Loading…
Dynamic mechanical properties and comparison of two constitutive models for martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb
The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb. For this purpose, the impact test was performed at six strain rates (750, 1500, 2000, 2600, 3500, and 4500 s−1) and four temperatures (25, 350, 500...
Saved in:
Published in: | Materials research express 2021-10, Vol.8 (10), p.106501 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 106501 |
container_title | Materials research express |
container_volume | 8 |
creator | Zhang, Ji-Lin Jia, Hai-Shen Yi, Xiang-Bin Xu, Chuang-Wen Luo, Wen-Cui Tang, Lin-Hu Shen, Jian-Cheng Li, Xiao |
description | The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb. For this purpose, the impact test was performed at six strain rates (750, 1500, 2000, 2600, 3500, and 4500 s−1) and four temperatures (25, 350, 500, and 650 °C) by using the high-temperature split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test device to attain the stress–strain relationship of materials; in addition, quasi-static (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 s−1) compression tests were conducted by applying the UTM5305 universal testing machine at normal temperature. The analysis of the stress–strain curves indicates that the stainless-steel shows strain-rate strengthening and thermal softening and the adiabatic temperature rise during the plastic deformation at a high strain rate exerts a thermal softening effect on materials. With the aid of Johnson-Cook (J-C) and power-law (P-L) constitutive models, the dynamic constitutive relation of the martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb was fitted and the correlation coefficients (R) and average absolute relative errors (AAREs) obtained through use of the two constitutive models were compared. Results indicate that the curves obtained through the constitutive models match the test curves to a reasonable extent. The R values are 0.968 33 and 0.977 80 while AAREs obtained through the J-C and P-L models are 4.77% and 2.25%, respectively. It can be found that the P-L model is slightly superior to the J-C model in terms of fitting accuracy. In addition, the dynamic mechanical properties of the materials were assessed through use of their constitutive equations from the perspectives of strain-rate sensitivity and temperature sensitivity and the acquired results are relatively consistent with the test results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/2053-1591/ac29f5 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_doaj_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2579129487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_8bb7955d3849476188e0a4dea18e05b2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2579129487</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1vFSEc3BhNbGrvPZJ48OKzwMICR_P8atK0l3omfPxQXnaXFVht_3t5XdN60BOTycww-U3XnRP8jmApLyjm_Y5wRS6MoyrwZ93JI_X8L_yyOyvlgDGmQvWcDifd-uF-NlN0aAL33czRmREtOS2Qa4SCzOyRS9NicixpRimg-is1Zi411rXGn4Cm5GEsKKSMJpMrzCXWlleqifMIpTQEMCK8z0RcR7Zf2bV91b0IZixw9uc97b5--ni7_7K7uvl8uX9_tXOMybobFLG81e6pkQ4G4a2XJIDgjhDmqcLG9c4CFYQFF0Sw3gpiiesDw4PofX_aXW65PpmDXnJsDe91MlE_ECl_061ydCNoaa1QnPteMsXEQKQEbJgHQxrglras11tWO8-PFUrVh7TmudXXlAtFqGJSNBXeVC6nUjKEx18J1set9HEMfRxDb1s1y5vNEtPylDnlOy0308Ax0YsPTfn2H8r_Bv8GtqyjHA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579129487</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dynamic mechanical properties and comparison of two constitutive models for martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Zhang, Ji-Lin ; Jia, Hai-Shen ; Yi, Xiang-Bin ; Xu, Chuang-Wen ; Luo, Wen-Cui ; Tang, Lin-Hu ; Shen, Jian-Cheng ; Li, Xiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji-Lin ; Jia, Hai-Shen ; Yi, Xiang-Bin ; Xu, Chuang-Wen ; Luo, Wen-Cui ; Tang, Lin-Hu ; Shen, Jian-Cheng ; Li, Xiao</creatorcontrib><description>The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb. For this purpose, the impact test was performed at six strain rates (750, 1500, 2000, 2600, 3500, and 4500 s−1) and four temperatures (25, 350, 500, and 650 °C) by using the high-temperature split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test device to attain the stress–strain relationship of materials; in addition, quasi-static (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 s−1) compression tests were conducted by applying the UTM5305 universal testing machine at normal temperature. The analysis of the stress–strain curves indicates that the stainless-steel shows strain-rate strengthening and thermal softening and the adiabatic temperature rise during the plastic deformation at a high strain rate exerts a thermal softening effect on materials. With the aid of Johnson-Cook (J-C) and power-law (P-L) constitutive models, the dynamic constitutive relation of the martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb was fitted and the correlation coefficients (R) and average absolute relative errors (AAREs) obtained through use of the two constitutive models were compared. Results indicate that the curves obtained through the constitutive models match the test curves to a reasonable extent. The R values are 0.968 33 and 0.977 80 while AAREs obtained through the J-C and P-L models are 4.77% and 2.25%, respectively. It can be found that the P-L model is slightly superior to the J-C model in terms of fitting accuracy. In addition, the dynamic mechanical properties of the materials were assessed through use of their constitutive equations from the perspectives of strain-rate sensitivity and temperature sensitivity and the acquired results are relatively consistent with the test results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2053-1591</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2053-1591</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/2053-1591/ac29f5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Compression tests ; Constitutive equations ; Constitutive models ; Constitutive relationships ; Correlation coefficients ; Deformation effects ; Dynamic mechanical properties ; High strain rate ; High temperature ; Impact tests ; Martensitic stainless steels ; Mathematical models ; Mechanical properties ; Plastic deformation ; predicted and experimental values ; Sensitivity ; Softening ; Split Hopkinson pressure bars ; Stainless steel ; Strain rate sensitivity ; strain-rate strengthening ; Stress-strain curves ; Stress-strain relationships ; Temperature ; thermal softening</subject><ispartof>Materials research express, 2021-10, Vol.8 (10), p.106501</ispartof><rights>2021 The Author(s). Published by IOP Publishing Ltd</rights><rights>2021. