the first national lockdown, lasting 7-weeks. Dramatic reductions of paediatric attendances/admissions were noted nationally and internationally, with concerns surrounding diagnosis which may be missing from secondary care.We conducted a systematic review on 9th January 2021, searching PubMed for ‘COVID’, AND ‘lockdown’, AND ‘paediatric’ OR ‘children’, AND ‘attendance’ OR ‘admission’, in all languages using MESH terms. This identified n=41 primary articles exploring paediatric healthcare usage during a lockdown period. These covered Europe, Brazil, USA, Canada, Iran, and India. 44% examined ED settings only; 49% reported on admissions for a single disease or specialty; only 2 examined all inpatients.No previous study has explored the changing patterns of diagnoses amongst all paediatric inpatients during a lockdown period, compared to historical years.ObjectivesTo establish the changing patterns of ED attendance and inpatient diagnoses across two Oxfordshire hospitals during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020, compared to five historical years (2015–2019).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed anonymised electronic records for all ED attendances and inpatients aged 0–15 years, across two Oxfordshire hospitals providing secondary and tertiary care services. Discharge ICD-10 coding were analysed to identify significant differences in lockdown inpatient diagnoses, compared to a matched 7-weeks in 2015–2019 (Mann-Whitney U test, admissions-per-week).ResultsDuring the first 2020 lockdown period, 2,843 diagnoses were associated with 1,416 admissions (mean 4.81 diagnoses/patient), compared with 12,458 admissions and 19,946 diagnoses across matched dates 2015–2019 (2.97 diagnoses/patient). Lockdown ED attendances (n=4030) and admissions (n=1416) were reduced by 56.8% and 59.4%, respectively, compared to 2015–2019 (mean n=7446.8 and n=2491.6, respectively). Proportions of admissions from ED and patients’ subsequent length of stay were similar across all years. Reductions in hospital admissions were highest in 1–5-year-old (age |
doi_str_mv | 10.1136/archdischild-2021-rcpch.127 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578035887</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578035887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1297-42baa1603e53e18f6523d7cf98e085e6082fdffa05ebe69870609fdbbf231c823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkc1uEzEUhS0EEqHwDlfqhi6mvbYzHg-7Ki00olI2lO3I45-OQ2qntlPoLhuegE37AjxYnoRJiwSrK517dM6RPkIOKR5TysWJSnowPuvBr0zFkNEq6bUejilrXpAJnQo5qtPpSzJBRF61UsrX5E3OS0TKpOQT8lsIutv-nBsbinf3PlzDU1qyAXbbhxuf86jtto9gNmn_vfoMs8XX-VlFW1hF_c3E7-EDnEKyJcW8trr4Ows6DjEVyGVj7uE9Q1rvtr_GgXgE0cHih4vJ5MEnC-dnoEqxwaigbQYVDPiwVsWPg8B4dR1itvkteeXUKtt3f-8Bufp4_mV2UV0uPs1np5dVT1nbVFPWK0UFcltzS6UTNeOm0a6VFmVtBUrmjHMKa9tb0coGBbbO9L1jnGrJ-AE5fM5dp3i7sbl0y7hJYazsWN1I5LWUzehqnl39zfKfgWK3h9L9D6XbQ-meoHQjFP4HrJ-JwA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578035887</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>661 Identifying children ‘missing’ during UK COVID-19 lockdown: A retrospective cohort study (2015–2020) of Oxfordshire ED attendances and inpatient diagnoses</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Charlesworth, James EG ; Bold, Rhian ; Pal, Rani</creator><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, James EG ; Bold, Rhian ; Pal, Rani</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundOn 23rd March 2020, the UK ‘stay at home’ order heralded the first national lockdown, lasting 7-weeks. Dramatic reductions of paediatric attendances/admissions were noted nationally and internationally, with concerns surrounding diagnosis which may be missing from secondary care.We conducted a systematic review on 9th January 2021, searching PubMed for ‘COVID’, AND ‘lockdown’, AND ‘paediatric’ OR ‘children’, AND ‘attendance’ OR ‘admission’, in all languages using MESH terms. This identified n=41 primary articles exploring paediatric healthcare usage during a lockdown period. These covered Europe, Brazil, USA, Canada, Iran, and India. 44% examined ED settings only; 49% reported on admissions for a single disease or specialty; only 2 examined all inpatients.No previous study has explored the changing patterns of diagnoses amongst all paediatric inpatients during a lockdown period, compared to historical years.ObjectivesTo establish the changing patterns of ED attendance and inpatient diagnoses across two Oxfordshire hospitals during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020, compared to five historical years (2015–2019).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed anonymised electronic records for all ED attendances and inpatients aged 0–15 years, across two Oxfordshire hospitals providing secondary and tertiary care services. Discharge ICD-10 coding were analysed to identify significant differences in lockdown inpatient diagnoses, compared to a matched 7-weeks in 2015–2019 (Mann-Whitney U test, admissions-per-week).ResultsDuring the first 2020 lockdown period, 2,843 diagnoses were associated with 1,416 admissions (mean 4.81 diagnoses/patient), compared with 12,458 admissions and 19,946 diagnoses across matched dates 2015–2019 (2.97 diagnoses/patient). Lockdown ED attendances (n=4030) and admissions (n=1416) were reduced by 56.8% and 59.4%, respectively, compared to 2015–2019 (mean n=7446.8 and n=2491.6, respectively). Proportions of admissions from ED and patients’ subsequent length of stay were similar across all years. Reductions in hospital admissions were highest in 1–5-year-old (age <1 =48.4%, 1–5 =67.2%, 6–10 =53.3% and 11–15 years =48.9%).We categorised diagnostic codes significantly reduced during lockdown (’missing’) compared to 2015–2019: 80% were infectious diseases or their sequelae; non-specific pains/aches/malaise (11%) and accidental injury/poisonings (9%) accounted for the remaining 20%. Categories with increased diagnoses (24% of lockdown diagnoses) were ‘related to pandemic screening’, ‘incidental finding/co-morbidity’ and ‘other diagnoses’. We also found significantly greater numbers of neoplasms (benign and malignant) diagnosed during lockdown (p=0.0123).ConclusionsPandemic measures and messaging are altering paediatric disease presentation. Our study confirms large reductions in paediatric ED attendances and inpatient admissions during the first national lockdown, raising concerns of vulnerable children ‘lost’ to secondary care.Our assessment of ‘missing’ paediatric diagnoses uses internationally comparable ICD-10 codes. We therefore postulate that the 80% of infection-related diagnoses ‘missing’ during the lockdown period are driven by a combination of stringent infection-control measures, parents/carers management of mild/self-limiting disease at home, and/or increased anxiety surrounding hospital attendance. As 20% were non-specific or accidental injuries, we remain concerned about significant disease with late presentations or patients with safeguarding concerns who may not be brought to hospital, amongst these patients.Prospective studies are necessary to establish whether parents/carers are adequately supported, have adequate contact with health professionals and feel empowered to use referral pathways for hospital review.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-9888</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1468-2044</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/archdischild-2021-rcpch.127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</publisher><subject>Abstracts ; Children ; Coding ; Complications ; Coronaviruses ; COVID-19 ; Disease ; Health care ; Hospitals ; Infectious diseases ; Medical diagnosis ; Medical personnel ; Morbidity ; Pandemics ; Patients ; Pediatrics ; Public health</subject><ispartof>Archives of disease in childhood, 2021-10, Vol.106 (Suppl 1), p.A74-A74</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2578035887/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2578035887?