Populist Psychology: Economics, Culture, and Emotions

Historical trends seem to show that populism, defined here as movements that self-identify as representatives of a unified good people confronting a corrupted or malevolent elite, tends to co-occur with major economic disruptions. However, research into this connection provides us with a puzzle: whi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of politics 2021-10, Vol.83 (4), p.1559-1572
Main Authors: Rhodes-Purdy, Matthew, Navarre, Rachel, Utych, Stephen M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Culture
Discontent
Economic crisis
Economic research
Emotional responses
Emotions
Experiments
Political attitudes
Political economy
Populism
Psychology
Public opinion
Public opinion surveys
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Historical trends seem to show that populism, defined here as movements that self-identify as representatives of a unified good people confronting a corrupted or malevolent elite, tends to co-occur with major economic disruptions. However, research into this connection provides us with a puzzle: while populist surges often come in the wake of economic crises, cultural variables tend to be better predictors of support for populism in public opinion surveys. In this article, we develop a theory (affective political economy) that can resolve this paradox by analyzing the influence of emotions on politics. Using survey experiments, we show that economic crises cause emotional reactions that activate cultural discontent. This, in turn, activates populist attitudes. This article provides an elegant solution to a major impasse in the study of the demand side of populism and provides a useful way of analyzing how economics and culture may interact to cause political outcomes.
ISSN:0022-3816
1468-2508
DOI:10.1086/715168