Towards a theoretical framework for sustainable smallholder irrigation farming: A case study of Lusip smallholder sugar-cane farmers in Swaziland

The government of Swaziland has fully recognized the role of smallholder irrigation development in poverty reduction hence intensive investments have been made to empower rural smallholder farmers through irrigation. The Lower Usuthu Irrigation Project (LUSIP) is one of the projects which strive to...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:African journal of agricultural research 2014-10, Vol.9 (43), p.3205-3214
Main Authors: Mphumelelo, Ndlovu, Cliff, S. Dlamini, Banele, Nkambule
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agricultural development
Case studies
Economics
Farmers
Irrigation
Politics-Africa
Poverty
Research & development
Rural areas
Sugar
Sustainable agriculture
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The government of Swaziland has fully recognized the role of smallholder irrigation development in poverty reduction hence intensive investments have been made to empower rural smallholder farmers through irrigation. The Lower Usuthu Irrigation Project (LUSIP) is one of the projects which strive to empower 2600 rural poor households to attain an improved quality of life and be able to sustain it. The study sought to interrogate the development model used at LUSIP and determine whether it guarantees sustainability of the development as well as to inform policy makers on the social and economic issues associated with the project. This was a case study using a qualitative research design where a purposive sample of the total operational farmers companies was selected for interviews. It can be concluded that the smallholder development under LUSIP has a potential to contribute to the overall agricultural contribution to the Swazi economy. The study unfolded issues around the farmer companies remaining in business and not being properly corporatized as well as uncertainty surrounding the land ownership and user rights though. Three broad recommendations include; corporatization of the farmer companies in a true sense, reviewing the participation-for-all model that is currently being used and the finalization of the National Land Policy by the government. [PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
ISSN:1991-637X
1991-637X
DOI:10.5897/AJAR2013.7510