Loading…

68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy

Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-10, Vol.9 (5), p.523-537
Main Authors: Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan, Li, Yan-Lin, Chen, Sirong, Ho, Chi Lai, Wartolowska, Karolina
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343
container_end_page 537
container_issue 5
container_start_page 523
container_title Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging
container_volume 9
creator Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan
Li, Yan-Lin
Chen, Sirong
Ho, Chi Lai
Wartolowska, Karolina
description Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis ( N  = 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis ( N  = 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests. Conclusion Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa. 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578176730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578176730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEElXbF2BlibXptR3HCbtqVEqlVq1gWFt3nJuMyyQZbE9HeSTeEpeMxI6Vr6zznftziuKDgE8CwFzFEpSqOEjBAUqt-PFNcSZlLbjRlX57qnVt5PviMsZnABAgtBDirPhd1bfIn74_XLOnm_XVas1wbNmwf_h2x7opsH3wA4aZ7eZhv2Xj1BKLCXs_9mzqmB8ThYFaj4lYmtjW91sefPyZuSnr8q_D0VH4zJDFOSYaMHnHAr14Oi6tKCHHEXdz9PHVM5v1Y4azLFFMDJ07BHTzRfGuw12ky9N7Xvz4crNefeX3j7d3q-t77mSjEq8JdNsgqaqERnWVNBsUdZMPU5I2sKGuFkjYImhZOy2bDkRpnGqhVBunSnVefFx88wq_DnkC-zwdQh4wWqlNLUxlFGSVXFQuLxoDdfZ0KSvAvqZil1RsTsX-TcUeM6QWKGbx2FP4Z_0f6g8MoZEW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578176730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan ; Li, Yan-Lin ; Chen, Sirong ; Ho, Chi Lai ; Wartolowska, Karolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan ; Li, Yan-Lin ; Chen, Sirong ; Ho, Chi Lai ; Wartolowska, Karolina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis ( N  = 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis ( N  = 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests. Conclusion Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa. 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2281-5872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2281-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Antigens ; Chi-square test ; Computed tomography ; Correlation coefficients ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diagnostic systems ; Emission analysis ; Estimates ; Gallium ; Heterogeneity ; Imaging ; Imaging techniques ; Interventional Radiology ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical and Radiation Physics ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Meta-Analysis ; Metastasis ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Performance evaluation ; Positron emission ; Prostate cancer ; Quality assessment ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical tests ; Systematic review ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-10, Vol.9 (5), p.523-537</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8174-7402 ; 0000-0003-4049-2364 ; 0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wartolowska, Karolina</creatorcontrib><title>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</title><title>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis ( N  = 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis ( N  = 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests. Conclusion Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa. 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Gallium</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical and Radiation Physics</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2281-5872</issn><issn>2281-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEElXbF2BlibXptR3HCbtqVEqlVq1gWFt3nJuMyyQZbE9HeSTeEpeMxI6Vr6zznftziuKDgE8CwFzFEpSqOEjBAUqt-PFNcSZlLbjRlX57qnVt5PviMsZnABAgtBDirPhd1bfIn74_XLOnm_XVas1wbNmwf_h2x7opsH3wA4aZ7eZhv2Xj1BKLCXs_9mzqmB8ThYFaj4lYmtjW91sefPyZuSnr8q_D0VH4zJDFOSYaMHnHAr14Oi6tKCHHEXdz9PHVM5v1Y4azLFFMDJ07BHTzRfGuw12ky9N7Xvz4crNefeX3j7d3q-t77mSjEq8JdNsgqaqERnWVNBsUdZMPU5I2sKGuFkjYImhZOy2bDkRpnGqhVBunSnVefFx88wq_DnkC-zwdQh4wWqlNLUxlFGSVXFQuLxoDdfZ0KSvAvqZil1RsTsX-TcUeM6QWKGbx2FP4Z_0f6g8MoZEW</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</creator><creator>Li, Yan-Lin</creator><creator>Chen, Sirong</creator><creator>Ho, Chi Lai</creator><creator>Wartolowska, Karolina</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-7402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</title><author>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan ; Li, Yan-Lin ; Chen, Sirong ; Ho, Chi Lai ; Wartolowska, Karolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Gallium</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical and Radiation Physics</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wartolowska, Karolina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</au><au>Li, Yan-Lin</au><au>Chen, Sirong</au><au>Ho, Chi Lai</au><au>Wartolowska, Karolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Clin Transl Imaging</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>523</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>523-537</pages><issn>2281-5872</issn><eissn>2281-7565</eissn><abstract>Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa). Methods PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients. Results Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis ( N  = 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis ( N  = 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests. Conclusion Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa. 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-7402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2281-5872
ispartof Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-10, Vol.9 (5), p.523-537
issn 2281-5872
2281-7565
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2578176730
source Springer Link
subjects Accuracy
Antigens
Chi-square test
Computed tomography
Correlation coefficients
Diagnostic Radiology
Diagnostic systems
Emission analysis
Estimates
Gallium
Heterogeneity
Imaging
Imaging techniques
Interventional Radiology
Lymphatic system
Magnetic resonance imaging
Medical and Radiation Physics
Medical imaging
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Meta-Analysis
Metastasis
Nuclear Medicine
Oncology
Performance evaluation
Positron emission
Prostate cancer
Quality assessment
Radiology
Radiotherapy
Sensitivity analysis
Statistical tests
Systematic review
Tomography
title 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=68Ga-PSMA%20PET/CT%20and%20mpMRI%20for%20primary%20lymph%20node%20staging%20of%20intermediate%20to%20high-risk%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20diagnostic%20test%20accuracy&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20translational%20imaging%20:%20reviews%20in%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Yip,%20Ka%20Chun%20Jonathan&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=523&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=523-537&rft.issn=2281-5872&rft.eissn=2281-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578176730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578176730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true