Loading…

O-137 Assessment of multiple exposures to chemical agents in French workplaces: findings from two exposure databases

BackgroundNational surveys of the French working population estimate that approximately 15% of all workers are exposed to at least three different chemical agents at work. However, the most prevalent coexposure situations and their associated health risks remain relatively understudied.ObjectiveTo c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England) England), 2021-10, Vol.78 (Suppl 1), p.A17-A17
Main Authors: Sauve, Jean-Francois, Emili, Andrea, Mater, Gautier
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page A17
container_issue Suppl 1
container_start_page A17
container_title Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)
container_volume 78
creator Sauve, Jean-Francois
Emili, Andrea
Mater, Gautier
description BackgroundNational surveys of the French working population estimate that approximately 15% of all workers are exposed to at least three different chemical agents at work. However, the most prevalent coexposure situations and their associated health risks remain relatively understudied.ObjectiveTo characterize occupational coexposure situations in France using available data from two occupational exposure databases.MethodsWe extracted personal measurement data from the Colchic and Scola databases for the period 2010–2019. We selected 118 chemical agents that had ≥100 measurements with detected concentrations, including 31 carcinogens (IARC groups 1, 2A, and 2B). We grouped measurements by work situation (WS, combination of sector, occupation, task, and year). We characterized the mixtures across WS using frequent itemset mining methods.ResultsWe retained 275,213 samples from 32,670 WS, encompassing 4,692 unique mixtures. Workers in thirty-two percent of all WS were exposed to ≥2 agents (median 3 agents/WS, interquartile interval 2–5) and 13% of all WS contained ≥2 carcinogens (median 2 carcinogens/WS, maximum 14). The most frequent coexposures across all agents were ethylbenzene-xylene (1,550 WS), quartz-cristobalite (1,417 WS), and toluene-xylene (1,305 WS). Prevalent combinations of carcinogens also included hexavalent chromium-lead (368 WS) and benzene-ethylbenzene (314 WS). Agents with the lowest proportions of coexposure were wood dust (6% of WS exposed to at least one other agent) and asbestos (8%). Tasks with the highest proportions of coexposure to carcinogens include electric arc welding (37% of WS with coexposure), polymerization and distillation (34%), construction drilling and excavating (34%), and water collection and treatment (32%).ConclusionCoexposure to multiple chemical agents, including carcinogens, was highly prevalent in the databases, and should be taken into account when assessing exposure risks in the workplace. However, these databases do not necessarily represent a random sample of the working population, thereby limiting the generalizability of our findings.
doi_str_mv 10.1136/OEM-2021-EPI.45
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_bmj_j</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2584676818</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2584676818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b1055-9f34dd4b78a6bfddc74d3c30d9af4acae2387bd53fd1fe3e78bbe5687d8976553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkLFOwzAARC0EEqUws1piRC52bMcOW1W1UKmoDDBHdmy3KUkc4oQysvCjfAmuQDDdDU930gPgkuAJITS9Wc8fUIITguaPywnjR2BEmMBIZEl6HDvlBGFByCk4C2GHMaGCJiPwtkaxfX18TkOwIdS26aF3sB6qvmwrC-1768PQ2QB7D4utrctCVVBtIhdg2cBFZ5tiC_e-e2krVdhwC13ZmLLZBOg6X8N-7_9GoFG90ioenYMTp6pgL35zDJ4X86fZPVqt75az6QppgjlHmaPMGKaFVKl2xhSCGVpQbDLlmCqUTagU2nDqDHGWWiG1tjyVwshMpJzTMbj62W07_zrY0Oc7P3RNvMwTLlkqUklkpK5_KF3v_gGC84PYPIrND2LzKDZnnH4DmBhulA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2584676818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>O-137 Assessment of multiple exposures to chemical agents in French workplaces: findings from two exposure databases</title><source>BMJ Journals - NESLi2</source><creator>Sauve, Jean-Francois ; Emili, Andrea ; Mater, Gautier</creator><creatorcontrib>Sauve, Jean-Francois ; Emili, Andrea ; Mater, Gautier</creatorcontrib><description>BackgroundNational surveys of the French working population estimate that approximately 15% of all