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,21358,21374,27903,27904,33590,33856,43712,43859,73967,74143</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, James EG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bold, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Rani</creatorcontrib><title>661 Identifying children ‘missing’ during UK COVID-19 lockdown: A retrospective cohort study (2015–2020) of Oxfordshire ED attendances and inpatient diagnoses</title><title>Archives of disease in childhood</title><addtitle>Arch Dis Child</addtitle><description>BackgroundOn 23rd March 2020, the UK ‘stay at home’ order heralded the first national lockdown, lasting 7-weeks. Dramatic reductions of paediatric attendances/admissions were noted nationally and internationally, with concerns surrounding diagnosis which may be missing from secondary care.We conducted a systematic review on 9th January 2021, searching PubMed for ‘COVID’, AND ‘lockdown’, AND ‘paediatric’ OR ‘children’, AND ‘attendance’ OR ‘admission’, in all languages using MESH terms. This identified n=41 primary articles exploring paediatric healthcare usage during a lockdown period. These covered Europe, Brazil, USA, Canada, Iran, and India. 44% examined ED settings only; 49% reported on admissions for a single disease or specialty; only 2 examined all inpatients.No previous study has explored the changing patterns of diagnoses amongst all paediatric inpatients during a lockdown period, compared to historical years.ObjectivesTo establish the changing patterns of ED attendance and inpatient diagnoses across two Oxfordshire hospitals during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020, compared to five historical years (2015–2019).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed anonymised electronic records for all ED attendances and inpatients aged 0–15 years, across two Oxfordshire hospitals providing secondary and tertiary care services. Discharge ICD-10 coding were analysed to identify significant differences in lockdown inpatient diagnoses, compared to a matched 7-weeks in 2015–2019 (Mann-Whitney U test, admissions-per-week).ResultsDuring the first 2020 lockdown period, 2,843 diagnoses were associated with 1,416 admissions (mean 4.81 diagnoses/patient), compared with 12,458 admissions and 19,946 diagnoses across matched dates 2015–2019 (2.97 diagnoses/patient). Lockdown ED attendances (n=4030) and admissions (n=1416) were reduced by 56.8% and 59.4%, respectively, compared to 2015–2019 (mean n=7446.8 and n=2491.6, respectively). Proportions of admissions from ED and patients’ subsequent length of stay were similar across all years. Reductions in hospital admissions were highest in 1–5-year-old (age <1 =48.4%, 1–5 =67.2%, 6–10 =53.3% and 11–15 years =48.9%).We categorised diagnostic codes significantly reduced during lockdown (’missing’) compared to 2015–2019: 80% were infectious diseases or their sequelae; non-specific pains/aches/malaise (11%) and accidental injury/poisonings (9%) accounted for the remaining 20%. Categories with increased diagnoses (24% of lockdown diagnoses) were ‘related to pandemic screening’, ‘incidental finding/co-morbidity’ and ‘other diagnoses’. We also found significantly greater numbers of neoplasms (benign and malignant) diagnosed during lockdown (p=0.0123).ConclusionsPandemic measures and messaging are altering paediatric disease presentation. Our study confirms large reductions in paediatric ED attendances and inpatient admissions during the first national lockdown, raising concerns of vulnerable children ‘lost’ to secondary care.Our assessment of ‘missing’ paediatric diagnoses uses internationally comparable ICD-10 codes. We therefore postulate that the 80% of infection-related diagnoses ‘missing’ during the lockdown period are driven by a combination of stringent infection-control measures, parents/carers management of mild/self-limiting disease at home, and/or increased anxiety surrounding hospital attendance. As 20% were non-specific or accidental injuries, we remain concerned about significant disease with late presentations or patients with safeguarding concerns who may not be brought to hospital, amongst these patients.Prospective studies are necessary to establish whether parents/carers are adequately supported, have adequate contact with health professionals and feel empowered to use referral pathways for hospital review.