Do Sub-Mesoscales Inhibit Destruction of PV?

We present the first explicit form of the three components, advective, diabatic and frictional of the PV J fluxes contributed by sub-mesoscales SM. Of particular interest is the surface value of the vertical frictional PV flux which when positive, can induce destruction of PV by down-front winds. Th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of geophysical research. Oceans 2021-11, Vol.126 (11), p.n/a
Main Authors: Canuto, V M, Cheng, Ye
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Angular momentum
Buoyancy flux
Destruction
Dimensionless numbers
Energy conservation
Fluctuations
frictional PV fluxes
Geophysics
Kinetic energy
Mathematical models
Meteorology And Climatology
Momentum
Momentum flux
Momentum transfer
Numerical simulations
Oceanography
Potential vorticity
PV destruction
Resolution
Reynolds stresses
Rossby number
Stratification
sub‐mesoscales
turbulent mixing
Vorticity
Wind
Winds
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:We present the first explicit form of the three components, advective, diabatic and frictional of the PV J fluxes contributed by sub-mesoscales SM. Of particular interest is the surface value of the vertical frictional PV flux which when positive, can induce destruction of PV by down-front winds. The 2005 numerical simulations of Thomas confirmed that this is indeed the case. However, since the 12 km numerical resolution could not account for sub-mesoscales SM (0.1-10) km, the effect of SM on the PV destruction process could not be quantified. The goal of this work is to provide an answer to that question asked in the title. The two SM parameterizations entering the problem, the vertical buoyancy flux and the momentum flux (Reynolds stresses), bring about a new feature, the dependence on the SM kinetic energy (represented by the dimensionless Rossby number Ro), that causes unexpected results. While in the absence of SM, there were no restrictions on where PV destruction could occur, in the presence of SM, the condition of a positive surface vertical frictional flux is restricted to SM regimes with very low Ro10. Since the SM kinetic energy is location dependent, so is PV destruction. The effect of SM seems to make PV destruction a much rarer occurrence than previously thought.
ISSN:2169-9275
2169-9291
DOI:10.1029/2020JC016991