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8427-5241</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2579129487?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Hai-Shen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Xiang-Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Chuang-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Wen-Cui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Lin-Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jian-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao</creatorcontrib><title>Dynamic mechanical properties and comparison of two constitutive models for martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb</title><title>Materials research express</title><addtitle>MRX</addtitle><addtitle>Mater. Res. Express</addtitle><description>The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb. For this purpose, the impact test was performed at six strain rates (750, 1500, 2000, 2600, 3500, and 4500 s−1) and four temperatures (25, 350, 500, and 650 °C) by using the high-temperature split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test device to attain the stress–strain relationship of materials; in addition, quasi-static (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 s−1) compression tests were conducted by applying the UTM5305 universal testing machine at normal temperature. The analysis of the stress–strain curves indicates that the stainless-steel shows strain-rate strengthening and thermal softening and the adiabatic temperature rise during the plastic deformation at a high strain rate exerts a thermal softening effect on materials. With the aid of Johnson-Cook (J-C) and power-law (P-L) constitutive models, the dynamic constitutive relation of the martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb was fitted and the correlation coefficients (R) and average absolute relative errors (AAREs) obtained through use of the two constitutive models were compared. Results indicate that the curves obtained through the constitutive models match the test curves to a reasonable extent. The R values are 0.968 33 and 0.977 80 while AAREs obtained through the J-C and P-L models are 4.77% and 2.25%, respectively. It can be found that the P-L model is slightly superior to the J-C model in terms of fitting accuracy. In addition, the dynamic mechanical properties of the materials were assessed through use of their constitutive equations from the perspectives of strain-rate sensitivity and temperature sensitivity and the acquired results are relatively consistent with the test results.</description><subject>Compression tests</subject><subject>Constitutive equations</subject><subject>Constitutive models</subject><subject>Constitutive relationships</subject><subject>Correlation coefficients</subject><subject>Deformation effects</subject><subject>Dynamic mechanical properties</subject><subject>High strain rate</subject><subject>High temperature</subject><subject>Impact tests</subject><subject>Martensitic stainless steels</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Plastic deformation</subject><subject>predicted and experimental values</subject><subject>Sensitivity</subject><subject>Softening</subject><subject>Split Hopkinson pressure bars</subject><subject>Stainless steel</subject><subject>Strain rate sensitivity</subject><subject>strain-rate strengthening</subject><subject>Stress-strain curves</subject><subject>Stress-strain relationships</subject><subject>Temperature</subject><subject>thermal softening</subject><issn>2053-1591</issn><issn>2053-1591</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uc1vFSEc3BhNbGrvPZJ48OKzwMICR_P8atK0l3omfPxQXnaXFVht_3t5XdN60BOTycww-U3XnRP8jmApLyjm_Y5wRS6MoyrwZ93JI_X8L_yyOyvlgDGmQvWcDifd-uF-NlN0aAL33czRmREtOS2Qa4SCzOyRS9NicixpRimg-is1Zi411rXGn4Cm5GEsKKSMJpMrzCXWlleqifMIpTQEMCK8z0RcR7Zf2bV91b0IZixw9uc97b5--ni7_7K7uvl8uX9_tXOMybobFLG81e6pkQ4G4a2XJIDgjhDmqcLG9c4CFYQFF0Sw3gpiiesDw4PofX_aXW65PpmDXnJsDe91MlE_ECl_061ydCNoaa1QnPteMsXEQKQEbJgHQxrglras11tWO8-PFUrVh7TmudXXlAtFqGJSNBXeVC6nUjKEx18J1set9HEMfRxDb1s1y5vNEtPylDnlOy0308Ax0YsPTfn2H8r_Bv8GtqyjHA</recordid><startdate>20211001</startdate><enddate>20211001</enddate><creator>Zhang, Ji-Lin</creator><creator>Jia, Hai-Shen</creator><creator>Yi, Xiang-Bin</creator><creator>Xu, Chuang-Wen</creator><creator>Luo, Wen-Cui</creator><creator>Tang, Lin-Hu</creator><creator>Shen, Jian-Cheng</creator><creator>Li, Xiao</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>O3W</scope><scope>TSCCA</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>DOA</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8427-5241</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20211001</creationdate><title>Dynamic mechanical properties and comparison of two constitutive models for martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb</title><author>Zhang, Ji-Lin ; Jia, Hai-Shen ; Yi, Xiang-Bin ; Xu, Chuang-Wen ; Luo, Wen-Cui ; Tang, Lin-Hu ; Shen, Jian-Cheng ; Li, Xiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Compression tests</topic><topic>Constitutive equations</topic><topic>Constitutive models</topic><topic>Constitutive relationships</topic><topic>Correlation