Third-Generation Instructional Models: More About Guiding Development and Design Than Selecting Training Methods

In this article, I summarize and respond to key comments and criticisms offered in commentaries on Kraiger (2008). At issue is whether the proposed third-generation instructional model is fundamentally sound, represents a new or better approach, overemphasizes the importance of learner–learner inter...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Industrial and organizational psychology 2008-12, Vol.1 (4), p.501-507
Main Author: Kraiger, Kurt
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Response
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In this article, I summarize and respond to key comments and criticisms offered in commentaries on Kraiger (2008). At issue is whether the proposed third-generation instructional model is fundamentally sound, represents a new or better approach, overemphasizes the importance of learner–learner interaction, and underemphasizes the role of the instructor. Responses to these concerns are offered, along with clarification that the major contribution of the third-generation model is at the point of training design.
ISSN:1754-9426
1754-9434
DOI:10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00096.x