E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia

Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)' rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Planning theory & practice 2021-05, Vol.22 (3), p.368-396
Main Authors: Field, Clare, Jon, Ihnji
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Dominance
E-scooters
Governance
Intelligence
Markets
Mobility
Motor scooters
muddling through
Public spaces
Regulation
regulation theory
Scooters
smart mobility
Social regulation
socially organised intelligence
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223
container_end_page 396
container_issue 3
container_start_page 368
container_title Planning theory & practice
container_volume 22
creator Field, Clare
Jon, Ihnji
description Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)' rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their use in public space. We reflect on how e-scooter governance can be considered a continually (re)negotiated site of state-market interface, drawing insights from Lindblom's science of muddling through, Dewey's socially organised intelligence, and Leitner, Peck, and Sheppard's discussion on contesting market domination/modes of social regulation.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/14649357.2021.1919746
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_infor</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2578291421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2578291421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QQh4dWuSTTYbL9qWaoVqD63gLWS3CaZsNzVJKf33Zmm9eppheO8N7wPgFqMBRiV6wLSgImd8QBDBAyyw4LQ4Az1MOcoQQl_n3V7QrBNdgqsQ1igpC8Z6YDrJFrVzUfvwCIfwQ-_hYqN8hO-uso2NBzjfRuvaJ7j81nCsgobOwJG3oVKtvofDXYheNVZdgwujmqBvTrMPPl8my_E0m81f38bDWVbnJYuZFlgzTRWixvBcYVULznm1qgtFNBF1lU6M5KkXq8pSaUEKUnBMV5xywgjJ--DumLv17menQ5Rrt_NteikJ4yURmBKcVOyoqr0LwWsjt96mXgeJkeygyT9osoMmT9CS7_nos61xfqP2zjcrGdWhcd541dY2yPz_iF9TnXC8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2578291421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Field, Clare ; Jon, Ihnji</creator><creatorcontrib>Field, Clare ; Jon, Ihnji</creatorcontrib><description>Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)' rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their use in public space. We reflect on how e-scooter governance can be considered a continually (re)negotiated site of state-market interface, drawing insights from Lindblom's science of muddling through, Dewey's socially organised intelligence, and Leitner, Peck, and Sheppard's discussion on contesting market domination/modes of social regulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1464-9357</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-000X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2021.1919746</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Dominance ; E-scooters ; Governance ; Intelligence ; Markets ; Mobility ; Motor scooters ; muddling through ; Public spaces ; Regulation ; regulation theory ; Scooters ; smart mobility ; Social regulation ; socially organised intelligence</subject><ispartof>Planning theory &amp; practice, 2021-05, Vol.22 (3), p.368-396</ispartof><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group 2021</rights><rights>2021 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-3812-8168</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27865,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Field, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jon, Ihnji</creatorcontrib><title>E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia</title><title>Planning theory &amp; practice</title><description>Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)' rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their use in public space. We reflect on how e-scooter governance can be considered a continually (re)negotiated site of state-market interface, drawing insights from Lindblom's science of muddling through, Dewey's socially organised intelligence, and Leitner, Peck, and Sheppard's discussion on contesting market domination/modes of social regulation.</description><subject>Dominance</subject><subject>E-scooters</subject><subject>Governance</subject><subject>Intelligence</subject><subject>Markets</subject><subject>Mobility</subject><subject>Motor scooters</subject><subject>muddling through</subject><subject>Public spaces</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>regulation theory</subject><subject>Scooters</subject><subject>smart mobility</subject><subject>Social regulation</subject><subject>socially organised intelligence</subject><issn>1464-9357</issn><issn>1470-000X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QQh4dWuSTTYbL9qWaoVqD63gLWS3CaZsNzVJKf33Zmm9eppheO8N7wPgFqMBRiV6wLSgImd8QBDBAyyw4LQ4Az1MOcoQQl_n3V7QrBNdgqsQ1igpC8Z6YDrJFrVzUfvwCIfwQ-_hYqN8hO-uso2NBzjfRuvaJ7j81nCsgobOwJG3oVKtvofDXYheNVZdgwujmqBvTrMPPl8my_E0m81f38bDWVbnJYuZFlgzTRWixvBcYVULznm1qgtFNBF1lU6M5KkXq8pSaUEKUnBMV5xywgjJ--DumLv17menQ5Rrt_NteikJ4yURmBKcVOyoqr0LwWsjt96mXgeJkeygyT9osoMmT9CS7_nos61xfqP2zjcrGdWhcd541dY2yPz_iF9TnXC8</recordid><startdate>20210527</startdate><enddate>20210527</enddate><creator>Field, Clare</creator><creator>Jon, Ihnji</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3812-8168</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20210527</creationdate><title>E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia</title><author>Field, Clare ; Jon, Ihnji</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Dominance</topic><topic>E-scooters</topic><topic>Governance</topic><topic>Intelligence</topic><topic>Markets</topic><topic>Mobility</topic><topic>Motor scooters</topic><topic>muddling through</topic><topic>Public spaces</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>regulation theory</topic><topic>Scooters</topic><topic>smart mobility</topic><topic>Social regulation</topic><topic>socially organised intelligence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Field, Clare</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jon, Ihnji</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Planning theory &amp; practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Field, Clare</au><au>Jon, Ihnji</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia</atitle><jtitle>Planning theory &amp; practice</jtitle><date>2021-05-27</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>368</spage><epage>396</epage><pages>368-396</pages><issn>1464-9357</issn><eissn>1470-000X</eissn><abstract>Standing electric scooters (e-scooters)' rapid infiltration as a mobility option has left cities in the limbo of having to deal with regulation and planning for their sudden interruption. As the first city in Australia to allow e-scooter sharing, Brisbane is at the forefront of regulating their use in public space. We reflect on how e-scooter governance can be considered a continually (re)negotiated site of state-market interface, drawing insights from Lindblom's science of muddling through, Dewey's socially organised intelligence, and Leitner, Peck, and Sheppard's discussion on contesting market domination/modes of social regulation.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/14649357.2021.1919746</doi><tpages>29</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3812-8168</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1464-9357
ispartof Planning theory & practice, 2021-05, Vol.22 (3), p.368-396
issn 1464-9357
1470-000X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2578291421
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; PAIS Index
subjects Dominance
E-scooters
Governance
Intelligence
Markets
Mobility
Motor scooters
muddling through
Public spaces
Regulation
regulation theory
Scooters
smart mobility
Social regulation
socially organised intelligence
title E-Scooters: A New Smart Mobility Option? The Case of Brisbane, Australia
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T19%3A46%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_infor&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=E-Scooters:%20A%20New%20Smart%20Mobility%20Option?%20The%20Case%20of%20Brisbane,%20Australia&rft.jtitle=Planning%20theory%20&%20practice&rft.au=Field,%20Clare&rft.date=2021-05-27&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=368&rft.epage=396&rft.pages=368-396&rft.issn=1464-9357&rft.eissn=1470-000X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/14649357.2021.1919746&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_infor%3E2578291421%3C/proquest_infor%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c385t-e91e5e4a04ff73a1ac9777bdc6a2e29cba1a5231085b88ae92626714d74725223%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2578291421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true