Loading…
Investigating Language Learning Strategy Use by Bhutanese Undergraduate Students
Language learning strategies have emerged as an important field of inquiry and have generated a massive amount of research output in the field of TESOL and applied linguistics. However, research that explores undergraduate student's language strategy use in two varying learning contexts is scar...
Saved in:
Published in: | I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching 2021, Vol.11 (1), p.28 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c917-607bfd7dee2874313380b6bbad4ee8a4eaa9703570f8351125c76b35b16eb3453 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 28 |
container_title | I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Dhendup, Sonam |
description | Language learning strategies have emerged as an important field of inquiry and have generated a massive amount of research output in the field of TESOL and applied linguistics. However, research that explores undergraduate student's language strategy use in two varying learning contexts is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in language learning strategy use and choice between gender and context. In this study, Oxford, 1990's SILL questionnaire was administered to 30 Bhutanese undergraduate students. Their responses on six parts of SILL were subjected to mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA. The results of an independent t-test showed differences between gender in ESL context while no statistical differences were observed between gender in EFL context. Further, ANOVA and MANOVA tests revealed that there were significant differences between the two learning contexts in terms of their language learning strategy use and choice. The study also showed that 'memory' strategy was least used (M=2.88; SD=0.63) while social strategy (M=3.30; SD=0.51) was the highly favoured strategy by Bhutanese students in general, but to a varying degree. Based on these findings, students studying in Australia seem to have scored relatively higher on the overall strategy use as opposed to their counterparts studying in Bhutan. Thus, the learning context of students can influence language learning strategy choice and their use. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26634/jelt.11.1.17552 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578165687</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1304173</ericid><sourcerecordid>2578165687</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c917-607bfd7dee2874313380b6bbad4ee8a4eaa9703570f8351125c76b35b16eb3453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4MoOObuXoSC5868pEm6o46pk4KC2zkk7WvtmNlMWqH_vakTeYf3g8_79SXkGuicScmzux3uuznAPJoSgp2RCWPZIqVKsPMx5pByzvNLMgthRynlFGiu2IS8rd03hq5tTNe6JimMa3rTYFKg8W6svHfedNgMyTZgYofk4aPvjMOYbF2FvvGm6iMQub5C14UrclGbfcDZn5-SzeNqs3xOi9en9fK-SMsFqFRSZetKVYgsVxmHeBu10lpTZYi5ydCYhaJcKFrnXAAwUSppubAg0fJM8Cm5PY09-sNXHz_Qu0PvXdyomVA5SCFzFSl6okp_CMFjrY--_TR-0ED1r3J6VE4D6GijcrHl5tSCvi3_8dULcJqB4vwHuTprGw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578165687</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Investigating Language Learning Strategy Use by Bhutanese Undergraduate Students</title><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Linguistics Collection</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><creator>Dhendup, Sonam</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhendup, Sonam ; Ministry of Education, Thimphu, Bhutan</creatorcontrib><description>Language learning strategies have emerged as an important field of inquiry and have generated a massive amount of research output in the field of TESOL and applied linguistics. However, research that explores undergraduate student's language strategy use in two varying learning contexts is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in language learning strategy use and choice between gender and context. In this study, Oxford, 1990's SILL questionnaire was administered to 30 Bhutanese undergraduate students. Their responses on six parts of SILL were subjected to mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA. The results of an independent t-test showed differences between gender in ESL context while no statistical differences were observed between gender in EFL context. Further, ANOVA and MANOVA tests revealed that there were significant differences between the two learning contexts in terms of their language learning strategy use and choice. The study also showed that 'memory' strategy was least used (M=2.88; SD=0.63) while social strategy (M=3.30; SD=0.51) was the highly favoured strategy by Bhutanese students in general, but to a varying degree. Based on these findings, students studying in Australia seem to have scored relatively higher on the overall strategy use as opposed to their counterparts studying in Bhutan. Thus, the learning context of students can influence language learning strategy choice and their use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2231-3338</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2249-0752</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26634/jelt.11.1.17552</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nagercoil: i-manager Publications</publisher><subject>Applied linguistics ; College students ; Cross Cultural Studies ; English (Second Language) ; English as a second language learning ; Foreign Countries ; Foreign Students ; Gender ; Gender Differences ; Learning environment ; Learning Strategies ; Measures (Individuals) ; Metacognition ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Statistical analysis ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 2021, Vol.11 (1), p.28</ispartof><rights>2021 i-manager publications. All rights reserved.</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c917-607bfd7dee2874313380b6bbad4ee8a4eaa9703570f8351125c76b35b16eb3453</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2578165687?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,12851,21382,21394,27923,27924,27925,31269,33611,33911,43733,43896</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1304173$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhendup, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ministry of Education, Thimphu, Bhutan</creatorcontrib><title>Investigating Language Learning Strategy Use by Bhutanese Undergraduate Students</title><title>I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching</title><description>Language learning strategies have emerged as an important field of inquiry and have generated a massive amount of research output in the field of TESOL and applied linguistics. However, research that explores undergraduate student's language strategy use in two varying learning contexts is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in language learning strategy use and choice between gender and context. In this study, Oxford, 1990's SILL questionnaire was administered to 30 Bhutanese undergraduate students. Their responses on six parts of SILL were subjected to mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA. The results of an independent t-test showed differences between gender in ESL context while no statistical differences were observed between gender in EFL context. Further, ANOVA and MANOVA tests revealed that there were significant differences between the two learning contexts in terms of their language learning strategy use and choice. The study also showed that 'memory' strategy was least used (M=2.88; SD=0.63) while social strategy (M=3.30; SD=0.51) was the highly favoured strategy by Bhutanese students in general, but to a varying degree. Based on these findings, students studying in Australia seem to have scored relatively higher on the overall strategy use as opposed to their counterparts studying in Bhutan. Thus, the learning context of students can influence language learning strategy choice and their use.