coefficients</topic><topic>Deformation effects</topic><topic>Dynamic mechanical properties</topic><topic>High strain rate</topic><topic>High temperature</topic><topic>Impact tests</topic><topic>Martensitic stainless steels</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Plastic deformation</topic><topic>predicted and experimental values</topic><topic>Sensitivity</topic><topic>Softening</topic><topic>Split Hopkinson pressure bars</topic><topic>Stainless steel</topic><topic>Strain rate sensitivity</topic><topic>strain-rate strengthening</topic><topic>Stress-strain curves</topic><topic>Stress-strain relationships</topic><topic>Temperature</topic><topic>thermal softening</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Ji-Lin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jia, Hai-Shen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yi, Xiang-Bin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xu, Chuang-Wen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Luo, Wen-Cui</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Lin-Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Jian-Cheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Open Access: IOP Publishing Free Content</collection><collection>IOPscience (Open Access)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>https://resources.nclive.org/materials</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Materials research express</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhang, Ji-Lin</au><au>Jia, Hai-Shen</au><au>Yi, Xiang-Bin</au><au>Xu, Chuang-Wen</au><au>Luo, Wen-Cui</au><au>Tang, Lin-Hu</au><au>Shen, Jian-Cheng</au><au>Li, Xiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dynamic mechanical properties and comparison of two constitutive models for martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb</atitle><jtitle>Materials research express</jtitle><stitle>MRX</stitle><addtitle>Mater. Res. Express</addtitle><date>2021-10-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>106501</spage><pages>106501-</pages><issn>2053-1591</issn><eissn>2053-1591</eissn><abstract>The purpose of the study is to investigate the dynamic mechanical properties and constitutive relationship of martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb. For this purpose, the impact test was performed at six strain rates (750, 1500, 2000, 2600, 3500, and 4500 s−1) and four temperatures (25, 350, 500, and 650 °C) by using the high-temperature split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) test device to attain the stress–strain relationship of materials; in addition, quasi-static (0.001, 0.01, and 0.1 s−1) compression tests were conducted by applying the UTM5305 universal testing machine at normal temperature. The analysis of the stress–strain curves indicates that the stainless-steel shows strain-rate strengthening and thermal softening and the adiabatic temperature rise during the plastic deformation at a high strain rate exerts a thermal softening effect on materials. With the aid of Johnson-Cook (J-C) and power-law (P-L) constitutive models, the dynamic constitutive relation of the martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb was fitted and the correlation coefficients (R) and average absolute relative errors (AAREs) obtained through use of the two constitutive models were compared. Results indicate that the curves obtained through the constitutive models match the test curves to a reasonable extent. The R values are 0.968 33 and 0.977 80 while AAREs obtained through the J-C and P-L models are 4.77% and 2.25%, respectively. It can be found that the P-L model is slightly superior to the J-C model in terms of fitting accuracy. In addition, the dynamic mechanical properties of the materials were assessed through use of their constitutive equations from the perspectives of strain-rate sensitivity and temperature sensitivity and the acquired results are relatively consistent with the test results.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/2053-1591/ac29f5</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8427-5241</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2053-1591 |
ispartof | Materials research express, 2021-10, Vol.8 (10), p.106501 |
issn | 2053-1591 2053-1591 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2579129487 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Compression tests Constitutive equations Constitutive models Constitutive relationships Correlation coefficients Deformation effects Dynamic mechanical properties High strain rate High temperature Impact tests Martensitic stainless steels Mathematical models Mechanical properties Plastic deformation predicted and experimental values Sensitivity Softening Split Hopkinson pressure bars Stainless steel Strain rate sensitivity strain-rate strengthening Stress-strain curves Stress-strain relationships Temperature thermal softening |
title | Dynamic mechanical properties and comparison of two constitutive models for martensitic stainless steel 0Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T21%3A38%3A59IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_doaj_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dynamic%20mechanical%20properties%20and%20comparison%20of%20two%20constitutive%20models%20for%20martensitic%20stainless%20steel%200Cr17Ni4Cu4Nb&rft.jtitle=Materials%20research%20express&rft.au=Zhang,%20Ji-Lin&rft.date=2021-10-01&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=106501&rft.pages=106501-&rft.issn=2053-1591&rft.eissn=2053-1591&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/2053-1591/ac29f5&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_doaj_%3E2579129487%3C/proquest_doaj_%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c448t-691b559132a8ce67dbd81fe75c114d290ac3cbe2714fcf7fbdb71b1c3f40673d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579129487&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |