Loading…
68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy
Purpose To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography ( 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk pro...
Saved in:
Published in: | Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging 2021-10, Vol.9 (5), p.523-537 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343 |
container_end_page | 537 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 523 |
container_title | Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan Li, Yan-Lin Chen, Sirong Ho, Chi Lai Wartolowska, Karolina |
description | Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods
PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Results
Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis (
N
= 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis (
N
= 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests.
Conclusion
Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa.
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578176730</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578176730</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEElXbF2BlibXptR3HCbtqVEqlVq1gWFt3nJuMyyQZbE9HeSTeEpeMxI6Vr6zznftziuKDgE8CwFzFEpSqOEjBAUqt-PFNcSZlLbjRlX57qnVt5PviMsZnABAgtBDirPhd1bfIn74_XLOnm_XVas1wbNmwf_h2x7opsH3wA4aZ7eZhv2Xj1BKLCXs_9mzqmB8ThYFaj4lYmtjW91sefPyZuSnr8q_D0VH4zJDFOSYaMHnHAr14Oi6tKCHHEXdz9PHVM5v1Y4azLFFMDJ07BHTzRfGuw12ky9N7Xvz4crNefeX3j7d3q-t77mSjEq8JdNsgqaqERnWVNBsUdZMPU5I2sKGuFkjYImhZOy2bDkRpnGqhVBunSnVefFx88wq_DnkC-zwdQh4wWqlNLUxlFGSVXFQuLxoDdfZ0KSvAvqZil1RsTsX-TcUeM6QWKGbx2FP4Z_0f6g8MoZEW</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578176730</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan ; Li, Yan-Lin ; Chen, Sirong ; Ho, Chi Lai ; Wartolowska, Karolina</creator><creatorcontrib>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan ; Li, Yan-Lin ; Chen, Sirong ; Ho, Chi Lai ; Wartolowska, Karolina</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods
PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Results
Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis (
N
= 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis (
N
= 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests.
Conclusion
Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa.
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2281-5872</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2281-7565</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cham: Springer International Publishing</publisher><subject>Accuracy ; Antigens ; Chi-square test ; Computed tomography ; Correlation coefficients ; Diagnostic Radiology ; Diagnostic systems ; Emission analysis ; Estimates ; Gallium ; Heterogeneity ; Imaging ; Imaging techniques ; Interventional Radiology ; Lymphatic system ; Magnetic resonance imaging ; Medical and Radiation Physics ; Medical imaging ; Medicine ; Medicine & Public Health ; Meta-Analysis ; Metastasis ; Nuclear Medicine ; Oncology ; Performance evaluation ; Positron emission ; Prostate cancer ; Quality assessment ; Radiology ; Radiotherapy ; Sensitivity analysis ; Statistical tests ; Systematic review ; Tomography</subject><ispartof>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-10, Vol.9 (5), p.523-537</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-8174-7402 ; 0000-0003-4049-2364 ; 0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27922,27923</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wartolowska, Karolina</creatorcontrib><title>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</title><title>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</title><addtitle>Clin Transl Imaging</addtitle><description>Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods
PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Results
Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis (
N
= 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis (
N
= 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests.
Conclusion
Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa.
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.</description><subject>Accuracy</subject><subject>Antigens</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Diagnostic Radiology</subject><subject>Diagnostic systems</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Estimates</subject><subject>Gallium</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Imaging</subject><subject>Imaging techniques</subject><subject>Interventional Radiology</subject><subject>Lymphatic system</subject><subject>Magnetic resonance imaging</subject><subject>Medical and Radiation Physics</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine & Public Health</subject><subject>Meta-Analysis</subject><subject>Metastasis</subject><subject>Nuclear Medicine</subject><subject>Oncology</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Positron emission</subject><subject>Prostate cancer</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiotherapy</subject><subject>Sensitivity analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Tomography</subject><issn>2281-5872</issn><issn>2281-7565</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc1u1DAUhSMEElXbF2BlibXptR3HCbtqVEqlVq1gWFt3nJuMyyQZbE9HeSTeEpeMxI6Vr6zznftziuKDgE8CwFzFEpSqOEjBAUqt-PFNcSZlLbjRlX57qnVt5PviMsZnABAgtBDirPhd1bfIn74_XLOnm_XVas1wbNmwf_h2x7opsH3wA4aZ7eZhv2Xj1BKLCXs_9mzqmB8ThYFaj4lYmtjW91sefPyZuSnr8q_D0VH4zJDFOSYaMHnHAr14Oi6tKCHHEXdz9PHVM5v1Y4azLFFMDJ07BHTzRfGuw12ky9N7Xvz4crNefeX3j7d3q-t77mSjEq8JdNsgqaqERnWVNBsUdZMPU5I2sKGuFkjYImhZOy2bDkRpnGqhVBunSnVefFx88wq_DnkC-zwdQh4wWqlNLUxlFGSVXFQuLxoDdfZ0KSvAvqZil1RsTsX-TcUeM6QWKGbx2FP4Z_0f6g8MoZEW</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</creator><creator>Li, Yan-Lin</creator><creator>Chen, Sirong</creator><creator>Ho, Chi Lai</creator><creator>Wartolowska, Karolina</creator><general>Springer International Publishing</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-7402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</title><author>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan ; Li, Yan-Lin ; Chen, Sirong ; Ho, Chi Lai ; Wartolowska, Karolina</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Accuracy</topic><topic>Antigens</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Diagnostic Radiology</topic><topic>Diagnostic systems</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Estimates</topic><topic>Gallium</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Imaging</topic><topic>Imaging techniques</topic><topic>Interventional Radiology</topic><topic>Lymphatic system</topic><topic>Magnetic resonance imaging</topic><topic>Medical and Radiation Physics</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine & Public Health</topic><topic>Meta-Analysis</topic><topic>Metastasis</topic><topic>Nuclear Medicine</topic><topic>Oncology</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Positron emission</topic><topic>Prostate cancer</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiotherapy</topic><topic>Sensitivity analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Tomography</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Yan-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Sirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Chi Lai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wartolowska, Karolina</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Yip, Ka Chun Jonathan</au><au>Li, Yan-Lin</au><au>Chen, Sirong</au><au>Ho, Chi Lai</au><au>Wartolowska, Karolina</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy</atitle><jtitle>Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging</jtitle><stitle>Clin Transl Imaging</stitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>523</spage><epage>537</epage><pages>523-537</pages><issn>2281-5872</issn><eissn>2281-7565</eissn><abstract>Purpose
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of Gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography-computed tomography (
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT) compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).
Methods
PRISMA-compliant systematic review updated to September 2020 was performed to identify studies that evaluated the diagnostic performance of
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for detection of metastatic lymph nodes in the same cohort of PCa patients using histopathologic examination as a reference standard. The quality of each study was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) instrument. STATA version 16.0 was used to obtain the pooled estimates of diagnostic accuracy for per-patient and per-lesion analyses. Heterogeneity in the accuracy estimates was explored by reviewing the generated forest plots, summary receiver operator characteristic (SROC) curves, hierarchical SROC plots, chi-squared test, heterogeneity index, and Spearman’s correlation coefficients.
Results
Six studies, which included 476 patients, met the eligibility criteria for per-patient analysis and four of these studies, reporting data from 4859 dissected lymph nodes, were included in the per-lesion analysis. In the per-patient analysis (
N
= 6), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.69 and 0.93, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.37 and 0.95. In the per-lesion analysis (
N
= 4), the pooled sensitivity and specificity for
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.58 and 0.99, and for mpMRI the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.44 and 0.99. There was high heterogeneity and a threshold effect in outcomes. A sensitivity analysis demonstrated that the pooled estimates were stable when excluding studies with patient selection concerns, whereas the variances of the pooled estimates became significant, and the characteristics of heterogeneity changed when excluding studies with concerns about index imaging tests.
Conclusion
Both imaging techniques have high specificity for the detection of nodal metastases of PCa.
68
Ga-PSMA PET/CT has the advantage of being more sensitive and making it possible to detect distant metastases during the same examination. These modalities may play a complementary role in the diagnosis of PCa. Given the paucity of data and methodological limitations of the included studies, large scale trials are necessary to confirm their clinical values.</abstract><cop>Cham</cop><pub>Springer International Publishing</pub><doi>10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w</doi><tpages>15</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8174-7402</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4049-2364</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1722-4188</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2281-5872 |
ispartof | Clinical and translational imaging : reviews in nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2021-10, Vol.9 (5), p.523-537 |
issn | 2281-5872 2281-7565 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2578176730 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Accuracy Antigens Chi-square test Computed tomography Correlation coefficients Diagnostic Radiology Diagnostic systems Emission analysis Estimates Gallium Heterogeneity Imaging Imaging techniques Interventional Radiology Lymphatic system Magnetic resonance imaging Medical and Radiation Physics Medical imaging Medicine Medicine & Public Health Meta-Analysis Metastasis Nuclear Medicine Oncology Performance evaluation Positron emission Prostate cancer Quality assessment Radiology Radiotherapy Sensitivity analysis Statistical tests Systematic review Tomography |
title | 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary lymph node staging of intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=68Ga-PSMA%20PET/CT%20and%20mpMRI%20for%20primary%20lymph%20node%20staging%20of%20intermediate%20to%20high-risk%20prostate%20cancer:%20a%20systematic%20review%20and%20meta-analysis%20of%20diagnostic%20test%20accuracy&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20and%20translational%20imaging%20:%20reviews%20in%20nuclear%20medicine%20and%20molecular%20imaging&rft.au=Yip,%20Ka%20Chun%20Jonathan&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=523&rft.epage=537&rft.pages=523-537&rft.issn=2281-5872&rft.eissn=2281-7565&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40336-021-00453-w&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2578176730%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c293t-8e05d9ae364093f627ba1890044e570bef81aeada0528c529f0147c3d043bc343%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578176730&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |