Loading…

Elimination of major vascular access complications (VAC) using ultrasound-guided vascular access and vessel closure protocols during Invasive EP procedures (IEPP)

Introduction: Vascular access complications (VAC) are common complications associated with invasive electrophysiology procedures (IEPP) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Reducing the risk of VAC is of considerable interest to Electrophysiologists. We studied the impact of vascular...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology 2021-01, Vol.7, p.36
Main Authors: Verma, S V, Giedrimas, E G, Hernandez, N H, Beard, S B, Pala, S P, Alsheikh, T A
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 36
container_title European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology
container_volume 7
creator Verma, S V
Giedrimas, E G
Hernandez, N H
Beard, S B
Pala, S P
Alsheikh, T A
description Introduction: Vascular access complications (VAC) are common complications associated with invasive electrophysiology procedures (IEPP) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Reducing the risk of VAC is of considerable interest to Electrophysiologists. We studied the impact of vascular access and vessel closure protocols utilizing ultrasound-guided vascular access (UG) on the incidence of IEPP associated VAC in our institution in a calendar year. Our goal was to achieve a major complication rate of less than 2.5%. Methods: All patients undergoing IEPP during the calendar year 2020 were included. Patients undergoing EP study, AFIB, SVT, PVC and VT ablations and Watchman device implantation were included. Specific protocols to reduce complications included- Elimination of arterial access for the purpose of blood pressure monitoring, reduction in the number of sheaths per case, universal use of UG for common femoral venous and arterial punctures, and immediate sheath removal in the laboratory facilitated by the use of FDA approved vascular closure devices (VCD)- Perclose Proglide™ (Abbott) in 39.2% of cases or Vascade- MVP™ (Cardiva Medical,Inc ) in 33.9% of all cases. Selection of VCD was based upon physician preference. VCD was used in 73% of all EP cases, otherwise manual pressure was held for hemostasis. Intravenous protamine sulfate was used for heparin reversal when applicable. Complications were recorded using prospective physician self-reporting, independent verification by retrospective review of billing codes related to VAC and institutional monitoring. Complications were classified as major if they included AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma required surgical or invasive intervention, blood transfusion or readmission. Major and minor complications were recorded and compared to historical cohort from 2018 and 2019. Results: A total of 690 patients underwent IEPP performed by 4 electrophysiologists in three laboratories at two hospitals. We recorded only 2 minor hematomas (not requiring surgery, thrombin injection or transfusion). 0 patients had AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma classified as major. There were 0 procedural deaths recorded from any cause. Conclusions: We demonstrated that it is possible to drastically reduce and possibly eliminate major vascular complications during EP procedures with careful use of ultrasound guidance for access and judicious use of vascular closure devices.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2590044546</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2590044546</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_25900445463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNj81qAkEQhAcxoKjv0JBLPCxs3D_3GGRDvO1BcpVxtpWR2Wkzve0D5UkzhpCLF09dVH3VTY_UdJUW6yRbV9X4X5f1RC2Y7SHN8yor8_p1qr4bZ3vr9WDJAx2h12cKcNVsxOkA2hhkBkP9xVnzSzG8fL5tliBs_QnEDUEzie-Sk9gOu7uu9tGLAh0YRywB4RJoIEOOoZNw27L1sWWvCE17Cw1GH-OhbdO2y7l6OmrHuPibM_X83uw2H0kkvwR52J9Jgo_RflXUaXyuyMvsMeoHVodfiA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2590044546</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Elimination of major vascular access complications (VAC) using ultrasound-guided vascular access and vessel closure protocols during Invasive EP procedures (IEPP)</title><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Verma, S V ; Giedrimas, E G ; Hernandez, N H ; Beard, S B ; Pala, S P ; Alsheikh, T A</creator><creatorcontrib>Verma, S V ; Giedrimas, E G ; Hernandez, N H ; Beard, S B ; Pala, S P ; Alsheikh, T A</creatorcontrib><description>Introduction: Vascular access complications (VAC) are common complications associated with invasive electrophysiology procedures (IEPP) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Reducing the risk of VAC is of considerable interest to Electrophysiologists. We studied the impact of vascular access and vessel closure protocols utilizing ultrasound-guided vascular access (UG) on the incidence of IEPP associated VAC in our institution in a calendar year. Our goal was to achieve a major complication rate of less than 2.5%. Methods: All patients undergoing IEPP during the calendar year 2020 were included. Patients undergoing EP study, AFIB, SVT, PVC and VT ablations and Watchman device implantation were included. Specific protocols to reduce complications included- Elimination of arterial access for the purpose of blood pressure monitoring, reduction in the number of sheaths per case, universal use of UG for common femoral venous and arterial punctures, and immediate sheath removal in the laboratory facilitated by the use of FDA approved vascular closure devices (VCD)- Perclose Proglide™ (Abbott) in 39.2% of cases or Vascade- MVP™ (Cardiva Medical,Inc ) in 33.9% of all cases. Selection of VCD was based upon physician preference. VCD was used in 73% of all EP cases, otherwise manual pressure was held for hemostasis. Intravenous protamine sulfate was used for heparin reversal when applicable. Complications were recorded using prospective physician self-reporting, independent verification by retrospective review of billing codes related to VAC and institutional monitoring. Complications were classified as major if they included AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma required surgical or invasive intervention, blood transfusion or readmission. Major and minor complications were recorded and compared to historical cohort from 2018 and 2019. Results: A total of 690 patients underwent IEPP performed by 4 electrophysiologists in three laboratories at two hospitals. We recorded only 2 minor hematomas (not requiring surgery, thrombin injection or transfusion). 0 patients had AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma classified as major. There were 0 procedural deaths recorded from any cause. Conclusions: We demonstrated that it is possible to drastically reduce and possibly eliminate major vascular complications during EP procedures with careful use of ultrasound guidance for access and judicious use of vascular closure devices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2058-3869</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2058-3877</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Reading: Touch Medical Media Limited</publisher><subject>Fistula ; Hematoma ; Laboratories ; Ultrasonic imaging ; Venous access</subject><ispartof>European journal of arrhythmia &amp; electrophysiology, 2021-01, Vol.7, p.36</ispartof><rights>2021. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at https://www.touchcardio.com/cardio-journals</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,37012</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Verma, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giedrimas, E G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, S B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pala, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsheikh, T A</creatorcontrib><title>Elimination of major vascular access complications (VAC) using ultrasound-guided vascular access and vessel closure protocols during Invasive EP procedures (IEPP)</title><title>European journal of arrhythmia &amp; electrophysiology</title><description>Introduction: Vascular access complications (VAC) are common complications associated with invasive electrophysiology procedures (IEPP) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Reducing the risk of VAC is of considerable interest to Electrophysiologists. We studied the impact of vascular access and vessel closure protocols utilizing ultrasound-guided vascular access (UG) on the incidence of IEPP associated VAC in our institution in a calendar year. Our goal was to achieve a major complication rate of less than 2.5%. Methods: All patients undergoing IEPP during the calendar year 2020 were included. Patients undergoing EP study, AFIB, SVT, PVC and VT ablations and Watchman device implantation were included. Specific protocols to reduce complications included- Elimination of arterial access for the purpose of blood pressure monitoring, reduction in the number of sheaths per case, universal use of UG for common femoral venous and arterial punctures, and immediate sheath removal in the laboratory facilitated by the use of FDA approved vascular closure devices (VCD)- Perclose Proglide™ (Abbott) in 39.2% of cases or Vascade- MVP™ (Cardiva Medical,Inc ) in 33.9% of all cases. Selection of VCD was based upon physician preference. VCD was used in 73% of all EP cases, otherwise manual pressure was held for hemostasis. Intravenous protamine sulfate was used for heparin reversal when applicable. Complications were recorded using prospective physician self-reporting, independent verification by retrospective review of billing codes related to VAC and institutional monitoring. Complications were classified as major if they included AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma required surgical or invasive intervention, blood transfusion or readmission. Major and minor complications were recorded and compared to historical cohort from 2018 and 2019. Results: A total of 690 patients underwent IEPP performed by 4 electrophysiologists in three laboratories at two hospitals. We recorded only 2 minor hematomas (not requiring surgery, thrombin injection or transfusion). 0 patients had AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma classified as major. There were 0 procedural deaths recorded from any cause. Conclusions: We demonstrated that it is possible to drastically reduce and possibly eliminate major vascular complications during EP procedures with careful use of ultrasound guidance for access and judicious use of vascular closure devices.</description><subject>Fistula</subject><subject>Hematoma</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Ultrasonic imaging</subject><subject>Venous access</subject><issn>2058-3869</issn><issn>2058-3877</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNj81qAkEQhAcxoKjv0JBLPCxs3D_3GGRDvO1BcpVxtpWR2Wkzve0D5UkzhpCLF09dVH3VTY_UdJUW6yRbV9X4X5f1RC2Y7SHN8yor8_p1qr4bZ3vr9WDJAx2h12cKcNVsxOkA2hhkBkP9xVnzSzG8fL5tliBs_QnEDUEzie-Sk9gOu7uu9tGLAh0YRywB4RJoIEOOoZNw27L1sWWvCE17Cw1GH-OhbdO2y7l6OmrHuPibM_X83uw2H0kkvwR52J9Jgo_RflXUaXyuyMvsMeoHVodfiA</recordid><startdate>20210101</startdate><enddate>20210101</enddate><creator>Verma, S V</creator><creator>Giedrimas, E G</creator><creator>Hernandez, N H</creator><creator>Beard, S B</creator><creator>Pala, S P</creator><creator>Alsheikh, T A</creator><general>Touch Medical Media Limited</general><scope>K9.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20210101</creationdate><title>Elimination of major vascular access complications (VAC) using ultrasound-guided vascular access and vessel closure protocols during Invasive EP procedures (IEPP)</title><author>Verma, S V ; Giedrimas, E G ; Hernandez, N H ; Beard, S B ; Pala, S P ; Alsheikh, T A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25900445463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Fistula</topic><topic>Hematoma</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Ultrasonic imaging</topic><topic>Venous access</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Verma, S V</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Giedrimas, E G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hernandez, N H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beard, S B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pala, S P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alsheikh, T A</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>European journal of arrhythmia &amp; electrophysiology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Verma, S V</au><au>Giedrimas, E G</au><au>Hernandez, N H</au><au>Beard, S B</au><au>Pala, S P</au><au>Alsheikh, T A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Elimination of major vascular access complications (VAC) using ultrasound-guided vascular access and vessel closure protocols during Invasive EP procedures (IEPP)</atitle><jtitle>European journal of arrhythmia &amp; electrophysiology</jtitle><date>2021-01-01</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>7</volume><spage>36</spage><pages>36-</pages><issn>2058-3869</issn><eissn>2058-3877</eissn><abstract>Introduction: Vascular access complications (VAC) are common complications associated with invasive electrophysiology procedures (IEPP) and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Reducing the risk of VAC is of considerable interest to Electrophysiologists. We studied the impact of vascular access and vessel closure protocols utilizing ultrasound-guided vascular access (UG) on the incidence of IEPP associated VAC in our institution in a calendar year. Our goal was to achieve a major complication rate of less than 2.5%. Methods: All patients undergoing IEPP during the calendar year 2020 were included. Patients undergoing EP study, AFIB, SVT, PVC and VT ablations and Watchman device implantation were included. Specific protocols to reduce complications included- Elimination of arterial access for the purpose of blood pressure monitoring, reduction in the number of sheaths per case, universal use of UG for common femoral venous and arterial punctures, and immediate sheath removal in the laboratory facilitated by the use of FDA approved vascular closure devices (VCD)- Perclose Proglide™ (Abbott) in 39.2% of cases or Vascade- MVP™ (Cardiva Medical,Inc ) in 33.9% of all cases. Selection of VCD was based upon physician preference. VCD was used in 73% of all EP cases, otherwise manual pressure was held for hemostasis. Intravenous protamine sulfate was used for heparin reversal when applicable. Complications were recorded using prospective physician self-reporting, independent verification by retrospective review of billing codes related to VAC and institutional monitoring. Complications were classified as major if they included AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma required surgical or invasive intervention, blood transfusion or readmission. Major and minor complications were recorded and compared to historical cohort from 2018 and 2019. Results: A total of 690 patients underwent IEPP performed by 4 electrophysiologists in three laboratories at two hospitals. We recorded only 2 minor hematomas (not requiring surgery, thrombin injection or transfusion). 0 patients had AV fistula, pseudoaneurysm or hematoma classified as major. There were 0 procedural deaths recorded from any cause. Conclusions: We demonstrated that it is possible to drastically reduce and possibly eliminate major vascular complications during EP procedures with careful use of ultrasound guidance for access and judicious use of vascular closure devices.</abstract><cop>Reading</cop><pub>Touch Medical Media Limited</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2058-3869
ispartof European journal of arrhythmia & electrophysiology, 2021-01, Vol.7, p.36
issn 2058-3869
2058-3877
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2590044546
source Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Fistula
Hematoma
Laboratories
Ultrasonic imaging
Venous access
title Elimination of major vascular access complications (VAC) using ultrasound-guided vascular access and vessel closure protocols during Invasive EP procedures (IEPP)
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T02%3A36%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Elimination%20of%20major%20vascular%20access%20complications%20(VAC)%20using%20ultrasound-guided%20vascular%20access%20and%20vessel%20closure%20protocols%20during%20Invasive%20EP%20procedures%20(IEPP)&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20arrhythmia%20&%20electrophysiology&rft.au=Verma,%20S%20V&rft.date=2021-01-01&rft.volume=7&rft.spage=36&rft.pages=36-&rft.issn=2058-3869&rft.eissn=2058-3877&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2590044546%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_25900445463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2590044546&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true