Loading…

Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict

With the rapid development of economy, the water shortage and water intake competition have been further intensified, resulting in the conflict of water resources development. This paper, against the amount of water conflict, has respectively constructed the three-party evolutionary game model regar...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Resources policy 2021-10, Vol.73, p.102139, Article 102139
Main Authors: Lu, Shibao, Lian, Zhiduan, Sun, Huaping, Wu, Xiaohe, Bai, Xiao, Wang, Congcong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 102139
container_title Resources policy
container_volume 73
creator Lu, Shibao
Lian, Zhiduan
Sun, Huaping
Wu, Xiaohe
Bai, Xiao
Wang, Congcong
description With the rapid development of economy, the water shortage and water intake competition have been further intensified, resulting in the conflict of water resources development. This paper, against the amount of water conflict, has respectively constructed the three-party evolutionary game model regarding the water intake condition at the upper, middle and lower reaches of the river basin from the perspective of evolutionary game theory, verified the related conclusions with the numerical simulation. The conclusions of the research are as follows: (1) There are four sets of system local asymptotic stability points P20,0,1, P40,1,1,P61,0,1 and P81,1,1 in the three-party game of amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, which means there existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), (non-cooperation, cooperation, cooperation), (cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), and (cooperation, cooperation, cooperation). After the verification with the numerical simulation, the most contradictory area is existed between the upper and middle reaches of the river basin. Thus, the selected choice is (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation); (2) as for the amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, the cost of cooperation water intake C1 has a significant impact on the strategy evolutionary path of the water intake group. This is of great theoretical and practical significance for the scientific regulation of trans-boundary water resources conflict and the realization of water resource management goals. •The paper establishes a three-party evolutionary game model.•There existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies in the three-party game.•Cooperation cost is of great significance to the scientific regulation of water resources conflict.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102139
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2580730390</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301420721001537</els_id><sourcerecordid>2580730390</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUMtKxDAUDaLgOPoNFlx3zKN5gZth8AUDLtR1SJNbTem0Y9Iq_r0ZKm5d3cvlPO45CF0SvCKYiOt2FSENU9wP3YpiSvKVEqaP0IIoyUopKnKMFphhUlYUy1N0llKLMeZSiQW6eQ67qbNj6N-KMdo-lfUw9d7G7-LLjhDTO_h5K2YbB6lwQ990wY3n6KSxXYKL37lEr3e3L5uHcvt0_7hZb0vHpBhLT7gVoIWmtQLpFPFcN1xWhHqGna1rrqBySmGpLaNc5yuXjaSE00r4BtgSXc26-zh8TJBG0-ZP-mxpKM80hpnGGSVnlItDShEas49hl5MYgs2hKtOav6rMoSozV5WZ65kJOcRngGiSC9A78CGCG40fwr8aPyODdps</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2580730390</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><source>PAIS Index</source><creator>Lu, Shibao ; Lian, Zhiduan ; Sun, Huaping ; Wu, Xiaohe ; Bai, Xiao ; Wang, Congcong</creator><creatorcontrib>Lu, Shibao ; Lian, Zhiduan ; Sun, Huaping ; Wu, Xiaohe ; Bai, Xiao ; Wang, Congcong</creatorcontrib><description>With the rapid development of economy, the water shortage and water intake competition have been further intensified, resulting in the conflict of water resources development. This paper, against the amount of water conflict, has respectively constructed the three-party evolutionary game model regarding the water intake condition at the upper, middle and lower reaches of the river basin from the perspective of evolutionary game theory, verified the related conclusions with the numerical simulation. The conclusions of the research are as follows: (1) There are four sets of system local asymptotic stability points P20,0,1, P40,1,1,P61,0,1 and P81,1,1 in the three-party game of amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, which means there existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), (non-cooperation, cooperation, cooperation), (cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), and (cooperation, cooperation, cooperation). After the verification with the numerical simulation, the most contradictory area is existed between the upper and middle reaches of the river basin. Thus, the selected choice is (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation); (2) as for the amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, the cost of cooperation water intake C1 has a significant impact on the strategy evolutionary path of the water intake group. This is of great theoretical and practical significance for the scientific regulation of trans-boundary water resources conflict and the realization of water resource management goals. •The paper establishes a three-party evolutionary game model.•There existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies in the three-party game.•Cooperation cost is of great significance to the scientific regulation of water resources conflict.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7641</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102139</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Boundaries ; Conflict ; Control ; Cooperation ; Economic development ; Evolution ; Game ; Game theory ; Games ; Mathematical models ; Moisture content ; Resource management ; River basins ; Simulation ; Verification ; Water intakes ; Water resources conflict ; Water resources development ; Water resources management ; Water resources system ; Water supply</subject><ispartof>Resources policy, 2021-10, Vol.73, p.102139, Article 102139</ispartof><rights>2021 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Science Ltd. Oct 2021</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27866,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lu, Shibao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Zhiduan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Huaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiaohe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Congcong</creatorcontrib><title>Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict</title><title>Resources policy</title><description>With the rapid development of economy, the water shortage and water intake competition have been further intensified, resulting in the conflict of water resources development. This paper, against the amount of water conflict, has respectively constructed the three-party evolutionary game model regarding the water intake condition at the upper, middle and lower reaches of the river basin from the perspective of evolutionary game theory, verified the related conclusions with the numerical simulation. The conclusions of the research are as follows: (1) There are four sets of system local asymptotic stability points P20,0,1, P40,1,1,P61,0,1 and P81,1,1 in the three-party game of amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, which means there existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), (non-cooperation, cooperation, cooperation), (cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), and (cooperation, cooperation, cooperation). After the verification with the numerical simulation, the most contradictory area is existed between the upper and middle reaches of the river basin. Thus, the selected choice is (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation); (2) as for the amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, the cost of cooperation water intake C1 has a significant impact on the strategy evolutionary path of the water intake group. This is of great theoretical and practical significance for the scientific regulation of trans-boundary water resources conflict and the realization of water resource management goals. •The paper establishes a three-party evolutionary game model.