Explaining Support for Post-Secondary Educational Funding for Indigenous Students

• Published in: Canadian journal of behavioural science 2021-07, Vol.53 (3), p.304-314
• Main Authors: Genge, Olivia, Day, Martin V.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: American Indians; Attitudes; Canadians; Conservatism; Educational programs; Employment; Female; Funding; Higher Education; Human; Indigenous peoples; Indigenous Populations; Inequality; Liberalism; Male; Marginality; Marginalized Groups; Meritocracy; Minority groups; Native North Americans; Political Attitudes; Political Conservatism; Politics; Prejudice; Psychological research; Public opinion; Reconciliation; Secondary education; Social classes; Social mobility; Students; Test Construction; Upward mobility
• ISSN: 0008-400X; 1879-2669
• DOI: 10.1037/cbs0000253

A concerning post-secondary education gap exists between Indigenous and non-Indigenous individuals in Canada. One program designed to help address this issue, the Post-Secondary Student Support Program (PSSSP), provides eligible First Nations students with post-secondary education funding. Although such programs are beneficial, it is unclear how much Canadians support public funding of Indigenous education and whether psychological research can help explain why some may endorse or oppose it. Thus, using the PSSSP as an example, we examined five possible psychological predictors of public support: personal prejudice toward Indigenous Peoples, perceived social mobility, meritocratic beliefs, group zero-sum beliefs, and political conservatism. Based on previous research, we hypothesized that all would negatively relate to support for the PSSSP. In a sample of non-Indigenous Canadian adults, we found that only higher personal prejudice, group zero-sum beliefs, and political conservatism uniquely explained lower support for the program (or conversely, lower prejudice, group zero-sum beliefs, and political liberalism were related to higher program support). Although correlational, this study provides insight into factors that may influence Canadians' attitudes toward a program aimed at addressing a consequential societal inequality. We discuss the implications of these findings in regard to support for programs and policies targeted at marginalized groups. Il existe un fossé entre les peuples autochtones et non-autochtones au Canada en ce qui concerne l'éducation post-secondaire. Un programme conçu pour aider à régler ce problème, le Programme d'aide aux étudiants de niveau postsecondaire (PSSSP), offre aux étudiants admissibles des Premières nations du financement pour l'éducation postsecondaire. Bien que ces programmes soient bénéfiques, on ne sait pas exactement dans quelle mesure les Canadiens soutiennent le financement public de l'éducation des Autochtones et si la recherche psychologique peut aider à expliquer pourquoi certains l'approuvent ou s'y opposent. Ainsi, en utilisant le PSSSP comme exemple, nous avons examiné cinq prédicteurs psychologiques possibles du soutien public : les préjugés personnels envers les peuples autochtones, la mobilité sociale perçue, les croyances méritocratiques, les croyances de groupe à somme nulle et le conservatisme politique. Sur la base de recherches antérieures, nous avons émis l'hypothèse que tout serait lié négativeme