Loading…

Restoring ecosystems and eating them too: guidance from agroecology for sustainability

Ecological restoration evaluation has historically focused on biophysical indicators, particularly in North America, with less attention for sociocultural and economic factors, undermining efforts' long‐term sustainability. Restoration projects should more regularly incorporate cultural and pro...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Restoration ecology 2021-11, Vol.29 (8), p.n/a
Main Authors: Garcia‐Polo, Jorge, Falkowski, Tomasz B., Mokashi, Shruti A., Law, Eugene P., Fix, Adam J., Diemont, Stewart A. W.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3
container_end_page n/a
container_issue 8
container_start_page
container_title Restoration ecology
container_volume 29
creator Garcia‐Polo, Jorge
Falkowski, Tomasz B.
Mokashi, Shruti A.
Law, Eugene P.
Fix, Adam J.
Diemont, Stewart A. W.
description Ecological restoration evaluation has historically focused on biophysical indicators, particularly in North America, with less attention for sociocultural and economic factors, undermining efforts' long‐term sustainability. Restoration projects should more regularly incorporate cultural and provisioning ecosystem services to offer local stakeholders tangible benefits (e.g. contributing to food security and sovereignty), thereby promoting participation in restoration efforts and long‐term environmental stewardship. While the principles of agroecology and ecological restoration have much in common, their differences can be instructional and inspirational to each other. Rather than be an apolitical tool for land management, restoration could, like agroecology, amplify its impact through collaboration with adjacent social movements that share common goals, such as addressing the root causes of environmental degradation and promoting socioeconomic justice. The manner in which ecosystems are restored is as important as the resulting systems; as agroecology guides, projects should minimize nonrenewable inputs and reliance on socioeconomic systems at the root of the environmental degradation. We articulate agroecological restoration (AER) in a novel set of formalized principles, which take a socioecological view of environmental degradation and social disruption as inextricably interrelated issues. We offer case studies illustrating how AER can help restore both the land and our relationship to the land, thereby promoting the health and cohesion of human and ecological communities. Finally, we identify opportunities for overcoming inevitable challenges for growing an agroecological restoration framework that could amplify project impacts in the current United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/rec.13509
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2604007158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2604007158</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI4ufIOAKxedyaVpG3cyjBcYEAYVdyGTpDVD24xJivTtzVi3ns05HL5z-X8ArjFa4BRLb9QCU4b4CZhhRooMI_RxmmpU4IzwEp-DixD2CGFWVXQG3rcmROdt30CjXBhDNF2AstfQyHjsxk_TwejcHWwGq2WvDKy966BsvEsTrWtGWDsPwxCitL3c2dbG8RKc1bIN5uovz8Hbw_p19ZRtXh6fV_ebTKVfeKYrVumS1sowwjhJAnKmtcklI5rIvMhLUlIlFaVFSTjHnGmqGdbUsHqHtaZzcDPtPXj3NSQpYu8G36eTghQoR6hMOhN1O1HKuxC8qcXB2076UWAkjraJZJv4tS2xy4n9tq0Z_wfFdr2aJn4A-gxu_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2604007158</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Restoring ecosystems and eating them too: guidance from agroecology for sustainability</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge ; Falkowski, Tomasz B. ; Mokashi, Shruti A. ; Law, Eugene P. ; Fix, Adam J. ; Diemont, Stewart A. W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge ; Falkowski, Tomasz B. ; Mokashi, Shruti A. ; Law, Eugene P. ; Fix, Adam J. ; Diemont, Stewart A. W.</creatorcontrib><description>Ecological restoration evaluation has historically focused on biophysical indicators, particularly in North America, with less attention for sociocultural and economic factors, undermining efforts' long‐term sustainability. Restoration projects should more regularly incorporate cultural and provisioning ecosystem services to offer local stakeholders tangible benefits (e.g. contributing to food security and sovereignty), thereby promoting participation in restoration efforts and long‐term environmental stewardship. While the principles of agroecology and ecological restoration have much in common, their differences can be instructional and inspirational to each other. Rather than be an apolitical tool for land management, restoration could, like agroecology, amplify its impact through collaboration with adjacent social movements that share common goals, such as addressing the root causes of environmental degradation and promoting socioeconomic justice. The manner in which ecosystems are restored is as important as the resulting systems; as agroecology guides, projects should minimize nonrenewable inputs and reliance on socioeconomic systems at the root of the environmental degradation. We articulate agroecological restoration (AER) in a novel set of formalized principles, which take a socioecological view of environmental degradation and social disruption as inextricably interrelated issues. We offer case studies illustrating how AER can help restore both the land and our relationship to the land, thereby promoting the health and cohesion of human and ecological communities. Finally, we identify opportunities for overcoming inevitable challenges for growing an agroecological restoration framework that could amplify project impacts in the current United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.13509</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Agroecology ; Amplification ; decade on ecosystem restoration ; Ecology ; Economic factors ; Economics ; Ecosystem restoration ; Ecosystem services ; Ecosystems ; Environmental degradation ; Environmental restoration ; Environmental stewardship ; food ; Food security ; International organizations ; Land management ; Principles ; Provisioning ; Social interactions ; socioecological systems ; Socioeconomics ; Sovereignty ; Stewardship ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2021-11, Vol.29 (8), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2021 Society for Ecological Restoration.</rights><rights>2021 Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0438-1037</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falkowski, Tomasz B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokashi, Shruti A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fix, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemont, Stewart A. W.</creatorcontrib><title>Restoring ecosystems and eating them too: guidance from agroecology for sustainability</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Ecological restoration evaluation has historically focused on biophysical indicators, particularly in North America, with less attention for sociocultural and economic factors, undermining efforts' long‐term sustainability. Restoration projects should more regularly incorporate cultural and provisioning ecosystem services to offer local stakeholders tangible benefits (e.g. contributing to food security and sovereignty), thereby promoting participation in restoration efforts and long‐term environmental stewardship. While the principles of agroecology and ecological restoration have much in common, their differences can be instructional and inspirational to each other. Rather than be an apolitical tool for land management, restoration could, like agroecology, amplify its impact through collaboration with adjacent social movements that share common goals, such as addressing the root causes of environmental degradation and promoting socioeconomic justice. The manner in which ecosystems are restored is as important as the resulting systems; as agroecology guides, projects should minimize nonrenewable inputs and reliance on socioeconomic systems at the root of the environmental degradation. We articulate agroecological restoration (AER) in a novel set of formalized principles, which take a socioecological view of environmental degradation and social disruption as inextricably interrelated issues. We offer case studies illustrating how AER can help restore both the land and our relationship to the land, thereby promoting the health and cohesion of human and ecological communities. Finally, we identify opportunities for overcoming inevitable challenges for growing an agroecological restoration framework that could amplify project impacts in the current United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.</description><subject>Agroecology</subject><subject>Amplification</subject><subject>decade on ecosystem restoration</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Economic factors</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Ecosystem restoration</subject><subject>Ecosystem services</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental degradation</subject><subject>Environmental restoration</subject><subject>Environmental stewardship</subject><subject>food</subject><subject>Food security</subject><subject>International organizations</subject><subject>Land management</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Provisioning</subject><subject>Social interactions</subject><subject>socioecological systems</subject><subject>Socioeconomics</subject><subject>Sovereignty</subject><subject>Stewardship</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2021</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kMtKxDAUhoMoOI4ufIOAKxedyaVpG3cyjBcYEAYVdyGTpDVD24xJivTtzVi3ns05HL5z-X8ArjFa4BRLb9QCU4b4CZhhRooMI_RxmmpU4IzwEp-DixD2CGFWVXQG3rcmROdt30CjXBhDNF2AstfQyHjsxk_TwejcHWwGq2WvDKy966BsvEsTrWtGWDsPwxCitL3c2dbG8RKc1bIN5uovz8Hbw_p19ZRtXh6fV_ebTKVfeKYrVumS1sowwjhJAnKmtcklI5rIvMhLUlIlFaVFSTjHnGmqGdbUsHqHtaZzcDPtPXj3NSQpYu8G36eTghQoR6hMOhN1O1HKuxC8qcXB2076UWAkjraJZJv4tS2xy4n9tq0Z_wfFdr2aJn4A-gxu_Q</recordid><startdate>202111</startdate><enddate>202111</enddate><creator>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge</creator><creator>Falkowski, Tomasz B.</creator><creator>Mokashi, Shruti A.</creator><creator>Law, Eugene P.</creator><creator>Fix, Adam J.</creator><creator>Diemont, Stewart A. W.</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0438-1037</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202111</creationdate><title>Restoring ecosystems and eating them too: guidance from agroecology for sustainability</title><author>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge ; Falkowski, Tomasz B. ; Mokashi, Shruti A. ; Law, Eugene P. ; Fix, Adam J. ; Diemont, Stewart A. W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2021</creationdate><topic>Agroecology</topic><topic>Amplification</topic><topic>decade on ecosystem restoration</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Economic factors</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Ecosystem restoration</topic><topic>Ecosystem services</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental degradation</topic><topic>Environmental restoration</topic><topic>Environmental stewardship</topic><topic>food</topic><topic>Food security</topic><topic>International organizations</topic><topic>Land management</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Provisioning</topic><topic>Social interactions</topic><topic>socioecological systems</topic><topic>Socioeconomics</topic><topic>Sovereignty</topic><topic>Stewardship</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Falkowski, Tomasz B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mokashi, Shruti A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Law, Eugene P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fix, Adam J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Diemont, Stewart A. W.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Garcia‐Polo, Jorge</au><au>Falkowski, Tomasz B.</au><au>Mokashi, Shruti A.</au><au>Law, Eugene P.</au><au>Fix, Adam J.</au><au>Diemont, Stewart A. W.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Restoring ecosystems and eating them too: guidance from agroecology for sustainability</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2021-11</date><risdate>2021</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>8</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Ecological restoration evaluation has historically focused on biophysical indicators, particularly in North America, with less attention for sociocultural and economic factors, undermining efforts' long‐term sustainability. Restoration projects should more regularly incorporate cultural and provisioning ecosystem services to offer local stakeholders tangible benefits (e.g. contributing to food security and sovereignty), thereby promoting participation in restoration efforts and long‐term environmental stewardship. While the principles of agroecology and ecological restoration have much in common, their differences can be instructional and inspirational to each other. Rather than be an apolitical tool for land management, restoration could, like agroecology, amplify its impact through collaboration with adjacent social movements that share common goals, such as addressing the root causes of environmental degradation and promoting socioeconomic justice. The manner in which ecosystems are restored is as important as the resulting systems; as agroecology guides, projects should minimize nonrenewable inputs and reliance on socioeconomic systems at the root of the environmental degradation. We articulate agroecological restoration (AER) in a novel set of formalized principles, which take a socioecological view of environmental degradation and social disruption as inextricably interrelated issues. We offer case studies illustrating how AER can help restore both the land and our relationship to the land, thereby promoting the health and cohesion of human and ecological communities. Finally, we identify opportunities for overcoming inevitable challenges for growing an agroecological restoration framework that could amplify project impacts in the current United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.13509</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0438-1037</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1061-2971
ispartof Restoration ecology, 2021-11, Vol.29 (8), p.n/a
issn 1061-2971
1526-100X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2604007158
source Wiley
subjects Agroecology
Amplification
decade on ecosystem restoration
Ecology
Economic factors
Economics
Ecosystem restoration
Ecosystem services
Ecosystems
Environmental degradation
Environmental restoration
Environmental stewardship
food
Food security
International organizations
Land management
Principles
Provisioning
Social interactions
socioecological systems
Socioeconomics
Sovereignty
Stewardship
Sustainability
title Restoring ecosystems and eating them too: guidance from agroecology for sustainability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T22%3A53%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Restoring%20ecosystems%20and%20eating%20them%20too:%20guidance%20from%20agroecology%20for%20sustainability&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Garcia%E2%80%90Polo,%20Jorge&rft.date=2021-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=8&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.13509&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2604007158%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2979-d858d73fce5259211145dde4a52d2a4647273cac3367299195d3d51d3e5fb1dd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2604007158&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true