•There existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies in the three-party game.•Cooperation cost is of great significance to the scientific regulation of water resources conflict.</description><subject>Boundaries</subject><subject>Conflict</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Cooperation</subject><subject>Economic development</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Game</subject><subject>Game theory</subject><subject>Games</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Moisture content</subject><subject>Resource management</subject><subject>River basins</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Verification</subject><subject>Water intakes</subject><subject>Water resources conflict</subject><subject>Water resources development</subject><subject>Water resources management</subject><subject>Water resources system</subject><subject>Water supply</subject><issn>0301-4207</issn><issn>1873-7641</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUMtKxDAUDaLgOPoNFlx3zKN5gZth8AUDLtR1SJNbTem0Y9Iq_r0ZKm5d3cvlPO45CF0SvCKYiOt2FSENU9wP3YpiSvKVEqaP0IIoyUopKnKMFphhUlYUy1N0llKLMeZSiQW6eQ67qbNj6N-KMdo-lfUw9d7G7-LLjhDTO_h5K2YbB6lwQ990wY3n6KSxXYKL37lEr3e3L5uHcvt0_7hZb0vHpBhLT7gVoIWmtQLpFPFcN1xWhHqGna1rrqBySmGpLaNc5yuXjaSE00r4BtgSXc26-zh8TJBG0-ZP-mxpKM80hpnGGSVnlItDShEas49hl5MYgs2hKtOav6rMoSozV5WZ65kJOcRngGiSC9A78CGCG40fwr8aPyODdps</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Lu, Shibao</creator><creator>Lian, Zhiduan</creator><creator>Sun, Huaping</creator><creator>Wu, Xiaohe</creator><creator>Bai, Xiao</creator><creator>Wang, Congcong</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict</title><author>Lu, Shibao ; Lian, Zhiduan ; Sun, Huaping ; Wu, Xiaohe ; Bai, Xiao ; Wang, Congcong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Boundaries</topic><topic>Conflict</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Cooperation</topic><topic>Economic development</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Game</topic><topic>Game theory</topic><topic>Games</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Moisture content</topic><topic>Resource management</topic><topic>River basins</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Verification</topic><topic>Water intakes</topic><topic>Water resources conflict</topic><topic>Water resources development</topic><topic>Water resources management</topic><topic>Water resources system</topic><topic>Water supply</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lu, Shibao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lian, Zhiduan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sun, Huaping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiaohe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Xiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Congcong</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lu, Shibao</au><au>Lian, Zhiduan</au><au>Sun, Huaping</au><au>Wu, Xiaohe</au><au>Bai, Xiao</au><au>Wang, Congcong</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict</atitle><jtitle>Resources policy</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>73</volume><spage>102139</spage><pages>102139-</pages><artnum>102139</artnum><issn>0301-4207</issn><eissn>1873-7641</eissn><abstract>With the rapid development of economy, the water shortage and water intake competition have been further intensified, resulting in the conflict of water resources development. This paper, against the amount of water conflict, has respectively constructed the three-party evolutionary game model regarding the water intake condition at the upper, middle and lower reaches of the river basin from the perspective of evolutionary game theory, verified the related conclusions with the numerical simulation. The conclusions of the research are as follows: (1) There are four sets of system local asymptotic stability points P20,0,1, P40,1,1,P61,0,1 and P81,1,1 in the three-party game of amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, which means there existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), (non-cooperation, cooperation, cooperation), (cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation), and (cooperation, cooperation, cooperation). After the verification with the numerical simulation, the most contradictory area is existed between the upper and middle reaches of the river basin. Thus, the selected choice is (non-cooperation, non-cooperation, cooperation); (2) as for the amount of water based trans-boundary water resources conflict, the cost of cooperation water intake C1 has a significant impact on the strategy evolutionary path of the water intake group. This is of great theoretical and practical significance for the scientific regulation of trans-boundary water resources conflict and the realization of water resource management goals. •The paper establishes a three-party evolutionary game model.•There existed four sets of evolutionary stable strategies in the three-party game.•Cooperation cost is of great significance to the scientific regulation of water resources conflict.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102139</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4207
ispartof Resources policy, 2021-10, Vol.73, p.102139, Article 102139
issn 0301-4207
1873-7641
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2580730390
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier; PAIS Index
subjects Boundaries
Conflict
Control
Cooperation
Economic development
Evolution
Game
Game theory
Games
Mathematical models
Moisture content
Resource management
River basins
Simulation
Verification
Water intakes
Water resources conflict
Water resources development
Water resources management
Water resources system
Water supply
title Simulating trans-boundary watershed water resources conflict
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T03%3A05%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Simulating%20trans-boundary%20watershed%20water%20resources%20conflict&rft.jtitle=Resources%20policy&rft.au=Lu,%20Shibao&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=73&rft.spage=102139&rft.pages=102139-&rft.artnum=102139&rft.issn=0301-4207&rft.eissn=1873-7641&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102139&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2580730390%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c376t-d15a6e9692b8e7c81d59f57412d30cabb58e4c88079a3259d3057f7215246dfe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2580730390&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true