</description><subject>Abstracts</subject><subject>Children</subject><subject>Coding</subject><subject>Complications</subject><subject>Coronaviruses</subject><subject>COVID-19</subject><subject>Disease</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Infectious diseases</subject><subject>Medical diagnosis</subject><subject>Medical personnel</subject><subject>Morbidity</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Public health</subject><issn>0003-9888</issn><issn>1468-2044</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkc1uEzEUhS0EEqHwDlfqhi6mvbYzHg-7Ki00olI2lO3I45-OQ2qntlPoLhuegE37AjxYnoRJiwSrK517dM6RPkIOKR5TysWJSnowPuvBr0zFkNEq6bUejilrXpAJnQo5qtPpSzJBRF61UsrX5E3OS0TKpOQT8lsIutv-nBsbinf3PlzDU1qyAXbbhxuf86jtto9gNmn_vfoMs8XX-VlFW1hF_c3E7-EDnEKyJcW8trr4Ows6DjEVyGVj7uE9Q1rvtr_GgXgE0cHih4vJ5MEnC-dnoEqxwaigbQYVDPiwVsWPg8B4dR1itvkteeXUKtt3f-8Bufp4_mV2UV0uPs1np5dVT1nbVFPWK0UFcltzS6UTNeOm0a6VFmVtBUrmjHMKa9tb0coGBbbO9L1jnGrJ-AE5fM5dp3i7sbl0y7hJYazsWN1I5LWUzehqnl39zfKfgWK3h9L9D6XbQ-meoHQjFP4HrJ-JwA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Charlesworth, James EG</creator><creator>Bold, Rhian</creator><creator>Pal, Rani</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8AF</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AN0</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>661 Identifying children ‘missing’ during UK COVID-19 lockdown: A retrospective cohort study (2015–2020) of Oxfordshire ED attendances and inpatient diagnoses</title><author>Charlesworth, James EG ; Bold, Rhian ; Pal, Rani</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1297-42baa1603e53e18f6523d7cf98e085e6082fdffa05ebe69870609fdbbf231c823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Abstracts</topic><topic>Children</topic><topic>Coding</topic><topic>Complications</topic><topic>Coronaviruses</topic><topic>COVID-19</topic><topic>Disease</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Infectious diseases</topic><topic>Medical diagnosis</topic><topic>Medical personnel</topic><topic>Morbidity</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Public health</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Charlesworth, James EG</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bold, Rhian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pal, Rani</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>STEM Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>British Nursing Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Consumer Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Charlesworth, James EG</au><au>Bold, Rhian</au><au>Pal, Rani</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>661 Identifying children ‘missing’ during UK COVID-19 lockdown: A retrospective cohort study (2015–2020) of Oxfordshire ED attendances and inpatient diagnoses</atitle><jtitle>Archives of disease in childhood</jtitle><stitle>Arch Dis Child</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>106</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A74</spage><epage>A74</epage><pages>A74-A74</pages><issn>0003-9888</issn><eissn>1468-2044</eissn><abstract>BackgroundOn 23rd March 2020, the UK ‘stay at home’ order heralded the first national lockdown, lasting 7-weeks. Dramatic reductions of paediatric attendances/admissions were noted nationally and internationally, with concerns surrounding diagnosis which may be missing from secondary care.We conducted a systematic review on 9th January 2021, searching PubMed for ‘COVID’, AND ‘lockdown’, AND ‘paediatric’ OR ‘children’, AND ‘attendance’ OR ‘admission’, in all languages using MESH terms. This identified n=41 primary articles exploring paediatric healthcare usage during a lockdown period. These covered Europe, Brazil, USA, Canada, Iran, and India. 44% examined ED settings only; 49% reported on admissions for a single disease or specialty; only 2 examined all inpatients.No previous study has explored the changing patterns of diagnoses amongst all paediatric inpatients during a lockdown period, compared to historical years.ObjectivesTo establish the changing patterns of ED attendance and inpatient diagnoses across two Oxfordshire hospitals during the first COVID-19 lockdown in 2020, compared to five historical years (2015–2019).MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed anonymised electronic records for all ED attendances and inpatients aged 0–15 years, across two Oxfordshire hospitals providing secondary and tertiary care