Efficiency of natural pozzolans, ground glasses and coal bottom ashes in mitigating sulfate attack and alkali-silica reaction

• Published in: Cement and concrete research 2021-11, Vol.149, p.106551, Article 106551
• Main Authors: Kasaniya, Mahipal, Thomas, Michael D.A., Moffatt, Edward G.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Alkali-silica reaction; Alkali-silica reactions; Bottom ash; Cement; Coal; Coal bottom ash; Concrete; Durability; Fly ash; Glass; Ground glass; Metakaolin; Natural pozzolan; Portland cements; Pozzolanic reactivity; Pozzolans; Pumice; Silica fume; Silicon dioxide; Sulfate attack; Sulfate resistance
• ISSN: 0008-8846; 1873-3948
• DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2021.106551

The use of pozzolans to partially replace Portland cement in concrete has generally demonstrated beneficial impacts on the durability characteristics of concrete for decades. In this paper a diverse range of pozzolans including natural pozzolans, ground glasses and industrial by-products such as coal ash (fly ash and bottom ash) and silica fume were investigated for their synergistic potential in binary or ternary blends with Portland cement in improving resistance to chemical sulfate attack and alkali-silica reaction (ASR). It is generally considered that pozzolans improve most of the durability issues encountered in concrete, including reducing the risk of sulfate attack or ASR. But this is not always the case. For example, it was found that ground glasses were very efficient in improving sulfate resistance, but their ability to mitigate expansion due to ASR was dictated by the equivalent alkalis content (Na2Oe) of the glass and high-alkali soda glass was generally not effective in this role. On the other hand, metakaolin, a highly reactive pozzolan, was highly effective in reducing ASR expansion, but may actually increase the damage due to sulfate attack when used at moderate replacement levels. Most pozzolans, such as low-CaO coal fly ash and ground coal bottom ash, silica fume, and pumice, were effective in controlling expansion due to both ASR and sulfate attack. The results demonstrated that the extent of the positive impact of using natural pozzolans on both properties was variable. The pozzolanic reactivity of materials alone was an unreliable indicator to assess the ability of the pozzolan to suppress expansion due to sulfate attack or ASR.