Loading…
A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure
In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage...
Saved in:
Published in: | Expert systems with applications 2022-01, Vol.187, p.115921, Article 115921 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 115921 |
container_title | Expert systems with applications |
container_volume | 187 |
creator | Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos Beullens, Patrick Klein, Jonathan |
description | In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach.
•Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602105843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957417421012756</els_id><sourcerecordid>2602105843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7wI45jiU3VlodUxIauLcceV4napNgOFX9PqrBmNZt77swchO4pySmh5WObQzyZnBFGc0qFYvQCzWgleVZKxS_RjCghs4LK4hrdxNgSQiUhcoZWC-xNEyBgEyPEeIAu4d7j1fs24qbDBu-gg2D2TQSH06nPYjI7wKv1AscUBpuGALfoypt9hLu_OUfb5_Xn8jXbfLy8LRebzHLJUuZKQbhwIIoalPCWUaJcRYGVtXTWU8-VYl565UoOtTNKFoQJT8oCCl5XwOfoYeo9hv5rgJh02w-hG1dqVo6vE1EVfEyxKWVDH2MAr4-hOZjwoynRZ1u61Wdb-mxLT7ZG6GmCYLz_u4Ggo22gs-BGOTZp1zf_4b9nGnGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602105843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos ; Beullens, Patrick ; Klein, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos ; Beullens, Patrick ; Klein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach.
•Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Context ; Criteria ; CRITIC ; Cross-efficiency ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Evaluation ; Fairness ; Job rotation ; Minimax technique ; Supply chains ; Two-stage</subject><ispartof>Expert systems with applications, 2022-01, Vol.187, p.115921, Article 115921</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9531-404X ; 0000-0002-5495-8738</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</title><title>Expert systems with applications</title><description>In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach.
•Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>CRITIC</subject><subject>Cross-efficiency</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Job rotation</subject><subject>Minimax technique</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Two-stage</subject><issn>0957-4174</issn><issn>1873-6793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7wI45jiU3VlodUxIauLcceV4napNgOFX9PqrBmNZt77swchO4pySmh5WObQzyZnBFGc0qFYvQCzWgleVZKxS_RjCghs4LK4hrdxNgSQiUhcoZWC-xNEyBgEyPEeIAu4d7j1fs24qbDBu-gg2D2TQSH06nPYjI7wKv1AscUBpuGALfoypt9hLu_OUfb5_Xn8jXbfLy8LRebzHLJUuZKQbhwIIoalPCWUaJcRYGVtXTWU8-VYl565UoOtTNKFoQJT8oCCl5XwOfoYeo9hv5rgJh02w-hG1dqVo6vE1EVfEyxKWVDH2MAr4-hOZjwoynRZ1u61Wdb-mxLT7ZG6GmCYLz_u4Ggo22gs-BGOTZp1zf_4b9nGnGk</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</creator><creator>Beullens, Patrick</creator><creator>Klein, Jonathan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-404X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-8738</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</title><author>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos ; Beullens, Patrick ; Klein, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>CRITIC</topic><topic>Cross-efficiency</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Job rotation</topic><topic>Minimax technique</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Two-stage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Expert systems with applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</au><au>Beullens, Patrick</au><au>Klein, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</atitle><jtitle>Expert systems with applications</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>187</volume><spage>115921</spage><pages>115921-</pages><artnum>115921</artnum><issn>0957-4174</issn><eissn>1873-6793</eissn><abstract>In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach.
•Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-404X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-8738</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0957-4174 |
ispartof | Expert systems with applications, 2022-01, Vol.187, p.115921, Article 115921 |
issn | 0957-4174 1873-6793 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2602105843 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Agglomeration Context Criteria CRITIC Cross-efficiency Data envelopment analysis Decision making Evaluation Fairness Job rotation Minimax technique Supply chains Two-stage |
title | A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20fairer%20assessment%20of%20DMUs%20in%20a%20generalised%20two-stage%20DEA%20structure&rft.jtitle=Expert%20systems%20with%20applications&rft.au=Kremantzis,%20Marios%20Dominikos&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=187&rft.spage=115921&rft.pages=115921-&rft.artnum=115921&rft.issn=0957-4174&rft.eissn=1873-6793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602105843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602105843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |