Loading…
Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care for conscious drug use: a systematic review
Primary care is a growing medical field willing to become a more integrated and technological asset. Although big changes already happened and more investments have been made, a limited amount of literature describes processes and technologies there applied or to be used. This paper aims to evaluate...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of public health 2021-10, Vol.31 (Supplement_3) |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Request full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | Supplement_3 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | European journal of public health |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Altamura, G Riccardi, MT Nurchis, MC Sapienza, M Sessa, G Damiani, G Ricciardi, W |
description | Primary care is a growing medical field willing to become a more integrated and technological asset. Although big changes already happened and more investments have been made, a limited amount of literature describes processes and technologies there applied or to be used. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy and usability of different types of algorithms in primary care to improve drug safety by speeding up processes and achieving greater accuracy opening the path to providing better healthcare overall. The PICO model was adopted, three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) were searched using appropriate keywords. Selected studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistic, comparison of drug usage between algorithms or artificial intelligence application and usual care was performed using a χ2 test(α = 0.05). Out of 2207,19 studies were included,37% of them regarding error prevention,21% drug interactions,21% drug monitoring,16% drug prescription,5% drug administration. Results showed an easier and safer medication use in 74% of studies, a loss of safeness and accuracy in 16%; 10% of total studies did not come up with a valid esteem of results either for inadequate availability of the AI machine or because of the heterogeneity of the results in different settings. The evaluation of errors prevention, 40% of total studies, showed the most statistically significant results with 88% of positive outcomes from AI application. The results support that this technological approach to drugs management could contribute to the safety of treatment and to increase patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction. The application of AI or algorithms is significantly associated with a reduction of drug use errors (p < 0.05). Future studies should work toward establishing a gold standard to measure AI performances.
Key messages
Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in primary care have the potentiality to disrupt patient care with a safer and faster medication management.
A comparison between Artificial Intelligence or algorithms and standard clinical practice may help finding the medication fields where a technological support could lead to better results. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2597252501</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2597252501</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1539-551944253e516398c0d086d27f57b744b412bdf2bbbbf4cb052d8318f8de09b13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7rZx7sqopHpUqwAImdZTt2cEnjYMeg_j2p0g9gNjOLc2c0B4BbjBYYVXRpUuiTWuovqXDOF5RWZ2CGWc4ymqOP83HGCGeY5OQSXMW4QwjxoiQzoFZt44MbPvcRyq6GqzA467STLdx0g2lb15hOG-g6-BrcXoYDXMtgoPUBat9F7XyKsA6pgSmaeyhhPMTB7OXgNAzmx5nfa3BhZRvNzanPwfvjw9v6Odu-PG3Wq22mMadVxjmuGCOcGo5zWpUa1ajMa1JYXqiCMcUwUbUlaizLtEKc1CXFpS1rgyqF6RzcTXv74L-TiYPY-RS68aQgvCoIJxwdKTJROvgYg7Gin_4SGImjSzG5FCeXYnQ5hrIp5FP_H_4P1zN55g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2597252501</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care for conscious drug use: a systematic review</title><source>Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals</source><creator>Altamura, G ; Riccardi, MT ; Nurchis, MC ; Sapienza, M ; Sessa, G ; Damiani, G ; Ricciardi, W</creator><creatorcontrib>Altamura, G ; Riccardi, MT ; Nurchis, MC ; Sapienza, M ; Sessa, G ; Damiani, G ; Ricciardi, W</creatorcontrib><description>Primary care is a growing medical field willing to become a more integrated and technological asset. Although big changes already happened and more investments have been made, a limited amount of literature describes processes and technologies there applied or to be used. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy and usability of different types of algorithms in primary care to improve drug safety by speeding up processes and achieving greater accuracy opening the path to providing better healthcare overall. The PICO model was adopted, three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) were searched using appropriate keywords. Selected studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistic, comparison of drug usage between algorithms or artificial intelligence application and usual care was performed using a χ2 test(α = 0.05). Out of 2207,19 studies were included,37% of them regarding error prevention,21% drug interactions,21% drug monitoring,16% drug prescription,5% drug administration. Results showed an easier and safer medication use in 74% of studies, a loss of safeness and accuracy in 16%; 10% of total studies did not come up with a valid esteem of results either for inadequate availability of the AI machine or because of the heterogeneity of the results in different settings. The evaluation of errors prevention, 40% of total studies, showed the most statistically significant results with 88% of positive outcomes from AI application. The results support that this technological approach to drugs management could contribute to the safety of treatment and to increase patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction. The application of AI or algorithms is significantly associated with a reduction of drug use errors (p < 0.05). Future studies should work toward establishing a gold standard to measure AI performances.
Key messages
Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in primary care have the potentiality to disrupt patient care with a safer and faster medication management.
A comparison between Artificial Intelligence or algorithms and standard clinical practice may help finding the medication fields where a technological support could lead to better results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1101-1262</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-360X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Artificial intelligence ; Chi-square test ; Data quality ; Drug use ; Drugs ; Errors ; Evaluation ; Health care ; Heterogeneity ; Institutes ; Intervention ; Medical treatment ; Patients ; Pharmacovigilance ; Prevention ; Primary care ; Public health ; Quality assessment ; Quality control ; Safety ; Satisfaction ; Statistical analysis ; Statistical tests ; Systematic review ; Therapeutic drug monitoring</subject><ispartof>European journal of public health, 2021-10, Vol.31 (Supplement_3)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved. 2021</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27866,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Altamura, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riccardi, MT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nurchis, MC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapienza, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sessa, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiani, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, W</creatorcontrib><title>Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care for conscious drug use: a systematic review</title><title>European journal of public health</title><description>Primary care is a growing medical field willing to become a more integrated and technological asset. Although big changes already happened and more investments have been made, a limited amount of literature describes processes and technologies there applied or to be used. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy and usability of different types of algorithms in primary care to improve drug safety by speeding up processes and achieving greater accuracy opening the path to providing better healthcare overall. The PICO model was adopted, three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) were searched using appropriate keywords. Selected studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistic, comparison of drug usage between algorithms or artificial intelligence application and usual care was performed using a χ2 test(α = 0.05). Out of 2207,19 studies were included,37% of them regarding error prevention,21% drug interactions,21% drug monitoring,16% drug prescription,5% drug administration. Results showed an easier and safer medication use in 74% of studies, a loss of safeness and accuracy in 16%; 10% of total studies did not come up with a valid esteem of results either for inadequate availability of the AI machine or because of the heterogeneity of the results in different settings. The evaluation of errors prevention, 40% of total studies, showed the most statistically significant results with 88% of positive outcomes from AI application. The results support that this technological approach to drugs management could contribute to the safety of treatment and to increase patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction. The application of AI or algorithms is significantly associated with a reduction of drug use errors (p < 0.05). Future studies should work toward establishing a gold standard to measure AI performances.
Key messages
Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in primary care have the potentiality to disrupt patient care with a safer and faster medication management.
A comparison between Artificial Intelligence or algorithms and standard clinical practice may help finding the medication fields where a technological support could lead to better results.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Chi-square test</subject><subject>Data quality</subject><subject>Drug use</subject><subject>Drugs</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Health care</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Institutes</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Medical treatment</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Pharmacovigilance</subject><subject>Prevention</subject><subject>Primary care</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality control</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Statistical tests</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Therapeutic drug monitoring</subject><issn>1101-1262</issn><issn>1464-360X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7rZx7sqopHpUqwAImdZTt2cEnjYMeg_j2p0g9gNjOLc2c0B4BbjBYYVXRpUuiTWuovqXDOF5RWZ2CGWc4ymqOP83HGCGeY5OQSXMW4QwjxoiQzoFZt44MbPvcRyq6GqzA467STLdx0g2lb15hOG-g6-BrcXoYDXMtgoPUBat9F7XyKsA6pgSmaeyhhPMTB7OXgNAzmx5nfa3BhZRvNzanPwfvjw9v6Odu-PG3Wq22mMadVxjmuGCOcGo5zWpUa1ajMa1JYXqiCMcUwUbUlaizLtEKc1CXFpS1rgyqF6RzcTXv74L-TiYPY-RS68aQgvCoIJxwdKTJROvgYg7Gin_4SGImjSzG5FCeXYnQ5hrIp5FP_H_4P1zN55g</recordid><startdate>20211020</startdate><enddate>20211020</enddate><creator>Altamura, G</creator><creator>Riccardi, MT</creator><creator>Nurchis, MC</creator><creator>Sapienza, M</creator><creator>Sessa, G</creator><creator>Damiani, G</creator><creator>Ricciardi, W</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><general>Oxford Publishing Limited (England)</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20211020</creationdate><title>Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care for conscious drug use: a systematic review</title><author>Altamura, G ; Riccardi, MT ; Nurchis, MC ; Sapienza, M ; Sessa, G ; Damiani, G ; Ricciardi, W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1539-551944253e516398c0d086d27f57b744b412bdf2bbbbf4cb052d8318f8de09b13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Chi-square test</topic><topic>Data quality</topic><topic>Drug use</topic><topic>Drugs</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Health care</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Institutes</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Medical treatment</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Pharmacovigilance</topic><topic>Prevention</topic><topic>Primary care</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality control</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Statistical tests</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Therapeutic drug monitoring</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Altamura, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Riccardi, MT</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nurchis, MC</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sapienza, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sessa, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Damiani, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricciardi, W</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Altamura, G</au><au>Riccardi, MT</au><au>Nurchis, MC</au><au>Sapienza, M</au><au>Sessa, G</au><au>Damiani, G</au><au>Ricciardi, W</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care for conscious drug use: a systematic review</atitle><jtitle>European journal of public health</jtitle><date>2021-10-20</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>Supplement_3</issue><issn>1101-1262</issn><eissn>1464-360X</eissn><abstract>Primary care is a growing medical field willing to become a more integrated and technological asset. Although big changes already happened and more investments have been made, a limited amount of literature describes processes and technologies there applied or to be used. This paper aims to evaluate the efficacy and usability of different types of algorithms in primary care to improve drug safety by speeding up processes and achieving greater accuracy opening the path to providing better healthcare overall. The PICO model was adopted, three electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science) were searched using appropriate keywords. Selected studies were assessed for quality and risk of bias using the National Institutes of Health Quality Assessment of Controlled Intervention Studies. Data were analysed using descriptive statistic, comparison of drug usage between algorithms or artificial intelligence application and usual care was performed using a χ2 test(α = 0.05). Out of 2207,19 studies were included,37% of them regarding error prevention,21% drug interactions,21% drug monitoring,16% drug prescription,5% drug administration. Results showed an easier and safer medication use in 74% of studies, a loss of safeness and accuracy in 16%; 10% of total studies did not come up with a valid esteem of results either for inadequate availability of the AI machine or because of the heterogeneity of the results in different settings. The evaluation of errors prevention, 40% of total studies, showed the most statistically significant results with 88% of positive outcomes from AI application. The results support that this technological approach to drugs management could contribute to the safety of treatment and to increase patients' and general practitioners' satisfaction. The application of AI or algorithms is significantly associated with a reduction of drug use errors (p < 0.05). Future studies should work toward establishing a gold standard to measure AI performances.
Key messages
Artificial Intelligence and Algorithms in primary care have the potentiality to disrupt patient care with a safer and faster medication management.
A comparison between Artificial Intelligence or algorithms and standard clinical practice may help finding the medication fields where a technological support could lead to better results.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1101-1262 |
ispartof | European journal of public health, 2021-10, Vol.31 (Supplement_3) |
issn | 1101-1262 1464-360X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2597252501 |
source | Open Access: Oxford University Press Open Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Artificial intelligence Chi-square test Data quality Drug use Drugs Errors Evaluation Health care Heterogeneity Institutes Intervention Medical treatment Patients Pharmacovigilance Prevention Primary care Public health Quality assessment Quality control Safety Satisfaction Statistical analysis Statistical tests Systematic review Therapeutic drug monitoring |
title | Algorithms and Artificial Intelligence in Primary Care for conscious drug use: a systematic review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A58%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Algorithms%20and%20Artificial%20Intelligence%20in%20Primary%20Care%20for%20conscious%20drug%20use:%20a%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=European%20journal%20of%20public%20health&rft.au=Altamura,%20G&rft.date=2021-10-20&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=Supplement_3&rft.issn=1101-1262&rft.eissn=1464-360X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_TOX%3E2597252501%3C/proquest_TOX%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1539-551944253e516398c0d086d27f57b744b412bdf2bbbbf4cb052d8318f8de09b13%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2597252501&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/eurpub/ckab165.339&rfr_iscdi=true |