Evaluation of timber floor in-plane retrofitting interventions on the seismic response of masonry structures by DEM analysis: a case study

• Published in: Bulletin of earthquake engineering 2021-11, Vol.19 (14), p.6003-6026
• Main Authors: Gubana, Alessandra, Melotto, Massimo
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Civil Engineering; Collapse; Discrete element method; Earth and Environmental Science; Earth Sciences; Earthquake resistance; Environmental Engineering/Biotechnology; Flooring; Forces; Geophysics/Geodesy; Geotechnical Engineering & Applied Earth Sciences; Historic buildings & sites; Historical buildings; Hydrogeology; Masonry; Original Article; Retrofitting; Seismic activity; Seismic engineering; Seismic response; Sequences; Shear; Shear strength; Stiffness; Strengthening; Structural Geology; Structures; Timber (structural); Walls; Wood floors
• ISSN: 1570-761X; 1573-1456
• DOI: 10.1007/s10518-021-01190-1

The seismic response of existing masonry structures is strongly influenced by floor and roof in-plane properties. A strengthening intervention is often needed for traditional timber floors to overcome their low in-plane stiffness and to preserve historical buildings. In this study, the effects of unreinforced and reinforced timber floors on the seismic behaviour of an existing listed masonry building are investigated with dynamic non-linear analyses by means of the Discrete Element Method (DEM). With this approach, the failure processes and collapse sequences of masonry structures can be captured in detail. A previously developed model of the floor cyclic behaviour, based on experimental data, is applied herein to DEM models of the masonry building. Different seismic ground accelerations, different floor types and different floor-to-wall connections are considered. The results highlight the effectiveness of the analysed floor strengthening solution in reducing the out-of-plane displacements of masonry walls. With adequate connections, the reinforced floor is able to transfer the seismic forces to the shear-resistant walls up to the shear-sliding collapse of the structural sidewalls. A comparison with the ideal rigid diaphragm case confirms the good performance of the strengthened floors. The small observed out-of-plane displacements are compatible with the masonry wall capacity, and the reinforced floor hysteretic cycles contribute to dissipate part of the input energy. Moreover, different designs of the connections can also cap the transferred seismic forces to an acceptable level for shear-resistant walls.