</description><subject>Applied linguistics</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Cross Cultural Studies</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Foreign Students</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Learning environment</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>2231-3338</issn><issn>2249-0752</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CPGLG</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM9LwzAUx4MoOObuXoSC5868pEm6o46pk4KC2zkk7WvtmNlMWqH_vakTeYf3g8_79SXkGuicScmzux3uuznAPJoSgp2RCWPZIqVKsPMx5pByzvNLMgthRynlFGiu2IS8rd03hq5tTNe6JimMa3rTYFKg8W6svHfedNgMyTZgYofk4aPvjMOYbF2FvvGm6iMQub5C14UrclGbfcDZn5-SzeNqs3xOi9en9fK-SMsFqFRSZetKVYgsVxmHeBu10lpTZYi5ydCYhaJcKFrnXAAwUSppubAg0fJM8Cm5PY09-sNXHz_Qu0PvXdyomVA5SCFzFSl6okp_CMFjrY--_TR-0ED1r3J6VE4D6GijcrHl5tSCvi3_8dULcJqB4vwHuTprGw</recordid><startdate>2021</startdate><enddate>2021</enddate><creator>Dhendup, Sonam</creator><general>i-manager Publications</general><general>iManager Publications</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04R</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>04U</scope><scope>04V</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>04X</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CPGLG</scope><scope>CRLPW</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GB0</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2021</creationdate><title>Investigating Language Learning Strategy Use by Bhutanese Undergraduate Students</title><author>Dhendup, Sonam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c917-607bfd7dee2874313380b6bbad4ee8a4eaa9703570f8351125c76b35b16eb3453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Applied linguistics</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Cross Cultural Studies</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Foreign Students</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Learning environment</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhendup, Sonam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ministry of Education, Thimphu, Bhutan</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: The Arts</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Health & Medicine</collection><collection>India Database: History</collection><collection>India Database: Literature & Language</collection><collection>India Database: Science & Technology</collection><collection>India Database: Social Sciences</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Linguistics Collection</collection><collection>Linguistics Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>DELNET Social Sciences & Humanities Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhendup, Sonam</au><aucorp>Ministry of Education, Thimphu, Bhutan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1304173</ericid><atitle>Investigating Language Learning Strategy Use by Bhutanese Undergraduate Students</atitle><jtitle>I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching</jtitle><date>2021</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>28</spage><pages>28-</pages><issn>2231-3338</issn><eissn>2249-0752</eissn><abstract>Language learning strategies have emerged as an important field of inquiry and have generated a massive amount of research output in the field of TESOL and applied linguistics. However, research that explores undergraduate student's language strategy use in two varying learning contexts is scarce. The purpose of this study was to investigate the differences in language learning strategy use and choice between gender and context. In this study, Oxford, 1990's SILL questionnaire was administered to 30 Bhutanese undergraduate students. Their responses on six parts of SILL were subjected to mean, standard deviation, independent samples t-test, ANOVA and MANOVA. The results of an independent t-test showed differences between gender in ESL context while no statistical differences were observed between gender in EFL context. Further, ANOVA and MANOVA tests revealed that there were significant differences between the two learning contexts in terms of their language learning strategy use and choice. The study also showed that 'memory' strategy was least used (M=2.88; SD=0.63) while social strategy (M=3.30; SD=0.51) was the highly favoured strategy by Bhutanese students in general, but to a varying degree. Based on these findings, students studying in Australia seem to have scored relatively higher on the overall strategy use as opposed to their counterparts studying in Bhutan. Thus, the learning context of students can influence language learning strategy choice and their use.</abstract><cop>Nagercoil</cop><pub>i-manager Publications</pub><doi>10.26634/jelt.11.1.17552</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2231-3338 |
ispartof | I-Manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 2021, Vol.11 (1), p.28 |
issn | 2231-3338 2249-0752 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2578165687 |
source | Social Science Premium Collection; Linguistics Collection; ERIC; Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA) |
subjects | Applied linguistics College students Cross Cultural Studies English (Second Language) English as a second language learning Foreign Countries Foreign Students Gender Gender Differences Learning environment Learning Strategies Measures (Individuals) Metacognition Second Language Instruction Second Language Learning Statistical analysis Undergraduate Students |
title | Investigating Language Learning Strategy Use by Bhutanese Undergraduate Students |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A45%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Investigating%20Language%20Learning%20Strategy%20Use%20by%20Bhutanese%20Undergraduate%20Students&rft.jtitle=I-Manager's%20Journal%20on%20English%20Language%20Teaching&rft.au=Dhendup,%20Sonam&rft.aucorp=Ministry%20of%20Education,%20Thimphu,%20Bhutan&rft.date=2021&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=28&rft.pages=28-&rft.issn=2231-3338&rft.eissn=2249-0752&rft_id=info:doi/10.26634/jelt.11.1.17552&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578165687%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c917-607bfd7dee2874313380b6bbad4ee8a4eaa9703570f8351125c76b35b16eb3453%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578165687&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1304173&rfr_iscdi=true |