Loading…

A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure

In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Expert systems with applications 2022-01, Vol.187, p.115921, Article 115921
Main Authors: Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos, Beullens, Patrick, Klein, Jonathan
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page 115921
container_title Expert systems with applications
container_volume 187
creator Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos
Beullens, Patrick
Klein, Jonathan
description In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach. •Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2602105843</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0957417421012756</els_id><sourcerecordid>2602105843</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7wI45jiU3VlodUxIauLcceV4napNgOFX9PqrBmNZt77swchO4pySmh5WObQzyZnBFGc0qFYvQCzWgleVZKxS_RjCghs4LK4hrdxNgSQiUhcoZWC-xNEyBgEyPEeIAu4d7j1fs24qbDBu-gg2D2TQSH06nPYjI7wKv1AscUBpuGALfoypt9hLu_OUfb5_Xn8jXbfLy8LRebzHLJUuZKQbhwIIoalPCWUaJcRYGVtXTWU8-VYl565UoOtTNKFoQJT8oCCl5XwOfoYeo9hv5rgJh02w-hG1dqVo6vE1EVfEyxKWVDH2MAr4-hOZjwoynRZ1u61Wdb-mxLT7ZG6GmCYLz_u4Ggo22gs-BGOTZp1zf_4b9nGnGk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2602105843</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos ; Beullens, Patrick ; Klein, Jonathan</creator><creatorcontrib>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos ; Beullens, Patrick ; Klein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><description>In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach. •Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0957-4174</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6793</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Agglomeration ; Context ; Criteria ; CRITIC ; Cross-efficiency ; Data envelopment analysis ; Decision making ; Evaluation ; Fairness ; Job rotation ; Minimax technique ; Supply chains ; Two-stage</subject><ispartof>Expert systems with applications, 2022-01, Vol.187, p.115921, Article 115921</ispartof><rights>2021</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier BV Jan 2022</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9531-404X ; 0000-0002-5495-8738</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><title>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</title><title>Expert systems with applications</title><description>In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach. •Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.</description><subject>Agglomeration</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Criteria</subject><subject>CRITIC</subject><subject>Cross-efficiency</subject><subject>Data envelopment analysis</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Fairness</subject><subject>Job rotation</subject><subject>Minimax technique</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><subject>Two-stage</subject><issn>0957-4174</issn><issn>1873-6793</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2022</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtOwzAQRS0EEqXwA6wssU7wI45jiU3VlodUxIauLcceV4napNgOFX9PqrBmNZt77swchO4pySmh5WObQzyZnBFGc0qFYvQCzWgleVZKxS_RjCghs4LK4hrdxNgSQiUhcoZWC-xNEyBgEyPEeIAu4d7j1fs24qbDBu-gg2D2TQSH06nPYjI7wKv1AscUBpuGALfoypt9hLu_OUfb5_Xn8jXbfLy8LRebzHLJUuZKQbhwIIoalPCWUaJcRYGVtXTWU8-VYl565UoOtTNKFoQJT8oCCl5XwOfoYeo9hv5rgJh02w-hG1dqVo6vE1EVfEyxKWVDH2MAr4-hOZjwoynRZ1u61Wdb-mxLT7ZG6GmCYLz_u4Ggo22gs-BGOTZp1zf_4b9nGnGk</recordid><startdate>202201</startdate><enddate>202201</enddate><creator>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</creator><creator>Beullens, Patrick</creator><creator>Klein, Jonathan</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-404X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-8738</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202201</creationdate><title>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</title><author>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos ; Beullens, Patrick ; Klein, Jonathan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2022</creationdate><topic>Agglomeration</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Criteria</topic><topic>CRITIC</topic><topic>Cross-efficiency</topic><topic>Data envelopment analysis</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Fairness</topic><topic>Job rotation</topic><topic>Minimax technique</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><topic>Two-stage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beullens, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klein, Jonathan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><jtitle>Expert systems with applications</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kremantzis, Marios Dominikos</au><au>Beullens, Patrick</au><au>Klein, Jonathan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure</atitle><jtitle>Expert systems with applications</jtitle><date>2022-01</date><risdate>2022</risdate><volume>187</volume><spage>115921</spage><pages>115921-</pages><artnum>115921</artnum><issn>0957-4174</issn><eissn>1873-6793</eissn><abstract>In Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), a variety of approaches have been used in the context of single-stage and basic serial two-stage systems to attain fairness in the evaluation of decision-making units (DMUs). Little work, however, has been done to address this challenge in a generalised two-stage structure featuring additional inputs in the second stage and a proportion of first-stage outputs as final outputs. In this paper, we argue that in this context, fairness is enhanced by increasing measures related to the discriminatory power and the weighting scheme of the method. We describe a mechanism that gives prominence to a more contemporary concept of fairness, incorporating diversity and inclusion of minority opinions. These aspects have, to our knowledge, not yet received explicit attention in the methodological development of DEA. We propose a novel combination of an additive self-efficiency aggregation model, a minimax secondary goal model, and the CRiteria Importance Through Inter-criteria Correlation (CRITIC) method, in order to promote these aspects of fairness, and thus achieve a better degree of cooperation between the stages of a DMU and among DMUs. The additive aggregation model is chosen over the alternative multiplicative approach for a variety of reasons relating to the emphasis on the intermediate products exchanged and the simplification. The minimax model offers peer evaluation in which each DMU aims to evaluate the worst of the others in the best possible light. Application of the CRITIC method to DEA addresses the aggregation problem within the cross-efficiency concept. Practical applications of this approach could include supporting the determination of training needs in job rotation manufacturing, or evaluation of sustainable supply chains. The paper includes a description of a numerical experiment, illustrating the approach. •Developed modelling approaches to attain fairness in a network DEA structure.•Minimax secondary model highlights the best behaviour of the worst performing DMUs.•CRITIC as a mechanism to highlight minority opinions within a network DEA context.•Envisaged applications include job rotation systems and sustainable supply chains.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9531-404X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5495-8738</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0957-4174
ispartof Expert systems with applications, 2022-01, Vol.187, p.115921, Article 115921
issn 0957-4174
1873-6793
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2602105843
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Agglomeration
Context
Criteria
CRITIC
Cross-efficiency
Data envelopment analysis
Decision making
Evaluation
Fairness
Job rotation
Minimax technique
Supply chains
Two-stage
title A fairer assessment of DMUs in a generalised two-stage DEA structure
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T23%3A34%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20fairer%20assessment%20of%20DMUs%20in%20a%20generalised%20two-stage%20DEA%20structure&rft.jtitle=Expert%20systems%20with%20applications&rft.au=Kremantzis,%20Marios%20Dominikos&rft.date=2022-01&rft.volume=187&rft.spage=115921&rft.pages=115921-&rft.artnum=115921&rft.issn=0957-4174&rft.eissn=1873-6793&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115921&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2602105843%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-d65035de54be95fc2109d81e26b7dcf1f3992f7f9d63ebda974025f064e43b8e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2602105843&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true