Metacognitions and Obsessive Beliefs in Obsessive–Compulsive Disorder: A Study of Within- and Between-Person Effects on Long-Term Outcome

• Published in: Cognitive therapy and research 2021-12, Vol.45 (6), p.1105-1119
• Main Authors: Sunde, Tor, Johnson, Sverre Urnes, Himle, Joseph A., Bertelsen, Thomas Bjerregaard, Haaland, Vegard Øksendal, Vogel, Patrick A., Walseth, Liv Tveit, Haaland, Åshild Tellefsen
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Clinical Psychology; Cognitive Psychology; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Metacognition; Obsessive compulsive disorder; Original Article; Quality of Life Research
• ISSN: 0147-5916; 1573-2819
• DOI: 10.1007/s10608-021-10210-y

Background This study extends previous research by exploring whether changes in obsessive beliefs and metacognitions that were associated with changes in obsessive–compulsive disorder (OCD) symptom severity over the course of group behavioral treatment were maintained at long-term follow-up. Methods Forty patients with a primary diagnosis of OCD participated. The between- and within-person effects were investigated with multilevel longitudinal models. Predictor variables were obsessive beliefs and metacognitions. Results Across the study period, with a mean 8-year follow-up, obsessive and metacognitive beliefs significantly declined. There were significant between-person effects for metacognition and obsessive beliefs on OCD symptom severity. When the overlap between the obsessive belief factors was controlled for, only changes in metacognitions emerged as an independent predictor of OCD symptom severity. A further analysis revealed that metacognitive beliefs regarding the need to control thoughts made a separate contribution at both the between- and within-person levels. Conclusions The results indicate that decreases in metacognitive beliefs during OCD treatment can also have important long-term consequences.