Loading…
Definition of no‐fishing zones and fishing effort limits to reduce franciscana bycatch to sustainable levels in southern Brazil
Franciscana dolphin Pontoporia blainvillei bycatch has been high for near six decades in western South Atlantic, with large regional variation. In 2012, the Brazilian Government‐regulated gillnet fisheries in south and southeast Brazil by reducing fishing effort and establishing no‐fishing zones. Ho...
Saved in:
Published in: | Animal conservation 2021-10, Vol.24 (5), p.770-782 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3 |
container_end_page | 782 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 770 |
container_title | Animal conservation |
container_volume | 24 |
creator | Prado, J. H. Kinas, P. G. Pennino, M. G. Seyboth, E. Silveira, F. R. G. Ferreira, E. C. Secchi, E. R. |
description | Franciscana dolphin Pontoporia blainvillei bycatch has been high for near six decades in western South Atlantic, with large regional variation. In 2012, the Brazilian Government‐regulated gillnet fisheries in south and southeast Brazil by reducing fishing effort and establishing no‐fishing zones. However, there is evidence that the magnitude of franciscana bycatch remains high and unsustainable. The aims of this study were to identify hotspot areas of franciscana bycatch associated with two main gillnet fisheries and to propose no‐fishing zones combined with limited total allowable fishing effort (i.e. total net length per season) in order to meet management objectives in southern Brazil. A hierarchical Bayesian model using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) was employed based on 1427 reported settings from 1999 to 2003 and 2006 to 2009. Hotspot zones were detected and are proposed as no‐fishing zone during the white croaker Micropogonias furnieri and striped weakfish Cynoscion guatucupa gillnet fishing seasons. Their extents represent 6% (1466.8 km2) and 19% (4493.7 km2) of the fishing ground (23 204.1 km2) during croaker and weakfish fishing seasons respectively. The total allowable fishing effort estimated outside the no‐fishing zones were estimated at 541 km (95% credible interval (CrI) [339; 940]) during croaker and 688 km (CrI [312; 2,166]) during weakfish fishing seasons, one order of magnitude lower than the current total fishing effort. The drastic reduction of total fishing effort estimated in this study is largely due to weak protection measures since the gillnet fisheries became the major conservation concern for franciscana by the end of 1970s in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo, they were based on the best scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce the risk of the franciscana population’s collapse in southern Brazil.
The franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) is the cetacean most seriously affected by incidental mortality in gillnet fisheries in western South Atlantic Ocean. The present work demonstrated that a drastic reduction of total fishing effort and the establishment of fishing exclusion zone are needed in order to reduce mortality to sustainable levels in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/acv.12679 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2585958156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2585958156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1OAzEQhS0EEiFQcANLVBSbePbP6zKEXykSDdBaXq9NHG3sYO-CkgpuwBk5CQ6Bkmlm9OabN9JD6BTICGKNhXwdQVpStocGkJcsAcqK_ThnJU1YnpFDdBTCghBIqwwG6ONSaWNNZ5zFTmPrvt4_tQlzY5_xxlkVsLAN_lOU1s53uDVL0wXcOexV00uFtRdWmiCFFbheS9HJ-XYb-tAJY0XdKtyqV9UGbCwOru_mylt84cXGtMfoQIs2qJPfPkSP11cP09tkdn9zN53MEpkyypJCVFJoaCgAlZplIJoo1LKoFDCAoiaUMNpUpGpqXTMJhGpG8rSGqOasyYbobOe78u6lV6HjC9d7G1_ytKgKVlRQlJE631HSuxC80nzlzVL4NQfCtwnzmDD_STiy4x37Zlq1_h_kk-nT7uIb3COAYA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2585958156</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Definition of no‐fishing zones and fishing effort limits to reduce franciscana bycatch to sustainable levels in southern Brazil</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Prado, J. H. ; Kinas, P. G. ; Pennino, M. G. ; Seyboth, E. ; Silveira, F. R. G. ; Ferreira, E. C. ; Secchi, E. R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Prado, J. H. ; Kinas, P. G. ; Pennino, M. G. ; Seyboth, E. ; Silveira, F. R. G. ; Ferreira, E. C. ; Secchi, E. R.</creatorcontrib><description>Franciscana dolphin Pontoporia blainvillei bycatch has been high for near six decades in western South Atlantic, with large regional variation. In 2012, the Brazilian Government‐regulated gillnet fisheries in south and southeast Brazil by reducing fishing effort and establishing no‐fishing zones. However, there is evidence that the magnitude of franciscana bycatch remains high and unsustainable. The aims of this study were to identify hotspot areas of franciscana bycatch associated with two main gillnet fisheries and to propose no‐fishing zones combined with limited total allowable fishing effort (i.e. total net length per season) in order to meet management objectives in southern Brazil. A hierarchical Bayesian model using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) was employed based on 1427 reported settings from 1999 to 2003 and 2006 to 2009. Hotspot zones were detected and are proposed as no‐fishing zone during the white croaker Micropogonias furnieri and striped weakfish Cynoscion guatucupa gillnet fishing seasons. Their extents represent 6% (1466.8 km2) and 19% (4493.7 km2) of the fishing ground (23 204.1 km2) during croaker and weakfish fishing seasons respectively. The total allowable fishing effort estimated outside the no‐fishing zones were estimated at 541 km (95% credible interval (CrI) [339; 940]) during croaker and 688 km (CrI [312; 2,166]) during weakfish fishing seasons, one order of magnitude lower than the current total fishing effort. The drastic reduction of total fishing effort estimated in this study is largely due to weak protection measures since the gillnet fisheries became the major conservation concern for franciscana by the end of 1970s in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo, they were based on the best scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce the risk of the franciscana population’s collapse in southern Brazil.
The franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) is the cetacean most seriously affected by incidental mortality in gillnet fisheries in western South Atlantic Ocean. The present work demonstrated that a drastic reduction of total fishing effort and the establishment of fishing exclusion zone are needed in order to reduce mortality to sustainable levels in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo of the fishery dynamics, they were based on robust scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce risk of the franciscana population’s collapse.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1367-9430</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-1795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/acv.12679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Approximation ; Bayesian analysis ; Brazil ; Bycatch ; Dolphins ; Exclusion zones ; Fisheries ; Fishing ; Fishing effort ; fishing effort limits ; Fishing grounds ; Fishing zones ; franciscana ; gillnet fisheries ; Gillnets ; hierarchical Bayesian models ; Hot spots ; INLA ; Man-induced effects ; Marine mammals ; Mortality causes ; no‐fishing zone ; Probability theory ; Regional variations ; Risk reduction ; Seasons</subject><ispartof>Animal conservation, 2021-10, Vol.24 (5), p.770-782</ispartof><rights>2021 The Zoological Society of London</rights><rights>Copyright © 2021 The Zoological Society of London</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1201-7718</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Prado, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinas, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennino, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyboth, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, F. R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secchi, E. R.</creatorcontrib><title>Definition of no‐fishing zones and fishing effort limits to reduce franciscana bycatch to sustainable levels in southern Brazil</title><title>Animal conservation</title><description>Franciscana dolphin Pontoporia blainvillei bycatch has been high for near six decades in western South Atlantic, with large regional variation. In 2012, the Brazilian Government‐regulated gillnet fisheries in south and southeast Brazil by reducing fishing effort and establishing no‐fishing zones. However, there is evidence that the magnitude of franciscana bycatch remains high and unsustainable. The aims of this study were to identify hotspot areas of franciscana bycatch associated with two main gillnet fisheries and to propose no‐fishing zones combined with limited total allowable fishing effort (i.e. total net length per season) in order to meet management objectives in southern Brazil. A hierarchical Bayesian model using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) was employed based on 1427 reported settings from 1999 to 2003 and 2006 to 2009. Hotspot zones were detected and are proposed as no‐fishing zone during the white croaker Micropogonias furnieri and striped weakfish Cynoscion guatucupa gillnet fishing seasons. Their extents represent 6% (1466.8 km2) and 19% (4493.7 km2) of the fishing ground (23 204.1 km2) during croaker and weakfish fishing seasons respectively. The total allowable fishing effort estimated outside the no‐fishing zones were estimated at 541 km (95% credible interval (CrI) [339; 940]) during croaker and 688 km (CrI [312; 2,166]) during weakfish fishing seasons, one order of magnitude lower than the current total fishing effort. The drastic reduction of total fishing effort estimated in this study is largely due to weak protection measures since the gillnet fisheries became the major conservation concern for franciscana by the end of 1970s in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo, they were based on the best scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce the risk of the franciscana population’s collapse in southern Brazil.
The franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) is the cetacean most seriously affected by incidental mortality in gillnet fisheries in western South Atlantic Ocean. The present work demonstrated that a drastic reduction of total fishing effort and the establishment of fishing exclusion zone are needed in order to reduce mortality to sustainable levels in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo of the fishery dynamics, they were based on robust scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce risk of the franciscana population’s collapse.</description><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Brazil</subject><subject>Bycatch</subject><subject>Dolphins</subject><subject>Exclusion zones</subject><subject>Fisheries</subject><subject>Fishing</subject><subject>Fishing effort</subject><subject>fishing effort limits</subject><subject>Fishing grounds</subject><subject>Fishing zones</subject><subject>franciscana</subject><subject>gillnet fisheries</subject><subject>Gillnets</subject><subject>hierarchical Bayesian models</subject><subject>Hot spots</subject><subject>INLA</subject><subject>Man-induced effects</subject><subject>Marine mammals</subject><subject>Mortality causes</subject><subject>no‐fishing zone</subject><subject>Probability theory</subject><subject>Regional variations</subject><subject>Risk reduction</subject><subject>Seasons</subject><issn>1367-9430</issn><issn>1469-1795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1OAzEQhS0EEiFQcANLVBSbePbP6zKEXykSDdBaXq9NHG3sYO-CkgpuwBk5CQ6Bkmlm9OabN9JD6BTICGKNhXwdQVpStocGkJcsAcqK_ThnJU1YnpFDdBTCghBIqwwG6ONSaWNNZ5zFTmPrvt4_tQlzY5_xxlkVsLAN_lOU1s53uDVL0wXcOexV00uFtRdWmiCFFbheS9HJ-XYb-tAJY0XdKtyqV9UGbCwOru_mylt84cXGtMfoQIs2qJPfPkSP11cP09tkdn9zN53MEpkyypJCVFJoaCgAlZplIJoo1LKoFDCAoiaUMNpUpGpqXTMJhGpG8rSGqOasyYbobOe78u6lV6HjC9d7G1_ytKgKVlRQlJE631HSuxC80nzlzVL4NQfCtwnzmDD_STiy4x37Zlq1_h_kk-nT7uIb3COAYA</recordid><startdate>202110</startdate><enddate>202110</enddate><creator>Prado, J. H.</creator><creator>Kinas, P. G.</creator><creator>Pennino, M. G.</creator><creator>Seyboth, E.</creator><creator>Silveira, F. R. G.</creator><creator>Ferreira, E. C.</creator><creator>Secchi, E. R.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>RC3</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1201-7718</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202110</creationdate><title>Definition of no‐fishing zones and fishing effort limits to reduce franciscana bycatch to sustainable levels in southern Brazil</title><author>Prado, J. H. ; Kinas, P. G. ; Pennino, M. G. ; Seyboth, E. ; Silveira, F. R. G. ; Ferreira, E. C. ; Secchi, E. R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Brazil</topic><topic>Bycatch</topic><topic>Dolphins</topic><topic>Exclusion zones</topic><topic>Fisheries</topic><topic>Fishing</topic><topic>Fishing effort</topic><topic>fishing effort limits</topic><topic>Fishing grounds</topic><topic>Fishing zones</topic><topic>franciscana</topic><topic>gillnet fisheries</topic><topic>Gillnets</topic><topic>hierarchical Bayesian models</topic><topic>Hot spots</topic><topic>INLA</topic><topic>Man-induced effects</topic><topic>Marine mammals</topic><topic>Mortality causes</topic><topic>no‐fishing zone</topic><topic>Probability theory</topic><topic>Regional variations</topic><topic>Risk reduction</topic><topic>Seasons</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Prado, J. H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kinas, P. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pennino, M. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seyboth, E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silveira, F. R. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, E. C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Secchi, E. R.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Prado, J. H.</au><au>Kinas, P. G.</au><au>Pennino, M. G.</au><au>Seyboth, E.</au><au>Silveira, F. R. G.</au><au>Ferreira, E. C.</au><au>Secchi, E. R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Definition of no‐fishing zones and fishing effort limits to reduce franciscana bycatch to sustainable levels in southern Brazil</atitle><jtitle>Animal conservation</jtitle><date>2021-10</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>24</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>770</spage><epage>782</epage><pages>770-782</pages><issn>1367-9430</issn><eissn>1469-1795</eissn><abstract>Franciscana dolphin Pontoporia blainvillei bycatch has been high for near six decades in western South Atlantic, with large regional variation. In 2012, the Brazilian Government‐regulated gillnet fisheries in south and southeast Brazil by reducing fishing effort and establishing no‐fishing zones. However, there is evidence that the magnitude of franciscana bycatch remains high and unsustainable. The aims of this study were to identify hotspot areas of franciscana bycatch associated with two main gillnet fisheries and to propose no‐fishing zones combined with limited total allowable fishing effort (i.e. total net length per season) in order to meet management objectives in southern Brazil. A hierarchical Bayesian model using integrated nested Laplace approximation (INLA) was employed based on 1427 reported settings from 1999 to 2003 and 2006 to 2009. Hotspot zones were detected and are proposed as no‐fishing zone during the white croaker Micropogonias furnieri and striped weakfish Cynoscion guatucupa gillnet fishing seasons. Their extents represent 6% (1466.8 km2) and 19% (4493.7 km2) of the fishing ground (23 204.1 km2) during croaker and weakfish fishing seasons respectively. The total allowable fishing effort estimated outside the no‐fishing zones were estimated at 541 km (95% credible interval (CrI) [339; 940]) during croaker and 688 km (CrI [312; 2,166]) during weakfish fishing seasons, one order of magnitude lower than the current total fishing effort. The drastic reduction of total fishing effort estimated in this study is largely due to weak protection measures since the gillnet fisheries became the major conservation concern for franciscana by the end of 1970s in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo, they were based on the best scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce the risk of the franciscana population’s collapse in southern Brazil.
The franciscana dolphin (Pontoporia blainvillei) is the cetacean most seriously affected by incidental mortality in gillnet fisheries in western South Atlantic Ocean. The present work demonstrated that a drastic reduction of total fishing effort and the establishment of fishing exclusion zone are needed in order to reduce mortality to sustainable levels in southern Brazil. Although the implementation of the proposed exclusion zones and limiting fishing effort will strongly impact the status quo of the fishery dynamics, they were based on robust scientific evidence and on a clearly defined management goal to reduce risk of the franciscana population’s collapse.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/acv.12679</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1201-7718</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1367-9430 |
ispartof | Animal conservation, 2021-10, Vol.24 (5), p.770-782 |
issn | 1367-9430 1469-1795 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2585958156 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Approximation Bayesian analysis Brazil Bycatch Dolphins Exclusion zones Fisheries Fishing Fishing effort fishing effort limits Fishing grounds Fishing zones franciscana gillnet fisheries Gillnets hierarchical Bayesian models Hot spots INLA Man-induced effects Marine mammals Mortality causes no‐fishing zone Probability theory Regional variations Risk reduction Seasons |
title | Definition of no‐fishing zones and fishing effort limits to reduce franciscana bycatch to sustainable levels in southern Brazil |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T23%3A55%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Definition%20of%20no%E2%80%90fishing%20zones%20and%20fishing%20effort%20limits%20to%20reduce%20franciscana%20bycatch%20to%20sustainable%20levels%20in%20southern%20Brazil&rft.jtitle=Animal%20conservation&rft.au=Prado,%20J.%20H.&rft.date=2021-10&rft.volume=24&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=770&rft.epage=782&rft.pages=770-782&rft.issn=1367-9430&rft.eissn=1469-1795&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/acv.12679&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2585958156%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-5a8caf1d7117cf931ad8cabc58e19115b07097d808dbfb9c107f9042b197d49d3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2585958156&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |