Opto-thermal in-vivo skin hydration measurements – a comparison study of different measurement techniques

We compared five different skin hydration measurement techniques, namely OTTER, Fingerprint sensors, Corneometer, Nova, and Moisture Checker, in order to understand the correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques and to understand the repeatability of each technique. The mea...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of physics. Conference series 2010-03, Vol.214 (1), p.012026
Main Authors: Xiao, P, Ciortea, L I, Singh, H, Cui, Y, Berg, E P, Imhof, R E
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Fingerprint verification
Hydration
Measurement techniques
Physics
Reproducibility
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 012026
container_title Journal of physics. Conference series
container_volume 214
creator Xiao, P
Ciortea, L I
Singh, H
Cui, Y
Berg, E P
Imhof, R E
description We compared five different skin hydration measurement techniques, namely OTTER, Fingerprint sensors, Corneometer, Nova, and Moisture Checker, in order to understand the correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques and to understand the repeatability of each technique. The measurements are performed on different in-vivo skin sites from different volunteers and at different hydration levels. The repeatability of different techniques is achieved by measuring the same skin site repeatedly. The correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques are achieved by plotting results from different techniques against each other. The different skin hydration levels are achieved through the recovery period after a skin immersive hydration.
doi_str_mv 10.1088/1742-6596/214/1/012026
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_iop_p</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2579952950</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2579952950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkM9KxDAQh4MouK6-ggQ81yZpmzRHWfwHC3vRc0jTlM3utqlJurA338E39ElMqcge9mAuE5jfNzN8ANxidI9RWaaY5SShBacpwXmKU4QJIvQMzP4a50f_S3Dl_QahLD42A9tVH2wS1tq1cgdNl-zN3kK_NR1cH2ong7EdbLX0g9Ot7oKH359fUEJl214642PXh6E-QNvA2jSNdjF0DMCg1bozH4P21-CikTuvb37rHLw_Pb4tXpLl6vl18bBMVI5xSIpSx0MrRFgpK8oaKjNGcYG0RohWNWdUSYY1K2TJsES4VIRrIrkiSNWKV9kc3E1ze2fHvUFs7OC6uFKQgnFeEF6gmKJTSjnrvdON6J1ppTsIjMQoVozOxOhMRLECi0lsBPEEGtv_n0lOMCezoq-b7Adhpoof</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2579952950</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opto-thermal in-vivo skin hydration measurements – a comparison study of different measurement techniques</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Xiao, P ; Ciortea, L I ; Singh, H ; Cui, Y ; Berg, E P ; Imhof, R E</creator><creatorcontrib>Xiao, P ; Ciortea, L I ; Singh, H ; Cui, Y ; Berg, E P ; Imhof, R E</creatorcontrib><description>We compared five different skin hydration measurement techniques, namely OTTER, Fingerprint sensors, Corneometer, Nova, and Moisture Checker, in order to understand the correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques and to understand the repeatability of each technique. The measurements are performed on different in-vivo skin sites from different volunteers and at different hydration levels. The repeatability of different techniques is achieved by measuring the same skin site repeatedly. The correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques are achieved by plotting results from different techniques against each other. The different skin hydration levels are achieved through the recovery period after a skin immersive hydration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1742-6588</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1742-6596</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/214/1/012026</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Fingerprint verification ; Hydration ; Measurement techniques ; Physics ; Reproducibility</subject><ispartof>Journal of physics. Conference series, 2010-03, Vol.214 (1), p.012026</ispartof><rights>Copyright IOP Publishing Mar 2010</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2579952950?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25733,27903,27904,36991,44569</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xiao, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciortea, L I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, E P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imhof, R E</creatorcontrib><title>Opto-thermal in-vivo skin hydration measurements – a comparison study of different measurement techniques</title><title>Journal of physics. Conference series</title><description>We compared five different skin hydration measurement techniques, namely OTTER, Fingerprint sensors, Corneometer, Nova, and Moisture Checker, in order to understand the correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques and to understand the repeatability of each technique. The measurements are performed on different in-vivo skin sites from different volunteers and at different hydration levels. The repeatability of different techniques is achieved by measuring the same skin site repeatedly. The correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques are achieved by plotting results from different techniques against each other. The different skin hydration levels are achieved through the recovery period after a skin immersive hydration.</description><subject>Fingerprint verification</subject><subject>Hydration</subject><subject>Measurement techniques</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Reproducibility</subject><issn>1742-6596</issn><issn>1742-6588</issn><issn>1742-6596</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkM9KxDAQh4MouK6-ggQ81yZpmzRHWfwHC3vRc0jTlM3utqlJurA338E39ElMqcge9mAuE5jfNzN8ANxidI9RWaaY5SShBacpwXmKU4QJIvQMzP4a50f_S3Dl_QahLD42A9tVH2wS1tq1cgdNl-zN3kK_NR1cH2ong7EdbLX0g9Ot7oKH359fUEJl214642PXh6E-QNvA2jSNdjF0DMCg1bozH4P21-CikTuvb37rHLw_Pb4tXpLl6vl18bBMVI5xSIpSx0MrRFgpK8oaKjNGcYG0RohWNWdUSYY1K2TJsES4VIRrIrkiSNWKV9kc3E1ze2fHvUFs7OC6uFKQgnFeEF6gmKJTSjnrvdON6J1ppTsIjMQoVozOxOhMRLECi0lsBPEEGtv_n0lOMCezoq-b7Adhpoof</recordid><startdate>20100301</startdate><enddate>20100301</enddate><creator>Xiao, P</creator><creator>Ciortea, L I</creator><creator>Singh, H</creator><creator>Cui, Y</creator><creator>Berg, E P</creator><creator>Imhof, R E</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100301</creationdate><title>Opto-thermal in-vivo skin hydration measurements – a comparison study of different measurement techniques</title><author>Xiao, P ; Ciortea, L I ; Singh, H ; Cui, Y ; Berg, E P ; Imhof, R E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Fingerprint verification</topic><topic>Hydration</topic><topic>Measurement techniques</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Reproducibility</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xiao, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciortea, L I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Singh, H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cui, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Berg, E P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Imhof, R E</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xiao, P</au><au>Ciortea, L I</au><au>Singh, H</au><au>Cui, Y</au><au>Berg, E P</au><au>Imhof, R E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Opto-thermal in-vivo skin hydration measurements – a comparison study of different measurement techniques</atitle><jtitle>Journal of physics. Conference series</jtitle><date>2010-03-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>214</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>012026</spage><pages>012026-</pages><issn>1742-6596</issn><issn>1742-6588</issn><eissn>1742-6596</eissn><abstract>We compared five different skin hydration measurement techniques, namely OTTER, Fingerprint sensors, Corneometer, Nova, and Moisture Checker, in order to understand the correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques and to understand the repeatability of each technique. The measurements are performed on different in-vivo skin sites from different volunteers and at different hydration levels. The repeatability of different techniques is achieved by measuring the same skin site repeatedly. The correlations between different skin hydration measurement techniques are achieved by plotting results from different techniques against each other. The different skin hydration levels are achieved through the recovery period after a skin immersive hydration.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/1742-6596/214/1/012026</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1742-6596
ispartof Journal of physics. Conference series, 2010-03, Vol.214 (1), p.012026
issn 1742-6596
1742-6588
1742-6596
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2579952950
source Publicly Available Content Database; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry
subjects Fingerprint verification
Hydration
Measurement techniques
Physics
Reproducibility
title Opto-thermal in-vivo skin hydration measurements – a comparison study of different measurement techniques
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T23%3A52%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_iop_p&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opto-thermal%20in-vivo%20skin%20hydration%20measurements%20%E2%80%93%20a%20comparison%20study%20of%20different%20measurement%20techniques&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20physics.%20Conference%20series&rft.au=Xiao,%20P&rft.date=2010-03-01&rft.volume=214&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=012026&rft.pages=012026-&rft.issn=1742-6596&rft.eissn=1742-6596&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/1742-6596/214/1/012026&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_iop_p%3E2579952950%3C/proquest_iop_p%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-58e659b0278ab67f6a376150ee006bd976ca71e75a871a018c29e2a9c20cdc9b3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2579952950&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true