workers are exposed to at least three different chemical agents at work. However, the most prevalent coexposure situations and their associated health risks remain relatively understudied.ObjectiveTo characterize occupational coexposure situations in France using available data from two occupational exposure databases.MethodsWe extracted personal measurement data from the Colchic and Scola databases for the period 2010–2019. We selected 118 chemical agents that had ≥100 measurements with detected concentrations, including 31 carcinogens (IARC groups 1, 2A, and 2B). We grouped measurements by work situation (WS, combination of sector, occupation, task, and year). We characterized the mixtures across WS using frequent itemset mining methods.ResultsWe retained 275,213 samples from 32,670 WS, encompassing 4,692 unique mixtures. Workers in thirty-two percent of all WS were exposed to ≥2 agents (median 3 agents/WS, interquartile interval 2–5) and 13% of all WS contained ≥2 carcinogens (median 2 carcinogens/WS, maximum 14). The most frequent coexposures across all agents were ethylbenzene-xylene (1,550 WS), quartz-cristobalite (1,417 WS), and toluene-xylene (1,305 WS). Prevalent combinations of carcinogens also included hexavalent chromium-lead (368 WS) and benzene-ethylbenzene (314 WS). Agents with the lowest proportions of coexposure were wood dust (6% of WS exposed to at least one other agent) and asbestos (8%). Tasks with the highest proportions of coexposure to carcinogens include electric arc welding (37% of WS with coexposure), polymerization and distillation (34%), construction drilling and excavating (34%), and water collection and treatment (32%).ConclusionCoexposure to multiple chemical agents, including carcinogens, was highly prevalent in the databases, and should be taken into account when assessing exposure risks in the workplace. However, these databases do not necessarily represent a random sample of the working population, thereby limiting the generalizability of our findings.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1351-0711</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-7926</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1136/OEM-2021-EPI.45</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher><subject>Arc welding ; Asbestos ; Benzene ; Carcinogens ; Chemical agents ; Chromium ; Cristobalite ; Data mining ; Distillation ; Distilled water ; Drilling ; Ethylbenzene ; Exposure ; Health risks ; Hexavalent chromium ; Occupational exposure ; Occupational health ; Oral Presentations ; Population statistics ; Toluene ; Workplaces ; Xylene</subject><ispartof>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2021-10, Vol.78 (Suppl 1), p.A17-A17</ispartof><rights>Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><rights>2021 Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/78/Suppl_1/A17.1.full.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://oem.bmj.com/content/78/Suppl_1/A17.1.full$$EHTML$$P50$$Gbmj$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,55346,77659,77685</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sauve, Jean-Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emili, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mater, Gautier</creatorcontrib><title>O-137 Assessment of multiple exposures to chemical agents in French workplaces: findings from two exposure databases</title><title>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</title><addtitle>Occup Environ Med</addtitle><description>BackgroundNational surveys of the French working population estimate that approximately 15% of all workers are exposed to at least three different chemical agents at work. However, the most prevalent coexposure situations and their associated health risks remain relatively understudied.ObjectiveTo characterize occupational coexposure situations in France using available data from two occupational exposure databases.MethodsWe extracted personal measurement data from the Colchic and Scola databases for the period 2010–2019. We selected 118 chemical agents that had ≥100 measurements with detected concentrations, including 31 carcinogens (IARC groups 1, 2A, and 2B). We grouped measurements by work situation (WS, combination of sector, occupation, task, and year). We characterized the mixtures across WS using frequent itemset mining methods.ResultsWe retained 275,213 samples from 32,670 WS, encompassing 4,692 unique mixtures. Workers in thirty-two percent of all WS were exposed to ≥2 agents (median 3 agents/WS, interquartile interval 2–5) and 13% of all WS contained ≥2 carcinogens (median 2 carcinogens/WS, maximum 14). The most frequent coexposures across all agents were ethylbenzene-xylene (1,550 WS), quartz-cristobalite (1,417 WS), and toluene-xylene (1,305 WS). Prevalent combinations of carcinogens also included hexavalent chromium-lead (368 WS) and benzene-ethylbenzene (314 WS). Agents with the lowest proportions of coexposure were wood dust (6% of WS exposed to at least one other agent) and asbestos (8%). Tasks with the highest proportions of coexposure to carcinogens include electric arc welding (37% of WS with coexposure), polymerization and distillation (34%), construction drilling and excavating (34%), and water collection and treatment (32%).ConclusionCoexposure to multiple chemical agents, including carcinogens, was highly prevalent in the databases, and should be taken into account when assessing exposure risks in the workplace. However, these databases do not necessarily represent a random sample of the working population, thereby limiting the generalizability of our findings.</description><subject>Arc welding</subject><subject>Asbestos</subject><subject>Benzene</subject><subject>Carcinogens</subject><subject>Chemical agents</subject><subject>Chromium</subject><subject>Cristobalite</subject><subject>Data mining</subject><subject>Distillation</subject><subject>Distilled water</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>Ethylbenzene</subject><subject>Exposure</subject><subject>Health risks</subject><subject>Hexavalent chromium</subject><subject>Occupational exposure</subject><subject>Occupational health</subject><subject>Oral Presentations</subject><subject>Population statistics</subject><subject>Toluene</subject><subject>Workplaces</subject><subject>Xylene</subject><issn>1351-0711</issn><issn>1470-7926</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkLFOwzAARC0EEqUws1piRC52bMcOW1W1UKmoDDBHdmy3KUkc4oQysvCjfAmuQDDdDU930gPgkuAJITS9Wc8fUIITguaPywnjR2BEmMBIZEl6HDvlBGFByCk4C2GHMaGCJiPwtkaxfX18TkOwIdS26aF3sB6qvmwrC-1768PQ2QB7D4utrctCVVBtIhdg2cBFZ5tiC_e-e2krVdhwC13ZmLLZBOg6X8N-7_9GoFG90ioenYMTp6pgL35zDJ4X86fZPVqt75az6QppgjlHmaPMGKaFVKl2xhSCGVpQbDLlmCqUTagU2nDqDHGWWiG1tjyVwshMpJzTMbj62W07_zrY0Oc7P3RNvMwTLlkqUklkpK5_KF3v_gGC84PYPIrND2LzKDZnnH4DmBhulA</recordid><startdate>20211022</startdate><enddate>20211022</enddate><creator>Sauve, Jean-Francois</creator><creator>Emili, Andrea</creator><creator>Mater, Gautier</creator><general>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</general><general>BMJ Publishing Group LTD</general><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BTHHO</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211022</creationdate><title>O-137 Assessment of multiple exposures to chemical agents in French workplaces: findings from two exposure databases</title><author>Sauve, Jean-Francois ; Emili, Andrea ; Mater, Gautier</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1055-9f34dd4b78a6bfddc74d3c30d9af4acae2387bd53fd1fe3e78bbe5687d8976553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Arc welding</topic><topic>Asbestos</topic><topic>Benzene</topic><topic>Carcinogens</topic><topic>Chemical agents</topic><topic>Chromium</topic><topic>Cristobalite</topic><topic>Data mining</topic><topic>Distillation</topic><topic>Distilled water</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>Ethylbenzene</topic><topic>Exposure</topic><topic>Health risks</topic><topic>Hexavalent chromium</topic><topic>Occupational exposure</topic><topic>Occupational health</topic><topic>Oral Presentations</topic><topic>Population statistics</topic><topic>Toluene</topic><topic>Workplaces</topic><topic>Xylene</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sauve, Jean-Francois</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emili, Andrea</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mater, Gautier</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>BMJ Journals</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sauve, Jean-Francois</au><au>Emili, Andrea</au><au>Mater, Gautier</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>O-137 Assessment of multiple exposures to chemical agents in French workplaces: findings from two exposure databases</atitle><jtitle>Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England)</jtitle><stitle>Occup Environ Med</stitle><date>2021-10-22</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>78</volume><issue>Suppl 1</issue><spage>A17</spage><epage>A17</epage><pages>A17-A17</pages><issn>1351-0711</issn><eissn>1470-7926</eissn><abstract>BackgroundNational surveys of the French working population estimate that approximately 15% of all workers are exposed to at least three different chemical agents at work. However, the most prevalent coexposure situations and their associated health risks remain relatively understudied.ObjectiveTo characterize occupational coexposure situations in France using available data from two occupational exposure databases.MethodsWe extracted personal measurement data from the Colchic and Scola databases for the period 2010–2019. We selected 118 chemical agents that had ≥100 measurements with detected concentrations, including 31 carcinogens (IARC groups 1, 2A, and 2B). We grouped measurements by work situation (WS, combination of sector, occupation, task, and year). We characterized the mixtures across WS using frequent itemset mining methods.ResultsWe retained 275,213 samples from 32,670 WS, encompassing 4,692 unique mixtures. Workers in thirty-two percent of all WS were exposed to ≥2 agents (median 3 agents/WS, interquartile interval 2–5) and 13% of all WS contained ≥2 carcinogens (median 2 carcinogens/WS, maximum 14). The most frequent coexposures across all agents were ethylbenzene-xylene (1,550 WS), quartz-cristobalite (1,417 WS), and toluene-xylene (1,305 WS). Prevalent combinations of carcinogens also included hexavalent chromium-lead (368 WS) and benzene-ethylbenzene (314 WS). Agents with the lowest proportions of coexposure were wood dust (6% of WS exposed to at least one other agent) and asbestos (8%). Tasks with the highest proportions of coexposure to carcinogens include electric arc welding (37% of WS with coexposure), polymerization and distillation (34%), construction drilling and excavating (34%), and water collection and treatment (32%).ConclusionCoexposure to multiple chemical agents, including carcinogens, was highly prevalent in the databases, and should be taken into account when assessing exposure risks in the workplace. However, these databases do not necessarily represent a random sample of the working population, thereby limiting the generalizability of our findings.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</pub><doi>10.1136/OEM-2021-EPI.45</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1351-0711
ispartof Occupational and environmental medicine (London, England), 2021-10, Vol.78 (Suppl 1), p.A17-A17
issn 1351-0711
1470-7926
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2584676818
source BMJ Journals - NESLi2
subjects Arc welding
Asbestos
Benzene
Carcinogens
Chemical agents
Chromium
Cristobalite
Data mining
Distillation
Distilled water
Drilling
Ethylbenzene
Exposure
Health risks
Hexavalent chromium
Occupational exposure
Occupational health
Oral Presentations
Population statistics
Toluene
Workplaces
Xylene
title O-137 Assessment of multiple exposures to chemical agents in French workplaces: findings from two exposure databases
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A26%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_bmj_j&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=O-137%E2%80%85Assessment%20of%20multiple%20exposures%20to%20chemical%20agents%20in%20French%20workplaces:%20findings%20from%20two%20exposure%20databases&rft.jtitle=Occupational%20and%20environmental%20medicine%20(London,%20England)&rft.au=Sauve,%20Jean-Francois&rft.date=2021-10-22&rft.volume=78&rft.issue=Suppl%201&rft.spage=A17&rft.epage=A17&rft.pages=A17-A17&rft.issn=1351-0711&rft.eissn=1470-7926&rft_id=info:doi/10.1136/OEM-2021-EPI.45&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_bmj_j%3E2584676818%3C/proquest_bmj_j%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b1055-9f34dd4b78a6bfddc74d3c30d9af4acae2387bd53fd1fe3e78bbe5687d8976553%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2584676818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true