services. Discharge ICD-10 coding were analysed to identify significant differences in lockdown inpatient diagnoses, compared to a matched 7-weeks in 2015–2019 (Mann-Whitney U test, admissions-per-week).ResultsDuring the first 2020 lockdown period, 2,843 diagnoses were associated with 1,416 admissions (mean 4.81 diagnoses/patient), compared with 12,458 admissions and 19,946 diagnoses across matched dates 2015–2019 (2.97 diagnoses/patient). Lockdown ED attendances (n=4030) and admissions (n=1416) were reduced by 56.8% and 59.4%, respectively, compared to 2015–2019 (mean n=7446.8 and n=2491.6, respectively). Proportions of admissions from ED and patients’ subsequent length of stay were similar across all years. Reductions in hospital admissions were highest in 1–5-year-old (age <1 =48.4%, 1–5 =67.2%, 6–10 =53.3% and 11–15 years =48.9%).We categorised diagnostic codes significantly reduced during lockdown (’missing’) compared to 2015–2019: 80% were infectious diseases or their sequelae; non-specific pains/aches/malaise (11%) and accidental injury/poisonings (9%) accounted for the remaining 20%. Categories with increased diagnoses (24% of lockdown diagnoses) were ‘related to pandemic screening’, ‘incidental finding/co-morbidity’ and ‘other diagnoses’. We also found significantly greater numbers of neoplasms (benign and malignant) diagnosed during lockdown (p=0.0123).ConclusionsPandemic measures and messaging are altering paediatric disease presentation. Our study confirms large reductions in paediatric ED attendances and inpatient admissions during the first national lockdown, raising concerns of vulnerable children ‘lost’ to secondary care.Our assessment of ‘missing’ paediatric diagnoses uses internationally comparable ICD-10 codes. We therefore postulate that the 80% of infection-related diagnoses ‘missing’ during the lockdown period are driven by a combination of stringent infection-control measures, parents/carers management of mild/self-limiting disease at home, and/or increased anxiety surrounding hospital attendance. As 20% were non-specific or accidental injuries, we remain concerned about significant disease with late presentations or patients with safeguarding concerns who may not be brought to hospital, amongst these patients.Prospective studies are necessary to establish whether parents/carers are adequately supported, have adequate contact with health professionals and feel empowered to use referral pathways for hospital review.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health</pub><doi>10.1136/archdischild-2021-rcpch.127</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-9888 |
ispartof | Archives of disease in childhood, 2021-10, Vol.106 (Suppl 1), p.A74-A74 |
issn | 0003-9888 1468-2044 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2578035887 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | Abstracts Children Coding Complications Coronaviruses COVID-19 Disease Health care Hospitals Infectious diseases Medical diagnosis Medical personnel Morbidity Pandemics Patients Pediatrics Public health |
title | 661 Identifying children ‘missing’ during UK COVID-19 lockdown: A retrospective cohort study (2015–2020) of Oxfordshire ED attendances and inpatient diagnoses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-23T22%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=661%E2%80%85Identifying%20children%20%E2%80%98missing%E2%80%99%20during%20UK%20COVID-19%20lockdown:%20A%20retrospective%20cohort%20study%20(2015%E2%80%932020)%20of%20Oxfordshire%20ED%20attendances%20and%20inpatient%20diagnoses&rft.jtitle=Archives%20of%20disease%20in%20childhood&rft.au=Charlesworth,%20James%20EG&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=106&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A74&rft.epage=A74&rft.pages=A74-A74&rft.issn=0003-9888&rft.eissn=1468-2044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/archdischild-2021-rcpch.127&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2578035887%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1297-42baa1603e53e18f6523d7cf98e085e6082fdffa05ebe69870609fdbbf231c823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578035887&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |